The Via Negativa Starter: What is it?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Via Negativa L/O: To learn and understand what is meant by the term Via Negativa. Task One: What is God? Write a short list of what you believe God is.
Advertisements

ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to summarise the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to explain the Cosmological and Ontological.
To study Thomas Aquinas’ argument from CAUSATION as an argument for the existence of God. (SAINT) Thomas Aquinas= a 13 th Century Catholic priest, theologian.
The Ontological Argument
You must complete ALL of TASK FOUR in the homework booklet – your teacher will give you a completion date. Complete page 60 of your SPAG BOOKLET – this.
The Cosmological Argument (Causation or ‘first cause’ theory)
Via Negativa L/O: To learn and understand what is meant by the term Via Negativa. Task One: What is God? Write a short list of what you believe God is.
All: Will be able to give their own views about religion Most: Will be able to give their own views about religion and be able to define the words ‘atheist’,
You live in a goldfish pond and you are a philosophic goldfish. Not for you the normal life of eating and breeding and eating... You wonder WHY there.
Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Lesson Objective: Lesson Outcomes: Mr M Banner 2016 Grade 12 th May 2016 Starter: What does Cosmology mean to you? Title:
The Cosmological Argument
Hook: Which do you think is correct?
Knowledge Empiricism 2.
Philosophy of Religion
Write it in your books when you have cracked it.
c) Strengths and weaknesses of Cosmological Arguments:
Building Self-Esteem and Body Confidence
LO: To reflect on assessment results and areas for improvement
Self-Esteem Learning Objectives To understand what self-esteem is.
Religious responses to the verification principle
The Ontological Argument Ontological
ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to describe what is meant by ‘religious experience’ and ‘conscience’   MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to compare different interpretations.
Language Games and the Via Negativa.
Recap task Think of fifteen key terms associated with analogy Choose nine and add to the bingo grid Play bingo.
Starter Activity Rejecting the use of univocal language
LO Adding and subtracting with negative numbers RAG
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
‘It's raining cats and dogs’
Using Analogy to Understand God
Welcome back to Religious Studies
RECAP Odd one out Match them up 1. Hare 4. Hick 7. Flew 2. Swinburne
Did King Harold die at the battle of Hastings?
Can you make three connections between these pictures?
Symbol and Myth Starter: Draw
Socratic Seminar By participating in
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
What is the difference between a sign and a symbol?
Using Analogy to Understand God
In pairs, attempt to describe an object in the room by saying what it is not…. It is not red…..
DIL check 1. Complete all the tasks in the booklet up to page 10 Summary of analogy 2. Write a one page revision summary of ‘Religious language as non-
RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE.
2) Who said ‘you can’t cross the same river twice?’
The Falsification Principle
Making moral decisions - Consolidation
What is the difference between a cabbage and a machine?
LO: Analyse the JWT and explain your own view on war
AQA Theme C – Arguments for the existence of God
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
Or Can you?.
Or Can you?.
RECAP Odd one out Match them up 1. Hare 3. Hick 5. Flew 2. Swinburne
Omnipotent Deity Atheist Agnostic Omnibenevolent Polytheist Analogy
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
By the end of today’s lesson you will:
Think, pair, Share The paradox of the stone Can God make a stone that is too heavy for him to lift? Discuss in pairs.
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
By the end of today’s lesson you will
By the end of today’s lesson you will
Write down as many myths as you can think of!
Religious Experience - Miracles
Is murder wrong? A: What is murder? B: What is the law on murder in the UK? A: Do you think murder is wrong? B: Do you think murder is wrong? ‘Garment.
Argument 1 Argument 2 Argument 3
Identity Pack Session: Visible and Invisible
Recap task Think of fifteen key terms associated with analogy Choose nine and add to the bingo grid Play bingo.
How Do We Understand Place?
Argument for the existence of God
What is the ideal cup of tea like?
Think, pair, share ACTIVITY
STARTER Go over the keywords for today’s test – do you know the words and their meanings??
Presentation transcript:

The Via Negativa Starter: What is it? Lesson 1 LO’s: To understand how some thinkers have solved the problem of speaking meaningfully about God by making negative statements about what God is not. Swap over when the timer goes or the object has been guessed correctly! Starter: What is it? Describe the things in your envelope using only negative statements – your partner has to guess what it is! e.g. it is not tall, it is not green, it does not have a tail. HWK TASK 7 in your REligious Language HWK Booklet (pg.10) Fact Box: The via negativa is also known as the apophatic way, particularly in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

Task 1: The benefits of saying nothing… God is greater than anything we can comprehend – therefore statements about Him cannot be made accurately! Language applied to God is equivocal. Saying ‘God is good’ and ‘John is good’ are two very different things. We still don't know what God is... Instead we say what God is not! By making a number of negative statement we may arrive at a knowledge , albeit limited, of what God is! Task 1: Attempt to write a description of God in negative statements. Do you think it works? A priori: Ontological argument A posteriori: Design and Cosmological Arguments

Starter Activity TASK- Draw up a list of characteristics that you believe a God has to have. Aim for at least 6 ideas. 1. List characteristics on board 2. Ask extension questions 3. Explain idea about God being ineffable 4. Ask students for potential ways around the problem (i.e. speak about God in negative terms) EXTENSION- In your personal view, do any of these descriptions truly capture the nature of God? Why or why not?

Date How does the Via Negativa approach work? Learning Objectives: To describe how the Via Negativa approach works. To explain how scholars have supported this approach to describing God. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach.

What is the Via Negativa? The Via Negativa suggests we can only talk about God in negative terms e.g. ‘God is not evil’. Joined with many other similar statements, this can actually tell us something about God. Q: What kind of statements could be given to describe God in negative terms? Negative terms (phrases that deny rather than confirm) E.g. When we use the term ‘God is good’ we cannot begin to fathom how good the goodness of God is. Clarify – it does not mean to criticise God in any way! TOP TIP: In the exam it can also be referred to as the ‘Apophatic Way’! LO: To describe how the Via Negativa approach works.

Task 2: Via Negativa - Roots in Plato The idea of the via negativa has been influential in both Christianity and Judaism. However, it came initially from Plato! Plotinus Moses Maimonides Pseudo-Dionysius Strengths Weaknesses

Water Light Bulb Tree Leprechaun Unicorn Giraffe

What is the Via Negativa? TASK- With your partner discuss the following questions: Why might supporters of this approach argue that God cannot be spoken of in positive terms? Why might they argue that, therefore, the only approach is to talk about God in negative terms? E.g. When we use the term ‘God is good’ we cannot begin to understand how good the goodness of God is. Clarify – it does not mean to criticise God in any way! LO: To describe how the Via Negativa approach works.

LO: To describe how the Via Negativa approach works. (i) Why might supporters of this approach argue that God cannot be spoken of in positive terms? (ii) Why might they argue that, therefore, the only approach is to talk about God in negative terms? God cannot be spoken of in positive terms as God is transcendent (beyond the confines of time and space). To use human language to describe God would limit our understanding of him. Q: Do you think humans can really understand what it means for God to be ‘all-knowing’? God should be spoken in negative terms as it is less limiting. This is because they descriptions do not have to be limited by our understanding. Q: Would you agree that ‘God is not bad’ is less limiting than ‘God is good’? LO: To describe how the Via Negativa approach works.

What is the Via Negativa? TASK- Take the following Positive Attributes commonly associated with God and write them in such a way as to conform with the Via Negativa. God is good God is just God is all-loving God is forgiving EXTENSION- Do you think to speaking about God in negative terms is less limiting than using positive terms? Explain your opinion. LO: To describe how the Via Negativa approach works.

How have scholars supported the Via Negativa? TASK- Produce a bullet-pointed fact file on your allocated scholars’ view. It must explain why they believe God cannot be described in positive terms. Pseudo-Dionysuius Thomas Aquinas Moses Maimodes LO: To explain how scholars have supported this approach to describing God.

Extension Tasks Confident: Evaluate any weaknesses you can come up with for your chosen scholar’s view. Very Confident: St Augustine, a Christian scholar, once stated ‘If you comprehend, it is not God. If you are able to comprehend, it is because you mistook something else for God’. How can this act as support for the Via Negativa approach in describing God? St. Augustine is arguing that it is not possible for humans to truly understand God. If someone thinks they can, then they are mistaken. LO: To explain how scholars have supported this approach to describing God.

Peer Teaching TASK: One person will teach and explain their scholar’s view. Everyone else will listen and summarise it into their notes. Pseudo-Dionysuius Thomas Aquinas Moses Maimodes LO: To explain how scholars have supported this approach to describing God.

‘The Via Negativa provides a way to truly understand God’ TASK- Working in pairs, come up with a set of strengths and weaknesses. Strengths Weaknesses Is human language really capable? Can humans really understand the mystery of God? What interpretation issues might it avoid? Do we actually gain an understanding about God? How do theists normally speak about God? How does it oppose religious experience? LO: To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach.

LO: To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach. Strengths Weaknesses It results in a limited understanding of God. It does not reflect how theists speak about God. It can be seen as a logical contradiction – are you really describing God at all? It opposes the idea of revelations about the nature of God (e.g. through religious experiences) It avoids the pitfalls of using inadequate human language to describe God. It conveys the essential mystery and transcendence of God. It avoids the interpretation issues of using positive language (e.g. what does it mean for God to be all-loving?) LO: To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach.

Date How does the Via Negativa approach work? Learning Objectives: To describe how the Via Negativa approach works. To explain how scholars have supported this approach to describing God. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach.

Plenary TASK- Answer the BIG QUESTION below, referring to scholarly arguments for and against your point of view. To what extent does the Via Negativa allow us to more fully understand God?

Consolidation: REad a friends sheet. Add in 3 pieces of information to help them develop their work! Use a different colour