NSF Graduate Research Fellowship

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship: What is it? 3 years of funding: $30k/year as stipend $10,500/year for tuition $1,000 one-time international travel allowance.
Advertisements

Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
Landing a job in Academia Robin K. Cameron Department of Biology Hamilton,Ontario, Canada.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
1 NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program Seminar 2 ©Valorie Troesch 2006.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
Broader Impacts September 30th and October 2nd, 2014 Writing the NSF GRFP Marianne Smith, Ph.D. Research Development Officer Ayala School of Biological.
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants Improve dissertation research – Provide funds not normally available to graduate students significant data-gathering.
DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU
Writing a Successful NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Application Anthony E. Kelly College of Education and Human Development George Mason University
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Go to Graduate School A Successful Life Go to Graduate School Professor Martha Mecartney Graduate Advisor to the Materials Science and Engineering Degree.
Graduate & Fellowship Applications Jeevak Parpia (DGS - Physics) June
Graduate Research Fellowship Program Operations Center NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation.
Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Operations Center.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Required Elements of the Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
Temple University Russell Conwell Learning Center Office of Senior Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies GETTING INVOLVED IN RESEARCH AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY.
Proposal Development Team, Office of Research & Sponsored Projects (ORSP) Computing Alliance for Hispanic-Serving Institutions (CAHSI) August 9,
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
NSF GRFP 2010 Applicant Workshop 21 August 2009 Genevieve K. Walden Department of Biology, SFSU National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow 2009.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Tips for NSF GRF Applicants Matt Williams Barry M. Goldwater Scholar ( ) NSF Graduate Research Fellow ( ) October 13, 2010.
The NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program PLOSA 2009: CRA-W/CDC March, 2009.
NSF GRFP Workshop Sept 16, 2016 Dr. Julia Fulghum
Grant Writing Strategies for Doctoral Students Scott M. Lanyon Professor and Head, Dept. of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior College of Biological Sciences.
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
How to develop an independent research plan – review literature with an eye for problem, approach, solution, new ideas – review objectives of funding programs.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Associate Professor of Civil and.
Session B – Broader Impacts: What’s the big idea? J. Britt HolbrookSharon Franks Center for the Study of InterdisciplinarityResearch Proposal Development.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Required Elements of the NSF Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Tips and Strategies for NSF GRF Applicants Matt Williams NSF Graduate Research Fellow October 12, 2009.
Integrating Broader Impacts into your Research Proposal Delta Program in Research, Teaching, and Learning Trina McMahon Professor of Civil and Environmental.
December Contact: Roxanne Malé-Brune,
NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.
Images: Images are extremely important to publicize the results of NSF investments. In general, graphs, spectra, and reaction diagrams are not compelling.
Getting into a Summer Program: The Application Process Keisha John, PhD.
NSERC Coach - Dr. Steve Perlman, Dept. of Biology
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
Promoting Undergraduate Research
D I S C O V E R Y Challenge.
5/20/2018 Graduate School Template C Plain-crimson-bright.
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
CARE Grants 101 Grants and Sponsored Programs Cindy Bell:
Strategies for Successful Proposal Development
Finding and applying for summer RESEARCH internships
Grant Writing Information Session
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
David W. Mogk Dept. of Earth Sciences Montana State University
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
STEM for Britain Informal session to encourage you to submit your application and offer some advice.
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
STEM for Britain Informal session to encourage you to submit your application and offer some advice.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Dr. Sheryl Zajdowicz and Dr. Rhonda Eaker
Gulf States Math Alliance 2019 Conference
Allison Neal PhD student GRFP UVM Department of Biology
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

NSF Graduate Research Fellowship How to write a winning fellowship Dr. David W. Mazyck Professor Environmental Engineering Sciences

Only 5 minutes to convince a tired reviewer, who’s not an expert in your field, that your proposal is worth funding.

Why should you apply? Fully funded – by a nicely sized stipend + tuition Develops writing skills –important skill set required during and after PhD Develops skills planning a series of experiments Provides best opportunity to attend #1 graduate school choice

“NSF funds the researcher, not the research” -Former NSF Reviewer Translation: They look at your potential to be a researcher

Personal Statement/Experience/Future Goals Required Materials: Personal Statement/Experience/Future Goals Opening memorable paragraph demonstrating your potential to have a long lasting impression on your field Why should they fund you specifically? Distinguish yourself from 20,000 other applicants (most will have a strong GPA) Summarize all your research/internship experiences Be detailed and specific (Intellectual Merit) Examples of leadership, teamwork, outreach, dissemination How will receiving the fellowship contribute to your career goals? What are your future career goals?

Previous Research: Key Points Required Materials: Previous Research: Key Points Why was the research important (Intellectual Merit)? What were the Broader Impacts? Within your field Did you mentor anyone, why does the average person care about your work What did you set out to accomplish? What was your role? What did you learn (overcome any obstacles)? Provide examples of teamwork and independent work List achievements, valuable contributions, dissemination of results…

Required Materials: Proposed Research SHORT introduction and background – only to show why your work is significant and/or novel Hypothesis Objectives Research Plan/methodology Make sure plan is feasible (time, resources… Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts How will your research contribute to the “big picture” outside of academia Inclusion of underrepresented students Contingency NO JARGON!

Letters of Recommendation Required Materials: Letters of Recommendation Who to ask? Research advisor (past and present) Industry/internship – if supervisor has a PhD. If not, please see next page. New to UF? 2:1 vs. 1:2 Aunt Ginny? Title? Pedigree – MIT is viewed positively Dean, Department Chair, Professor Assistant Professor

Letters of Recommendation Required Materials: Letters of Recommendation What should they say? Potential to conduct research is outstanding Intellectual Merit of research Novelty Impact on the field Broader Impacts Application to the field Incorporation of underrepresented students

Know Your Audience!

The review process A reviewer has 40 applications! Each application has 3 reviewers Given your essays, transcripts, letters of recommendation, and application forms Rated based on “Intellectual Merit” and “Broader Impacts” Review Criteria listed for each on NSF’s website

Stand Out! Clearly organized – easy to find key information Title the background, plan, methods, intellectual merit, broader impacts… Use bold, italics, and underline for key information Goals, hypothesis, broader impacts… Use pictures! Worth 1000 words Schematics explain a lot while taking up little room

Directly From Rating Sheet: Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts Ability to plan/conduct research To work as a member of team as well as independently To interpret and communicate research findings Integrate research and education to all levels, broad context Encourage diversity, broaden opportunities in science/research Enhance scientific understanding Benefit society

Intellectual Merit 7 Questions Research/Internship experience What did you do? What did you learn? Did you work in a team? Did you conduct independent work? Did you mentor anyone during the work? Did you publish or disseminate? Did anything fail where you had to overcome any adversity?

Broader Impacts Examples Mentor undergrad and graduate students Assistance in lab, help them develop posters… Be a guest lecturer for your college/department or local community colleges Work with summer camps that tour campus and lead lab activities and lectures that explain your research Incorporate interdisciplinary studies to widen the impact

Broader Impacts (Cont’d) Examples Develop teaching materials regarding your research Work with a professor for a specific class Demonstrate link between your research and how it benefits society Specific examples: health benefits, social aid, economic advantage… Publish results! Be specific Present at conferences! “Results will be disseminated in the literature”

Getting Started Understand what application materials are required Set a timeline for accomplishing small tasks one at a time Start early! Different disciplines have different deadlines Keep NSF’s rating sheet close by when writing your essays Give copies of essays to professors, peers, friends, family, etc., to proofread – as many people as possible!

Common Positive Reviews “Demonstrates ability to plan and conduct research” “Well written proposal with clear hypothesis” “Potential to have a real impact” “Publications and presentations show effective communication” “Original research idea” “Demonstrates leadership ability” “Shows desire and ability to communicate science through outreach activities”

Common Negative Reviews “Benefit to society not well expressed” “Methods and research plan are not clearly explained” “Unclear of the significance of this work” “No mention of how research will be disseminated to the public” “Limited research experience” “Research did not result in any presentations or scientific publications” “Lacks Broader Impacts”