Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A controlled-source experiment to investigate the origin of wavefield polarization in fault zones Giuseppe Di Giulio 1, Antonio Rovelli 2, Fabrizio Cara.
Advertisements

Real-Time Estimation of Earthquake Location and Magnitude for Seismic Early Warning in Campania Region, southern Italy A. Zollo and RISSC-Lab Research.
Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry Kees Wapenaar 75 th SEG meeting, Houston November 8, 2005.
Pre-Processing and Cross-Correlation Techniques for Time-Distance Helioseismology Nan Wang 1, Sjoerd de Ridder 1, & Junwei Zhao 2 (1) Geophysics and Planetary.
Group Velocity Dispersion Curves from Wigner-Ville Distributions Simon Lloyd 1, Goetz Bokelmann 1, Victor Sucic 2 1 University of Vienna 2 University of.
Global Distribution of Crustal Material Inferred by Seismology Nozomu Takeuchi (ERI, Univ of Tokyo) (1)Importance of Directional Measurements from geophysicists’
Seismic interferometry: Who needs a seismic source? Roel Snieder Center for Wave Phenomena Colorado School of Mines
Thermal structure of old continental lithosphere from the inversion of surface-wave dispersion with thermodynamic a-priori constraints N. Shapiro, M. Ritzwoller,
Center for Wave Phenomena Department of Geophysics Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado.
Neustadt July 8, 2009 Seismic Interferometry by cross-correlation (CC) and by multi-dimensional deconvolution (MDD) using ambient seismic noise Deyan Draganov,
Correlations 1 Surface waves and correlations  Correlation of time series  Similarity  Time shifts  Applications  Correlation of rotations/strains.
Lecture #19- Seismometers
“ringwoodite” More complicated waves, too.
Extending the North Atlantic Hurricane Record Using Seismic Noise Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Northwestern University American Geophysical.
Application of empirical Green’s functions for the construction and validation of the GBCVM Morgan P. Moschetti and Michael H. Ritzwoller Center for Imaging.
5: EARTHQUAKES WAVEFORM MODELING S&W SOMETIMES FIRST MOTIONS DON’T CONSTRAIN FOCAL MECHANISM Especially likely when - Few nearby stations, as.
Task 3: Irpinia Fault System WP3.1 Seismic noise analysis and Green Functions Project – DPC S5 High-resolution multi-disciplinary monitoring of active.
Where does background noise in the ocean come from? ORE 654 Guest Lecture Fred Duennebier October 21, 2011.
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson Carleton University.
New Scientific Applications with Existing CGPS Capabilities Earthquakes, Soil Moisture, and Environmental Imaging Andria Bilich Geosciences Research Division.
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson.
Tracking the origin of the seismic noise. Apparent origin of the noiseAverage sea wave height winter summer.
The following figures show three modeled measures of network capability 1) Minimum magnitude threshold 2) Network detection time 3) Earthquake Location.
Surface wave tomography : 1. dispersion or phase based approaches (part A) Huajian Yao USTC April 19, 2013.
Crust and upper mantle structure of Tien Shan Orogen and its surroundings by ambient noise tomography and earthquake tomography Yong Zheng a, Yingjie Yang.
An array analysis of seismic surface waves
Assimilation of HF Radar Data into Coastal Wave Models NERC-funded PhD work also supervised by Clive W Anderson (University of Sheffield) Judith Wolf (Proudman.
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
An Extension of Stochastic Green ’ s Function Method to Long-Period Strong Ground-motion Simulation Y. Hisada and J. Bielak.
Surface waves Earthquakes generate both body waves (P, S) and surface waves Surface waves are generated along any free surface in the medium In the Earth,
10 Sept 2006SCEC/USGS Workshop: CA 3D Seismic Velocity Model The Role of Ambient Noise Tomography in Developing the California 3-D Seismic Velocity Model:
Observation of diffuse seismic waves at teleseismic distances
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
Project IDA (International Deployment of Accelerometers) Project IDA II GSN Calibration Procedures November 16, 2011 Peter Davis Project IDA Scripps Institution.
Noise and Sensitivity of RasClic 91
3D Seismic Imaging based on Spectral-element Simulations and Adjoint Methods Qinya Liu Department of Physics University of Toronto 1 st QUEST Workshop,
An Assessment of the High-Gain Streckheisen STS2 Seismometer for Routine Earthquake Monitoring in the US ISSUE: Is the high-gain STS2 too sensitive to.
Infrasounds and Background Free Oscillations Naoki Kobayashi [1] T. Kusumi and N. Suda [2] [1] Tokyo Tech [2] Hiroshima Univ.
Surface-wave Derived Focal Mechanisms in Mid-America R. B. Herrmann 1, C. J. Ammon 2 and H. M. Benz 3 1 Saint Louis University, 2 Pennsylvania State University,
HIGH FREQUENCY GROUND MOTION SCALING IN THE YUNNAN REGION W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD W. Winston Chan, Multimax, Inc., Largo, MD Robert.
P wave amplitudes in 3D Earth Guust Nolet, Caryl Michaelson, Ileana Tibuleac, Ivan Koulakov, Princeton University.
1/24/09 Updated 12/23/09 What about Hawaii? Don L. Anderson.
1 Wavefield Calibration Using Regional Network Data R. B. Herrmann Saint Louis University.
Barbara Romanowicz1, Aimin Cao2, M. Panning3, F
Milton Garces, Claus Hetzer, and Mark Willis University of Hawaii, Manoa Source modeling of microbarom signals generated by nonlinear ocean surface wave.
Introduction to Seismology
1.1 Seismic Interferometry Optical interferometry.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
Site effect characterization of the Ulaanbaatar basin
Introduction to Seismology
ABSTRACT –Basic Principles and applications
ILC MDI Platform Concept
Susan L. Beck George Zandt Kevin M. Ward Jonathan R. Delph.
Bruce Cornuelle, Josh Willis, Dean Roemmich
Introduction to Seismology
Frequency dependent microseismic sources
報告者:聶家駿 指導老師:陳卉瑄老師 指導助教:葉庭禎 陳耀傑
F. Brenguier (OVPF/IPGP), D. Clarke (IPGP), N. M. Shapiro (IPGP), M
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 22 Apr 2016
Lithosphere Delamination and Small-Scale Convection Beneath California Imaged with High Resolution Rayleigh Wave Tomography Donald W. Forsyth and Yingjie.
2University of Southern California, 3San Diego Supercomputer Center
1-D Mississippi embayment sediment velocity structure and anisotropy: constraint from ambient noise analysis on a dense array Chunyu,Liu1; Charles A. Langston1.
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
Douglas Dreger, Gabriel Hurtado, and Anil Chopra
LCDR John Hendrickson 17SEP2008
Directions of Inquiry Given a fixed atmospheric CO2 concentration assimilation scheme, what is the optimal network expansion? Given the wide array of available.
by Asaf Inbal, Jean Paul Ampuero, and Robert W. Clayton
Ken Creager, Wendy McClausland and Steve Malone
by Hiro Nimiya, Tatsunori Ikeda, and Takeshi Tsuji
Presentation transcript:

Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France The nature and promise of broadband surface-wave measurements from the random wavefield Nikolai Shapiro Michael Ritzwoller Michel Campillo Laurent Stehly Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France University of Colorado at Boulder

Main goal: to optimize the surface-wave imaging in context of USArray earthquakes with M>4.5 occurred during 18 months (01/01/2001-07/01/2002) Main problem: low regional seismicity for most of USA

Diffuse field vs. ballistic waves localized lateral sensitivity samples all directions source independent may allow many short-period measurements Alternative solution: making measurement from random wavefield (ambient seismic noise) May improve resolution traditional approach: using teleseismic surface waves source extended lateral sensitivity sample only certain directions source dependent difficult to make short-period measurements Consequence: limited resolution

Extracting Green functions from the random wavefield by field-to-filed correlation: theoretical background seismic noise is excited by randomly distributed ambient sources (oceanic microseisms and atmospheric loads) modal representation of the random field: - eigenfunctions - eigenfrequencies - modal excitations, uncorrelated random variables: - spectral energy density cross-correlation between points x and y : differs only by an amplitude factor F() from an actual Green function between x and y

Cross-correlations from ambient seismic noise: ANMO - CCM (from Shapiro and Campillo, GRL, 2004) cross-correlations from 30 days of continuous vertical component records (2002/01/10-2002/02/08) prediction from global group velocity maps of Ritzwoller et al. (2002) frequency-time analysis of the broadband cross-correlation

Cross-correlations from ambient seismic noise at US stations (from Shapiro and Campillo, GRL, 2004) frequency-time analysis of broadband cross-correlations computed from 30 days of continuous vertical component records

Cross-correlation from ambient seismic noise in North-Western Pacific (from Shapiro and Campillo, GRL, 2004) broadband cross-correlation computed from 30 days of continuous vertical component records

Cross-correlation from ambient seismic noise in North-Western Pacific (from Shapiro and Campillo, GRL, 2004) broadband cross-correlation computed from 30 days of continuous vertical component records

Cross-correlations from ambient seismic noise in California (from Shapiro and Campillo, GRL, 2004) cross-correlations of vertical component continuous records (1996/02/11-1996/03/10) 0.03-0.2 Hz 3 km/s - Rayleigh wave

correlations computed over four different three-week periods PHL - MLAC 290 km band- passed 15 - 30 s repetitive measurements provide uncertainty estimations band- passed 5 - 10 s

correlations computed over four different three-week periods PHL - MLAC 290 km band- passed 15 - 30 s band- passed 5 - 10 s repetitive measurements provide uncertainty estimations

Conclusions Cross-correlations computed from the ambient seismic noise can provide new surface-wave dispersion measurements that have numerous advantages relative to traditional measurements made from teleseismic waves: Measurements possible for every pair of stations No source related errors Localized sensitivity zones Measurements can be extended to shorter periods Repetitive measurements provide uncertainty estimations Those measurements may be particularly useful in context of dense arrays of seismometers, such as USArray