Electronic Structure Theory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Computational Chemistry NSF Computational Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering Pan-American Advanced Studies Institutes (PASI) Workshop.
Advertisements

Wave function approaches to non-adiabatic systems
0 Jack SimonsJack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah Electronic Structure Theory Session 7.
The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems
Molecular Bonding Molecular Schrödinger equation
Molecular Quantum Mechanics
Introduction to Molecular Orbitals
Chapter 3 Electronic Structures
Lecture 23 Born-Oppenheimer approximation (c) So Hirata, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This material has been developed.
1 Cold molecules Mike Tarbutt. 2 Outline Lecture 1 – The electronic, vibrational and rotational structure of molecules. Lecture 2 – Transitions in molecules.
Separating Electronic and Nuclear Motions The Born-Oppenheimer Approximation All Computational Chemistry rests on a fundamental assumption called.
Quantum Mechanics Discussion. Quantum Mechanics: The Schrödinger Equation (time independent)! Hψ = Eψ A differential (operator) eigenvalue equation H.
Conical Intersections Spiridoula Matsika. The study of chemical systems is based on the separation of nuclear and electronic motion The potential energy.
Femtochemistry: A theoretical overview Mario Barbatti III – Adiabatic approximation and non-adiabatic corrections This lecture.
Optical potential in electron- molecule scattering Roman Čurík Some history or “Who on Earth can follow this?” Construction of the optical potential or.
Hartree-Fock Theory Patrick Tamukong North Dakota State University
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Atomic units The atomic units have been chosen such that the fundamental electron properties are all equal to one atomic unit. (me=1, e=1, = h/2 = 1,
Chapter 6: A Qualitative Theory of Molecular Organic Photochemistry December 5, 2002 Larisa Mikelsons.
0 Jack SimonsJack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah Electronic Structure Theory Session 3.
Predoc’ school, Les Houches,september 2004
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012 Karine Chesnel.
0 Jack SimonsJack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah Electronic Structure Theory Lecture Schedule 1.
MODULE 26 (701) RADIATIONLESS DEACTIVATION OF EXCITED STATES We have used terms such as "internal conversion" and "intersystem crossing" without thinking.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Evolution of Many Particle Systems 3.
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 6. The theory of molecular orbitals for the description of nanosystems (part II) The Hartree-Fock method applied.
MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 6.The theory of molecular orbitals for the description of nanosystems (part II) The density matrix.
Chemistry 700 Lectures. Resources Grant and Richards, Foresman and Frisch, Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods (Gaussian Inc., 1996)
Last hour: Electron Spin Triplet electrons “avoid each other”, the WF of the system goes to zero if the two electrons approach each other. Consequence:
0 Jack SimonsJack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah Electronic Structure Theory Session 8.
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 6. The theory of molecular orbitals for the description of nanosystems (part II) Perturbational methods for dealing.
0 Jack SimonsJack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah Electronic Structure Theory Session 5.
Lecture 5. Many-Electron Atoms. Pt
Lecture 22 Spin-orbit coupling. Spin-orbit coupling Spin makes an electron act like a small magnet. An electron orbiting around the nucleus also makes.
Lecture 8. Chemical Bonding
0 Jack SimonsJack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah Electronic Structure Theory Session 6.
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Restricted and Unrestricted Hartree-Fock method Sudarshan Dhungana Phys790 Seminar (Feb15,2007)
Time Dependent Perturbation Theory
0 Jack SimonsJack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah Electronic Structure Theory Session 12.
Lecture 9. Many-Electron Atoms
Ch.1. Elementary Quantum Chemistry
Lecture 12. Potential Energy Surface
Molecular Bonding Molecular Schrödinger equation
Ground State of the He Atom – 1s State
Structure of Presentation
Electronic Structure Theory
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Time Dependent Perturbation Theory
Computational Chemistry:
Non-degenerate Perturbation Theory
Lecture 4 Intramolecular energy transfer
Brief Quantum Mechanics (QM) Review
Statistical Mechanics and Multi-Scale Simulation Methods ChBE
Electronic Structure Theory
Electronic Structure Theory
Electronic Structure Theory
Quantum Two.
Electronic Structure Theory
Electronic Structure Theory
Electronic Structure Theory
Electronic Structure Theory
Electronic Structure Theory
Electronic Structure Theory
Hartree Self Consistent Field Method
By- Prof. R.S. Gupta GOVERNMENT (AUTONOMOUS) P.G. COLLEGE
In the BOA, we neglect the nuclear kinetic energy
Cooper Pairs In the 1950s it was becoming clear that the superelectrons were paired ie there must be a positive interaction that holds a pair of electrons.
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

Electronic Structure Theory TSTC Session 1 1. Born-Oppenheimer approx.- energy surfaces 2. Mean-field (Hartree-Fock) theory- orbitals 3. Pros and cons of HF- RHF, UHF 4. Beyond HF- why? 5. First, one usually does HF-how? 6. Basis sets and notations 7. MPn, MCSCF, CI, CC, DFT 8. Gradients and Hessians 9. Special topics: accuracy, metastable states Jack Simons Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah

H(r,R) (r,R,t) = i ∂(r,R,t)/∂t, The Schrödinger equation for N electrons and M nuclei of a molecule: H(r,R) (r,R,t) = i ∂(r,R,t)/∂t, or, if H is t-independent, ((r,R,t) = (r,R) exp(-iEt/)) H(r,R) (r,R) = E (r,R) |(r,R)|2 gives probability density for finding electrons at r = r1r2 r3 ... rN and nuclei at R1 R2 R3 ...RM.

H contains electronic kinetic energy: TM= -2/2 j=1,N me-1 j2 Nuclear kinetic energy: TM= -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 electron-nuclei Coulomb potentials: – VeM = -j=1,MZj k=1,N e2/|rk-Rj| Note the signs! nuclear-nuclear Coulomb repulsions: + VMM = j<k=1,M ZjZke2/|Rk-Rj| and electron-electron Coulomb repulsions: + Vee= j<k=1,Ne2/rj,k It can contain more terms if, for example, external electric (e.g., k=1,N erkE) or magnetic fields –(e/2me)be k=1,N SkB are present What is the reference zero of Hamiltonian energy?

H0 (r|R) =EK(R) (r|R) In the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) approximation/separation, we (first) ignore the TM motions of the nuclei (pretend the nuclei are fixed at specified locations R) and solve H0 (r|R) =EK(R) (r|R) the so-called electronic Schrödinger equation. H0 contains all of H except TM (Te plus all of the potential energy terms). This is why we say we “freeze the nuclei” in making the BO approximation. We don’t really freeze them; we just solve first for the motions of the electrons at some specified (i.e., frozen set of nuclear positions) R values, and we account for the motions of the nuclei later. Why? Electrons move fast compared to nuclei.

(r,R) = K K(r|R) K(R). Because H0 is a Hermitian operator in r-space, its eigenfunctions form a complete and orthonormal set of functions of r < L(r|R)|K(r|R)> = dL,K (note- the integration is only over dr1drr…drN) SK |K(r|R)>< K(r}R)| = 1 (for any values of R) So,  the r-dependence of can be expanded in the {K}: (r,R) = K K(r|R) K(R). The K(r|R) depend on R because H0 does through j=1,MZj k=1,N e2/|rk-Rj| + j<k=1,M ZjZke2/|Rk- Rj| The K(R) also depend on R.

[H0 –2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 -E] K K(r|R) K(R) = 0 This expansion ((r,R) = K K(r|R) K(R)) can then be substituted into H(r,R) (r,R) = E (r,R) [H0 –2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 -E] K K(r|R) K(R) = 0 to produce equations for the K(R) by multiplying by < L(r,R)| and integrating over dr1dr2…drN : 0 = [EL(R) -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 -E] L(R) + K< L(r|R)| -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 K(r|R)> K(R) + K< L(r|R)| -2j=1,M mj-1 j K(r|R)> j K(R) These are called the coupled-channel equations.

0 = [EL(R) -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 -E] L(R) If we ignore all of the non-BO terms K< L(r|R)| -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 K(r|R)> K(R) + K< L(r|R)| -2j=1,M mj-1 j K(r|R)> j K(R) we obtain a SE for the vib./rot./trans. motion on the Lth energy surface EL(R) 0 = [EL(R) -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 -E] L(R) The translational part of L(R) separates out (e.g., exp(iPR/)) and won’t be discussed further.

[EL(R) -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 -EL,J,M,] L,J,M, (R) = 0 Each electronic state L has its own set of rot./vib. wave functions and energies: [EL(R) -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 -EL,J,M,] L,J,M, (R) = 0 This is the electronic-vibrational-rotational separation one sees in textbooks.

The non-BO couplings K< L(r|R)| -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 K(r|R)> K(R) + K< L(r|R)| -2j=1,M mj-1 j K(r|R)> j K(R) can induce transitions among the BO states (radiationless transitions). When the nuclear motions are treated classically, these wave functions are replaced by trajectories on the two surfaces.

The surfaces drawn below are eigenvalues of the electronic SE H0 (r|R) =EK(R) (r|R) where H0 contains all but the nuclear kinetic energy. Such surfaces are called adiabatic. Each surface adiabatically evolves as the geometry is changed and T2 is always above T1.

K< L(r|R)| -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 K(r|R)> K(R) Sometimes, one leaves out of H0 some small terms V (e.g., spin-orbit coupling A Sk Sk Lk ) in defining the BO states. The resulting BO states are called diabatic. One then includes the non-BO couplings K< L(r|R)| -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 K(r|R)> K(R) + K< L(r|R)| -2j=1,M mj-1 j K(r|R)> j K(R) as well as couplings K< L(r|R)|V|K(r|R)> K(R) due to the “ignored terms”. Singlet-triplet diabatic states’ curve crossing

Sometimes, one leaves out of H0 some small terms that couple different electronic configurations (e.g., np* or pp*) in defining the BO states. The resulting BO states are also called diabatic. At geometries where these diabatic states cross, the couplings K< L(r|R)|V|K(r|R)> are especially important to consider.

Again, one includes the non-BO couplings K< L(r|R)| -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 K(r|R)> K(R) + K< L(r|R)| -2j=1,M mj-1 j K(r|R)> j K(R) as well as couplings K< L(r|R)|V|K(r|R)> K(R) due to the “ignored terms”.

Can adiabatic BO surfaces cross? Suppose that all but two exact BO states have been found and consider two orthogonal functions fK(r|R) and fL(r|R) that span the space of the two “missing” exact BO states. Form a 2x2 matrix representation of H0 within the space spanned by these two functions: <|H0|> -E <|H0|L> <L|H0|> <L|H0|L> -E det = 0 E2 –E(HK,K+HL,L) +HK,K HL,L –HK,L2 = 0 E = ½{(HK,K+HL,L) ±[(HK,K-HL,L)2 +4HK,L]1/2} The two energies can be equal only if both HK,K(R) = HL,L(R) and HK,L(R) = 0 at some geometry R. R is a 3N-6 dim. space; so the “seam” of intersection is a space of 3N-8 dimensions.

BO energy surfaces have certain critical points to be aware of Minima (all gradients vanish and all curvatures are positive characteristic of stable geometries Transition states (all gradients vanish and all but one curvature are positive; one is negative) characteristic of transition states.

Summary: Basic ingredients in BO theory are: Solve H0 (r|R) =EK(R) (r|R) at specified R for states K and L “of interest”. Keep an eye out for geometries R* where EK and EL intersect or come close. Solve [EL(R) -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 -EL,J,M,] L,J,M, (R) = 0 or compute classical trajectories on the EL and EK surfaces. Stoppng here {(r,R) = K(r|R) K(R) or (r,R) = L(r|R) L(R)} = pure BO To go beyond the BO approximation, compute all of the couplings: K< L(r|R)| -2/2 j=1,M mj-1 j2 K(r|R)> K(R) + K< L(r|R)| -2j=1,M mj-1 j K(r|R)> j K(R) K< L(r|R)|V|K(r|R)> K(R) and Evaluate the effects of the couplings on the nuclear-motion state L(R) or on the classical trajectory coupling surface EL(R) to EK(R). How is this done?