Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Is a Novel Predictor of Interferon Responsiveness in Chronic Hepatitis C Infection  Philipp Solbach, Sandra Westhaus,
Advertisements

Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages e2 (September 2010)
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
HIV Increases HCV Replication in a TGF-β1–Dependent Manner
Volume 145, Issue 6, Pages e1 (December 2013)
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages e4 (September 2011)
Volume 136, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2009)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages e6 (November 2010)
Hepatitis C Virus Infection of Neuroepithelioma Cell Lines
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 135, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 146, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2014)
Inhibition of Platelet GPIbα and Promotion of Melanoma Metastasis
Volume 143, Issue 1, Pages e5 (July 2012)
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages e7 (September 2009)
Volume 117, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Volume 145, Issue 5, Pages e7 (November 2013)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Α-defensins block the early steps of HIV-1 infection: interference with the binding of gp120 to CD4 by Lucinda Furci, Francesca Sironi, Monica Tolazzi,
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 137, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages e4 (September 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 140, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2011)
Volume 136, Issue 7, Pages (June 2009)
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 140, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 141, Issue 5, Pages e2 (November 2011)
Volume 145, Issue 5, Pages e7 (November 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 144, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 144, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Glucocorticosteroids Increase Cell Entry by Hepatitis C Virus
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages e11 (September 2013)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
S100A15, an Antimicrobial Protein of the Skin: Regulation by E
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages e2 (August 2008)
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2010)
CD4-Independent Infection by HIV-2 Is Mediated by Fusin/CXCR4
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2016)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 117, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages e2 (September 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 157, Issue 3, Pages e9 (September 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages 1719-1728.e1 (November 2008) Neutralizing Host Responses in Hepatitis C Virus Infection Target Viral Entry at Postbinding Steps and Membrane Fusion  Anita Haberstroh, Eva K. Schnober, Mirjam B. Zeisel, Patric Carolla, Heidi Barth, Hubert E. Blum, François–Loic Cosset, George Koutsoudakis, Ralf Bartenschlager, Ann Union, Erik Depla, Ania Owsianka, Arvind H. Patel, Catherine Schuster, Françoise Stoll–Keller, Michel Doffoël, Marlène Dreux, Thomas F. Baumert  Gastroenterology  Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages 1719-1728.e1 (November 2008) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.018 Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Neutralizing host responses in HCV infection target HCVpp entry at postbinding steps. (A) Experimental setup. HCVpp binding to Huh7 cells was performed for 1 hour at 4°C in the presence or absence of antibodies. Under these conditions, HCVpp bind to the cells but do not efficiently enter. Synchronous entry and infection occurs when the inoculum is removed and the cells are shifted to 37°C. In protocol I, inhibitory antibodies were added before binding of HCVpp to the target cell. In protocol II, antibodies were added after HCVpp binding to target cells, thus allowing to study the effect of antibodies on viral entry after HCVpp binding. Dashed lines indicate the time intervals at which antibodies were present. Seventy-two hours later, HCVpp infection was assessed by GFP reporter gene expression determination, expressed relative to control infections without addition of inhibitors. (B) Inhibition of HCVpp (1a; H77c strain) entry into Huh7 cells by anti-SR-BI, anti-CD81, antibodies, heparin, or chondroitin sulfate (CSA) in protocols I and II. Mean ± SD of 6 independent experiments is shown. (C) Inhibition of HCVpp (1a; H77c strain) entry into Huh7 cells by purified human anti-HCV IgG (100 μg/mL) from patients with chronic HCV infection or anti-HCV-negative control individuals (CTRL) in protocols I and II. Mean ± SD of at least 4 independent experiments is shown. (D) Dose-dependent inhibition of HCVpp (1a; H77c strain) entry by anti-HCV IgG derived from patient 7 (solid diamonds) or control IgG (open triangles) in experimental protocol II. Mean values ± SD of a representative experiment performed in triplicate are shown. Statistically significant differences (P < .01; t test) in inhibition of HCVpp entry between protocol I and II in panels B and C are indicated (*). Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1719-1728.e1DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.018) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Targeting of HCVpp entry during postbinding steps by monoclonal antienvelope antibodies. (A and B) Inhibition of HCVpp entry (1a; H77c strain) into Huh7 cells by anti-E1 (A) and anti-E2 (B) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Inhibition of entry was assessed as described in Figure 1A. (C) Inhibition of HCVpp (1b; HCV J strain) entry by anti-E1 mAbs. (D) Dose-dependent inhibition of HCVpp (1a; H77c strain) entry by anti-E2 mAb AP33 (solid circles), anti-E1 mAb IGH520 (solid squares), or control mouse IgG in experimental protocol II (addition of IgG postbinding). (E) Inhibition of recombinant envelope glycoprotein E1 binding to Huh7 cells by purified anti-E1 antibodies or heparin. Experiments were performed as described in the Materials and Methods section. Cells stained with detection antibodies alone served as negative control (“NC,” light shaded histograms). (F) Inhibition of E1 (subtype 1b), HCV-LP (1a), and HCVpp (1b) binding to Huh7 cells by anti-E1, control IgG, or heparin. Data are shown as percentage of inhibition of binding of ligands incubated with PBS (100%). For panels A–C and F, mean values ± SD of at least 6 experiments are shown. For panels D and E, mean values of a representative experiment performed in triplicate are shown. Statistically significant differences (P < .01; t test) in inhibition of HCVpp entry between protocol I and II (panels A–C) are indicated (*). Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1719-1728.e1DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.018) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Kinetics of anti-HCV IgG-mediated inhibition of HCVpp entry. (A) Schematic drawing of the experimental setup. Inhibition of HCVpp entry into Huh7 cells by purified anti-HCV-IgG derived from patient or control sera (100 μg/mL) was performed as described in legend to Figure 1A, except that patient-derived anti-HCV IgG or control IgG was added every 20 minutes for up to 120 minutes after HCVpp (1a; strain H77c) binding. Dashed lines indicate the time intervals at which antibodies were present. (B) Kinetics of antibody-mediated inhibition of HCVpp (1a; strain H77c) entry by anti-CD81, anti-SR-BI, heparin, and control IgG. (C) Kinetics of antibody-mediated inhibition of HCVpp entry by patient-derived IgG. Purified anti-HCV-IgG derived from patients 1, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, and 19 (Table 1); IgG derived from an anti-HCV-negative control individual 20 (Table 1), and anti-CD81 mAb were added to HCVpp bound to target cells as depicted in A. Mean values of a representative experiment performed in triplicate are shown. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1719-1728.e1DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.018) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Inhibition of membrane fusion of HCVpp-lipsomes by patient-derived anti-HCV IgG. The fusion capacities of HCVpp (1a; H77c strain) were tested using lipid mixing assays. The results are expressed as percentages of maximal fluorescence, obtained by addition of Triton X-100 (final 0.1% vol:vol) to the pseudoparticle/liposome suspensions. The experiments were repeated 3 times, and the most representative profiles of the fusion kinetics are presented here. (A) HCVpp were preincubated in the presence or absence of ApoC-I (0.7 μg/mL) or control IgG from control individual 20 (100 μg/mL). (B–D) HCVpp were preincubated in the presence of IgG (100 μg/mL) from anti-HCV-negative control individual 20 or purified anti-HCV IgG (100 μg/mL) from patients 1, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, and 19. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1719-1728.e1DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.018) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Inhibition of HCVcc infection by human anti-HCV neutralizing antibodies. (A) Inhibition of Luc-Jc1 HCVcc entry into Huh7.5.1 cells by heparin, anti-CD81, control mouse IgG, anti-SR-BI serum, or control rat serum was studied as described in Figure 1A and the Materials and Methods section. (B) Inhibition of HCVcc entry into Huh7.5.1 cells by human anti-HCV IgG from patients 3, 7, 9, 12, 17, 19, 22, 23, and 24; control IgG from control individual 21 (100 μg/mL); anti-CD81; or anti-SR-BI was performed in protocols I and II as described in Figure 1A. Results are expressed as percentage inhibition relative to control infections performed in the same way but without addition of inhibitors and represent mean ± SD from 4 independent experiments performed in duplicate. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1719-1728.e1DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.018) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Kinetics of anti-HCV IgG-mediated inhibition of HCVcc entry. (A) Kinetics of inhibition of Luc-Jc1 HCVcc (genotype 2a) entry by anti-CD81 and anti-SR-BI were performed as described in Figure 3A. (B) Kinetics of antibody-mediated inhibition of HCVcc entry by anti-HCV IgG purified from patients with HCV 2a infection. Purified anti-HCV-IgG derived from patients 22, 23, and 24; IgG derived from an anti-HCV-negative control individual 21; and anti-CD81 mAb were added to HCVcc bound to target cells as depicted in Figure 3A. (C) Kinetics of antibody-mediated inhibition of HCVcc entry by patient IgG analyzed previously in the HCVpp system (Figure 4C). Purified anti-HCV-IgG derived from patients 9, 7, 12, and 19 (Figure 3C) were added to HCVcc bound to target cells as described in B. Results are expressed as percentage HCVcc infection relative to infection performed in the absence of antibody and represent mean values from 1 representative experiment performed in duplicate. Gastroenterology 2008 135, 1719-1728.e1DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.018) Copyright © 2008 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions