Director’s Review November 2003

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Gilchriese US ATLAS Pixel Meeting July 18-19, 2002 UC Santa Cruz.
Advertisements

ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting ATLAS Detector Upgrade Opportunities M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
M. Gilchriese Mechanics Labor and Disk Sectors US Pixel Meeting November 2001.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
March 20, 2001M. Garcia-Sciveres - US ATLAS DOE/NSF Review1 M. Garcia-Sciveres LBNL & Module Assembly & Module Assembly WBS Hybrids Hybrids WBS.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Upgrade R&D August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Introduction January 2008.
DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 WBS 1.1 Silicon Subsystem Abe Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
M. Gilchriese May Physics Division M. Barnett, A. Ciocio, S. Dardin, K. Einsweiler, V. Fadeyev, M. Garcia- Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, C.
P i x e l C a r m e l Sept. 9, 2002M. Garcia-Sciveres - The ATLAS Pixel Detector1 The ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel 2002 Workshop M. Garcia-Sciveres.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Project N. Hartman LBNL 1 Alexis Smith Intern Progress Report Neal Hartman, March 25, 2003.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Director’s Review November 6, 2002.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
Background Physicist in Particle Physics. Data Acquisition and Triggering systems. Specialising in Embedded and Real-Time Software. Since 2000 Project.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS DoE Review May M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS LBNL Group M. Barnett, V. Chang, A. Ciocio, A. Clark, D. Costanzo, S. Dardin, A.Deisher,
M. Gilchriese ATLAS HEPAP March 6, 2003 M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS LBNL Group C. Anderson, M. Barnett, V. Chang, A. Ciocio, A. Clark, D. Costanzo, F. Goozen.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
ATLAS PIXEL SYSTEM OVERVIEW M. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 11, 1999.
Silicon Module Tests The modules are tested in the production labs. HIP is is participating in the rod quality tests at CERN. The plan of HIP CMS is to.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS DoE Review May 7, 2002 M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS LBNL Group F. Goozen J. Richardson M. Barnett, A. Ciocio, D. Costanzo, S. Dardin, K.
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Pixel Upgrade Thoughts on US Role.
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS /March 2001 WBS Pixel Overview and WBS Pixel Mechanics M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman LBNL.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Services Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman, A Smith, LBNL S. Coelli,
M. Gilchriese Items from Talks U.S. Pixel Meeting Santa Cruz July 2003.
R. Boyd 1 February  Dr. M. Saleem  D. Jana  M. R. Meera Labbai  R. Boyd.
ATLAS Pixel Detector July 2003 SC Pixel Meeting N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube WBS Santa Cruz Cost Workshop July 9, 2003.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2002 N. Hartman LBNL 1 Pixel Support Tube: Cost and Production Schedule September 2002.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Silicon M&OWBS 3.1 August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
Introduction S. Rajagopalan August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting.
CMS 1.Goal of the experiment CMS is a general purpose apparatus for LHC designed to study the physics of p-p collisions at the center-of- mass energy of.
Jan 24, 2005Tracking Upgrades Welcome and Agenda Carl Haber 1 US ATLAS: Meeting on SLHC Tracking Upgrades Jan 2005 Lawrence Berkeley Lab Welcome.
Ideas for Super LHC tracking upgrades 3/11/04 Marc Weber We have been thinking and meeting to discuss SLHC tracking R&D for a while… Agenda  Introduction:
David M. Lee Forward Vertex Detector Cost, Schedule, and Management Plan Participating Institutions Organizational plan Cost Basis R&D Costs.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS DoE Review February M. Gilchriese 2 ATLAS LBNL Group J. Alonso*, M. Barnett, A. Ciocio, A. Clark*, D. Costanzo, S. Dardin, A.
Argonne’s Rôle in ZEUS José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DOE Visit, Germantown, March 11 th, 2004.
M. Gilchriese WBS Pixel System DoE/NSF Review May 2003.
Steinar Stapnes, LHCC June The ATLAS inner detector TRT endcap A+B TRT endcap C TRT barrel SCT barrel SCT endcap Pixels uWhole ID sits inside bore.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
Detector building Notes of our discussion
LHC Science Goals & Objectives
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
P. Morettini Towards Pixel TDR PM - ITk Italia - Introduction 8/2/2017.
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
June 22, 2017 Burkhard Schmidt for the DT coordination team
S. Rajagopalan August 28, 2003 US ATLAS Computing Meeting
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
The DESY ATLAS Group The Group and ALFA Physics SLHC upgrade
Valerio Re (INFN-Pavia) on behalf of the RD53 collaboratios
CMS Goal of the experiment
ATLAS DoE Review February 2004.
ATLAS: Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger
P. Calafiura, C. Day, C. Leggett, J. Milford, D. Quarrie, C. Tull
Yasuhiro Okada, Executive Director, KEK
Update on ATLAS insertable B-layer
HL-LHC upgrade at IPHC news
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

Director’s Review November 2003 ATLAS Director’s Review November 2003

ATLAS LBNL Group J. Alonso, M. Barnett, A. Ciocio, A. Clark, D. Costanzo, S. Dardin, A. Deisher, M. Dobbs, K. Einsweiler, R. Ely, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, F. Goozen, C. Haber, J. Haller, I. Hinchliffe, H.-C. Kaestli, S. Lee, S. Loken, J. Lys, R. Madaras, F. McCormack, J. Muelmenstaedt, J. Richardson, A. Saavedra, M. Shapiro, J. Siegrist, G. Stavropoulos, G. Trilling, S. Vahsen, J. Virzi, T. Weber, R. Witharm Physics Division and UC Berkeley E. Anderssen, L. Blanquart, N. Hartman, J. Hellmers, T. Johnson, D. Jones, J. Joseph, E. Mandelli, G. Meddeler, R. Post, R.Powers, A. Smith, C. Tran, J. Wirth, G. Zizka Engineering Division P. Calafiura, W. Lavrijsen, C. Leggett, M. Marino, D. Quarrie NERSC Physicist Postdoc Grad Student Undergraduate Engineer Technician

ATLAS Overview Production is complete or in progress for most ATLAS components. Underground installation has been underway for some months. The schedule continues to be tight, but it is feasible for ATLAS to be ready for first LHC beam as planned in 2007. http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/TCOORD/Activities/TcOffice/Scheduling/Installation/UX15webcams.html

ATLAS Detector Inner Tracking Detector

ATLAS Tracking Silicon pixels Silicon strips(SCT) Straw tubes with transition radiation(TRT)

Silicon Strip Detector(SCT) SCT Barrel Module About 6x106 channels, 60m2 Radiation hardness up to 10 MRad(roughly a decade at 1034 luminosity). About 4000 modules to be built world-wide. Production is well underway. Integration with mechanical structures, cables etc to begin in 2004 Silicon detector Integrated circuits Hybrid Strip pitch 80(barrel), 12cm long, noise about 1500e-

Pixel Detector LHC radiation levels at 1034cm-2sec-1 prevent long-term operation of silicon strip detectors for R< 25 cm. Pixel detectors have much smaller cell size, lower capacitance and thus noise, that results in signal-to-noise(unirradiated) about 10 times better than silicon strip detectors.. Critical for tracking and finding secondary vertices(b-tagging) New technology for hadron colliders. Pixel size 50x400 About 108 channels About 1,000 modules Noise about 150e-

Current LBNL Roles in ATLAS Silicon strip detector Test system for integrated circuits(ICs) completed and nearly all ICs tested. Module production for barrel region is well underway. Strong collaboration with UC Santa Cruz in ICs and module production. All VME readout boards for SCT(and pixels) in collaboration with Wisconsin. Pixel detector Leadership roles in electronics, modules and mechanics Production complete or underway of mechanical supports, silicon detectors, ICs and hybrids Module preproduction underway, final production about to begin Collaborate with Albany, Iowa State, New Mexico, Ohio State, Oklahoma Software, computing and physics simulation Lead role in the development of the Athena framework Lead role in development and maintenance of physics simulation tools. U.S. Physics Coordinator. Overall ATLAS software coordinator.

Highlights Since Last Review Most of the pixel detector components are in production or complete. In particular, the critical path item for the pixel detector, the front-end electronics, has been led by LBNL and is in production. About ½ of the silicon strip modules are started in the production pipeline and about 1/3 are done. The ATLAS software organization has been improved. D. Quarrie is the overall Software Project Leader. ATLAS has completed a significant data challenge DC1 and re-evaluation of the physics potential of ATLAS(Physics Workshop) in which LBNL had a major role. M. Barnett re-elected to be outreach co-coordinator for ATLAS.

SCT at LBNL LBNL designed and built custom, high-speed test systems for the SCT integrated circuits (ABCDs), about 1000 wafers. Nearly all of the ICs needed have been tested at Santa Cruz and RAL. LBNL is responsible in the US for module assembly and testing. We have mostly transferred the process of hybrid assembly/testing to Santa Cruz to speed up the production rate. Approximately ½ of the total modules to be be built( of about 500) are at the start of the production pipeline and about 1/3 have been completed. We are on track to finish by about July 2004. The SCT(and pixel) systems are read out using VME boards located about 100m from the experiment. The design work is largely done by LBNL engineering funded through the University of Wisconsin but there is also involvement of Physics Division staff. Prototypes of these boards have been tested and the final production is just about to start.

SCT Module Production and Testing The Crew Wire Bonding Electrical Testing Module Metrology

SCT Module Production GOAL

Pixel and Beam Pipe Assembly About 7m long package assembled on surface and lowered into collision hall for insertion into detector in April 2006 Beam Pipe Support Structure Pixel Detector Beam Pipe Service Panels PP1b Corrugated Panels installation configuration LBNL responsible for support frame, disk region, service panels and beampipe support structures

Pixels and Inner Detector LBNL responsible for support tube.. Z=~3200 – Bellows/Temp. Support Z=3120 – Adjustors Z=848 – Wire Support Z=3092 – PP1 TRT Forward TRT Forward SCT Barrel Services and Beam Pipe Support Structure Pixel Detector Services and Beam Pipe Support Structure Side C Side A Beam Pipe Support Wire Beam Pipe ID Endplug Insertion Trolley PP1 Pixel Support Tube PST Support Flexures Package Insertion Riders PP1 Bellows/Temporary Support

Composite Structures Autoclave at LBNL We have developed the capability to make custom composite structures and production is underway. Combined thermal, structural and electrical properties to meet the pixel needs. Prototype Support Tube Section and Rails Ply Cutter at LBNL

Support/Cooling Structures Fabrication of pixel support structures is nearly complete. Disk Support Rings Global Support Frame New cleanroom provided via Lab infrastructure/bldg renovations will be used for final assembly Disk Module Support/Cooling

Pixel Hybrids and Modules M. Garcia-Sciveres from LBNL is the overall ATLAS module coordinator. About ½ of sensors(detectors) have been produced. About 1000 flex hybrids made About 250 modules(25%) to be assembled at LBNL Preproduction has started Pigtail (beyond) Sensor ASICs Flex Hybrid Bumps Wirebonds Schematic Cross Section (through here) Electrical  optical conversion at end of pigtail

Pixel Electronics K. Einsweiler is the overall ATLAS pixel electronics coordinator. The strong LBNL IC group has allowed us to lead the pixel electronics effort, in particular the design of the front-end chip that is on the critical path for the project. In addition, we are responsible for providing most of the IC and all of the module tests systems for the collaboration, and these have also been designed and implemented by LBNL. The pixel ICs designs has been extensively validated by laboratory, irradiation and beam tests over the last two years. LBNL has led the way to show that pixel technology will work at the LHC.

Pixel Integrated Circuits Fabrication of the module control chip and optical ICs is complete and testing underway. Final production quantities available. Iterations of front-end chip(FE-I2 and FE-I2.1) since last year. Irradiation and beam test validation -> production version, FE-I3. Production of FE-I3 in progress and first wafers will be delivered in about two weeks with more to follow next year. Doric (from PIN diode to decoded LVDS) VDC array (from LVDS to laser diodes) Front End Chip 2880 channels Module Control Chip Manages data & control between module’s 16 chips Optical interface chips

2003 Irradiations and Beam Tests When Type May Irradiation 7 FE-I1 modules. Average of 1.1x1015 protons, 30 MRad. Test Beam Un-irradiated FE-I1 modules with high statistics. July 6 FE-I2 chips and 4 MCC-I2 chips to 60 MRad. Irradiated FE-I1 modules. Beam problems. August Irradiated FE-I1 modules. September FE-I2 modules at high intensity, 3x107 pions/cm2-sec, about innermost layer at design luminosity October 7 FE-I2.1 modules to about 2x1015or 55 MRad. Intensity about 1x1014 p/cm2-hr. Online results good. November 1-2 modules, fast extract of 1010 – 1011 protons/cm2 in two 42 ns. bunches separated by 250 ns.

Example – Single Event Upset(SEU) About = to 35 weeks at design L

Module Production Assembly and testing of modules using the preproduction front-end IC(FE-2.1) is underway at LBNL(and in Europe). Module mounting on support/cooling structures just underway at LBNL in pre-production mode to be ready for FE-I3 modules. Prototype Pixel Modules on Support/Cooling Structure

ATLAS Software ATLAS has completed two phases of significant data challenges(DC0 and DC1) to exercise the simulation, reconstruction and analysis codes and the computing infrastructure. Major software re-organization about one year ago, D. Quarrie from LBNL now resident at CERN as Software Project Leader Leads the developments of ATLAS software, as the Chief Architect of the Software Project. Is member of the ATLAS Executive Board. Participates in the LCG Architects Forum and other LCG activities. Chairs the Software Project Management Board and the Architecture Team. The U.S. currently provides about ½ of the core software engineering, and LBNL about 1/3 of the U.S. effort. Although ATLAS is estimated to be short by a factor of about two in the number of software engineers, LBNL staff in this area has been reduced by 1 FTE in FY04 from lack of funds. The next major milestone is Data Challenge 2 to occur Spring-Summer 2004

Software/Simulation Team Software Project Leader (Quarrie) Physics Generators Coordinator (Hinchliffe) U.S. ATLAS Physics Coordinator and overall Deputy Physics Coordinator Physics Generator Maintenance(Stavropoulos) Standard Model Co-coordinator(Dobbs) GEANT4 and Digitization Coordinator for Silicon(Costanzo) Framework Coordinator (Calafiura) Transient storage management Pileup in G4 Core Libraries and Services(LCG SEAL) (Lavrijsen) Software training coordinator (Marino) Resident at CERN. Also working on LCG SEAL project. Calibration/Alignment and Histogramming Infastructure (Leggett)

Some Highlights in Last Year Software re-organization – a major improvement DC1 production, reconstruction and analysis of 100K SUSY events Used U.S. grid test bed of which LBNL PDSF was a major part Use of core software for DC1 production for High Level Trigger Technical Design Report completed Reconstruction software validation during DC1 LBNL only site able to provide quick feedback(SUSY events) Costanzo presentation to LHCC Review on behalf of Collaboration Little Higgs study led by Hinchliffe ATL-COM-PHYS-2003-040, October 2003 Exploring Little Higgs Models with ATLAS at the LHC To be published

SUSY Simulation Point chosen similar to an ATLAS Physics TDR case Adjusted to have mh=115GeV (not excluded by LEP) 100K events corresponding to about 5fb-1, (Perhaps what one might expect by end 2007) m0 = 100 GeV m1/2 = 300 GeV A0 = -300 GeV tan b = 6 sgn m = + -- 100K events simulated with Geant3 (just 1% of the total DC1 production) -- 1 Tbyte of data Simulation: ~15minutes/event (1Ghz PentiumIII) US Grid (50K), LBNL(10K), Cambridge(10K), Copenhagen(10K), Sheffield (10K), Weizmann(10K) -- Re-digitization: very fast, but disk intensive (LBNL, Chicago) -- Reconstruction ~ 1minute/event (LBNL) ~ 12 times (lots of bugs…)

SUSY Study Example Results ~ c02 c01 l qL q M(c2)-M(c1) ≈ 105 GeV All q jets Only b-jets Flavor Subtracted l+ l- mass

The Next Year Data Challenge 2 planned to start April 2004. Will use GEANT4 instead of GEANT3 Exercise Tier 0(=CERN) reconstruction, data to Tier 1(ie. BNL in US) -> Tier 2 and other sites. Test of computing model(and resources). Lead again updated SUSY study with different parameter assumptions. Hope for LBNL role similar to DC1, but depends on (modest) upgrades to PDSF hardware that must come from Physics Division. In DC1 PDSF was used for GRID production(ie. CPU/storage available to ATLAS GRID usage) Local reconstruction(many times over) of SUSY simulation Fast simulation(Little Higgs study)

On to First Beam Complete the fabrication of SCT modules and deliver them to the UK by Fall 2004. Complete fabrication and testing of pixel components and begin to deliver them to CERN by early 2005. Then assemble, install and commission pixel detector, which will require a continuous presence at CERN by 2005. Maintenance and Operation(M&O) follows at CERN with some support from the US ATLAS Research Program. Continue to make ATLAS software work for data challenges and then ready for first data. Increase LBNL participation in physics analysis, as part of data challenge activity, and be ready for first data. New physics possible with very little integrated luminosity!

Beyond The Initial Detector ATLAS has been staged to meet funding realities. Pixel system(one layer) staged and discussions underway about how and when to recover this layer, which will be essential at design luminosity. Innermost layer of pixels will die after some years at 1034. Must be replaced, critical for b-tagging and tracking. Replacement would use new technology (improved ICs, better detectors, lower mass structures, etc) for improved pixel performance, and be step towards SLHC(1035). Continued software development will be essential as the luminosity increases towards the design value and to respond to the actual data environment.

Major Upgrades A luminosity upgrade to 1035(SLHC) will require the complete replacement of the tracking detectors. Tracking is hard at 1034 and has required extensive R&D for over 15 years. Tracking will be harder at 1035 and will require a similar R&D effort => organization for this just starting in U.S. LBNL hopes to remain leader in silicon (pixel) detectors for SLHC

ATLAS Planning(1) Budget exigencies in the past two years have prevented us from hiring postdoctoral staff or other new physicists at the rate needed to keep pace with ATLAS needs. We have added retirees and redirected senior staff in an attempt to meet our construction commitments. But we are still short of physicists to meet all continuing commitments As a result, we have chosen to phase out our SCT activity once module production is completed.

ATLAS Planning(2) We are now at the time when we MUST also ramp up our effort in physics simulation/analysis AND begin upgrade R&D. We cannot continue to meet our (reduced) commitments to the construction project, software and computing and have a role in physics analysis and the challenging upgrades without additional physicist staff. The ATLAS staffing plan was developed in last year to provide a coherent framework for personnel in future years.

LBNL ATLAS Plan Physics Division supported personnel only. Does not include Project, M&O or R&D funded personnel.

Status for 2004 Current funding allocation in FY04 is at best flat compared to FY03, whereas we planned to be ramping up. Practically this means pushing ramp into FY05, unless there is some FY04 relief. Additional leadership needed and a search for a Divisional Fellow has been launched with the expectation of arrival in Fall ’04. Physics Division contribution to upgrade pixel R&D minimal, perhaps zero, in FY04. At risk to lose our leadership role in pixels.

Concluding Remarks ATLAS is on its way to be ready for first LHC beam. LBNL is a world-wide leader in silicon detector technology and leads the development of the ATLAS pixel detector. We are providing critical leadership in software and physics simulation, the keys to successful data analysis. We look forward to first physics with ATLAS! Physicist staff must grow very soon to meet our ongoing commitments and to participate in physics analysis at the energy frontier after decades of work.