Peer Evaluation of Teammates

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alternative Strategies for Evaluating Teaching How many have used end-of-semester student evaluations? How many have used an alternative approach? My comments.
Advertisements

By taking the PSAT and the PLAN, you have already taken your first steps toward college. Both tests show you the kinds of reading, math and writing skills.
Descriptive Statistics. Descriptive Statistics: Summarizing your data and getting an overview of the dataset  Why do you want to start with Descriptive.
Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:
Welcome to Turnitin.com’s Peer Review! This tour will take you through the basics of Turnitin.com’s Peer Review. The goal of this tour is to give you.
First-Year Engineering Program Engineering H191 Engineering Fundamentals and Laboratory I Lecture 41 - Week 11 Day 04 The Final Day of Class.
Test 1 & 2 information Econ 130 Spring Information about Test 1 Number of students taking test: 41 Points possible: 50 Highest score: 47 (2 students)
Is PeerMark a useful tool for formative assessment of literature review? A trial in the School of Veterinary Science Duret, D & Durrani,
5 th Grade Parent Orientation Math Overview Ms. Skaria Mrs. Mathew.
The Auditor Role The auditor has the same view of the course as the student does, but no marks are recorded for auditors.
CATME Overview Ken Chapman Lorraine Gardiner April 3, 2015.
Presented by the HCHS Guidance Department Understanding Your PSAT Results.
“USING BLACKBOARD” “Best Practices in Business Curricula Related to Systems and Technology” June 26, 2001.
College of Education Meeting with the Professor: The Field Assignment Project (Case Study)
SAT & ACT PSAT & PLAN Heritage High School College Planning Series.
Teaching and Evaluating a Required Course in Career Planning for Psychology Majors b b James H. Thomas b b Cyndi R. McDaniel b b Northern Kentucky University.
Growth Mindsets at Long Crendon The Story So Far Monday 29 th February 2016.
Review: Teaching Writing ETC, Chapter 5 Agenda: Starter: Discussion of response journal topics.
Assessment in HuskyCT Janet Jordan Manager, Instructional Resource Center.
Group collaborative Projects: TECHNOLOGICAL TOOLS TO ASSESS INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION.
Articulating from FE to HE: Assessing & Improving Academic Confidence Enhancement Themes conference, Thursday 9 June 2016 John McIntyre Conference Centre,
PowerTeacher Gradebook PTG and PowerTeacher Pro PT Pro A Comparison The following slides will give you an overview of the changes that will occur moving.
A Roundtable Discussion of Best Practices in Online Learning.
Stephen L. Firsing III, PhD, MPA, MA John Delport, PhD Fredanna A.D. M’Cormack McGough, PhD, RD John Yannessa, PhD Mariel Celina Po, BS Kaitlyn Brown,
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Documenting Your Teaching and Student Evaluations
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Clickers in a Biology Lab
Prioritizing Online Course Preparedness Using PACE Matrix
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
University Park IST/SRA 440W Peer Evaluation of Teammates
PeerWise Student Instructions
Consider Your Audience
Stevens High School Home of the Raiders
What are standards-based report cards?
Institute for Learning Innovation and Development
(includes online “demo” video)
LAE Assessment My Course Was Selected For LAE Assessment Reporting.
Applying for Unemployment Insurance Benefits
Today’s Agenda: Discuss College Application Process: Common App, Coalition App, School App Common App matching in Naviance Transcript Request forms & Parent.
Overview The designer role in CE 4 has been separated into two new roles in CE6: Designer Role Instructor Role The Auditor role has been added as.
General Education Assessment
Recording Blackboard Collaborate Sessions
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Multi Rater Feedback Surveys FAQs for Participants
Assessment of Learning Outcomes
Data Structures Algorithms: (Slides to be Adopted from Goodrich and aligned with Weiss' book) Instructor: Ganesh Ramakrishnan
General Education Assessment
Senior Year Planning Class of 2018.
Director, Institutional Research
Motivating Students and Increasing Success Using Student Contracts
Counseling with Depth of Knowledge
The purposes of grading student work
Online Testing System Assessment Viewing Application (AVA)
Beth Perrell Arri Stone
Understanding Your PSAT/NMSQT® Results
Evaluating Community-Based Learning In the Classroom
MGF Math for Liberal Arts
Understanding Your PSAT/NMSQT® Results
Data Literacy Survey results and Data Protocols
Keeping Students on Track Using Technological Retention Tools
Dr Angelica Risquez, Teaching Innovation and Enhancement Advocate
Easy Chair Online Conference Submission, Tracking and Distribution Process: Getting Started + Information for Reviewers AMS World Marketing Congress /
Overview Three assessments/tests are hosted in SDS Qualtrics survey software Students and mentors can click on the links below to access them Students.
3 Psychological investigations
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Instructor Provided Questions
ePerformance: A Process Crosswalk May 2010
Office hours are student hours
Evaluating High Impact Research Assignments for Undergraduates: Incorporating Research in Freshman/Sophomore Classes Lisa van Raalte, Ph.D.
SELF-ASSESSMENT.
Presentation transcript:

Peer Evaluation of Teammates World Campus IST 440W Peer Evaluation of Teammates Spring 2017 Qualtrics Survey Results from World Campus IST 440W Students (n = 5) March 28th 2017, 6:39 am EDT

Q11 - What is your class standing? # Answer % Count 1 First-year student 0.00% 2 Sophomore 3 Junior 4 Senior 100.00% 5 Total 100%

Q1 - Consider your College of IST courses that include team assignments (e.g., projects, papers, presentations, etc.). With what frequency have you been asked to evaluate team members? # Answer % Count 1 > 75% of my courses that include teamwork require me to evaluate team members 80.00% 4 2 50-75% of my courses that include teamwork require me to evaluate team members 20.00% 3 < 50% (and at least in one) of my courses that include teamwork require me to evaluate team members 0.00% 0% of my courses that include teamwork require me to evaluate team members Total 100% 5

Q2 - Check all the tools that you have used for the purpose of evaluating team members: # Answer % Count 1 CATME (Comprehensive Assessment for Team-Member Effectiveness) 80.00% 4 2 World Campus Peer Evaluation tool 40.00% 3 Online or paper evaluation created by the instructional team (i.e., the instructor and/or TA and/or LA) Other 0.00% Total 100% 5

Q6 - Do you think it is appropriate for students to evaluate their team members when working on team assignments? # Answer % Count 1 Definitely yes 60.00% 3 2 Probably yes 40.00% Might or might not 0.00% 4 Probably not 5 Definitely not Total 100%

Q7 - In your experience in College of IST courses, what is the most common weight that team member peer evaluations are given toward the team assignment grade? # Answer % Count 1 > 50% of the team assignment grade is determined by team member peer evaluations 0.00% 2 Between 26 and 50% of the team assignment grade is determined by team member peer evaluations 3 Between 11 and 25% of the team assignment grade is determined by team member peer evaluations 40.00% 4 Between 1 and 10% of the team assignment grade is determined by team member peer evaluations 60.00% 5 Although we are asked to evaluate our peers, the evaluation does not count toward the team assignment grade; it is counted as a separate grade altogether 6 Although we are asked to evaluate our peers, the evaluation does not count toward any part of our grade Total 100%

Q8 - Considering tools that you have used to evaluate your team members, which features are important to you? (Check all that apply.)

Q8 - Considering tools that you have used to evaluate your team members, which features are important to you? (Check all that apply.) # Answer % Count 1 Anonymity 80.00% 4 2 Rating scale that includes a broad range of points (i.e., at least 6 or 7 points, so that a 1-point deduction does not automatically reduce a student's grade from an A to a B) 60.00% 3 Option to rate myself as well as my team members Comparison of my self-rating with my team members' ratings of me 0.00% 5 Average scores from my team members 20.00% 6 Option to add written comments 7 Graphics that make the data easy to understand 8 Option to evaluate my team as a whole unit 40.00% 9 Ease of using the tool, in general 10 Other Total 100%

Q12 - What is the name of the tool that you have used most often to evaluate team members? # Answer % Count 1 CATME (Comprehensive Assessment for Team-Member Effectiveness) 60.00% 3 2 World Campus Peer Evaluation tool 0.00% Online or paper evaluation created by the instructional team (i.e., the instructor and/or TA and/or LA) 40.00% 4 Other Total 100% 5

Q13 - Briefly, what do you like about CATME; and what do you dislike about CATME? If gives a range to choice from that gives best scores to lowest scores. However, the wording gives the user that the first choice may not be the highest score. It would be better if CATME could be integrated directly into the course management system Q15 - Briefly, what do you like about the evaluation tool created by the instructional team; and what do you dislike about the evaluation tool created by the instructional team? Briefly, what do you like about the evaluation tool created by the instruct... The easy interface Q10 - If there is anything else you would like to share about your experiences with evaluating your peers on team assignments, please add your comments here. If there is anything else you would like to share about your experiences wi... While evaluating team members, the grades are sometimes given out during the course of the project. Team members can see if other team members gave them lower scores. This can cause them to work hard in a positive way, however, it can also make them want to get revenge and score the team member lower.