26AUG16.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

The Preassembling Installation Survey & Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Qu Huamin 2006 / 4 / 27.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
LHeC Test Facility Meeting
November 07, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beam Delivery System updates BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Andrei Seryi Valencia GDE.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Interim Working Assumption” 2006e Release European LC Workshop, January , Daresbury.
LCLS-II Magnet Error Sensitivities. Sensitivities of dipole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted.
HINS 6-Cavity Test 3 Month Plan Jan 12, Current Schedule 2-3 day shutdown scheduled to start Jan 18 (Wednesday) to upgrade BPM system and reinstall.
LHC Insertions Upgrade Working Group (LIUWG) Space available in tunnel Y. Muttoni.
Current CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1. Main Beam Generation Complex Drive Beam Generation Complex Layout at 3 TeV D. Schulte2.
N.Solyak, RTMLALCPG 2009,Albuquerque, Oct.2 1 ILC RTML Upgrade in SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
Positron source beamline lattice Wanming Liu, ANL
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SPL Cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations 9-10 November, 2009 Joe Preble Workshop on cryogenic and.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility SensL 6-Oct CHL-2 12 GeV CEBAF Upgrade magnets and power supplies Two 1.1GV linacs Enhanced capabilities.
Beam Stay-Clear (BSC) Apertures in LCLS-II June 24, 2015 P. Emma Take up work Jim Welch started (LCLSII-TN-14-15, Jan. 23, 2015) Goal is to define stay-clear.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
Spreaders & Recombiners Beam Transport Michael Bevins May 30, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Spreader/Recombiner Dipoles and Layout, & Installation.
Status of RTML design in TDR configuration A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF NEW CONNECTION LINES: BSY TO A-LINE AND CU-LINAC TO SXR Y. Nosochkov April 1, 2015.
LSS1 post LS2 F.M. Velotti, B. Goddard. Q-Dogleg in LSS1 The quadrupole misalignment in LSS1 was needed to dump horizontally wide beams (e.g. FT beam.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz Status and Plans for Linac and RLAs.
LCLS-II Optics Release: 26FEB16. What’s new in this release? new cathode-to-L0 (“GUNB”) layout ˃input Twiss from Feng Zhou’s 100 pC beam updated cryomodule.
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Alex.
2K Cold Box FDR Introduction
ILC-CR-0004 Main Linac extension: Implementation status
Field Emission Minimization for LCLS-II
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
LCLS2sc MAD files: Injector to Bypass Line
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Alignment of the 12 GeV CEBAF Accelerator
Large Booster and Collider Ring
LCLS-II Lattice 26FEB16: updates in the areas from bypass to dump
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
Michael Sullivan and John Seeman SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Beam-Based Feedback in LCLS-II
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
01SEP17.
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
Lattice update: downstream sections
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
LCLS-II β-Matching Study
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
CryoPlant Commissioning
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
Linearization of Bunch Compression (2nd order )
Transfer Line for EIC.
Rough designs for The LEB and HEB for pCDR-100
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Presentation transcript:

26AUG16

LCLS-II baseline [29JUN16] (15.59 MeV/m … 6% overhead) 1.600 GeV BC2 15 L2 L3 4.000 GeV Jose’s space ~10 m COL2 EXT 16 25 26 35 CP-1 15+2 CP-2 20 BRB1 (to NIT) NOTE: not to scale LCLS-II-HE [07JAN16] (17.68 MeV/m … 6% overhead) 1.600 GeV BC2 15 L2 L3 7.000 GeV Jose’s space 24.4 m COL2 16 25 26 35 36 45 46 54 CP-1 25+2 BRB1 (to NIT) CP-2 29 68.82 m LCLS-II-HE [01JUL16] (18.60 MeV/m … 6% overhead) 1.882 GeV BC2 15 3.630 GeV 8.000 GeV Jose’s space 12.2 m 16 27 28 37 38 47 48 57 CP-2 30 BRB1 (to NIT) CP-1 25+2

LCLS-II baseline (15.59 MeV/m … 6% overhead) 1.600 GeV BC2 15 L2 L3 4.000 GeV 44.19 m Jose’s space ~10 m COL2 EXT 16 25 26 35 CP-1 15+2 CP-2 20 BRB1 (to NIT) LCLS-II′ (15.56 MeV/m … 6% overhead) L2 1.600 GeV L3 4.000 GeV BC2 particle free NOTE: not to scale 15 16 26 27 30 35 20 m BRB1 (to NIT) CP-1 15+2 CP-2 20 special long vacuum break (ΔL = +7.72 m) LCLS-II-HE (19.53 MeV/m … 6% overhead) L2 1.963 GeV L3 3.623 GeV L4 8.000 GeV BC2 12.4 m Jose’s space 15 16 26 27 36 37 45 46 55 BRB1 (to NIT) CP-1 26+2 CP-2 29

NOTE: this drawing has been modified to show 26AUG16 design 27 37 36 46 45 55 L4 SIT SCRF expansion and layout. Each gray block represents one 12-m long 1.3-GHz cryomodule, with 55 total CM’s. A fast extraction kicker is added at 3.6-GeV to optionally feed the SXR FEL at 3.6 GeV. The cryo distribution (CP – blue lines) is also shown. 2.0 GeV 3.6 GeV 36 55 Cryomodules and the cryo distribution system for the LCLS-II-HE upgrade with 55 total CM’s. NOTE: this drawing has been modified to show 26AUG16 design

Surface Transfer Lines / DB positions 0.610 m 41.8521 m Surface Transfer Lines 2 x 80m = 160 m 44.1889 m from Vincent Heloin

DISTRIBUTION BOX 2 POSITION 5.75945 m FC6 5-4 5-5 CM (34.00) ZFC6 = 434.1756 m (29JUN16) → 389.9867 m (19AUG16)

Low Energy Extraction South Tunnel Wall North Tunnel Wall Tunnel Floor Tunnel Ceiling Kickers Septum SIT CM27

looking East beam into page NIT SIT 120” = 4.01” 132” = 4.38”

WSEMIT2

Changes with respect to baseline (29JUN16) remove COL2 move L3 u/s 44.1889 m (including cryogenics Distribution Box #2) add EMIT2 between BC2 and L3 four 1.259Q3.5 quadrupoles double-waist (βX = βY ≈ 6 m; σ ≈ 25 μ) provided for quad-scan ε-measurement match into L3 add 20 CM’s (55 1.3 GHz CM’s total) L3 has 11 CM’s; L4 has 29 CM’s (10-break-9-break-10) common L2/L3/L4 gradient: 19.53 MeV/m (includes 6% overhead) BC2 energy increases from 1.6 GeV to 1.963 GeV final energy = 8.0 GeV extract 3.623 GeV beam after L3 and connect to SIT line with dogleg FC7 (d/s end of L3) to FC8 (u/s end of L4) ΔZ = 44.6 m required for extraction 3 kickers plus Lambertson septum (spreader type) used to extract standard “2π” dogleg design (eight 2Q10’s) reinstall SIT line from “QB-5” (Sector 8) connection from SIT line to SXR not yet designed

Still to do connect SIT line to SXR add two sextupoles to LEX (Low Energy Extraction) check effectiveness of single R56-compensation chicane after LEX begin engineering design iterations tracking studies

LCLS-II’

LCLS-II baseline (15.59 MeV/m … 6% overhead) 1.600 GeV BC2 15 L2 L3 4.000 GeV 44.19 m Jose’s space ~10 m COL2 EXT 16 25 26 35 CP-1 15+2 CP-2 20 BRB1 (to NIT) LCLS-II′ (15.56 MeV/m … 6% overhead) L2 1.600 GeV L3 4.000 GeV BC2 particle free NOTE: not to scale 15 16 26 27 30 35 20 m BRB1 (to NIT) CP-1 15+2 CP-2 20 special long vacuum break (ΔL = +7.72 m) LCLS-II-HE (19.53 MeV/m … 6% overhead) L2 1.963 GeV L3 3.623 GeV L4 8.000 GeV BC2 14.9 m Jose’s space 15 16 26 27 36 37 45 46 55 BRB1 (to NIT) CP-1 26+2 CP-2 29

BC2 EMIT2 dogleg 16 26 27 35 NIT particle free ε

Changes with respect to baseline (29JUN16) remove COL2 move L3 u/s 44.1889 m (including cryogenics Distribution Box #2) add EMIT2 between BC2 and L3 four 1.259Q3.5 quadrupoles double-waist (βX = βY ≈ 6 m ; σ ≈ 25 μ) provided for quad-scan ε-measurement match into L3 35 1.3 GHz CM’s total (baseline) … repartition L3 L3 has 20 CM’s (11-long break-9 … baseline was 10-break-10) use a long break (ΔL = 7.72 m) between CM26 and CM27 to align CMs for LCLS-II-HE 3 CM’s must move to upgrade to LCLS-II-HE if we use a standard vacuum break, 9 CM’s must move to upgrade to LCLS-II-HE retain baseline L2/L3 gradients BC2 energy = 1.6 GeV final energy = 4.0 GeV remove EXT move dogleg 277.15 m upstream (into Sector 7) leave 20 m particle-free space between post-L3 Differential Pumping station and R56-compensation chicane (includes two QE-type quadrupoles) install two NIT line FODO cells u/s of “QBP13”

LCLS-II-HE’ ?

LCLS-II baseline (15.59 MeV/m … 6% overhead) 1.600 GeV L3 4.000 GeV 44.19 m BC2 Jose’s space ~10 m COL2 EXT 15 16 25 26 35 CP-1 15+2 CP-2 20 BRB1 (to NIT) LCLS-II′ (15.85 MeV/m … 6% overhead) L2 1.800 GeV L3 4.000 GeV BC2 particle free NOTE: not to scale 15 17 18 27 28 35 20 m BRB1 (to NIT) CP-1 17+2 CP-2 18 special long vacuum break (ΔL = +7.72 m) LCLS-II-HE’ (18.65 MeV/m … 6% overhead) L2 2.159 GeV L3 3.619 GeV L4 8.000 GeV BC2 Jose’s space 14.9 m 15 17 18 27 28 37 38 47 48 57 CP-1 27+2 BRB1 (to NIT) CP-2 30