Arctic maritime perspectives and opportunities for cooperation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A safe and robust society – where everyone takes responsibility Norways internal analysis of laws pursuant to IDRL Guidelines Dag Olav Høgvold
Advertisements

Denmark v. Norway CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION IN THE AREA BETWEEN GREENLAND AND JAN MAYEN.
Forsvarets operative hovedkvarter National naval command of operations National Joint Headquarter Chief of naval operations Norwegian national.
U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 1 The U.S. Arctic and NOAA’s Role Overview U.S. is.
Canada-U.S. Relations in the Arctic : Conflict and Cooperation Stéphane Roussel (UQAM) Conference Northern Sovereignty and Political Geography in North.
POLICING AFRICA’S SEABORDERS Henri Fouche Tshwane University of Technology.
Navigating Risk, Challenge and Opportunity Promise of the Arctic, Seattle, WA Drummond Fraser Transport Canada, Marine Safety & Security May 29, 2013.
Kamrul Hossain Northern Institute for Environmental and Minority Law Arctic Centre, University of Lapland First Groningen-Moscow Conference on EU-Russian.
RESCUE AT SEA Esben Poulsson International Chamber of Shipping A challenge for the Shipping Industry 1.
1 ECOSOC AMR 2008 National Presentation by Belgium How does Belgium implement the international goals and commitments on sustainable development?
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
Climate Change and Future Scenarios in the Arctic A Canadian Perspective Venezia, December 2014.
What is the future for SOF in the Arctic? Nick Daugherty (USA) Jesper Vesterby (DNK) Patrick van Rooij (NLD)
Safe shipping for people and environment. Swedish & European legal framework for Maritime Security Capt. Dan Sarenius Survey and Inspection Coordinator.
Ministry for Foreign Affairs Sweden Sweden’s National Arctic approach and Arctic Council perspectives Mikael Anzén Deputy Director, MFA, Sweden Twitter:
VICE AMIRAL MOHAMMED LAGHMARI th Regional Seapower Symposium Venice, october th Regional Seapower Symposium Venice,
SOVEREIGNTY: THE AUTHORITY OF A STATE TO GOVERN ITS PEOPLE AND LAND What determines sovereignty????
REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA The water protection in the Region of Istria Dino Babić – Official Representative of the Region.
Earth Observation for Polar Monitoring A unique view of the environment, the economy, and safety Helge Tangen, Regional Director, met.no Tromso EuroArctic.
INITIAL PLANNING CONFERENCE FOR ARF DiREx 2015
“Safety in the North”, Alta August 2010 Svalbard’s Maritime Zones The (lack of) jurisdiction of Norway over foreign maritime activities in the waters.
Arctic Circle Arctic Boundary according to AMAP Arctic boundary according to AHDR.
Collaboration for Maritime Security African Union Workshop April 2012 Phillip J. Heyl Chief, Air & Maritime Security Branch (J5)
Arctic Energy Development Fran Ulmer Chair, US Arctic Research Commission USAEE Presentation July 29, 2013.
MSDI OPEN FORUM MSDI in the Baltic London, Tuesday 3rd March 2015 Jens Peter Hartmann Chair BSMSDIWG Denmark.
PROGRESS REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PROJECT “ARCTIC RESCUE” 2013 EPPR Emergency Prevention, Preparedness and Response.
Pollution prevention preparedness and response Kristján Geirsson Environment Agency of Iceland EPPR-meeting 10 Nov
International Cooperation in Cartel Investigations Regional Cooperation Hanna Witt Head of Cartel Enforcement, Swedish Competition Authority 2013 ICN Cartel.
The RAN’s perspective on the New Maritime Strategy 37 th IFPA-Fletcher Conference on National Security and Policy Commodore Vince Di Pietro, CSC, RAN Naval.
RELATED ISSUE #3 Should internationalism be pursued? Related Issue #3 Should internationalism be Pursued? Chapter 10 To what extent should be embrace nationalism?
Canada’s Arctic Council Chairmanship Development for the People of the North.
U.S. Coast Guard Partnering in Oceania
Coordinating with the International Community Strengthening Institutions: Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment of the Beaufort.
Fact Versus Fiction: Setting the Record Straight about Arctic Security Sara French Program Officer/Agente chargée des programmes Arctic Security Program/Programme.
New York 5 May 2016 Report on Legal Framework for Civil Liability for Vessel Source Oil Spills in Polar Regions LARS ROSENBERG OVERBY.
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY IN THE ARCTIC THE CASES OF GREENLAND, NUNAVUT AND THE ICC Dr. Natalia Loukacheva
Transport EU Arctic Policy, Developments from a Maritime Transport Perspective Josep A. CASANOVAS Maritime Transport & Logistics (D.1), DG MOVE European.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 13 – Fisheries International agreements.
Ed Veen Director Netherlands Coastguard International coastguard network NACGF and ECGFF.
Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries Oil Spill Contingency in a Future Perspective Interspill 2004 Norwegian Minister of Fisheries Svein Ludvigsen.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31: Foreign, security and defence.
Common Concern for the Arctic 9-10 September Ilulissat Greenland Claude Rouam DG Environment European Commission.
Greenland and Self Governance Introduction to seminar on ”Research and development in and for the Arctic – Greenland” Head of Greenland Representation.
Dr. Elisabeth Lipiatou Head of Unit Climate Change and Environmental Risks Unit Environment Directorate Research DG European Commission Way forward for.
Governance of Arctic Search and Rescue. Search and Rescue (SAR) “Search and Rescue comprises the search for, and the provision of aid to, persons, ships.
Export licensing of dual-use and military goods in the Russian Federation.
Ændr 2. linje i overskriften til AU Passata Light Tilpas dit navn og titel ved at tilgå Diasmaster under Vis i topmenuen ELLEN MARGRETHE BASSE PROFESSOR.
SCIENCE DIPLOMACY US-Russia Cooperation in the Arctic
Asia’s Transformation:
Maritime Security as an Integral Part of an
The Tripartite Working Arrangement (TWA) of EFCA, EMSA and Frontex
Aleut International Association and The Arctic Council
Law of the Sea and Dispute Resolution
Maritime Role for the Canadian Rangers
Security in the Arctic - the Icelandic Perspective
Territorial Disputes and Cross-Border Resource Management
National Interest & Arctic Sovereignty
Ocean University of China
New York 5 May 2016   Report on Legal Framework for Civil Liability for Vessel Source Oil Spills in Polar Regions LARS ROSENBERG OVERBY.
China and the Arctic Elizabeth Wishnick, Professor of Political Science, Montclair State University, Senior Research Scholar, WEAI, Columbia University.
The Climate conditions from a European perspective is the blue Arctic or High North with increased access and opportunities for social and economic development,
The Climate conditions from a European perspective is the blue Arctic or High North with increased access and opportunities for social and economic development,
Securitization of Climate Change in the Arctic The Case of Iceland
The EU Strategy for the Atlantic Region
Building Capacity on Protected Areas Law & Governance
Norwegian presentation on LRIT from a Coastal State perspective
Regulating Arctic Shipping Unilateral, Regional and Global Approaches
Royal Danish Defence College
NORDIC HYDROGRAPHIC COMMISSION (NHC)
Northern Sea Route Infrastructure
Presentation transcript:

Arctic maritime perspectives and opportunities for cooperation ARCTIC MARITIME SYMPOSIUM My COM MG Kim Jesper Jørgensen sends his regards. Unfortunately, he could not be here himself because of meetings in Copenhagen with e.g. with the US Defense Vice Chief. Arctic maritime perspectives and opportunities for cooperation CLASSIFICATION BRANCH/DIV/DATE

Arctic maritime symposium THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK The Kingdom of Denmark, including both Greenland and the Faroe Islands, is a NATO member. Denmark has approximately 5.5 mio. inhabitant and both Greenland and the Faroe Islands have between 50.000-60.000 inhabitants. Both Greenland and the Faroe Islands have self-governance with two representatives in the Danish parliament each. Greenland and the Faroe Islands are responsible for certain areas such as education, helth, minerals and ressources and trade. Denmark is overall responsible for the foreign policy, justice and the defence. Danish Joint Arctic Command covering both Greenland and the Faroe Islands was commissioned in 2012. Operational, Denmark has 4 frigates of the THETIS-Class and 3 Arctic Offshore Patrol Vessels of the KNUD RASMUSSEN-Class with icebreaking capabilities operating in the Arctic. Normally, 1 frigate is operating around the Faroe Islands and the rest of the ships are deployed to Greenland or in Denmark for maintenance. The ships main tasks are surveillance/sovereignty and to participate in daily picture compilation. Having frigates and AOPVs operating in the Arctic is not a new task – We have been present for surveillance, sovreignty, SAR and fiskery inspection for many decades. CLASSIFICATION BRANCH/DIV/DATE

New sea routes – increased activities In the last decade it became clear that global warming was going to impact the Arctic region. Many tried to raise public awareness of the dangers of global warming and called for immediate actions to curb its destructive effects on the environment. An example was Davis Guggenheim’s documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” with former presidential candidate Al Gore lecturing. In Greenland single hulled cruise ships operating in un-surveyed areas were observed and maritime authorities were notified and recommended to work for a Polar Code to regulate the ship traffic in the Arctic. The Kingdom of Denmark invited the five Arctic coastal nations bordering on the Arctic Ocean (later extended with Iceland, Finland and Sweden) to Ilulissat, Greenland, in May 2008 to discuss and sign a declaration of how to handle the consequences of the climate changes in the Arctic Ocean. The meeting was held at the political level on the 28 May 2008.

Arctic maritime symposium The ilulissat declaration ARCTIC OCEAN CONFERENCE ILULISSAT, GREENLAND, 27 – 29 MAY 2008 Signed 28 May 2008 Choosing Ilulissat or Jakobshavn which is the old Danish name for the city as the place for an Arctic Ocean Conference, was not a coincidence. Adm. Zukunft explained Tuesday how much the glacier has pulled back and because of that Ilulissat was a good place to have a meeting discussing and agreeing on consequences of global warming. Seen with Danish eyes, the Ilulissat Declaration is providing a solid foundation for a responsible management of the increased use of Arctic waters including tourism, shipping, research, resource development, the risk of accidents and to strengthen Search And Rescue capabilities and the capacity to prevent and counter maritime pollution in the Arctic Ocean. Signing the Ilulissat Declaration, the Arctic states ensured each other an appropriate response to any accident. The Arctic nations also agreed to share information and to cooperate dealing with the new challenges in the Arctic Ocean.

Arctic maritime symposium Potential expansion of the continental shelf 200 NM Agreed limit Mid-line Lomonosov ridge This slide shows the Kingdom of Denmark’s claim of the continental shelf submitted 15 Dec 2014. Russia submitted their overlapping claim 10 years before Denmark and will receive a decision from the international court in Haag 10 years before Denmark. To the best of my knowledge, Russia will have an answer this year or in 2019. With reference to the Ilulissat Declaration it is formulated, that – “the law of the sea provides for important rights and obligations concerning delineation of the outer limits of the continental shelf, and that the signing nations are committed to this legal framework and to the orderly settlement of any possible overlapping claims. Denmark is convinced that the Ilulissat Declaration was the right initiative and hope – without being naïve – that continental shelf claims will not leave to tension and conflicts in the Arctc region. Claimed area DANISH CLAIM SUBMITTED 15 DEC 2014 895.000 KM2 CLASSIFICATION

Arctic maritime symposium More potential continental shelf expansions This slide just shows (the blue borders) the total Danish continental shelf expansions claims. The yellow border shows JACO Area of interest, the red JACO area of operations and in green the areas of responsibility (the EEZ)

Arctic maritime symposium Exercises and partnerships Denmark is dedicated in different Arctic forums an especially in the Arctic Council, the Arctic Coast Guard Forum and of course in NATO.

The Arctic Coast Guard Forum has been mentioned during the symposium as an operational/tactical forum for sharing information, cooperation and a forum for planning and executing exercises. Last year Iceland hosted an Arctic SAR exercise and next year Finland will do the same as an agreed part of the rotating chair responsibilities. The ACGF is also a forum for discussions and during the last Principals Meeting in Finland Adm. Zukunft mentioned that cruise ship operators are planning to operate as far north as the North Pole in 2030. Of course this information gives food for thoughts of how to deal with a mass casualty cruiseship accident on such latitudes. Denmark sees the ACGF as a great forum to discuss such challenges.

Arctic maritime symposium Bilateral and multilateral engagement Denmark’s focus is bilateral and multilateral engagement - with the Arctic Security Forces Roundtable as an example. Denmark sees cooperation in the Arctic as the way forward. Information sharing, sharing operational and tactical procedures and exchange of personnel could or should be the way forward for better understanding and cooperation in the Arctic. CLASSIFICATION BRANCH/DIV/DATE

Arctic maritime symposium Thank you CLASSIFICATION