Toy Monte Carlo for the Chromatic Correction in the Focusing DIRC Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Maximum Likelihood Method
Advertisements

Light, Reflection, & Mirrors
Parametric Equations Local Coordinate Systems Curvature Splines
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Reflection and Refraction of Light
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
Reflection and Refraction. Reflection  Reflection occurs when light bounces off a surface.  There are two types of reflection – Specular reflection.
David Doll. Beyond SM theories Mark Wise paper BBU starting point and expansion Look at 2.24 and 2.26 to see difference between kinetic and pole scheme.
Ran my analysis software for position 1-6 from 2006 run. Same data set shown by Jerry at Vienna but my own analysis code version. Still no treatment of.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
Chapter 23 Mirrors and Lenses.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill CHAPTER 6 The Normal Distribution.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
880.P20 Winter 2006 Richard Kass Propagation of Errors Suppose we measure the branching fraction BR(Higgs  +  - ) using the number of produced Higgs.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Position Sensitive SiPMs for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters C.Woody BNL January 17, 2012.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
APEX Septum Analysis G.M. Urciuoli. Comparison between PREX septum field (from SNAKE input), and APEX septum field (from TOSCA simulations). Y axis.
Background Subtraction and Likelihood Method of Analysis: First Attempt Jose Benitez 6/26/2006.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Simulations Report E. García, UIC. Run 1 Geometry Radiator (water) 1cm x 2cm x 2cm with optical properties Sensitive Volume (hit collector) acrylic (with.
The amount of reflection depends on how different the media are.
Scan ~100 bar entry positions with laser diode measures transmitted intensity (relative to reference intensity) determine attenuation length (Λ) by aiming.
Adam Blake, June 9 th Results Quick Review Look at Some Data In Depth Look at One Anomalous Event Conclusion.
RICH MEETING - CERN - April 21 st 2004 Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Variation of Refractive Index inside an Aerogel Block Davide Perego.
CHAPTER- 3.2 ERROR ANALYSIS. 3.3 SPECIFIC ERROR FORMULAS  The expressions of Equations (3.13) and (3.14) were derived for the general relationship of.
GEOMETRICAL OPTICS. Laws of Reflection Laws of Refraction.
R. Kass/W03 P416 Lecture 5 l Suppose we are trying to measure the true value of some quantity (x T ). u We make repeated measurements of this quantity.
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
A Simple Monte Carlo to understand Cerenkov photons propagation and light collection in a single crystal equipped with two PMs Alessandro Cardini / INFN.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
PhD thesis: Simulation & Reconstruction for the PANDA Barrel DIRC Official name: Open charm analysis tools Supervisor: Prof. Klaus Peters Maria Patsyuk.
Geometrical Optics.
Preliminary Analysis of the New Focusing DIRC Prototype Beam Data
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Topic 1: Measurement and uncertainties 1.2 Uncertainties and errors
The Maximum Likelihood Method
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
B. Meadows University of Cincinnati
FDIRC MC Studies: PMT Coupling Options
Light, Reflection, & Mirrors
Observation of the DsJ(2463)Dspo & Confirmation of the DsJ(2317)Dspo
The Maximum Likelihood Method
Time-dependent analyses at D0-D0 threshold
Simulation for Fast Focusing DIRC R&D
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Light Big Idea: Electromagnetic Radiation, which includes light, is a form of radiant energy possessing properties of both waves and zero-mass particles.
The Maximum Likelihood Method
Light Big Idea: Electromagnetic Radiation, which includes light, is a form of radiant energy possessing properties of both waves and zero-mass particles.
RICH simulation for CLAS12
IMAGE FORMATION e.g. lens, mirors
Rays, Mirrors, Lenses, and Prisms
TORCH – a Cherenkov based Time-of-Flight Detector
Progress on the Focusing DIRC R&D
Software Development for the PANDA Barrel DIRC
MC simulation of the DIRC prototype
Monte Carlo simulation of the DIRC prototype
Light, Reflection, & Mirrors
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
Evaluating Algebraic Expressions
Latest results of the G4 simulation
Light, Reflection, & Mirrors
/ Separation and the New Dirc
Presentation transcript:

Toy Monte Carlo for the Chromatic Correction in the Focusing DIRC Data Jose Benitez 8/29/2006

Outline Compare Resolutions of Focusing DIRC with BaBar DIRC. Toy Monte Carlo: In this example photons will be generated from beam position 1 in bar and the SOB path length will not be taken into account. Reconstruct using ultimate Focusing DIRC resolutions (using 6x6mm pixels). Apply Method1 of b resolution calculation. Show results as function of photon path length. Show new method (Method2) of calculating b resolution.

Resolution Comparison With BaBar DIRC Photon Generation Resolution Comparison With BaBar DIRC Angular (q) Resolution BaBar DIRC (mrad) Focusing DIRC (mrad) Tracking ~1 Transport Along Bar ~3 Bar Size ~4.1 ~.5 Pixel Size ~5.5 Other ~2.4 Total sq = ~7.9 ~6.8 Pixel Size resolution is for 6x6mm pads (slot4). Chromatic Smearing is irrelevant in this model. Path length resolution depends both q and f resolution. Timing Resolution BaBar Chromatic Smearing=5.4mrad, FD Chromatic Smearing=3.5 mrad. sT= ~1700 ps ~100 ps Photon Path Length Resolution sL/L= >1% ~1%

Toy Monte Carlo

Photon Track Description ˆ PMTs mirror q z0 b lb The photon track is fully described by the following variables. z0 , n , b, l, q, j, L, v, T not all independent. ˆ In this toy Monte Carlo I specialize to photons with the following parameters: z0 for beam position 1 n normal to the bar. b=1 for 10GeV electrons j fixed for indirect photons traveling straight down the bar, so no side bounces only up down bounces. These parameters are adequate for photons detected in slot 4. ˆ We are left with the following variables to vary: l, q, L, v, T

Wavelength Generation: l 1. Determine wavelength distribution at production. 2. Find all wavelength dependent efficiencies in the detector. 3. Multiply above distributions to get final distribution.

Generation of Theta q The Angle q at which the photons are produced is given by the Cherenkov equation: where b=1 and n(l) is the index of refraction of the bar: mean=1.4697 rms=.0059 mean=822mrad rms=3.7mrad l in mm in this formula.

Generation of Photon Speed: v Photon Generation Generation of Photon Speed: v The speed of a photon with a given wavelength traveling inside the bar is given by: where mean=1.5139 rms=.0196 mean=.6607 rms=.0085

Generation of the Photon Path Length L and Propagation Time T Given that the particle track is perpendicular to the bar and that we are considering photons traveling straight down the bar, the total path length for indirect (mirror reflected) photons is given by: Finally the propagation time is given by: mean=9.2m rms=.032m mean=46.5ns rms=.4396ns

Reconstruction: With the Focusing DIRC we are able to measure the following observables : q , L , T from which we can calculate the necessary quantities: q, v mean=9.2m rms=.098m mean=46.5ns rms=.4509ns mean=822mrad rms=7.7mrad mean=.6607 rms=.0109 Monte Carlo _ PDF Projection Monte Carlo _ PDF Projection

Correlation of q with v Distribution with Distribution with sq=.5mrad, sv /c0=.5e-3 l Efficiency Off (300nm<l<650nm) Distribution with sq=.5mrad, sv /c0=.5e-3 l Efficiency On PDF used in this Toy Monte Carlo to calculate b. b is varied between .93 and 1.07. sq=6.8mrad sv /c0=1.5e-3 l Efficiency On This Toy Monte Carlo

Results: sb=7.74e-3 This Example: sq=6.8mrad sT=100ps sL / L=1% L~9.2m BaBar DIRC As Function of L: sq=6.8mrad Focusing DIRC For explanation of Method2 see later slides. These numbers are equivalent to ones obtained using Method1.

Conclusions This toy Monte Carlo shows that this method of reconstructing our data actually works. The path length error is actually taking a significant amount of chromatic correction; about half of it. However there is not much we can do about, this error is determined by the pixel size as well as other angular smearing.

Method 2 of b Resolution Calculation Suppose you had a detector fixed at some angle q0 and which could only detect photons with speed v0. Also assume this detector has errors in the measurements of q0 and v0 equal to sq and sv respectively. Consider the following question: What is the b of the particle which produced your measurements? Answer: As you might expect there is not a unique b which produced your measurements because you have errors. Rather there is a distribution of b’s which can generate (q0,v0 ), this distribution of b’s is given by the PDF evaluated at q=q0 and v=v0: PDF(b,q=q0,v=v0). Comments: In this method we are using the PDF in “reverse mode”. Earlier I used the PDF with fixed b=1 to generate a 2D distribution which describes our measurements of q and v, now I am doing the opposite. I know, for example that q=822mrad and v=.66c corresponds to b=1, so I can use the PDF to generate a Gaussian distribution centered at b=1, the sigma of this distribution is non other than the b resolution of a detector which can measure q an v with resolutions sq and sv. This method provides a very quick way of calculating the b resolution. In fact the b resolutions in the previous slides (as a function of path length) were calculated using this method, Method1 is very time consuming. I believe what is going on behind this method is that we are just projecting the PDF onto the b axis.

Example: sb=7.78e-3 This Example: sq=6.8mrad sT=100ps sL / L=1% L~9.2m q0=.822mrad v0=.66c As Function of L: sq=6.8mrad sT=100ps sL / L=1% q0=.822mrad v0=.66c The small differences (~.6%) can be caused by statistics and/or fit errors.