Georg Oberholzer, Philipp Sommer, Roger Wattenhofer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christoph Lenzen Philipp Sommer Philipp Sommer Roger Wattenhofer Roger Wattenhofer Optimal Clock Synchronization in Networks.
Advertisements

Gradient Clock Synchronization in Wireless Sensor Networks
Dynamic Location Discovery in Ad-Hoc Networks
You are here Three Beacon Sensor Network Localization through Self Propagation Mohit Choudhary Under Guidance of: Dr. Bhaskaran Raman.
Localization with RSSI Method at Wireless Sensor Networks Osman Ceylan Electronics Engineering PhD Student, Istanbul Technical University, Turkiye
A 6 to 7 GHz front end for UWB based radio positioning
Transmission Power Control in Wireless Sensor Networks CS577 Project by Andrew Keating 1.
Computer Networks Group Universität Paderborn Ad hoc and Sensor Networks Chapter 9: Localization & positioning Holger Karl.
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Gizem ERDOĞAN.
1 PinPoint: An Asynchronous Time Based Location Determination System Moustafa Youssef, Adel Youssef, Chuck Rieger, UdayaShankar, Ashok Agrawala Presented.
Institute for Software Integrated Systems Vanderbilt University Node Density Independent Localization Presented by: Brano Kusy B.Kusy, M.Maroti, G.Balogh,
Efficient Network Flooding and Time Synchronization with Glossy
Calamari’s Design Decisions Kamin Whitehouse June 18, 2003.
RADAR: An In-Building RF-based User Location and Tracking System Paramvir Bahl and Venkata N. Padmanabhan Microsoft Research.
Mica: A Wireless Platform for Deeply Embedded Networks Jason Hill and David Culler Presented by Arsalan Tavakoli.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 16th Lecture Christian Schindelhauer.
1 Link Characteristics in Sensor Networks. 2 Why Such a Study? (in)validate whether the basic model used in design is accurate or not  Remember you have.
CMPE 257 Spring CMPE 257: Wireless and Mobile Networking Spring 2005 Location management.
Mica Sensor Board Review Alec Woo November 21, 2001 NEST Meeting.
A Mobile Sensor Platform for Indoor Location-Aware Navigation By Ryan Patterson, L3D URA.
Lost in Space or Positioning in Sensor Networks Michael O’Dell Regina O’Dell Mirjam Wattenhofer Roger Wattenhofer.
Introduction to Sensor Networks Rabie A. Ramadan, PhD Cairo University 3.
1 Localization Technologies for Sensor Networks Craig Gotsman, Technion/Harvard Collaboration with: Yehuda Koren, AT&T Labs.
TPS: A Time-Based Positioning Scheme for outdoor Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Xiuzhen Cheng, Andrew Thaeler, Guoliang Xue, Dechang Chen From IEEE.
TinyOS – Communication and computation at the extremes Jason Hill U.C. Berkeley 1/10/2001.
A Transmission Control Scheme for Media Access in Sensor Networks Alec Woo, David Culler (University of California, Berkeley) Special thanks to Wei Ye.
SourceSync: A Distributed Architecture for Sender Diversity Hariharan Rahul Haitham Hassanieh Dina Katabi.
Wireless Transmission Fundamentals (Physical Layer) Professor Honggang Wang
Energy Saving In Sensor Network Using Specialized Nodes Shahab Salehi EE 695.
ENERGY EFFICIENT INDOOR LOCALIZATION IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS
Wireless Sensor Networking for “Hot” Applications: Effects of Temperature on Signal Strength, Data Collection and Localization.
RADAR Detection of Extensive Air Showers Nils Scharf III. Physikalisches Institut A Bad Honnef Nils Scharf III. Physikalisches Institut A Bad.
Time of arrival(TOA) Prepared By Sushmita Pal Roll No Dept.-CSE,4 th year.
Wireless Links & Localization Wireless Sensor Networks and Laboratories Link Characteristics Localization Ranging Techniques.
Introduction to Sensor Networks Rabie A. Ramadan, PhD Cairo University 3.
Presenter Ho-lin Chang. Introduction Design Implementation Evaluation Conclusion and future Work 2.
RT-Link: A Time-Synchronized Link Protocol for Energy-Constrained Multi- hop Wireless Networks Anthony Rowe, Rahul Mangharam and Raj Rajkumar CMU SECON.
Architectures and Applications for Wireless Sensor Networks ( ) Localization Chaiporn Jaikaeo Department of Computer Engineering.
Localization using DOT3 Wireless Sensors Design & Implementation Motivation Wireless sensors can be used for locating objects: − Previous works used GPS,
Network Computing Laboratory Radio Interferometric Geolocation Miklos Maroti, Peter Volgesi, Sebestyen Dora Branislav Kusy, Gyorgy Balogh, Andras Nadas.
Dynamic Fine-Grained Localization in Ad-Hoc Networks of Sensors Weikuan Yu Dept. of Computer and Info. Sci. The Ohio State University.
S PIDER B AT : A UGMENTING W IRELESS S ENSOR N ETWORKS WITH D ISTANCE AND A NGLE I NFORMATION Georg Oberholzer, Philipp Sommer, and Roger Wattenhofer IPSN.
Wireless Sensor Networks Nov 1, 2006 Jeon Bokgyun
Differential Ad Hoc Positioning Systems Presented By: Ramesh Tumati Feb 18, 2004.
Network and Systems Laboratory nslab.ee.ntu.edu.tw Branislav Kusy, Christian Richter, Wen Hu, Mikhail Afanasyev, Raja Jurdak, Michael Brunig, David Abbott,
University “Ss. Cyril and Methodus” SKOPJE Cluster-based MDS Algorithm for Nodes Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks Ass. Biljana Stojkoska.
Low Power, Low Delay: Opportunistic Routing meets Duty Cycling Olaf Landsiedel 1, Euhanna Ghadimi 2, Simon Duquennoy 3, Mikael Johansson 2 1 Chalmers University.
Webdust PI: Badri Nath SensIT PI Meeting January 15,16, Co-PIs: Tomasz Imielinski,
Tracking Mobile Nodes Using RF Doppler Shifts
The GETA Sandals: A Footprint Location Tracking System Kenji Okuda, Shun-yuan Yeh, Chon-in Wu, Keng-hao Chang, and Hao-hua Chu National Taiwan University.
Experimental Ranging With Mica2 Motes M. Allen, E. Gaura, R. Newman, S. Mount Cogent Computing, Coventry University The experimental work here makes use.
HOT CAR BABY DETECTOR Group #20 Luis Pabon, Jian Gao ECE 445 Dec. 8, 2014.
Nissanka Bodhi Priyantha Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology RTLab. Seolyoung, Jeong Dissertation, MIT, June 2005.
Signal Propagation Basics
Frame counter: Achieving Accurate and Real-Time Link Estimation in Low Power Wireless Sensor Networks Daibo Liu, Zhichao Cao, Mengshu Hou and Yi Zhang.
IMPROVING OF WIRELESS MESH NETWORKS.
Packet Leashes: Defense Against Wormhole Attacks
Dynamic Fine-Grained Localization in Ad-Hoc Networks of Sensors
WALL DETECTOR ROBOT VEHICLE
Location of Mobile Device
Georg Oberholzer, Philipp Sommer, Roger Wattenhofer
Fast Localization for Emergency Monitoring and Rescue in Disaster Scenarios Based on WSN SPEAKER:Jyun-Ying Yu ADVISOR:DR. Kai-Wei Ke DATE:2018/05/04.
Indoor Location Estimation Using Multiple Wireless Technologies
Wireless Mesh Networks
Wireless Sensor Networks and Internet of Things
Indoor Localization of Mobile Robots with Wireless Sensor Network Based on Ultra Wideband using Experimental Measurements of Time Difference of Arrival 
Team North Star + Lockheed Martin
3D Localization for Sub-Centimeter Sized Devices
RADAR: An In-Building RF-based User Location and Tracking System
Sound Waves and Ultrasound
Presentation transcript:

Georg Oberholzer, Philipp Sommer, Roger Wattenhofer SpiderBat: Augmenting Wireless Sensor Networks with Distance and Angle Information Georg Oberholzer, Philipp Sommer, Roger Wattenhofer 11/16/2018 IPSN'11

Location in Wireless Sensor Networks Context of sensor readings <location, time, value> Leverage location information Network layer: geographic routing Physical layer: transmission power control Learn about the current node position Nodes might be attached to moving objects Alice Bob 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Learning the Position of Sensor Nodes Global Positioning System (GPS) Not for indoor applications Special hardware required High power consumption Radio-based (connectivity/signal strength) High node density required Limited accuracy (multipath effects) 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Positioning with Ultrasound Inspired by nature ... Human hearing range: 20 – 20,000 Hz 20 – 120,000 Hz

Ultrasound meets Sensor Networks High accuracy Speed of sound c = 343 m/s Low complexity Simple analog circuits for signal processing and peak detection Energy efficiency Short pulses (e.g. 250 microseconds) Duty-cycling ultrasound transmitter/receivers TelosB/Tmote Sky MicaZ/IRIS Clock speed 32 kHz 1 MHz Resolution 1.04 cm 0.343 mm 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Related Work Cricket Calamari Medusa [Priyantha et al., 2000] [Whitehouse et al., 2004] Calamari [Savvides et al., 2001] Medusa 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Ultrasound Ranging Time difference of arrival (TDoA) between radio and ultrasound: Radio packet wakes up ultrasound receivers Ultrasound pulse is sent after a constant delay Sender Receiver t 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Distance based Positioning in Sensor Networks Determine position based on distances to anchor nodes (trilateration) 3 anchor nodes 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Positioning in Sparse Networks How does angle information help to position nodes? 3 anchor nodes 1 anchor node 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

The SpiderBat Ultrasound Platform 4x Ultrasound Receivers @ 40 kHz 6.5 cm (2.56 inches) 4x Ultrasound Transmitters @ 40 kHz Digital Compass 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

System Architecture SpiderBat is an extension board for wireless sensor nodes 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Ultrasound Receiver Circuits Three amplification stages with a total gain of 58-75 dB Each receiver provides two output signals: Digital comparator output generates an interrupt signal (RX_INT) Analog signal output (RX_ADC) 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Experimental Evaluation Prototype Hardware SpiderBat extension board Atmel ZigBit900 (Atmega1281 MCU + RF212 radio) Software Ultrasound ranging application implemented in TinyOS 2.1 Distance/angle/compass information forwarded to a base station 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Accuracy of Distance Measurements Measurement errors are in the order of a few millimeters Std. dev of error is 5.39 mm (0.21 inch) at 14 m (45.9 feet) 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Angle-of-Arrival Measurements with SpiderBat Receiver Sender West South North East Tn Te,Tw Ts 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Angle-of-Arrival Estimation We can calculate the angle based on the TDoA at the receivers 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Accuracy of Angle Measurements Estimation of the angle-of-arrival within a few degrees Error is less than 5° for short distances between sender and receiver 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Step 2: Minimize distance errors (method of least squares) Indoor Experiments 4 nodes placed in a gym hall, single anchor node (Node 1) 200 measurements for each node Anchor Anchor Step 1: Distance + angle to nearest neighbor Step 2: Minimize distance errors (method of least squares) Std. dev. < 15.5 cm (6.1 inch) Std. dev. < 5.7 cm (2.2 inch) 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Non Line-of-Sight Propagation What if the direct path between two nodes is obstructed? Two nodes are in line-of-sight if: Node 1 Node 2 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Non Line-of-Sight Propagation We use the digital compass to get the node orientation Magnetic North North Angle of arrival Honeywell HMC6352 We can use the digital compass to identify non-line of sight paths 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Outlook: Learning about the Proximity of Nodes Sampling the received ultrasound signal Idea: Identify reflection at nearby obstacles 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11

Conclusions SpiderBat platform Experiments Ultrasound extension board for sensor nodes Distance and angle measurements Digital compass Experiments Std. dev. of localization error below 5.7 cm (indoor setup) Non-line of sight propagation Detect obstacles between nodes 11/16/2018 Philipp Sommer @ IPSN'11