Downlink rates The next slide was presented to Jonathans’ flux review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alex Moiseev, 02/01/021 ACD VETO SIGNALS AND EFFICIENCY With the recent changes, the following ACD VETO signals will be generated: AEM VETO HIT MAP, created.
Advertisements

GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 1 Proposed Flight Trigger Configuration: Engines and Scheduler Table J.
1 Background: Use of TKR Trigger One-Shots individual TKR strip channels “true” when analog shaped pulse is above threshold. strips in a plane are OR’d.
S. Ritz 1 Hardware Trigger Throttle Issues Context: the triggers Purpose of throttle on TKR trigger Earlier design using TKR geographic information The.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
GLAST LAT Project Apr 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/31 Overview of End to End Runs Eduardo do Couto e Silva April 1, 2005 ( not it is not a joke, we finally.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Workshop, February 27, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 Overview Of LAT Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis.
High-Multiplicity Events Analysis Group March 28, 2005 Leon R.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting– May 27, 2005 Hiro Tajima, TKR Bad Strips 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Bad strips analysis update Hiro.
THB Flux study 12/14/05 1 Flux archeology We are digging into the detritus of the past: how could we have been confident that we had a good estimate, even.
GLAST LAT ProjectOnline Peer Review – July 21, Integration and Test A. T. Kavelaars 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I&T Integration Readiness.
GLAST LAT ProjectTrigger Scheduler, Engines, and Rates 6 Feb 2006 J. Eric Grove Naval Research Lab Washington DC Trigger Scheduler, Engines, and Rates.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
GLAST LAT Project May 25, 2006: Pre-Environmental Test Review Presentation 6 of 12 LAT Test Results 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Pre-Environmental Test.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA CD3-Critical Design Review, May 12, 2003 S. Ritz Document: LAT-PR Section 03 Science Requirements and Instrument Design.
SVAC Instrument Analysis Meeting Aug 5, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva and Anders W. Borgland 1/7 SVAC 8 tower testing+ACD Anders and Eduardo.
GLAST LAT ProjectGLAST Flight Software IDT, October 16, 2001 JJRussell1 October 16, 2001 What’s Covered Activity –Monitoring FSW defines this as activity.
Onboard Filter Update Performance after updated cuts David Wren 26 January 2004.
IA meeting, Feb. 3, 2006 Mutsumi Sugizaki TKR Noise Stdudy 1 LAT TKR Noise Study Current Status Mutusmi Sugizaki (and short comment about TOT=255 event)
Residual Background events after Rejection Cuts M total background events (GlastReleasev3r3p7) 344 residual events after Bill's rejection cuts. 342.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting– Dec 9, 2005 Takuya Kawamoto, TKR Noisy Strip determination 1 Noisy Strip determination Takuya Kawamoto (Hiroshima.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning meeting October 4, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/13 SVAC Data Taking during LAT SLAC Oct 4, 2004 Eduardo.
GLAST background review dec Simulating rates: the big picture Incoming rate into the 6 m 2 sphere: is it right? Corresponding trigger rate: implies.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb27,2006 S. Ritz Backgrounds and Trigger Rates 1 Backgrounds and Trigger Rates on Orbit S. Ritz with many contributions.
1 ACD studies: 1. Light Yield Determination for top ACD Tiles 2. Looking for holes (screws) in the ACD data Instrument Analysis Workshop VI Luis C. Reyes.
Background runs at the UW “farm” A little background: we have installed the GRID-standard condor from the other UW in Madison. –Currently 6 CPUs available,
GLAST Large Area Telescope Engineering Meeting 23 November 2004 Charge Injection Calibration James Swain Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Analysis meeting 11July05 - T. Burnett 1 Status of the Background Review DC2 prep meeting: Switch to CRflux package by Mizuno for charged particles, Earth.
ACD calibrations Pedestals Measured from online script Measure PHA w/ HV off, no charge injection Use cyclic triggers ~ ADC counts, very narrow.
ACD Calibrations in L&EO Needed Calibrations Pedestals (low and high range) Low range gains via MIP peak positions Veto and HLD discriminator set points.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago L2Cal Group at UIC: Mark Adams Bob Hirosky Rob Martin Nikos Varelas Marc Buehler (graduate student) James.
too.
T. Burnett1 GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 9, 2002 SAS Software: Sources Detector geometry model Simulation Event.
1 BFEM Trigger Diagnostics Mar 12, 2002 Tsunefumi Mizuno Note: For reference, this document includes some works already reported (pages 2-5 and 7). The.
Offline raw data format of SVD2.0 The offline raw data format of SVD2.0 is almost same as that of SVD1.0 which was developed by Krakow people. The big.
Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4.
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
Throttle Studies David Wren Analysis Group Meeting 22 March 2004.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST ACD Status. GLAST Overview McPositionHitCol AcdDigiCol AcdRecon AcdDigiAlg AcdReconAlg TkrFitTrackCol TDS Gaudi Algorithms.
20 April 2007MICE Tracker Phone Meeting1 Analysis of cosmic/self-triggerd data of station 5 Hideyuki Sakamoto MICE Tracker Phone Meeting 20 th April 2007.
GLAST LAT ProjectNovember 18, 2004 I&T Two Tower IRR 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Integration and Test Two Tower Integration Readiness Review SVAC Elliott.
GLAST LAT Project SE Test Planning Dec 7, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/27 Trigger and SVAC Tests During LAT integration Su Dong, Eduardo do Couto e Silva.
Acd Veto Latching The Acd front end electronics generate a veto primitive when a discriminator goes above threshold. But. The signal is split: One path.
More technical description:
Background Rejection Prep Work
Servo Motor Drive Velocity Tracking
AFE II Status First board under test!!.
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
Unit 2- Lesson 1 & 2- Bytes and File Sizes / Text Compression
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Signaling Compression for Push-to-talk over Cellular (PoC)
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Maki KUROSAWA VTX Group 2014 Feb 20
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
LAT Test Results GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Pre-Shipment Review
Overview Goal Study GEM variables in SVAC ntuple
Imaging crystals with TKR
Update on Laser ‘Aftershock’ Triggers
EVENT PROJECTION Minzhao Liu, 2018
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
Eduardo do Couto e Silva Feb 28, 2006
CSE 373 Data Structures and Algorithms
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
Studies of the Time over Threshold
Current Status of the VTX analysis
Shaped Digital Readout Noise in CAL
Presentation transcript:

Downlink rates The next slide was presented to Jonathans’ flux review It was based on the UW background runs, for which the generated and trigger rates are available, and which sampled a full orbit-day at 10%. An important parameter: downlink limit is 1.2 Mbit/sec (average). THB C&A presentation 12/12/05

Simulating rates: the big picture Incoming rate into the 6 m2 sphere: is it right? Corresponding trigger rate: implies 15% deadtime: too high! Downlink rate: saturates our bandwidth allocation? one full day THB C&A presentation 12/12/05

The downlink rates from the SLAC/Lyon 1B background run Note: it was not a full day If we throw out “no-cal” events here, rather than later, save a factor of two THB C&A presentation 12/12/05

What is the limit? Are we in trouble? Depends on amount of event data (including noise, which for the tracker is probably overestimated) JJ’s skill at lossless compression Current status, from JJ, via Atwood: OVERHEAD: ~12 bytes (fixed)   GEM: 40 bytes (fixed) (a little work could bring this done to <20 bytes, I'll do it at some time cause its cheap)   ACD : 7 addressing bits            5 bit hit mask (The 5 bits are-> Hit A:B side. Pha Accept A:B side, GEM Veto hit)            12 bits for each PHA side (up to 2)            example: A tile with only one PHA reporting in: 24 bits                          A tile with both       PHA's reporting in: 36 bits CAL: 32-64 bits overhead        : 4-5 bits addressing / log        : 12:17 bits for the ADC value /log (both ends)           [Empirically I am measuring about a factor of 2-2.25 compression over the data encoding           of  16 towers * (32 bits + 32 bits * nlogs)]           Example 50 logs::  64 + (5+15) * 50 bits => 133 bytes TKR: 12:13 bits per strip address           5-6  bits per TOT           Example 100 strips::         100 * 18 bits => 225 bytes THB C&A presentation 12/12/05

OK, these are (almost) linear in the number of DIGIS: what do we see for these events? THB C&A presentation 12/12/05

Apply the JJ analysis Event size analysis All events NoCal n bits   All events NoCal n bits total tota overhead 1.0 480 ACD 1.8 30 54 0.8 24 TKR* 9.8 18 176 6.7 121 CAL 19.0 20 380  20  0 1090 625 *TRK is overestimate, assuming 1 TOT/hit THB C&A presentation 12/12/05

The bottom line Preliminary! 1.2 Mbits/s / 1.1 kbit/event = 1.1 kHz event rate Preliminary! THB C&A presentation 12/12/05