The Correlation Between Selected Measurements From Footprint and Radiograph of Flatfoot Chia-Hsin Chen, MD, Mao-Hsiung Huang, MD, PhD, Tien-Wen Chen, MD, Ming-Cheng Weng, MD, Chia-Ling Lee, MD, Gwo-Jaw Wang, MD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 235-240 (February 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.014 Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Template for radiographic measurements of the medial longitudinal arch, calculated on lateral radiography. Abbreviations: AH, arch height; C, calcaneus; CP, calcaneal pitch angle; MC, medial cuneiform bone; MT, metatarsal bone; N, navicular bone; T, talus; TC, talocalcaneal angle; TH, talo-horizontal angle; TM, talo-first metatarsal angle. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006 87, 235-240DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.014) Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 The geometric parameters were determined with the EMED ST-4 system. Subarch angle (equal to COD, A, A′, B, B′) defined over the forefoot and heel width, forefoot arch index (equal to L/A A′), midfoot arch index (equal to L/B B′), and long plantar angle determined by AB and A′ B′. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006 87, 235-240DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.014) Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Scattergram of subarch angle versus (A) talo-first metatarsal angle, (B) talo-horizontal angle, and (C) arch height. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006 87, 235-240DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.014) Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions