Multi-Year ( ) North American Population Exposure to PM2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EC Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System (RAQDPS) Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario Mtg on AQ.
Advertisements

MOPITT CO Louisa Emmons, David Edwards Atmospheric Chemistry Division Earth & Sun Systems Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
George Pouliot, Ana Rappold, Amber Soja, Wayne Cascio Estimating Emissions for the 2008 Evans Road Fire in North Carolina Office of Research and Development.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Discussion Space Research Centre. Urbanization and Industrialization: in 2008, more than half of humans live in cities UN Population Report 2007.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
ACCENT/GLOREAM 2006, October, Paris Photo-oxidants formation and transport over Europe during the heat wave period in July 2006 Joanna Struzewska.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
2008 Seasonal Prediction for Canada Kerry Anderson Richard Carr Peter Englefield.
Chapter 2: Satellite Tools for Air Quality Analysis 10:30 – 11:15.
Modeling BC Sources and Sinks - research plan Charles Q. Jia and Sunling Gong University of Toronto and Environment 1 st annual NETCARE workshop.
Emission processing methodology for the new GEM-MACH model ABSTRACT SMOKE has recently been adapted to provide emissions for the new Meteorological Service.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
GEM-MACH Global The Canadian Global Air Quality Modeling/Forecasting System Dr. Sunling Gong Science and Technology Branch January 16-17, 2012.
Improved representation of boreal fire emissions for the ICARTT period S. Turquety, D. J. Jacob, J. A. Logan, R. M. Yevich, R. C. Hudman, F. Y. Leung,
Implementation of GEM-MACH10, A New Higher-Resolution Version of the Canadian Operational Air Quality Forecast Model Mike Moran 1, Sylvain Ménard 2, Radenko.
Impacts of Biomass Burning Emissions on Air Quality and Public Health in the United States Daniel Tong $, Rohit Mathur +, George Pouliot +, Kenneth Schere.
Use of Photochemical Grid Modeling to Quantify Ozone Impacts from Fires in Support of Exceptional Event Demonstrations STI-5704 Kenneth Craig, Daniel Alrick,
Source-Specific Forecasting of Air Quality Impacts with Dynamic Emissions Updating & Source Impact Reanalysis Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu.
GEM/AQ Simulations on Intercontinental Transports Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
A Five-Year Performance Evaluation of Environment Canada’s Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System M.D. Moran 1, J. Zhang 1, R.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
A ir Quality Research Branch Meteorological Service of Canada Environment Environnement Canada Performance Evaluation of AURAMS for Multiple Cases Michael.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Using TEMPO to Evaluate the Impact of Ozone on Agriculture
15th Annual CMAS Conference
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
ADAGIO (Atmospheric Deposition Analysis Generated by optimal Interpolation from Observations): Project plans and status A.S. Cole1, A. Robichaud2, M.D.
New Developments in Wildfire Emission and Dispersion Forecasting with FireWork – The Operational Canadian AQ Forecast System with Near-Real-Time Biomass-Burning.
Tanya L. Spero1, Megan S. Mallard1, Stephany M
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Forecasting the Impacts of Wildland Fires
Recent Improvements to FireWork: Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Operational Air Quality Forecast System with Near-real-time Wildfire Emissions.
17th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC
Model Evaluation of ECCC FireWork: Scientific Intrigue in 3 Acts
IWAQFR 2017, Toronto, Didier Davignon1
Improvements to Wintertime Particulate-Matter Forecasting with GEM-MACH15 Michael Moran1, Sylvain Ménard2 Paul Makar1, Radenko Pavlovic2, Mourad Sassi2,
Recent Updates to the Canadian Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System Michael Moran, Sylvie Gravel, Verica Savic-Jovcic, Alexandru.
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
10th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC 2010 October 11-13
Junhua Zhang and Wanmin Gong
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Joanna Struzewska Warsaw University of Technology
Modelling atmospheric transport of Benzo(a)Pyrene with CMAQ
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presented by: Sophie Cousineau
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Year (2013-2016) North American Population Exposure to PM2 Multi-Year (2013-2016) North American Population Exposure to PM2.5 Emissions from Wildfires Estimated from Operational Air Quality Forecasts Rodrigo Munoz-Alpizar1, Radenko Pavlovic1, Mike Moran2, Jack Chen3, Sylvie Gravel3, Sarah Henderson4, Sylvain Ménard1,Jacinthe Racine1, Annie Duhamel1, Samuel Gilbert1, Paul-André Beaulieu1, Hugo Landry1, Didier Davignon1, and Sophie Cousineau1 1Air Quality Modelling Applications Section, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada 2Air Quality Research Division, ECCC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 3Air Quality Research Division, ECCC, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 4Environmental Health Services, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 16th Annual CMAS Conference Oct. 23-25 2017 Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Acknowledgements Natural Resources Canada U.S. Forest Service Canadian Wildland Fire Information System (CWFIS) Canadian Forest Service: Kerry Anderson, Peter Englefield U.S. Forest Service BlueSky team: Susan O’Neill Environment Canada Alexandru Lupu and Cassandra Bolduc

Talk Outline Background and overview Short description of ECCC FireWork system (clone of regular operational AQ forecast system + near-real-time biomass-burning emissions) Methodology Results: wildfire smoke impacts and exposure Related study Conclusions

Background Biomass burning (BB) from both natural processes (wildfires) and anthropogenic activities (prescribed burns) can emit significant amounts of pollutants that can adversely impact local and regional air quality (AQ), public health and climate During the last decade an average of 7000 wildfires occurred each year in Canada and burned an average of 2.6 million ha per year (larger than Vermont); annual costs of wildfire suppression in Canada range from about $0.5 billion to $1 billion Fort McMurray wildfire from 1 May to 4 July 2016 burned 590,000 ha, forced evacuation of ~90,000 people, & caused damages of ~$9.5 billion

Study Overview Objectives: Scientific Questions: To quantify the contribution of fire-originated fine particulate matter (“fire-PM2.5”) to PM2.5 pollution in North America based on FireWork forecasts for the 5-month “fire season” (May to September) over the past four years (2013-2016) To help public health professionals, policymakers, and the general public better understand the health impacts of wildfire- related PM2.5 pollution. Scientific Questions: What is the size of the area affected by wildfire smoke? What is the extent of population exposure to wildfire PM2.5 pollution? How often does wildfire smoke cause exceedances of Canadian daily PM2.5 standard (CAAQS)?

Current ECCC Operational Wildfire Forecast System: FireWork Emission Inventories CAN (2010), USA (2011 NEI), Mexico (1999) Wildfire emissions dataflow GEM and Obs. Meteorology valid at local noon Fire information AVHRR/MODIS Area sources Non-road sources Mobile sources Point sources SMOKE (Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions) Converts daily total wildfire emissions into hourly values, and converts VOC, NOx, PM into explicit model species. Emissions are then combined with other GEM-MACH emissions and provided as major point sources to FireWork CWFIS (Canadian Wildland Information System) Hotspots for US and CA Wildfire location by lat/lon Estimated fuel type/consumption - Biogenic Emissions Area Emissions Major Point Emissions with Near-Real Time Wildfire Emissions BLUE SKY (FEPS only) Estimates total daily emissions per hotspot for PMs, VOCs, NOx, SO2, CO and NH3 GEM-MACH Global Environmental Multiscale Modelling Air Quality and CHemistry Initial Conditions Regional 4DVar analysis for meteorological variables No assimilation of chemical constituents Dynamics Tracer Advection Physics Radiation; PBL; vertical diffusion; convec.; conden.; cloud microphysics; surface process; etc.) Chemistry processor Emissions; vertical diffusion of chemical tracers; chemistry: gas phase, aqueous, and heterogeneous; dry/wet deposition, plumerise/spread, SOA, aerosol dynamics and microphysics. Boundary Conditions Meteorology from the Regional Deterministic Prediction System at 10km Seasonal climatology for chemical constituents run twice daily (00z, 12z) from April to October

Experimental/Operational FireWork Methodology (1) FireWork Timeline: 2013: FireWork system was first run in an experimental mode at ECCC’s Canadian Centre for Meteorological and Environmental Prediction (CCMEP). Also run in summer 2014 and summer 2015 2016: FireWork system became operational in April 2016 FireWork is identical to the ECCC operational Regional Air Quality Prediction System (RAQDPS), except for the inclusion of satellite- derived, near-real-time biomass burning emissions from natural, prescribed, and agricultural fires Forecast Periods : Multi-year (2013-2016) for May-Sept. FireWork was re-run retrospectively for added periods Year Experimental/Operational FireWork Added periods Start End 2013 June 1 August 31 May 1‒31; Sep. 1‒31 2014 June 9 October 1 May 1‒June 8 2015 May 21 October 31 May 1‒20 2016 April 1 ‒

Methodology (2) Modelling Set-Up: Grid configuration Limited Area Model over North America (LAM) with Rotated Latitude-Longitude grid. Horizontal and Vertical Resolution 10km x 10km; 80 Hybrid Levels up to 0.1 hPa (~60 km) Model time step 300 s for meteorology; 900 s for chemistry On-line chemistry processes Representation of Gas and Aerosol Chemistry: Gas-Phase Chemistry: ADOM-II (42 species, 114 reactions) Aerosol Representation: 2 size bins (0 -2.5 um, 2.5 – 10 um); 8 chemical species (SO4, NO3, NH4, EC, pOC, sOC, crustal material, sea salt) Aerosol Dynamics & Microphysics Aqueous & Inorganic heterogeneous chemistry Secondary Organic Aerosol Chemistry Cloud processing (aerosol activation, aqueous-phase chemistry, wet removal of gas and aerosols) Dry deposition for aerosol particles and gases. One-way coupling (meteorology affects chemistry ) FireWork domain boundaries prior (red) and post (green) Operational (April-October) ECCC's AQ system in September 7th 2016.

Methodology (3) Wildfire Emissions’ Contribution to PM2.5 Pollution : fire-Pm2.5 = FireWork PM2.5 – RAQDPS PM2.5 Different concentration thresholds were used to assess areas affected by wildfire smoke : 0.2, 1, 5, 10 and 28 µg/m3 (annual standard and daily standard CAAQS ) Population Exposure Estimation: Combining FireWork fields of direct contributions of fire-PM2.5 to total surface PM2.5 concentration with population data. Used population data from the 2016 Canadian census (dissemination-area level) and from the 2010 U.S. census (census-tract level)

Methodology (4) Exposure Frequency Estimation: Population shapefiles to FireWork grid cells Exposure Frequency Estimation: To characterize exposure frequency, the number of occurrences of hourly or daily fire-PM2.5 concentrations above specific thresholds for individual grid cells were used : 1, 5, 10, 28 µg/m3.

Results Area Affected by Wildfire Smoke (1) Average seasonal fire-PM2.5 footprint 2013 2014 2015 2016

Area Affected by Wildfire Smoke (2) Average seasonal percentage of fire-PM2.5 contribution to average seasonal PM2.5 FireWork concentrations 2013 2014 2015 2016

Results Population Exposure to Wildfire Pollution (1) In 17 of the 20 months considered, more than 1 million Canadians (3% of the population) were estimated to have been affected by average monthly fire- PM2.5 > 0.2 µg/m3 more than 14 million Canadians (39% of the population) were affected by average monthly fire- PM2.5 > 0.2 µg/m3 in 10 of the 20 months, and over 32 million Canadians (90% of the population) were affected in 7 months. In the U.S., more than 200 million people (65% of the population) were exposed to average monthly fire-PM2.5 > 0.2 µg/m3 during nine of the 20 months considered

Population Exposure to Wildfire Pollution (2) July and August were the months affecting the most people (with August 2015 being the worst for average monthly fire-PM2.5 > 10 µg/m3) The total percentages of the U.S. population affected by seasonal fire-PM2.5 > 0.2 µg/m3 ranged from 21% (2016) to 90% (2015), and the corresponding range above 1 µg/m3 was 5% (2015) to 15% (2014).

Results Frequency of Wildfire-Related Pollution Events (Percentage of days with predicted 24-hr PM2.5 concentration above threshold) > 1 µg/m3 from fire-PM2.5 contribution 2013 2014 2015 2016 > 10 µg/m3 from fire-PM2.5 contribution 2013 2014 2015 2016 > 28 µg/m3 from fire-PM2.5 contribution 2013 2014 2015 2016

Related Study (1) Atmosphere 2017, 8, 179; doi:10.3390/atmos8090179 , Jeanette Reyes, George Pouliot, Wayne E. Cascio, and David Diaz-Sanchez, ES&T, 2017, 51, 6674-6682, doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b06200

Related Study (2) Paper Rappold et al. (2017) This Study Period 2008-2012 2013-2016 Domain Continental U.S. North America Model CMAQ GEM-MACH Type Retrospective Prospective Emissions SMARTFIRE v2 CWFIS / FEPS Munoz-Alpizar et al. (2017) concluded that the two studies estimated comparable exposure impacts from wildfire PM2.5 over the continental U.S.

Conclusions (1) Comparison of average monthly fire-PM2.5 surface concentration fields showed large year-to-year variations in both timing and spatial locations of wildfires between 2013 and 2016 For both Canada and the U.S., July and August had the maximum fire-PM2.5 levels, although intense wildfires can also occur in September in the western U.S., likely due to a longer summer season Monthly and seasonal analyses of the mean forecasted fire-PM2.5 suggested that, on average, over 76% of Canadians and 69% of Americans were at least minimally affected by wildfire smoke during the four-year study period Calculations of the number of days with forecasted fire-PM2.5 above concentration thresholds from 1 µg/m3 to 28 µg/m3 showed that most wildfire events over North America occurred in the western part of the U.S. and in western, northern, and central Canada

Conclusions (2) During months of extreme wildfire activity, some areas in northwestern Canada and the western U.S. had up to 20% of days where the fire-PM2.5 was > 28 µg/m3. The eastern U.S. and eastern Canada had fewer days with threshold exceedances, but most of North America was affected by fire-PM2.5 > 1 µg/m3 on at least one day per year FireWork is a valuable prognostic tool used as guidance by AQ meteorologists to issue forecasts on a daily basis, allowing advance warnings to populations at risk to reduce their exposure FireWork is also useful for retrospective analysis of past wildfire events. The statistical analyses of these forecasts over multiple years can be used by public health researchers, AQ regulators and policymakers, and others interested in wildfire impacts to understand and characterize exposure to wildfire smoke and its interannual and geographic variability

Thank you for your attention!