Perkins Monitoring Orientation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
ULS FACULTY LIBRARIAN PEER REVIEW AND MENTORING Margarete Bower Chemistry Library.
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
Office of Federal and State Accountability September 11, 2012.
Effective Strategies to Align Learner Levels: Minnesota Local Consortia NASDCTEc, March 30,2010 JoAnn Simser, State Director for Career & Technical Education.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. QUESTIONS.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Perkins Basic & Regional Reserve Grants Annual Report Directions October 30, 2009.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
IDEA EC Grant Application & Fiscal Accountability New Charter Leaders Institute June 16-17, 2015 Valencia W. Davis, Consultant IDEA, Part B Programs NCDPI.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Kansas CTE Conference, Wichita, KS February 21, 2011 Mike Gross
SD Secondary Career & Technical Education (CTE) Perkins Updates – July 2013.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Preparing.
PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
October 2011 CAO/CSAO/Deans Meeting The New Professional Development in CTE Debra Wilcox Hsu.
Perkins Fiscal Procedures and Requirements for Managing the Funds-Postsecondary Carl D. Perkins Career Technical Education Act of
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
March Leadership Webinar March24, :00-11:30am To access this meeting by voice, please dial , participant code #
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
NACTEI – May 17, 2007 Perkins in a Binder: How to GET and STAY Organized! Renee Kuharski – Dean of Career & Technical Education Colorado Mountain College.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
PERKINS MONITORING ORIENTATION January 12, 2016 Debra Wilcox Hsu Associate Director for Career Technical Education MN State Colleges and Universities.
Perkins Fiscal Procedures and Requirements for Managing the Funds-Postsecondary Carl D. Perkins Career Technical Education Act of 2006.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
GRANT GUIDELINES WEBINAR/MEETING October 15,
MN Carl D. Perkins CTE Plan Preparation February CTE Professional Development Webinar
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
Field Analyst Support Team (FAST) School Finance Division
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program (CTEIG)
Perkins Monitoring Update
IDEA EC Grant Application & Fiscal Accountability
Purpose of par and Perkins internal controls reviews
Orientation to painless Perkins Monitoring
Anna Preston Vance, HA of Paris
Title I Program Review Preparation
ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting
October 17, 2012 JoAnn Simser Shannon Kohlman State Director, CTE
CAEP Orientation: Newcomers
Adult and Community Learning Services (ACLS)
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Tennessee Highway Safety Office FFY19 Grant Orientation Workshop
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
January 11, 2018 Mid-Year Assessment.
Session two: Grant Guidelines Webinar/meeting
Infectious Disease Bureau,
FY19 Federal Grant Monitoring: Titles I, II, IV
FY19 Grant Monitoring Process: Titles I, II, and IV
WELCOME TO CTAE ACCOUNTABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT UNIT
Universal Review: Fiscal Requirements
TRANSITIONS January 2019.
Conducting Local Monitoring Visits Based Upon Maryland’s Unique Workforce and Economic Development Needs During the 2008 Maryland General Assembly Session.
Reallocation of Perkins Funds
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Reallocation of Perkins Funds
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
OPSB Grant Application Procedure
Presentation transcript:

Perkins Monitoring Orientation October 12, 2017 Debra Wilcox Hsu Associate Director for Career Technical Education MN State Colleges and Universities

FY17 Perkins Monitoring - Purpose Comply with federal monitoring requirements of Carl D. Perkins Career Technical Education Act of 2006 and the US Dept. of Education Determine present and predict future CTE program opportunities and challenges Better define how high-quality CTE programs operate Detect conditions, procedures, or factors that threaten CTE programs in time to effectively mitigate Identify factors that may enhance or detract from the availability of high-quality CTE programs

FY17 Monitoring Process - Evidence This monitoring visit is different from your previous Perkins monitoring experience.  Consortia required to provide evidence to support your activities for five criteria not 23: Consortium Membership Fiscal Requirements Occupational Skill Development Collaboration, and Partnerships Rigorous Programs of Study And Criteria related to prior consortium monitoring findings.

FY17 Perkins Monitoring Process Schedule of monitoring visits agreed upon (July) Sample agenda; last monitoring report; guidelines of evidence of five criteria sent to consortium leaders Pre-onsite (30 days prior to visit) Desk review of fiscal processes including cash management Desk review of past monitoring report findings On-site 1.5 Day face-to-face interviews and presentations Opening presentation and closing initial report Welcome all guests

FY17 Perkins Monitoring Process 1 ½ days, Day 1 Noon-4:00, Day 2 8:00-2:00 Evidence for five criteria and for others cited at last monitoring visit Fiscal desk audit – secondary and postsecondary PAR reports for personnel funded by Perkins Closing meeting on Day 2 to report findings Final monitoring visit report within 30 days Corrective action completed by agreed upon date.

FY17 MN Perkins Monitoring Evidence http://cte.mnscu.edu/directories/pdf/FY16-Minnesota-Perkins-Monitoring-Criteria-for-Local-Consortia.pdf

FY17 Monitoring Process – Post Sec Fiscal Desk Audit 1. At least 30 days prior to the visit, system office grant accountant will notify the postsecondary fiscal contact identified in the approved consortium plan of which transactions will be reviewed. 2. The fiscal contact will provide all supporting documents to system office grant accountant at least twenty days prior to the visit. 3. System office grant accountant will then request any additional information if needed on the documentation provided by the fiscal contact. 4. At least ten days prior to the visit, fiscal contact responds to the system office grant accountant. 5. At least five days prior to the visit system office grant accountant will send findings to the monitoring team. 6. During the monitoring visit a member of the team meets with the fiscal contact to review any questions, findings and required corrective actions. 7. Grant accountant will consult with the monitoring team. 8. Within ten days following the visit the system office grant accountant will send the final audit report with any findings to the impacted parties.

FY17 Monitoring Process – Post Sec Fiscal Desk Audit Criteria for Audit: I. A random sample of 3-5% of transactions depending on the volume of transactions. II. Sample will focus on larger transaction, especially those over $10,000. III. System office will review documentation provided for: a) Appropriateness of documentation b) Consistency with GAAP processing procedures c) Potential fraud implications d) Additional elements Time/activity reporting (PAR) Asset inventory- equipment lists: one master list for the full consortium Documents may be supplied in paper or electronic form to: Judy Bradford, Grants Accountant Email: judy.bradford@so.mnscu.edu Phone: 651-201-1770

FY17 Monitoring Process – Sec Fiscal Desk Audit MDE Secondary Grants Specialists, Lisa Spofford Lisa.Spofford@state.mn.us, will contact secondary fiscal agents 3-4 weeks before monitoring visit Template with step-by-step instructions For more information contact Michelle Kamenov 651-582-8434

Sample Agenda - Day 1 10:00 PM Review team arrives.. 10:30 PM Meet with consortium leadership to review schedule and purpose of the visit. *Presentation by Consortium. Walk through criteria; Highlight promising practices; Showcase your good work 1:00 PM Fiscal personnel available from consortium to review desk audit findings 1:30-4:00 PM MDE/Minnesota State personnel review evidence files prepared in advance by consortium directors 4:00 PM Visit with secondary and postsecondary directors to ask/answer questions for the day and to discuss Day 2 schedule

Sample Agenda - Day 2 8:00 AM Review team arrives 8:00 – 9:30 AM MDE/Minnesota State Staff continue to review prepared materials and new information requested at the close of day 1. 9:30 AM Meet with secondary and postsecondary consortium leadership to discuss any last minute requests for information and to discuss findings 10:30 AM Monitoring team to prepares final materials for 1:00 PM findings session 12:00 PM Lunch 1:00 PM Meet with all consortium leadership to report findings and answer questions

FY17 Monitoring Visit Conclusion Closing meeting on Day 2 to report findings Final monitoring visit report within 30 days Findings require completion of corrective actions. Corrective actions completed by agreed upon dates. Usually correspond to local plan submission or APR (May 15 or October 15) Recommendations for continuous improvement- Optional

Resources to Help You Prepare for Monitoring http://cte.mnscu.edu/directories/portal.html Minnesota’s Perkins IV Monitoring Process and Recommendations 2013-2016 (529 KB .pdf) Fiscal Postsecondary Desk Audit (140 KB .pdf) Tips that help you prepare for your Perkins IV Monitoring Visit (428 KB .pdf) SAMPLE Agenda (218 KB .pdf) FY16 Minnesota Perkins Monitoring Criteria for Local Consortia (119 KB .pdf)