Technology and Living Third Consultation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This is a subject-based presentation for you as PV to adapt to your subject. The subject content at present is English for Speakers of other Languages.
Advertisements

Qualifications Update: National 5 Music Qualifications Update: National 5 Music.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Classical Studies National 3, 4 and 5.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Seminar for Teacher Assistants
Seminar for Teacher Assistants LS Public Assessment Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.
A2 Unit 4A Geography fieldwork investigation Candidates taking Unit 4A have, in section A, the opportunity to extend an area of the subject content into.
1 New Senior Secondary Mathematics Curriculum Design of Public Assessment HKEAA September 2006.
GCSE Statistics Coursework Sets 1 & 2 February 2013.
HONG KONG EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSED HKDSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
1 Technology and Living Third Consultation Assessment Framework 4 & 5 October 2006.
Consultation on Senior Cycle Science Anna Walshe Brendan Duane
1 NSS Biology Public Assessment (3 rd Consultation) October 2006 HKEAA.
Consistency of Assessment
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT FORMS OF ASSESSMENT.
The reform of A level qualifications in the sciences Dennis Opposs SCORE seminar on grading of practical work in A level sciences, 17 October 2014, London.
Utilising the Levels Framework Workshop 4 November 2009.
1 Health Management and Social Care Third Consultation.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
Enhancing assessment capacity For teachers of Authority and Authority-registered subjects.
Seminar for Teacher Assistants Liberal Studies Public Assessment Oct
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Design and Manufacture: Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Welcome to Turton High School.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Health and Food Technology: Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Qualifications Update: Environmental Science Qualifications Update: Environmental Science.
Key messages from Verification  Use valid and reliable assessments  SQA-produced Unit Assessment Support Packs  Centre devised assessments.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
The New Studies of Religion Syllabus Implementation Package: Session Two.
Qualifications Update: Care Qualifications Update: Care.
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Qualifications Update: Human Biology Qualifications Update: Human Biology.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs National 3, 4 and 5.
GCSE CHILD DEVELOPMENT. Summary of Assessment Unit 1 Written Paper 1½ hours (40% final mark, one tier only) Unit 2 Controlled Assessment – Child Study.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Fieldwork at GCSE. A ‘world class’ curriculum? Extend their knowledge of locations, places and contexts Understand some key processes, concepts,
AS/A level Geography from 2016 Preparing to teach Session 2.
AQA’s GCE Science Specifications Presentation to Lancashire Heads of Science Conference 
CERTIFICATE IN ASSESSING VOCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT (CAVA) Unit 1: Understanding the principles and practices of assessment.
Preparing to teach OCR GCSE (9-1) Geography B (Geography for Enquiring Minds) Planning, constructing and introducing your new course.
Development of Assessments Laura Mason Consultant.
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Curriculum Forum Secondary Tuesday 6 June 2017
Quality Assurance processes
This project has been funded with support the European Commission
Agenda Delivering the practical and preparing for assessment
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Accounting 9706.
Understanding Standards: An Overview of Course Assessment
Assessing Young Learners
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Assessment of Learning 1
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
In-Service Teacher Training
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Investigating science
EPQ Learner Outcomes identify, design, plan and complete an individual project, applying a range of organisational skills and strategies to meet.
Information for Parents
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
BURNSIDE ACADEMY INSPIRES KS2 SATS Guidance for Parents
The Assessing Cycle Module 1 Assessment Assessment Accountability Data
KS3 Science 2008: An AfL Approach to How Science Works
Providing feedback to learners
AICE General Paper What IS this class?.
Understanding Standards: An Overview of Course Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Technology and Living Third Consultation Assessment Framework 4 & 5 October 2006

(Formerly Home Economics) Technology & Living 科技與生活 Technology and Living (Formerly Home Economics) 科技與生活科 (前稱為家政科)

Curriculum & Assessment Guide   Curriculum & Assessment Guide http://www.emb.gov.hk

Chapter 5 Assessment The roles of Assessment Formative and Summative Assessment Internal Assessment Public Assessment

Roles of Assessment Evidence of student learning Provide feedback to students, teachers, schools and parents For monitoring standards and selection decisions The Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (HKDSE) Student Learning Profile

Formative and Summative Assessment Assessment for learning (formative) Obtaining feedback on learning and teaching, and utilising this to make learning more effective … Assessment of learning (summative) Determining progress in learning, summarising how much learning has taken place Inclusion of SBA to enhance formative assessment within the context of HKSDE

Internal assessment: Principles Alignment with learning objectives Catering for the range of student ability Tracking progress over time Timely and quality feedback with encouragement Making reference to the school’s context Making reference to current progress in student learning Feedback from peers and from the students themselves

Public assessment: Principles Alignment with the curriculum Fairness, objectivity and reliability Inclusiveness Standards-referencing Informativeness

Assessment Framework

Assessment Objectives To evaluate students’ abilities To demonstrate knowledge and understanding of concepts, principles, theories and issues present in the specification content (for subject specific content, please refer to Ch 2 of C&A Guide); To apply such knowledge and understanding to analyse and solve problems which may involve familiar and unfamiliar situations To collect, select, analyse and evaluate information in relation to the specified subject content

To evaluate the potential and limitation of evidence and arguments, make reasoned judgments about their relevance to particular situations and present supported conclusions To demonstrate communication skills using a wide variety of methods and present them in a logical and coherent structure appropriate to the nature of the activity To plan and carry out a course of action with relevant technological and scientific knowledge and skills to achieve an effective results

Assessment Design Both Food Science and Technology strand and Fashion, Clothing and Textile strand will adopt the same mode of assessment which include two components: Public examination (70%) Paper 1 (30%) Paper 2 (40%) School-based assessment (30%) Prescribed Task (15%) Project / Design folio (15%)

Paper Structure – Paper 1 Duration: 1hour 30 minutes Question sets based on compulsory part, they include: Multiple choice questions (15 marks) Design questions (25 marks) Structured questions (30 marks)

Paper Structure – Paper 2 Duration: 2 hours Question sets based on elective part with the integration of basic knowledge from compulsory part, they include: Short questions (20 marks) Data-response questions (30 marks) Essay questions (30 marks)

Paper 1 – Multiple Choice Questions Mainly testing students’ some basic knowledge and understanding of concepts, principles, theories …

Paper 1 – Design Questions Students should design or modify some products according to the specifications given in the questions Mainly assess students’ ability to apply related knowledge and understanding to analyse and solve problems Students can demonstrate their creativity in the design questions

Paper 1 – Structured Questions Similar to some CE questions A set of questions based on a given context, with the integration of knowledge from different subtopics The context may be familiar or unfamiliar to the students

Paper 2 – Short Questions Questions that demand short answers on basic knowledge and understanding of the elective part

Paper 2 – Data-response Questions Data will be provided in the form of table, graph, diagram or text Students are required to select useful information from the data analyse and evaluate the relevance of the information Students should integrate the information provided and knowledge learnt to make judgement or draw conclusion

Paper 2 – Essay Questions Students are required to show in-depth discussion on related issues or topics, the following ability will be assessed: Students’ understanding on the related issues or topics Students’ ability to express their views coherently and logically Marks will be awarded for effective communication

School-based Assessment (SBA) It is: part of the public assessment administered in schools and marked by the students’ own teachers to include a more extensive range of learning outcomes which cannot be possibly assessed in written exam

SBA: Rationale SBA allows students to explore a specific issues in their own area of interest

SBA: Rationale SBA allows the assessment of the ability to integrate the knowledge learnt from the four dimensions of students’ learning in technology education Conceptual – knowledge and understanding of relevant concepts and procedures Procedural – knowing how to do something, what to do, and when to do it Societal – related to the interrelationships between science, technology, environment and groups of people Technical – skills related to manual / practical techniques

SBA – Prescribed Task Students are required to include both scientific experiments and practical skills to complete the prescribed task, e.g. Food Science and Technology Using experiment to find out the effect of different cooking method on a certain food and then apply the findings in meal planning Fashion, Clothing and Textile Try out practical tests on different fabrics and make decision on the choice of fabrics for the production of a certain garment

SBA – Prescribed Task Assessment criteria – performing experiment Ability to follow procedure to complete the task smoothly and independently Ability to use apparatus and instrument correctly and competently Ability to organise the work and keep working surface neat and tidy

SBA – Prescribed Task Assessment criteria – reporting Ability to use appropriate method to present the data collected in the experiment Ability to interpret and analyse the data collected Ability to discuss the data systematically and draw valid conclusion from the experimental results

SBA – Prescribed Task Assessment criteria – Application and practicing (similar to existing practical exam) Ability to apply experimental results for the production of a specific product Ability to propose workable plan according to specification given Ability to apply relevant practical skills to carry out the plan

SBA – Prescribed Task Assessment criteria – Product Evaluation (similar to existing practical exam) Teacher evaluate the product developed

SBA – Project / Design Folio The design of the project / design folio should provide opportunity for students to explore related topics / issues in their own area of interests Students should develop their ideas and work out their plan Students should report to the teacher regularly about their progress

SBA – Project / Design Folio Assessment criteria include the four dimensions of students’ learning in technology education Conceptual Procedural Societal Technical

SBA – Project / Design Folio Assessment criteria - Societal Ability to analyse the chosen topics / issues in relation to science, technology, environment or groups of people And hence, propose specification for the design of a product

SBA – Project / Design Folio Assessment criteria - Procedural Ability to plan a course of action for the development of product and carry out the plan at different stages, e.g. Ability to search and collective information for the design of product Survey? Internet search? Literature search? Ability to choose relevant materials / method for the development of product Suitable materials? Appropriate methods?

SBA – Project / Design Folio Assessment criteria - Procedural (cont’d) Ability to produce the product Trial? Prototype? Reproducible? Ability to evaluate the process Effectiveness? Fulfill the specifications set? Address the problem defined? Any suggestions for improvement?

SBA – Project / Design Folio Assessment criteria - Technical Ability to choose appropriate methods to address the problems / issues Ability to use tools and instruments correctly and safely Ability to demonstrate relevant skills in the process of product making

SBA – Project / Design Folio Assessment criteria - Conceptual Ability to demonstrate correct and in-depth knowledge and understanding of the processes, methods, concepts involved in the chosen topics / issues Ability to apply learnt knowledge to solve problems, develop ideas

Moderation of SBA results To iron out possible differences among schools in marking standards By means of either statistical method or trained moderators Rank order determined by teachers will remain unchanged

Supervision: basic principles Teachers are expected to supervise and guide students in the process of preparing for SBA projects Degree of teacher guidance will vary according to students’ ability and the kind of work undertaken Students are required to reach their own judgments and conclusions

Supervision: guidelines When supervising students, teachers are expected to: Discuss with students about their approach and method used in the development of the product Set internal deadlines for different stages of product development Exercise continuous supervision of work in order to monitor progress and prevent plagiarism Ensure the product is done in accordance with the specification requirements and procedures suggested

Support to teachers Assessment Handbook (including Assessment Criteria, Guidance for Teachers, sample of Assignment Recording Sheet and Assessment Evidence Grid etc.) Examples of work Training workshops on SBA work

Standards and reporting of results Standards-referencing Results represented by 5 levels of performance Written descriptors which explain what the candidates can do at a certain level will be developed Standards of work expected will be illustrated by samples of students work

Technology and Living Q & A