A Comparison of the Efficacy of Immunomodulatory-containing Regimens in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Network Meta-analysis  Meletios Athanasios.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Advertisements

1 Baz R et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Lacy MQ et al.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Bleeding Diathesis Associated With Ibrutinib Treatment: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Controlled.
Myeloma hope new treatment in the horizon
Efficacy and Safety of Pemetrexed Maintenance Therapy versus Best Supportive Care in Patients from East Asia with Advanced, Nonsquamous Non-small Cell.
ELOQUENT-2: Elotuzumab + Len/Dex in R/R MM
Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Bayesian network meta-comparison of maintenance treatments for stage IIIb/IV non- small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with good performance status.
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dex vs High-Dose Dex in Rel/Ref Myeloma
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Sekeres MA et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 908.
Phase Ib MMY1001: Daratumumab Plus Pom/Dex for Patients With R/R MM
Fatimah Al-Ani 1,2,. MD MRCP, Jose Maria Bastida Bermejo3,
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Slideset on: Lonial S, Vij R, Harousseau JL, et al. Elotuzumab in combination.
How have evolutions in strategies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma translated into improved outcomes for patients?  Pieter Sonneveld,
Cost-effectiveness of Pomalidomide, Carfilzomib, and Daratumumab for the Treatment of Patients with Heavily Pretreated Relapsed–refractory Multiple Myeloma.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Pharmacy Perspectives in Multiple Myeloma: Relapsed and/or Refractory Disease.
Hot Off the Press: Changes in the Landscape of Multiple Myeloma
Heterogeneity of Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in the Connect MM Registry ( )  Sundar Jagannath, Rafat Abonour, Brian.
The Effect of Lenalidomide on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Lower- Risk Non-del(5q) Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results From the MDS-005.
Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment
Assessing Newer Treatment Approaches for Multiply Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.
Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
The Nurse View: Best Practices in Multiple Myeloma
Pharmacist Perspectives on Novel Agents in Multiple Myeloma
An Evaluation of Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Elderly Patients Newly Diagnosed With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Analysis of Electronic.
The Epidemiology and Clinical Associations of Stroke in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Review of 10,972 Admissions From the 2012 National Inpatient.
Efficacy of Standard Dose R-CHOP Alternating With R-HDAC Followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation as Initial Therapy of Mantle Cell Lymphoma,
Prolonged Duration of Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients Treated for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Routine Clinical Care.
Differences in Quality of Life Between Bendamustine-Rituximab and R-CHOP/R-CVP in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Advances in Multiple Myeloma: Data Highlights and Analysis from the 2015 Hematology/Oncology Conferences.
Outcome of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis Associated With Deletion of 17p  Sandy W. Wong, Ute Hegenbart, Giovanni Palladini,
A Comparison of Clofarabine-based (GCLAC) and Cladribine-based (CLAG) Salvage Chemotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory AML  Benyam Muluneh, Kaitlyn Buhlinger,
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages e31-e40 (January 2017)
Analysis of Availability and Access of Anti-myeloma Drugs and Impact on the Management of Multiple Myeloma in Latin American Countries  Roberto José Pessoa.
Ibrutinib Dose Adherence and Therapeutic Efficacy in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience  AnnaLynn M. Williams, Andrea M. Baran, Carla Casulo,
Systematic Literature Review of Treatment Options and Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic.
Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma: Foundational Knowledge Essential to Improve Patient Outcomes.
Interim Functional Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Progression-free Survival in Advanced Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma – A Real-world Analysis  Moussab.
Efficacy and Toxicity of Idarubicin Versus High-dose Daunorubicin for Induction Chemotherapy in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and.
Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Treatment- resistant Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis With Multiple Myeloma  Shumaila.
Targeting T Cell Co-receptors for Cancer Therapy
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages e433-e441 (October 2017)
Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Proteasome Inhibitors and Patients
Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in a Patient With Multiple Myeloma
PRISMA study flow diagram
Single-Agent Liposomal All-Trans-Retinoic Acid as Initial Therapy for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: 13-Year Follow-Up Data  Preetesh Jain, Hagop Kantarjian,
A clinical prediction model for outcome and therapy delivery in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma (UK Myeloma Research Alliance Risk Profile):
A Post Hoc Sensitivity Analysis of Survival Probabilities in a Multinational Phase III Trial of Decitabine in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute.
Graft-versus-Host Disease Induced Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect: Greater Impact on Relapse and Disease-Free Survival after Reduced Intensity Conditioning 
Madeliene Parrott, Simon Rule, Michael Kelleher, Jayne Wilson 
Boccadoro M et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8020.
Modified VR-CAP, Alternating With Rituximab and High-dose Cytarabine: An Effective Pre-transplant Induction Regimen for Mantle Cell Lymphoma  Stephen.
One-way Versus Two-way Text Messaging on Improving Medication Adherence: Meta- analysis of Randomized Trials  David S. Wald, MD, FRCP, Shahena Butt, MSc,
An Evidence-based Review of Anti-CD20 Antibody-containing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia,
Phase II Study of Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection (Marqibo) and Rituximab for Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Network meta-analysis of randomized trials in multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory patients by Cirino Botta, Domenico Ciliberto,
Overall Survival (OS) of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Treated with Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (KRd) Versus.
Nicholas Z. Kerin, MD, Sony Jacob, MD  The American Journal of Medicine 
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
High-dose Therapy with Single Autologous Transplantation versus Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Treatment options for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for POEMS Syndrome
Maintenance therapies in Multiple Myeloma
Presentation transcript:

A Comparison of the Efficacy of Immunomodulatory-containing Regimens in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Network Meta-analysis  Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos, Jonathan L. Kaufman, Darrell White, Gordon Cook, Maria Rizzo, Yingxin Xu, Kyle Fahrbach, Maren Gaudig, Mary Slavcev, Lindsay Dearden, Annette Lam  Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia  Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 163-173.e6 (March 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.011 Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Flowchart for Study Selection and Review. aThe Cochrane Library includes Cochrane reviews, a database of abstracts of reviews of effects, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database. bConference searches included American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association, International Myeloma Working Group, and International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Abbreviations: MA = meta-analysis; NMA = network meta-analysis; PI = proteasome inhibitor; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RRMM = relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma; SLR = systematic literature review. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia 2018 18, 163-173.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.011) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Network Diagram. Brown indicates glucocorticoid alone; blue, proteasome inhibitor alone or combined; green, immunomodulators with or without a glucocorticoid; gray, immunomodulators and glucocorticoid with or without an alkylating agent; orange, monoclonal antibody alone or combined; bold text, treatments licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration and/or European Medicines Agency; regular text, unlicensed treatments; black dashed lines, trials with incomplete or interim results; and solid red lines, trials removed from the base-case network meta-analysis Abbreviations: d = dexamethasone; DRd = daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; ERd = elotuzumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; ICd = pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone; Id = pomalidomide, dexamethasone; KRd = carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; NRd = ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; Rd = lenalidomide, dexamethasone. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia 2018 18, 163-173.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.011) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (A) Progression-Free Survival, (B) Overall Survival, and (C) Overall Response Rate With Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD)-containing Regimens. Hazard ratios for a given treatment compared with another IMiD-containing regimen presented for (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival. (C) Comparisons for each treatment versus each of the other treatments; specifically, every combination of A versus B, where A is the treatment at the beginning of each row and B is the treatment at the top of each column. Odds ratios (ORs) > 1 indicate a numerical advantage for the treatment at the end of the row. To obtain ORs for comparisons in the opposite direction, reciprocals should be taken. The probability (prob) that the OR for A versus B is < 1 (ie, that regimen A is more Efficacious) is presented under the OR. Interventions with a significant advantage are shown in bold with green shading; interventions with a trend toward improving the overall response (eg, OR > 1.20 but credible intervals crossing 1.0) are shaded in orange. It is possible that 100% probability will appear to represent any value > 99.951% Abbreviations: DRd = daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; ERd = elotuzumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; KRd = carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; NRd = ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; Rd = lenalidomide, dexamethasone. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia 2018 18, 163-173.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.011) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Probability of Being the Best Treatment Across Survival and Response Outcomes Abbreviations: DRd = daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; ERd = elotuzumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; KRd = carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; NRd = ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; ORR = overall response rate; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; Rd = lenalidomide, dexamethasone. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia 2018 18, 163-173.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.011) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Subgroup Analyses: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of Patients With 1 Versus ≥ 2 Previous Lines of Therapy (LOTs; A), With and Without Previous Bortezomib Exposure (B), and With and Without Previous Lenalidomide Exposure (C). Tabular data represent comparisons for each treatment versus each of the other treatments. To obtain hazard ratios (HRs) for comparisons in the opposite direction, reciprocals should be taken. The probability that the HR is < 1 is presented under the HR. (A) For 1 previous LOT, HRs < 1 indicate a numerical advantage for the treatment at the top of the column. For ≥ 2 previous LOTs, HRs < 1 indicate a numerical advantage for the treatment at the beginning of the row. (B) For no previous bortezomib, HRs < 1 indicate a numerical Advantage for the treatment at the top of the column. For previous bortezomib, HRs < 1 indicate a numerical advantage for the treatment at the beginning of the row. (C) For no previous lenalidomide, HRs < 1 indicate a numerical advantage for the treatment at the top of the column. For previous lenalidomide, HRs < 1 indicate a numerical advantage for the treatment at the beginning of the row. It is possible that 100% probability will appear to represent any value > 99.951%. Interventions with a significant advantage are shown in bold with green shading; interventions with a trend toward improving PFS (eg, HR < 0.80 but credible intervals crossing 1.0) are shaded in orange Abbreviations: DRd = daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; ERd = elotuzumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; KRd = carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; NRd = ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; Rd = lenalidomide, dexamethasone. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia 2018 18, 163-173.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.011) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions