Clark Fork Symposium Friday April 24th 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Advertisements

Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
Background Texas Instream Flow Program Determine fish species composition and abundances in Big, Little and Black Cypress creeks Determine if changes through.
Strengthening the State- Tribal-Federal Partnership to Assess the Condition of Nations Waters.
Monty Porter - Streams/Rivers Monitoring Coordinator Jason Childress – Biological Team Leader Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) Water Quality Programs.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
The adequacy of the existing reserve system for the protection of freshwater ecosystems Janet Stein Fenner School of Environment and Society.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Stream Sampling for Benthic Macroinvertebrates What are the bugs telling us? And who understands them? Presented By: Grant De Jong Rocky Mountain Water.
Conclusion -Velocity affects the temperature, pH and DO of a stream; the greater the velocity, the greater the water quality -The positive correlation.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Comparable Biological Assessments from Different Methods and Analyses David B. Herbst 1 and Erik L. Silldorff 2 1 Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Laboratory,
Metric (Family Level) Standard Best Value (95 th or 5 th percentile) Worst Possible Value Expected Response to Degradation Total Taxa180 EPT Taxa120 %EPT91.90.
LONG-TERM WATER QUALITY DATA AND BIOGEOCHEMICAL FILTERING ALONG THE UPPER CLARK FORK RIVER, MT, USA. H. Maurice Valett 1 Marc Peipoch 1 Mike DeGrandpre.
To what extent is there excess sediment in the Middle Truckee River that impairs aquatic life use? Application of benthic macroinvertebrate bioassessment.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Site Classification for Re-calibration of the Alabama Index of Stream Macroinvertebrate Condition Ben Jessup and Jen Stamp Tetra Tech, Inc. SWPBA November.
Benthic invertebrate response to heavy metal contamination in the Panther Creek drainage (Idaho): A case study using McQuire’s Metal Tolerance Index (MTI)
Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner.
CRITICAL TECHNICAL ELEMENTS FOR A BIOASSESSMENT PROGRAM Michael T. Barbour, Tetra Tech Chris O. Yoder, MBI.
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Linda C. Schaffner AIWA Conference November 18, 2010.
Habitat Status and Trend in the Upper Columbia ESU Chapter 3 John Arterburn.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
Benthic Community Assessment Tool Development Ananda Ranasinghe (Ana) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Sediment.
1 Do traits of freshwater species predict vulnerability to climate change? Bruce Chessman Climate Change Science, NSW DECCW.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Effects of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) on Nesting Tree Swallows.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Assessments 2: What the biota can tell us about watershed condition K.E. Limburg lecture notes 26 March, 2002.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
ISEMP Data Management System. Support entire workflow Based on required functions Based on understanding of the data ISEMP Data Management System.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
DISTURBING FLOWS: RECOVERY CAPACITY OF MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGE AND TRAITS TO FLOW EXTREMES Daniela P. Cortez 1, Prof. Ross Thompson 1, Dr. Ivor Growns.
WISER Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery.
Disentangling the effects of multiple stressors in lakes; should we use littoral benthic invertebrates? Rebeka ŠILING, Gorazd URBANIČ Institute for Water.
COMPARING BIOINDICATORS TO MEASURE THE EFFICACY OF RESTORATION IN MIDDLE FORK JOHN DAY RIVER, OR Robin M. Henderson & James R. Pratt.
Dodge County Water Monitoring Update
Watershed Health Indicators
How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.
Macroinvertebrates as Water Quality Indicators on Mount Mansfield
Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Composition Over an Elevation Gradient
Environmental Studies Program
Butternut Creek Biomonitoring
State of the Basin 2005 Doc Watson UM Watershed Clinic.
John Babcock, Bruce Anderson, and Gary Ingman,
Using Bugs and GIS to Assess and Manage Watershed Health
Cain, DJ, Carter, JL, Buchwalter, DB, and Luoma, SN
Long Term Precipitation Chemistry Monitoring on Vancouver Island
Combinations (= multimetrics)
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
A Fish based index of biotic integrity for the Schelde estuary
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
Chad Larson - WDOE Daniel Marshalonis - EPA Region 10
Relationship Between NO3 and Salinity:
CLASSIFICATION TOOLS FOR BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA IN COASTAL WATERS
IBI’s: How It’s Done.
IBI’s: An Introduction
Assessing the environmental status in the Mediterranean Sea: a case-study in Saronikos Gulf to be extended to the regional sea Angel Borja (AZTI), Alexandra.
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Defining Reference Conditions Setting Class Boundaries
Classification systems
Presentation transcript:

Clark Fork Symposium Friday April 24th 2015 Temporal and Spatial Trends of Benthic Biological Integrity in the Upper Clark Fork Basin Clark Fork Symposium Friday April 24th 2015 Sean P. Sullivan1 Wease Bollman1 Daniel McGuire 2 1 Rhithron Associates, Inc. Missoula, Montana 2 McGuire Consulting, Espanola New Mexico

Outline History of benthic community sampling in the Clark Fork Basin. Current monitoring efforts across multiple agencies. Trend analysis at sentinel sites in the basin. Current longitudinal gradient of biological integrity. Conclusions and future directions

41 years of Bioassessment in the CFR Community analyses dates back to 1972 ( Canton and Chadwick, 1986*) Historical data focused on SBC and upper river. State programs pick up sampling in the early to Mid –eighties Federal and State programs ‘annually’ to present *Clark Fork Symposium (1985)

More Recent Efforts Federal monitoring program sampling 36 sampling sites from Blacktail Creek to Thompson Falls Reservoir. State Monitoring Program(s) 15 sites in the CFOU 17 sites in SSTOU

Method Heterogeneity Field: Lab: Interpretation: Quantitative v. semi quantitative Level of effort Habitats Lab: Subsampling v. whole sample analysis. Taxonomic targets Interpretation: 11 historic indices

Field Methods/ Lab Methods 4 replicate modified Hess samples ( 0.1m2) Targeted Riffles Laboratory No sub-sampling in Lab Lowest Practical Taxonomic Level Hydropsyche ( s.s. and s.l.) to species Chironomidae- Genus / species grp. Oligochaeta to Family 10 % Taxonomic and Sorting QC Synoptic Reference Collections

Data Analysis Methods Indices MVFP(Bollman,1998) MT Foothills (Bukantis, 1998) B-IBI (Karr,1996) Montana MMI (Jessup, 2006) Montana O:E (Hawkins 2006) Montana O:E (Feldman et al., 2012) Metals Tolerance Index (McGuire, 1998) “Hilsenhoff” Biotic Index (McGuire, 1998) Index of Biological Integrity (McGuire, 1998) Organic pollution subset Metals pollution subset

Data Harmonization Field Methods homogenized to 4 replicate modified Hess samples in targeted Riffles. Laboratory Methods homogenized to full sample identification and enumeration. Taxonomic harmonization is still in progress with continued QA/QC between analysts. Interpretation harmonization to McGuire IBI and subsets.

Trend Analyses Historical Trend Analysis Spatial Trend Combine historical and current data Three ‘sentinel’ locations Mann – Kendall Non- Parametric Trend Test Spatial Trend 5 year mean ( 2010-2014 10 sites Silver Bow Creek- Turah Mann-Kendall Test

Trend Analysis- CFR nr. Galen Extremely weak (R=0.2) but significant upward trends (p>0.01). 2011 decline due to high spring flow scour events? Observing recovery from more limited recruitment?

Trend Analysis Clark Fork at Deer Lodge Strong positive significant trend over time. p=>0.01 Recent years have had instream/ near stream construction likely affecting local community. Limiting factor still appears to be ‘metals’ related.

Trend Analysis Clark Fork at Turah No significant Trend. p=0.47 All but a few years are un impaired. Impaired years correlated to Metals impacts

Longitudinal Gradient Map produced by Judy Rosenbaum (RESPEC)

Conclusions Temporal Trends: Upper river trends indicate slow and steady improvement in biotic integrity. Region most susceptible to ‘natural’ disturbance regimes. Middle river shows strong positive trends in biotic integrity scores. Nutrients and metals still having some effect on community structure. Lower river shows little improvements, but relatively least impacted reach.

Conclusions Spatial Trends No statistically significant trend Observationally that the river generally improves in biotic integrity with increased distance from “source”. Mid river shows a decline in IBI scores, further investigation coming in 2015.

Discussion Increased harmonization of monitoring efforts and data in the basin has reduced duplication and increased data compatibility Refining the tools for measuring biotic integrity. Re calibration of currently used indices Use of additional regional indices (O:E) to compare to least impacted streams Similar analyses with Algal communities Diatom and Soft bodied algae Algal biovolume estimates Nutrient Increaser Taxa ( Teply and Bahls, 2006)