Continuous School Improvement And

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Advertisements

Response to Intervention Funding Issues. The Question Is… Can RTI be an allowable part of a federally funded program? NOT Can federal funds pay for RTI?
Schoolwide Programs (SWP) NCLB Regional Meetings April 2010.
Instructional Decision Making
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
ESEA Title Programs Use of Funds: Consolidated School Wide Budget March 19, 2013 March 20, 2013 Presenters: GayeLeia King, Supervisory Education Specialist.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference M aximizing the I mpact of S choolwide P rograms on I mproving.
Title Grants Division Illinois State Board of Education 1 Navigating Rising Star for Title I District & Schoolwide Plans Dr. Lilibeth Gumia and Marie Nolen.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
1 MERA May 17, 2011 Mike Radke, Director, Office of Field Services, Michigan Department of Education.
Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
©2015, Region One Education Service Center Curriculum Advisory Council Meeting March 26, 2015 EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance Office of School Improvement,
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
School-wide Consolidation: LEA Panel
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Title I Information Lake Preston School District 38-3
New Fiscal Rules for Funding Flexibility with Title I, Part A
PARENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Title I Parent/Family Meeting
ESEA Title Programs Use of Funds: Consolidated School Wide Budget
Annual Title I, Part A Meeting
Technical Assistance webinar SEP-dpa-4/27/2018 & 5/9/2018
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title I Schools: “ESSA” Every Student Succeeds Act Information Meeting Pershing M. School Library October 12, 2017 Pershing Middle School Houston Independent.
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Federal Programs Department: Plan4Learning
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
School Title I Stakeholder Meeting
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
The Alabama Continuous Improvement Plan ACIP
PRE-QUALIFIED AND PREFERRED SUPPLIER PROGRAM
What is does it mean to be a Title I School?
Schoolwide Programs.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Continuous School Improvement And 11/16/2018

Purpose of Our Session Explain the impact of a Title I Schoolwide Program on a school’s operation and the process for developing a schoolwide consolidated budget that supports: Continuous School Improvement Accountability of progress for improved student outcomes Ongoing and transparent activities involving the various stakeholders Alignment of resources (time, personnel, funding) according to student needs through identified continuous school improvement activities. Tell audience session in two parts 11/16/2018

Title I Schoolwide Program What is a Schoolwide Program? Purpose: Implement comprehensive reform strategies designed to upgrade the entire educational program in a school Goal: Ensures that ALL students – particularly those who are low-achieving – meet and exceed proficiency levels of academic achievement on assessments aligned to academic standards. Flexibility: allows schools to write one, single plan under the various ESEA programs and meet each of their intended purposes and to consolidate and use funds with other Federal, State, and local funds in order to upgrade the entire education program and improve student outcomes. 11/16/2018

5 Essential Continuous School Improvement Questions Where are we now? A comprehensive review of all data Where do we want to be? A creation of a shared vision How did we get to where we are? A study of contributing causes of undesirable results How are we going to get to where we want to be? The development of structures required to get all staff implementing the vision. Is what we are doing making a difference? Formative and summative evaluation structures Bernhardt, V. L., & Hébert, C. L. (2011). Response to intervention (RTI) and continuous school improvement (CSI) : using data, vision, and leadership to design, implement, and evaluate a schoolwide prevention system. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. strategies 11/16/2018

Continuous Improvement Process Assess and Diagnose Plan Implement Monitor Adjust 11/16/2018

Three Core Elements of a Schoolwide Program [34 CFR 200.26] Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment; Develop and implement a comprehensive plan that addresses the components of a Title I Schoolwide program; and Conduct an annual review of the effectiveness of the Schoolwide program and revise the plan as necessary. 11/16/2018

Three Core Elements of a Schoolwide Program [34 CFR 200.26] Comprehensive Needs Assessment §1114(b)(1)(A) a school operating a schoolwide program must conduct a comprehensive needs assessment that identifies the schools strengths and challenges in the key areas that affect student achievement. A comprehensive needs assessment is based on: Student Learning data School Processes data Demographics data Perceptions data ID10 - The school’s Leadership Team regularly looks at performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and uses that data to make decisions about the school improvement and professional development needs. IIA01 – Instructional Teams develop standards-aligned units of instruction for each subject and grade level. IID09 – Instructional Teams use student learning data to plan instruction. IIIA01 – All teachers are guided by a document that aligns standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment. 11/16/2018

Three Core Elements of a Schoolwide Program [34 CFR 200.26] Comprehensive schoolwide Plan Using data from the comprehensive needs assessment, a school must develop a comprehensive schoolwide plan that describes how it will improve academic achievement so that all students demonstrate at least proficiency on the State’s academic standards. 11/16/2018

Three Core Elements of a Schoolwide Program [34 CFR 200.26] The comprehensive schoolwide plan must – Incorporate strategies in the overall instructional program that are research-based and provide opportunities for all children to meet the State’s proficient or advanced levels of academic achievement §1114(b)(1)(B) Reform strategies include: Using effective methods and instructional practice that are based on scientifically based research and that – Strengthen the core academic program; Provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum; Increase the amount and quality of learning time IE07 - The principal monitors curriculum and classroom instruction regularly. IID06 – Yearly learning goals are set for the school by the Leadership Team, utilizing student learning data. IID07 – Leadership Team monitors school-level student learning data. 11/16/2018

Three Core Elements of a Schoolwide Program [34 CFR 200.26] The comprehensive schoolwide plan must – Provide instruction by highly qualified teachers § 1114 (b)(1)(C) Offer high-quality, ongoing professional development §1114(b)(1)(D) IE08 - The principal spends at least 50% of his/her time working directly with teachers to improve instruction, including classroom observations. ID10 – The school’s Leadership Team regularly looks at performance data and aggregated classroom observation data and uses that data to make decisions about the school improvement and professional development needs. Create strategies to attract highly qualified teachers §1114(b)(1)(E) Create strategies to increase parental involvement § 1114(b)(1)(F) IIIB06 – All teachers systematically report to parents the student’s mastery of specific standards- based objectives. 11/16/2018

Three Core Elements of a Schoolwide Program [34 CFR 200.26] The comprehensive schoolwide plan must – Develop plans to assist preschool students through the transition from early childhood programs to local elementary school programs §1114(b)(1)(G) Identify measures to include teachers in decisions regarding the use of academic assessments §1114(b)(1)(H) ID11 – Teachers are organized into grade-level, grade-level cluster, or subject-area Instructional Teams. ID13 – Instructional Teams meet for blocks of time (4-6 hour blocks, once a month; whole days before and after school year) IID03 – Teachers receive timely reports of results from standardized and objectives-based tests. IID10 – Instructional Teams use student learning data to identify students in need of instructional support or enhancement. IID11 – Instructional Teams review the results of unit pre/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum and instructional plans and to “red flag” students in need of intervention (both students in need of tutoring or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of objectives) 11/16/2018

Three Core Elements of a Schoolwide Program [34 CFR 200.26] The comprehensive schoolwide plan must – Conduct activities to ensure that students who experience difficulty attaining proficiency receive effective, timely, additional assistance -§1114(b)(1)(I) IID11 – Instructional Teams review the results of unit pre/post-tests to make decisions about the curriculum and instructional plans and to “red flag” students in need of intervention (both students in need of tutoring or extra help and students needing enhanced learning opportunities because of their early mastery of objectives) IIIA07 – All teachers differentiate assignments (individualize instruction) in response to individual student performance on pre-tests and other methods of assessments. IIIA31 – All teachers interact instructionally with students (explaining, checking, giving feedback) IIIC05 – All teachers use a variety of instructional modes (whole class, teacher-directed groups, student-directed groups, independent work, computer-based, and homework) Coordinate and integrate Federal, State, and local services and programs §1114(b)(1)(J) 11/16/2018

Three Core Elements of a Schoolwide Program [34 CFR 200.26] Evaluation - The school must evaluate annually the outcomes and the implementation to determine whether the academic achievement of all students, and particularly of low-achieving students’ goals and objectives were achieved. 11/16/2018

Developing a Budget Begin with your school’s Schoolwide School Improvement Plan Comprehensive Needs Assessment Comprehensive Plan Follow school-wide plan and school improvement plan Review the prior year funding to project future funding levels. Funding levels of grant programs change each year. Make lists of budget items needed for the project from NS and/or SWP. 11/16/2018

Three tools - use one that show all funding sources Part II – Three tools - use one that show all funding sources Consolidated Schoolwide Budget Template Web Budget School’s/tribe’s format 11/16/2018

Native Star – Consolidated Schoolwide Budget Doc and Links 11/16/2018

BASE VERSES SUPPLEMENTAL 25 CFR Ch. I (4–1–01 Edition), PART 39—THE INDIAN SCHOOL EQUALIZATION PROGRAM,Subpart B—The Indian School Equalization Formula, § 39.11 ISEP Funds The Base Program [Minus 15% for Special Education] ISEP Supplemental Funds: Gifted & Talented LEP/NLL 11/16/2018

Supplement, Not Supplant Background: Supplement, Not Supplant Requirement for Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Funds. Under the Federal “supplement not supplant” requirement, the Bureau of Indian Education LEAs/Schools may use these federal funds only to supplement not supplant. These provisions generally operate the same way for all programs. Supplanting is presumed to occur in the following instances:   The local educational agency or school uses Federal funds to provide services that it is required to make available under other Federal, State or local law. The agency or school district uses Federal funds to provide services that it provided with non-Federal funds in the immediate prior years. Because of the importance of the supplement/supplant requirement, it is very important that LEAs/Schools maintain good fiscal records and other documentation that will permit an auditor or program monitor to conclude that they have overcome a presumption that supplanting has occurred. 11/16/2018

BUDGET MANAGEMENT Cost Principles require that : Reasonable: costs a prudent person would have incurred Allocable: costs directly benefit the program to which they are charged and are in proportion to the benefit received by the program Allowable: costs are allocable, reasonable and not specifically excluded by Cost Principles 11/16/2018

Streamlining the Federal government's guidance A Rule by the Management and Budget Office on 12/26/2013 “To deliver on the promise of a 21st-Century government that is more efficient, effective and transparent, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is streamlining the Federal government's guidance on Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal awards.” Focus - federal resources improving performance and outcomes - while ensuring the financial integrity Reduce administrative burden for non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards - while reducing the risk of waste, fraud and abuse. 11/16/2018

Relocated to 2 CFR This final guidance supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, and A-122 , Circulars A-89, A-102, and A-133; and Circular A-50 on Single Audit Act OMB Circulars that are superseded by this guidance are available on OMB's Web site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_default/. Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments (OMB Circular A–87 OMB Circular A-102 - Grants and Cooperative Agreements With State and Local Governments   OMB Circular A-133 - Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit 11/16/2018

Budgeting Tool- Accounting processes are dependent on the budgeting of expenditure authorizations (appropriations) 11/16/2018

Lessons from Pilot Year Developing Budget Justification 11/16/2018

FAQs – USE OF FEDERAL AWARDS Can ESEA funds be used for meals as incentive for parent volunteers? Yes - Reasonable expenditures for refreshments of food, particularly when such sessions extend through mealtime, are allowable. Adequate documentation to show that meal costs were necessary and reasonable for proper and efficient performance of Federal awards, and allocable to Federal awards. Parental Involvement Policy stating how it will support the involvement of parents Can ESEA funds be used for purchasing gift cards for rewarding parental involvement? Yes - Gift Cards are allowable as an incentive or reward for participating in surveys and evaluation studies. Schools must show evidence that the intended recipients of the cards had, in fact, received the cards. Can ESEA funds be used to purchase items like are T-shirts, Sports Jerseys, Gatorade, basketballs, footballs, etc. for student incentives to promote Positive Behavior? Yes - Allowable cost  -  include the procurement of goods and services for the performance of a Federal award that include improving student achievement, closing achievement gaps, and contribute toward making AYP. If the items have positive behavior insignia, then items would be allowable (with the caveat that it is part of your school improvement plan in Native Star). No - Unallowable costs - costs for promotional items and memorabilia, including models, gifts and souvenirs. If T-shirts, Sports Jerseys, basketball and football items promote professional teams, they would be considered unallowable. IS IT IN YOUR PLAN? 11/16/2018

BUDGET JUSTIFICATION Budget should justify all expenses and be consistent with the School-wide Plan 11/16/2018

Resources Bernhardt, V. L., & Hébert, C. L. (2011). Response to intervention (RTI) and continuous school improvement (CSI) : using data, vision, and leadership to design, implement, and evaluate a schoolwide prevention system. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. U.S. Department of Education (March 2006). Designing Schoolwide Programs, Non-Regulatory Guidance. Learning Point Associates (December 2004). Guide to Using Data in School Improvement Efforts. Naperville, IL. Learning Point Associates (June 1, 2009). Conducting A Comprehensive Needs Assessment. The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement 34 CFR 200.26 – 200.29 11/16/2018

We appreciate your participation and recommendations. Thank you We appreciate your participation and recommendations. 11/16/2018

Contact us at: Marie2. Sandoval@BIE. EDU GayeLeia. King@bie Contact us at: Marie2.Sandoval@BIE.EDU GayeLeia.King@bie.edu Johnnita.tsabetsaye@bie.edu 11/16/2018