GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marine Construction SCM 330 Tyler Mason Pratt Tyler Mason Pratt
Advertisements

Chp12- Footings.
RETAINING EARTH STRUCTURE Session 11 – 16
Design of Cantilevered Retaining Walls
1 Earth retaining structures Gravity/Cantilever walls References: 1. Budhu, Muni, D. Soil Mechanics & Foundations. New York;
Lateral Earth Pressures
Foundations Excavations
AASHTO LRFD Section 11 Abutments, Piers, and Walls
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 07 TOPIC : 3
Reinforced Concrete Design II
Session 13 – 14 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
BRACED EXCAVATIONS  for deep, narrow excavations  pipelines  service cuts.
Cantilever/Gravity Walls Bar lists and estimates from standard design sheet 1.
1. By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-II Lec-3 Retaining walls.
ASSALAMUALAIKUM & GOOD MORNING
Building Walls Have one main purpose, to support roofs and ceilings such walls most often have three or more separate components. In today construction,
ERT352 FARM STRUCTURES RETAINING WALL DESIGN
Direct Shear Test CEP 701 PG Lab.
Soil Mechanics-II Lateral Earth Pressure
Retaining Walls.
Concrete (Gravity) Dam Engineering
Lecture 11 Advance Design of RC Structure Retaining walls
EXTERNAL STABILITY The MSE wall system consists of three zones. They are: 1. The reinforced earth zone. 2. The backfill zone. 3. The foundation soil zone.
LINTON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
SOIL STRENGTH AND SOIL FORCES
7. APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
UNIT I RETAINING WALLS.
Session 11 – 12 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3
Chapter 2: Total Hydrostatic Force on Surfaces
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
COFFERDAMS.
 PREPARED BY:  AVAIYA KEYUR ( )  BADRUKHIYA DHAVAL( )  BHANDERI AKASH( )  CHATROLA VIVEK( )  CHAUDHARI.
FOUNDATIONS.
Chapter 13 Lateral Earth Pressure – Curved Failure Surface
Soil mechanics and foundation engineering-III (CE-434)
DIAPHRAGM WALLS.
SARDAR PATEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 10 Revision
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Earth Retaining Structures
Direct Shear Test.
AN ACTIVE LEARNING ASSIGNMENT ON Guided By : Prof. B.M. PUROHIT 2015 SOIL MECHNICS( ) DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE,
A.D.I.T New V. V. Nagar Branch : Civil Engineering (5th semester) Subject : Soil Mechanics ( ) Topic : Cofferdams Prepared by : Tina Naik ( )
REINFORCED EARTH STRUCTURES
The Engineering of Foundations
BHAGWAN MAHAVIR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Chapter 15 (1) Slope Stability
DESIGN OF RETAINING WALLS
FE: Geotechnical Engineering
oleh: A. Adhe Noor PSH, ST., MT
For updated version, please click on
Under supervision of: Dr. Sami A. Hijjawi
CHAPTER FOUR LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE. 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Definitions of Key Terms 3.2 Lateral Earth Pressure at Rest 3.3 Active and Passive Lateral Earth.
Presented By: Sanku Konai
Theory of Reinforced Concrete and Lab. II
RETAINING WALL.
EAG346-Sem II 2014/2015 Lesson 2.
Chapter 5: Substructure
B.V.Patel Institute of Technology-Diploma studies
CT Reinforced Earth Structures
CHAPTER 4 SOIL STRESSES.
Soil Mechanics-II Soil Stabilization and Improvement
Chapter 14 Lateral Earth Pressure – Curved Failure Surface
N.N.Som Consulting Geotechnical Engineer
For updated version, please click on
Po Shan Road, Hong Kong, 18 June 1972
Graduation Project Bracing system for deep excavation.
Civil Engineering Dept.
Presentation transcript:

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES 18 SEPTEMBER 2008

LEARNING OUTCOMES Learning outcomes: At the end of this lecture/week the students would be able to: Understand natural slope and made engineered soil slope assessment which include rainfall induced failure and role of suction.

Braced Excavation – Determination of Forces in Struts TOPIC TO BE COVERED Braced Excavation – Determination of Forces in Struts Cofferdam

Synopsis Needs for further trenching, where it carried out, design consideration + analysis of components (design of the elements) Objective Able to design the bracing and other components to support trench excavation. Able to analyzed the design. Trenching normally temporary structure

Design Components : Select appropriate size of wale, struts, sheet pile or soldier beam Basis of selection : Based on the estimated lateral earth pressure Theoretically aspects of lateral pressure :

Class A – Firm clay and flexible wall Pressure Envelope : Class A – Firm clay and flexible wall 0.2H = unit weight H = height of cut 0.2H H 0.3H

Class B – Stiff to very stiff clay and flexible wall Pressure Envelope : Class B – Stiff to very stiff clay and flexible wall = unit weight H = height of cut H 0.3H

Class C – Coarse soil dry Pressure Envelope : Class C – Coarse soil dry = unit weight H = height of cut H 0.2H

1 P1 2 P2 P3 3 = Apparent pressure S = Spacing strut c/c d1 d 1 P1 d2 / 2 d2 d2 / 2 2 P2 d3 / 2 d3 d3 / 2 P3 d4 / 2 3 d4 d4 / 2 = Apparent pressure S = Spacing strut c/c 1 = P1 / S (d1 + d2 /2)

Lateral earth pressure varies with depth Lateral earth pressure varies with depth. Each strut being designed for maximum load to which it is subjected. Thus, braced cut being designed using apparent pressure diagram determined from measured struts load in the field.

b. Clay, soft to medium stiffness where H  4  = H [ 1 – (4c) ] or By Peck, a. Sand,  = 0.65HKa b. Clay, soft to medium stiffness where H  4  = H [ 1 – (4c) ] or  = 0.3 H which ever is the bigger C H

Pressure Envelope For Sand H  = 0.65HKa Pressure Envelope For Sand

Pressure Envelope For Cuts in Soft to Medium Clay 0.25H 0.75H Pressure Envelope For Cuts in Soft to Medium Clay

Pressure Envelope For Cuts in Stiff Clay 0.25H H  4 C 0.5H  = 0.2H to 0.4 H Purposely for design, take average 0.25H Pressure Envelope For Cuts in Stiff Clay

Design Procedure Design procedure to determine strut load : i. Draw the pressure envelope of the propose strut levels (soldiers beam are assumed to be hinged at the strut level, except for the top and bottom ones)

Design Procedure ii. Determine the reaction for the two simple cantilever beam (top and bottom) and all others are simple beam (A, B1, B2, C1, C2 and D) iii. Used the formulae to calculate strut loads PA = (A) (s) PB = (B1 + B2) (s) PC = (C1 + C2) (s) PD = (D) (s)

Design Procedure iv. Knowing the strut load at each level and the intermediate bracing, then select the proper section from steel construction manuals.

EXAMPLE 1 Draw the earth pressure envelope and determine the strut loads. Strut are placed at 3m c/c 6m 1m = 18kN/m3 c = 35 kN/m2  = 10 2m 2m 1m 1m 3m 3m 3m 3m

EXAMPLE 2 A braced cut shown in Figure below were constructed in a cohesionless soil having a unit weight,  = 18.2 kN/m3 and an angle of internal friction,  = 35. The trust located at 3.5m centre-to-centre in a plan. Determine the trust load at levels A, B and C 5m 2m A = 18.2 kN/m3  = 20 3m B 3m C 1.5m 3.5m 3.5m 3.5m 3.5m

CELLULAR COFFERDAMS Used to enable construction works in water bound areas eg. rivers, lake and sea Stability depend mainly on interaction of the soil to fill the cell and the steel sheetpiling.

Contains three basic types which is : a. Circular Cofferdam b. Diaphragm Cofferdam c. Cloverleaf Cofferdam

Design consideration: a. Cell geometry b. Cell fill materials c. Sheet piles

LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE Stability Analysis Worked example 2 : A concrete gravity wall is shown in Figure below. Determine : FOS against Overturning FOS against Sliding The pressure on the soil at the toe and heel (Note : Unit weight of concrete is 24kN/m3)

1 2 3 6 5 4 8 m 1.5 m 3.5 m 0.5 m 3 m 1 m 1 = 30 1 = 16kN/m3 c1 = 0 2 = 20 2 = 20kN/m3 c2 = 15 kN/m2