Structural Basis for Assembly and Activation of the Heterotetrameric SAGA Histone H2B Deubiquitinase Module  Alwin Köhler, Erik Zimmerman, Maren Schneider,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Advertisements

Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 119, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
Structural Basis of Atg8 Activation by a Homodimeric E1, Atg7
Molecular Insights into Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly
The Intrinsically Disordered Sem1 Protein Functions as a Molecular Tether during Proteasome Lid Biogenesis  Robert J. Tomko, Mark Hochstrasser  Molecular.
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Structural Basis for the Histone Chaperone Activity of Asf1
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2012)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Selective Dimerization of a C2H2 Zinc Finger Subfamily
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of DDB1 in Complex with a Paramyxovirus V Protein: Viral Hijack of a Propeller Cluster in Ubiquitin Ligase  Ti Li, Xiujuan Chen, Kenneth C.
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Structure and Regulation of the CDK5-p25nck5a Complex
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Ulp1-SUMO Crystal Structure and Genetic Analysis Reveal Conserved Interactions and a Regulatory Element Essential for Cell Growth in Yeast  Elena Mossessova,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Sebastian Rumpf, Stefan Jentsch  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
The Structure of the GGA1-GAT Domain Reveals the Molecular Basis for ARF Binding and Membrane Association of GGAs  Brett M. Collins, Peter J. Watson,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
ESCRT-II, an Endosome-Associated Complex Required for Protein Sorting
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Structural Basis for Assembly and Activation of the Heterotetrameric SAGA Histone H2B Deubiquitinase Module  Alwin Köhler, Erik Zimmerman, Maren Schneider, Ed Hurt, Ning Zheng  Cell  Volume 141, Issue 4, Pages 606-617 (May 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall View of the Yeast SAGA DUB Module (A) Two orthogonal views of the complex. Ubp8 (blue), Sgf11 (red), Sus1 (green), and Sgf73 (orange) are shown in ribbon representation with disordered regions in dashed lines. The zinc ions are shown as yellow spheres. The active site cysteine is shown in cyan CPK model. (B) Individual or different combination of the DUB module subunits are shown in surface representation to demonstrate their spatial relationships. The orientation of all subunits is the same as shown in (A) on the left. See Table S1 for crystallographic information. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Ubp8 ZnF-UBP Domain Mediates Complex Assembly of the DUB Module (A) Superposition analysis of the ZnF-UBP domains in Ubp8 (blue) and USP5 (gray). The three zinc ions in the Ubp8 ZnF-UBP domain are numbered (yellow spheres). Secondary structure elements of both proteins are labeled (H, α helix; S, β strand). (B) The ubiquitin tail-binding pocket of the USP5 ZnF-UBP domain. The side chains of key ubiquitin-contacting residues in USP5 and the last three ubiquitin residues are shown in sticks. (C) The corresponding region of Ubp8 as shown for USP5 in (B). The side chains of key residues from Ubp8, Sus1, and Sgf11 for forming a three-protein junction are shown in sticks. (D and E) Two views of the entire “assembly lobe” of the DUB module. (F) The interface between the Ubp8 ZnF-UBP domain and the second helix of Sgf73 featuring the conserved WK motif. The side chains of the Sgf73 WK motif are shown in sticks. The Ubp8 ZnF-UBP domain is shown in surface representation. The two backbone carbonyl groups of Ubp8, which accept hydrogen bonds from the Sgf73 WK motif, are colored in red. (G) The indicated DUB module components were polycistronically expressed in E. coli. Protein lysates were split and subjected in parallel to either GST- or 6His-affinity purifications. Lanes 1 and 4, 2 and 5, and 3 and 6 correspond to each other. Purified complexes were eluted with either GSH or imidazole and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining. Filled circles indicate bait proteins. Labeled proteins were identified by mass spectrometry. See also Figure S1. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sus1 Clamps Down the Sgf11 N-Terminal Helix onto the Ubp8 ZnF-UBP Domain (A) Overall view of the “assembly lobe” in the DUB module. (B) A three-protein junction formed among the two terminal helices of Sus1 (green) and the N-terminal end of Sgf11 (red) and Sgf73 (orange). (C) Superposition analysis of Sus1 in complexes with Sgf11 (red) and Sac3 (magenta). The Sus1 molecule in the Sus1-Sgf11 and Sus1-Sac3 complexes is colored in green and gray, respectively. The Cα of Sus1-contacting residues in Sgf11 and Sac3 are labeled with asterisks. (D and E) Two orthogonal views of the superimposed Sus1-Sgf11 and Sus1-Sac3 complex structures. H2 and H5 helices of Sus1 in the two structures were superimposed to demonstrate the structural plasticity of Sus1. (F) Reconstitution assay with recombinant proteins. GST-Ubp8 (1–107) was immobilized on GSH beads (filled circle) and incubated with either Sus1 or Sgf11 alone or with equal molar amounts of both proteins (input). Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Sgf11 ZnF Domain Binds to the Ubp8 Catalytic Domain next to the Active Site (A) Overall view of the “catalytic lobe” of the SAGA DUB module. The Ubp8 catalytic domain is differentially colored to show the three subdomains, Thumb (gray), Palm (blue), and Fingers (cyan). The catalytic triad of Ubp8 are shown in sticks. (B) A close-up view of the Ubp8 active site with the catalytic triad (C146, H427, and N443) and two amino acids (N141 and D444) that might help stabilize the oxyanion hole. (C) Interface between the Sgf11 ZnF domain and the Ubp8 Thumb domain. The three conserved arginine residues exposed at the outer surface of the Sgf11 ZnF domain are also shown. (D) Interface between the Sgf11 linker sequence and the Palm domain within the Ubp8 catalytic domain. The Ubp8 catalytic triad, the two Sgf11 DxxG motifs, and their surrounding residues are shown in sticks. (E) Sequence alignment of Sgf11 orthologs with secondary structure assignment. The zinc-coordinating residues are highlighted in yellow. Other highly conserved residues are highlighted in salmon. See also Figure S2. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Sgf11 ZnF Domain Activates Ubp8 and Mediates Ub-H2B Deubiquitination (A and B) Ub-AMC hydrolysis assay. Coomassie staining shows equalized amount of Ubp8 and overall composition of the complexes. (C) In vitro H2B deubiquitination assay. Hyperubiquitinated Flag-tagged H2B purified from ubp8Δ cells was incubated with equal amounts of the indicated wild-type and mutant DUB tetramers as depicted in (A) and (B). Ubiquitinated and unmodified H2B were detected by anti-Flag western blotting. (D) Anti-Flag immunoprecipitates derived from cells expressing Flag-tagged H2B. sgf11Δ cells were transformed with plasmids carrying the indicated wild-type, mutant sgf11 alleles, or an empty vector. Recovered proteins were analyzed by SDS–PAGE and anti-Flag western blotting. (E) A GCN5/sgf11Δ shuffle strain containing a GCN5 cover plasmid (URA3) was transformed with wild-type SGF11, empty vector, or the indicated sgf11 mutant alleles (TRP1 plasmids). Growth was followed on SDC-Trp and on SDC+5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) plates. Cell density was normalized, and cells were spotted onto plates in 10-fold serial dilution steps and incubated at 30°C for 2 days (SDC-TRP) and 4 days (SDC+5-FOA). See also Figure S3 and Table S2 for yeast strains and plasmids used. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Sgf73 Couples the Two Functional Lobes of the DUB Module and Potentiates Ubp8 (A) A close-up view of the space between the two Ubp8 domains occupied by Sgf73. The structure is depicted in the same orientation as seen in Figure 1B. Sgf73 is shown in ribbon with the rest of the DUB complex shown in surface representation. (B) Left-side view of (A) showing that the H2-loop-H3 region of Sgf73 holds together the two domains of Ubp8 at one end of the complex. (C) Right-side view of (A) showing that the Sgf73 ZnF domain functions as a wedge to fix the conformation of the Ubp8 linker sequence, which is also in contact with the Sgf11 linker region. Key residues of the Sgf11 linker are shown in sticks. Two Ubp8 residues forming salt bridges with two positively charged Sgf11 residues are colored in red. (D) A focused view of the DUB module showing the spatial relationships among the Sgf73 ZnF domain, the Ubp8 linker sequence, the Sgf11 C-terminal region, and the Ubp8 active site. (E) Ub-AMC hydrolysis assay. Coomassie staining shows equalized amount of Ubp8 and overall composition of the complexes (filled circle marks bait proteins). (F) A tetrameric complex containing Sgf73 amino acids 1–47 (lane 3) was preincubated with recombinant Sgf73 amino acids 48–104 at a 1:1 or 1:10 stoichiometry (30° for 15 min) and subsequently assayed for Ub-AMC hydrolytic activity. Coomassie-stained gel shows imidazole eluates of affinity-purified 6His-Sgf73 complexes (filled circle). (G) A GCN5/sgf73Δ shuffle strain was transformed with wild-type SGF73, empty vector or the indicated sgf73 mutant alleles (TRP1 plasmids). Growth was followed on SDC-Trp and on SDC+5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) plates. See also Figure S4. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for the Assembly and Activation of the SAGA DUB Module Free Ubp8 (blue) has a ZnF-UBP domain (square) and an inactive catalytic domain (full circle). Independent from other subunits, Sus1 (green) can form a complex with Sgf11 (red) by wrapping around its N-terminal helix (hexagon). The correctly positioned ZnF domains of Sgf11 (red circle) and Sgf73 (orange circle) are both required to fully activate Ubp8 (sharp teeth). See also Figure S5. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Sequence Alignment of Ubp8 and USP22 Orthologs, Related to Figure 2 Secondary structure elements of S. cerevisiae Ubp8 are indicated by cylinders (helices), arrows (β strands), solid lines (loops), and dashed lines (disordered loops). Secondary structure elements are colored in blue for the Zn-UBP domain and Ubp8 linker, gray for the Thumb domain, cyan for the Fingers domain, and blue for the Palm domain. Amino acids that are strictly conserved are highlighted in light blue. Residues involved in forming the six zinc-coordinating sites are highlighted in yellow with the site numbers indicated below the sequences. Critical catalytic residues are highlighted in salmon. The amino acids of S. cerevisiae Ubp8 are numbered. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Analyses of the Three Zinc-Binding Sites in the Ubp8 Catalytic Domain, Related to Figure 4 (A) A close-up view of the 4th and 5th zinc-coordinating sites in the Ubp8 catalytic domain. The Thumb domain (gray) is shown in ribbons with secondary structure elements labeled. The Fingers (cyan) and Palm (blue) domains are shown in surface representation. Residues involved in coordinating the zinc ions are shown in sticks. Site 4 is formed by one histidine and three cysteine residues from the H10-loop-H11 region, whereas site 5 is coordinated by two histidine and two cysteine residues of the H13-loop-H14 region. Both sites are strictly conserved in Ubp8 and USP22 orthologs from yeast to humans (see Figure S1). The location of these two zinc-binding sites suggests that they are minimally involved in maintaining the structural integrity of the Ubp8 catalytic domain. Based on the USP2 structure (Renatus et al., 2006), the Ubp8 catalytic domain is predicted to possess yet a third zinc-binding site (site 6) at the tip of the Fingers domain (see Figure S1). This zinc-coordinating site is disordered in the DUB module crystal, presumably due to structural distortion induced by crystal packing. (B) Ub-AMC hydrolysis assay with the indicated GST-purified recombinant DUB tetramers or Ub-AMC alone. Consistent with a role in maintaining local structural integrity, disruption of either site leads to reduced enzymatic activity of the DUB module and a greater susceptibility to proteolysis during purification. (C) Purification of the recombinant yeast DUB module containing the Ubp8 zinc-binding site mutants. Coomassie staining shows composition of the complexes. Diamond marks an Sgf11 fragment, open circles Ubp8 degradation products as determined by mass spectrometry. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Protein Expression Level of C-Terminally 6His-Tagged Alleles of SGF11, Related to Figure 5 The indicated plasmids were transformed into sgf11Δ cells. After normalizing cell densities, whole cell extracts (WCE) were prepared by trichloroacetic acid precipitation and bead lysis, followed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-His antibodies. Arc1 (a yeast cytosolic marker) was detected as a loading control. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Sequence and Mutational Analyses of the Sgf73 N-Terminus, Related to Figure 6 (A) Sequence alignment of the N-terminal regions of the yeast Sgf73 proteins. Secondary structure elements of S. cerevisiae Sgf73 N-terminal fragment are indicated by cylinders (helices), arrows (β strands), and solid lines (loops). Amino acids that are conserved are highlighted in orange. Residues involved in forming the zinc-coordinating sites are highlighted in yellow. The amino acids of S. cerevisiae Sgf73 are numbered. (B) Mutations in the N-terminus of full-length Sgf73 abolish the recruitment of Ubp8 to SAGA. The yeast SAGA complex was purified by tandem affinity-tagged Ada2 in the background of wild-type Sgf73, Sgf73 W32A/K33A/H93A, and Sgf73 deletion mutant. Calmodulin eluates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (4%–12% gradient gel, MOPS buffer) and Coomassie staining. Indicated bands are bona fide SAGA subunits, which were assigned according to their molecular mass; filled circles designate Ada2, arrow marks Ubp8, which was detected by mass spectrometry. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Conformational Changes of the “Blocking Loops” of the Ubp8 Catalytic Domain Is Not a Part of the Activation Mechanism, Related to Figure 7 The catalytic domains of Ubp8 (blue) is superimposed with the catalytic domain of USP7 (orange) in complex with ubiquitin (gray) (Hu et al., 2002). The BL1 and BL2 loops of Ubp8 in the free DUB module appear to impose steric hindrance for ubiquitin binding. However, since the DUB module is already in an activated state, these two loops must be free to undergo conformational changes to accommodate the C-terminal tail of ubiquitin when the substrate is present. Cell 2010 141, 606-617DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions