Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: in medias res  Roy Soetikno, MD, MS,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EQUIP Training session 2
Advertisements

T1 colonic carcinoma – Is endoscopic resection sufficient? HC Yip JHGR 21/7/2012.
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Dr. Howard Mertz Clinical Assistant Professor Vanderbilt University Saint Thomas Hospital Nashville TN.
Malignant colonic polyp: endoscopic treatment updates
(A) Surveillance colonoscopies for detecting dysplasia and preventing colorectal carcinoma. (B) Management of visible lesions at endoscopy. A visible lesion.
Detection and staging of esophageal cancers within Barrett's esophagus is improved by assessment in specialized Barrett's units  Georgina R. Cameron,
Insulated tip knife tunneling technique with clip line traction for safe endoscopic submucosal dissection of large circumferential esophageal cancer 
SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease  Loren Laine, MD, Tonya Kaltenbach,
A standardized imaging protocol for the endoscopic prediction of dysplasia within sessile serrated polyps (with video)  David J. Tate, MA(Cantab), MBBS,
American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Technology Assessment on Image-Enhanced Endoscopy  Tonya Kaltenbach, Yasushi Sano, Shai Friedland,
Wide Field Endoscopic Resection for Advanced Colonic Mucosal Neoplasia: Current Status and Future Directions  Bronte A. Holt, Michael J. Bourke  Clinical.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with scissor-type knife for pedunculated polyp with short and thick stalk  Shunsuke Yamamoto, MD, PhD, Morteza Shafazand,
Surveillance of Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Gastroenterologist- Pathologist Partnership  David T. Rubin, Jerrold R. Turner  Clinical Gastroenterology.
Volume 2, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Tomoaki Tashima, MD, Kouichi Nonaka, MD, PhD, Shomei Ryozawa, MD, PhD 
Volume 151, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Intraluminal Endoscopic Surgery: The Scioto Returns
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 124, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Steven H Itzkowitz, Noam Harpaz  Gastroenterology 
Nonpolypoid (Flat and Depressed) Colorectal Neoplasms
Advances in Endoscopic Imaging of Colorectal Neoplasia
Endoscopic Management of Nonpolypoid Colorectal Lesions in Colonic IBD
Clip-assisted EMR: a new resection technique for treating flat remnants of colonic polyp tissue during piecemeal EMR  Matthijs P. Schwartz, MD, PhD  VideoGIE 
Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps  Akira Horiuchi, MD, Kenji Hosoi, MD, Masashi Kajiyama,
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Peter V. Draganov, Andrew Y. Wang, Mohamed O. Othman, Norio Fukami 
Volume 140, Issue 7, Pages (June 2011)
How we resect colorectal polyps <20 mm in size
Beyond Standard Image-enhanced Endoscopy Confocal Endomicroscopy
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 2018)
Tonya Kaltenbach, MD, William J. Sandborn, MD 
The role of endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease
Multipoint traction technique in endoscopic submucosal dissection
Acetic-acid chromoendoscopy for Barrett's esophagus: the “pros”
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Pocket endoscopic submucosal dissection with countertraction and partial full-thickness excision as salvage therapy for advanced colonic adenoma with.
Christopher G. Chapman, MD, Irving Waxman, MD, FASGE  VideoGIE 
Large Sessile Serrated Polyps Can Be Safely and Effectively Removed by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection  Aarti K. Rao, Roy Soetikno, Gottumukkala S. Raju,
Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer  Douglas K. Rex,
Endoscopic Management of Nonpolypoid Colorectal Lesions in Colonic IBD
Pocket endoscopic submucosal dissection with countertraction and partial full-thickness excision as salvage therapy for advanced colonic adenoma with.
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Sergey V. Kantsevoy, MD, PhD  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
AGA Technical Review on the Diagnosis and Management of Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease  Francis A. Farraye, Robert D. Odze, Jayne.
David G. Hewett, MBBS, MSc, PhD, FRACP  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Cancers, Flat Adenomas, and Submucosal Tumors in the Gastrointestinal Tract  Andreas Probst, Daniela Golger,
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
A small adenocarcinoma in the cervical esophagus
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Barrett’s Esophagus and Colorectal Neoplasia  Dennis Yang, Mohamed Othman, Peter.
Endoscopic mechanical hemostasis of GI arterial bleeding (with videos)
Tissue retractor system–assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large rectal tumor with significant fibrosis from direct tattooing  Salmaan Jawaid,
Detection of Nonpolypoid Colorectal Neoplasia Using Magnifying Endoscopy in Colonic Inflammatory Bowel Disease  Shiro Oka, MD, PhD, Shinji Tanaka, MD,
Conscious transnasal hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection enables safe and painless en bloc resection in elderly patients with early gastric cancer 
Volume 3, Issue 10, Pages (October 2018)
Sergey V. Kantsevoy, MD, PhD  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Nasim Parsa, MD, Douglas K. Rex, MD  VideoGIE 
David L. Diehl, MD, FACP, FASGE, Jay P. Babich, MD 
Much ado about very little (lamina propria)?
Endoscopic resection is the criterion standard of treatment for patients with early squamous cell neoplasia of the esophagus  Yuichi Shimizu, MD, Masakazu.
Neil O'Morain, Ammar Shahin, Barbara Ryan, Deirdre McNamara 
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2019)
Interventional chromoendoscopy: specific aspects for the colon
Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a grasping-type scissors for early colorectal epithelial neoplasms: a large single-center experience  Kazuya Akahoshi,
Endoscopic findings of esophageal submucosal gland duct adenoma
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States: Why do we hear so much about it and do so little of it?  Douglas K. Rex, MD  Gastrointestinal.
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages (July 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: in medias res  Roy Soetikno, MD, MS, MSM  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages 1085-1094 (April 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.013 Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: International Consensus Recommendations (SCENIC) endoscopic classification of superficial colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The classification is a modification of the Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions. The modifications included the addition of terms (presence or absence) to describe ulceration and border of the lesion. The SCENIC classification replaces the terms dysplasia-associated lesion or mass and adenoma-like and non–adenoma-like. Note that in patients with IBD, the nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia in IBD is often completely flat (or the same level) compared with the surrounding mucosa. This is different from patients without IBD, who rarely have completely flat dysplasia. Thus, in patients without IBD “flat lesion” is colloquially used to describe lesions that are slightly (superficially) elevated in comparison with the surrounding mucosa. Descriptions of the terms are listed below.Modified from Soetikno et al, Dig Endosc 2016;28:266-73, and Laine et al, Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:489-501e26.TermDescriptionVisible dysplasiaDysplasia identified on targeted biopsy specimens from a lesion visualized at colonoscopyPolypoidLesion protruding from the mucosa into the lumen ≥2.5 mmPedunculatedLesion attached to the mucosa by a stalkSessileLesion not attached to the mucosa by a stalk; entire base is contiguous with the mucosaNonpolypoidLesion with little (<2.5 mm) or no protrusion above the mucosaSuperficial elevatedLesion with protrusion but <2.5 mm above the lumen (less than the height of the closest cup of a biopsy forceps)FlatLesion without protrusion above the mucosaDepressedLesion with at least a portion depressed below the level of the mucosaGeneral descriptorsUlceratedUlceration (fibrinous-appearing base with depth) within the lesionBorderDistinct borderLesion’s border is discrete and can be distinguished from surrounding mucosaIndistinct borderLesion’s border is not discrete and cannot be distinguished from surrounding mucosaInvisible dysplasiaDysplasia identified on random (nontargeted) biopsy specimens of colon mucosa without a visible lesion Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, 1085-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.013) Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Preparation and application of chromoendoscopy for detection and detailed inspection of nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. ∗Chromoendoscopy for detection with indigo carmine: 1. American Regent, Shirley, NY, 5 mL (0.8%) - Mix two 5-mL ampules (0.8%) with 250 mL water. The manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) is approximately $330 ($165 per 5 mL 0.8% solution). 2. Microtech, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 5 mL (0.4%) - Mix four 5-mL ampules (0.4%) with 250 mL water. The MSRP is approximately $156.80 ($39.2 per 5 mL 0.4% solution). Methylene blue: 1. American Regent, Shirley, NY, 10 mL (0.5%) - Mix one 10-mL ampule (0.5%) with 300 mL water. The MSRP is approximately $202.69 ($202.69 per 10 mL 0.5% solution). †Chromoendoscopy for detailed viewing with indigo carmine: 1. American Regent, Shirley, NY, 5 mL (0.8%) - Mix one 5-mL ampule (0.8%) with 20 mL water in a 60-mL syringe to approximate a 0.16% dilution. The MSRP is approximately $165 ($165 per 5 mL 0.8% solution). 2. Microtech, Ann Arbor, MI, 5 mL (0.4%) - Mix two 5-mL ampules (0.4%) with 15 mL water in a 60-mL syringe to approximate a 0.16% dilution. The MSRP is approximately $78.60 ($39.2 per 5 mL 0.4% solution). Methylene blue: 1. American Regent, Shirley, NY, 10 mL (0.5%) - Mix one 10-mL ampule (0.5%) with 20 mL water in a 60-mL syringe to approximate a 0.16% dilution. The MSRP is approximately $202.69 ($202.69 per 10 mL 0.5% solution). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, 1085-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.013) Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The red-in-blue sign: the lesion, which appears red, is in a blue surrounding. One way the dye improves our visualization of a flat lesion is by making some lesions appear redder than its surroundings. These observations are derived from the detection of early gastric cancer. A, There was spontaneous bleeding on white light. B, After dye spraying, a large superficial elevated lesion could be visualized. C, Closer view of the lesion. D, Similarly to the study by Kinoshita et al,9 the dye helped determine the margin of the lesion for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). E, Pathologic appearance of the lesion showing dysplasia-associated colitic and horizontal or vertical margin free of dysplasia. F, Artist’s rendition of the phenomena seen: dysplasia often has shallower and narrower glands, and there was a slight elevation of the lesion. These reasons were likely to have contributed to the lesion having less dye on its surface. The sensitivity and specificity of this sign is not known at present. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, 1085-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.013) Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The pit patterns of nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia (NP-CRD). Detailed evaluation of the pit pattern can be complex and tedious and requires magnification. Also, many patterns require a significant learning curve. In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in general, we need to focus on only a few general patterns: type 1 (normal mucosa), type 2 (hyperplastic tissue), NP-CRD, and type VN (invasive cancer). Note that patterns for sessile serrated adenoma are not included. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, 1085-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.013) Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A to G, Examples of lesions showing signs of nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia (NP-CRD) during chromoendoscopy examination. H, A sessile serrated adenoma/polyp. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, 1085-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.013) Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Simplified endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) / hybrid ESD. A patient with long-standing colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was referred after chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsy specimen from a 2-cm flat lesion in the rectosigmoid colon showed low-grade dysplasia. A, Chromoendoscopic view of lesion, a 1.7-cm NP-CRD, superficial elevated (flat). B, The border of the lesion was marked with brief bursts of cautery; the Dual knife (Olympus Corp, Tokyo, Japan) was used. C, After injection with saline mixed with indigo carmine, a circumferential incision was made around the lesion. The lesion was completely isolated from its lateral surroundings. D, Underwater viewing of the submucosa below the lesion showing severe fibrosis. The lesion was on the top part of the image, and the muscle layer, which was white, was at the lower part. E, The lesion was captured using a stiff snare. The stiff snare was closed completely to the hub prior to applying cautery in order to prevent entrapment of the muscularis mucosa. F, Exposed submucosa and muscularis propria after en-bloc resection. The result of pathologic analysis was low-grade dysplasia. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, 1085-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.013) Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Example of full endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to remove a large area of nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia (NP-CRD). A, A large area of dysplasia was seen between the 6 o’clock and 12 o’clock positions. The periphery of the lesion had been marked. After circumferential marking for the margin of an NP-CRD, B, the submucosa was carefully dissected with a flash knife coupled with a Sumitomo Bakelite knife (Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan). Severe fibrosis could be visualized. C, Minor bleeding was encountered frequently during the dissection. D, The lesion was completely removed by en bloc resection. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, 1085-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.013) Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions