Katherine Weeks (AMEC) Scott Veenstra (AMEC) David Hill

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arsenic/Iron Co-Precipitation and High Rate Filtration in the City of Portage Christopher Barnes, P.E., City of Portage Kendra Gwin, P.E., City of Portage.
Advertisements

N A V A L F A C I L I T I E S E N G I N E E R I N G S E R V I C E C E N T E R Richard J. Zuromski, Jr., P.E. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center.
LEACHATE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT
Removal of Arsenic from Drinking Water using Hybrid Ion Exchangers or HIX : A Prudent approach for Rural Water Utilities Presentedby VEETech, P.C. 942.
Biological Treatment of Groundwater Containing Perchlorate Using Fluidized Bed Reactors August 23-24, 2000 Bill Guarini.
U.S. Department of Defense Perchlorate Treatment Technology Workshop San Antonio, Texas PERCHLORATE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY Fast Track to a Solution Richard.
ERIN PARTLAN, DAVID LADNER Clemson University Dissolved CO 2 – An Alternative for Cleaning Inorganic Scale from RO Membranes Acknowledgements Clemson University.
Navy Involvement with Perchlorate Issues and an Overview of Activities at Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant McGregor, Texas Mario Dumenigo Naval Facilities.
Class evaluations.
IX1 Arsenic Removal by Ion Exchange Joe Chwirka - Camp Dresser & McKee Bruce Thomson - University of New Mexico
Passive Remediation of High Metal Loading, Net Acidic Mine Impacted Water Using Crab Shell Chitin as a Substrate Amendment Amanda K. Brown and Dr. Rachel.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Microwave Soil Vapor Treatment CHA Corporation Field DemonstrationWINTER 2004 CHA Corporation 372 W. Lyon Laramie, WY Telephone:(307) Fax:(307)
. All rights reserved MAR Systems Inc.
Dr. Martin T. Auer MTU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Water Treatment.
Dr. Martin T. Auer MTU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Water Treatment.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Southern Illinois University Carbondale Instructor: Dr. L.R. Chevalier Lecture Series.
New Nuclear Power and Climate Change: Issues and Opportunities Student Presentation Ashish K Sahu and Sarina J. Ergas University of Massachusetts - Amherst.
Adsorption Equilibrium Adsorption vs. Absorption –Adsorption is accumulation of molecules on a surface (a surface layer of molecules) in contact with an.
Defluoridation by Adsorption
Fundamentals of Radium and Uranium Removal from Drinking Water Supplies Dennis Clifford University of Houston.
Salts in Solution.  A salt is composed of a cation (from a base) and an anion (from an acid)  Not all salts are neutral – some can be basic, others.
Landfill Processes. Objectives  Describe the physical, chemical, and biological processes occurring in a landfill  Describe leachate quality (Table.
Physical & Chemical Treatment Chapter 9. Chemistry Review Chapter 3.
The Living Machine & Leachate
Depending on the Size of the S&R Program, Additional Facilities May Be Required Groundwater Production Wells Imported Water Treatment Plant Capacity Wellhead.
Water Conditioning Process
Technologies for Radon & Radionuclide Removal Tom Sorg U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Ion Exchange for the Production of Cellulosic Ethanol A.Hammervold, C. Cochran, J. Belsher, K. Childress Sponsored by Trillium FiberFuels, Inc. IntroductionProject.
PERFORMANCE OF A GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON BIOFILTER IN LOW STRENGTH WASTEWATER TREATMENT D. S. Chaudhary, H. H. Ngo and S. Vigneswaran Environmental Engineering.
What are the types of growing media used in floriculture production? The health and quality of horticultural crops rest largely with the growing medium.
1 Analytical Methods for Perchlorate: Current Technology and Possibilities for the Future David J. Munch Daniel P. Hautman Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Study on removal of bromate by activated carbon By Weifang Chen.
Donald Pope| IPEC 2015 Conference
Bioremediation of Arsenic Contaminated Water
Anion Exchange for Drinking Water Treatment
Mike Perlmutter 5th Annual Joint Services Pollution Prevention and
Practical Treatment of Produced and Flow-back Waters for Re-use or Surface Discharge Eric Ringler, Bill Chatterton (SR) Joon H. Min, Allen Chan (BKT Co.
SERDP Perchlorate Research Catherine Vogel SERDP/ESTCP Program Manager for Cleanup Attachment 5.
1 Case History: Removal of Perchlorate from Groundwater at the Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant Presented at the Sixth In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation.
1 Combined Perchlorate and RDX Treatment in Biological Fluid Bed Reactors PRESENTATION AT THE NDIA 30 TH ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY SYMPOSIUM APRIL 7, 2004.
Chapter 5 Ion Exchange. Lecture Outline  Uses  Fundamental Concepts  Process Operation  Practice  Operation and Maintenance.
January 2008 Updates This ppt was originally arsenic & fluoride and now they have been split Formatted to be consistent with other PowerPoint.
EVALUATION OF MAGNETIC NANO- ADSORBENTS FOR SELECTIVELY REMOVING METALS OF VALUE FROM REVERSE OSMOSIS REJECT STREAMS Leah V. Birgen and Dr. Jonathan Brant.
Prepared by: Pn. Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim
Combination of Ion Exchange and Solvent Extraction versus Solvent Extraction, a Technical–Economical Comparison G. Savov, T. Angelov, Al.Tsekov - Iontech.
Brine Concentration Pilot Project (AquaSel) Update
Paul Eger, Global Minerals /Sovereign Consulting Peggy Jones, Doug Green, American Peat Technology Igor Kolomitsyn, Natural Resources Research Institute.
Use of a Vadose Zone Biobarrier for Removal of Nitrate from Percolating Groundwater Jim Hunter, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado
Removal efficiency of nitrate.
Groundwater Pilot Treatment System Update May 2017
Soil Chemistry.
Treatment of Perchlorate in Water
RIMCON PROVIDES NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONSULTING TO THE MINING AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES INCLUDED ARE ZEOLITE AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL MINERAL-BASED.
Background Professional Geologist - 36 years
Nenad Marić, Zoran Nikić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry
Private Homeowner Drinking Water Issues
Jim Flechtner, PE Executive Director April 26, 2018
Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation (Anammox) for Nitrogen Removal
AN emerging issue (PFAS POLY- AND PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES)
New Jersey Drinking Water Quality Institute Treatment Subcommittee
Treatment – Ion Exchange Filters
Ecologically Effective Metals Adsorption Sorbster® Media Wastewater, leachates, ground water, process water, and ponds.
ENG421 (4c) – Water Quality Management
MRU: Metal Removal Units
MRU: Metal Removal Units
Physical/Chemical Waste Treatment
Arsenic Lisa Miller Water Quality Engineer Golden State Water Company
Trihalomethanes Removal Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Katherine Weeks (AMEC) Scott Veenstra (AMEC) David Hill 17/11/2018 Innovative Options for Ex-Situ Removal of Perchlorate and Explosives in Groundwater National Defense Industry Association 30th Environmental and Energy Symposium and Exhibition April 7, 2004 Katherine Weeks (AMEC) Scott Veenstra (AMEC) David Hill

Innovative Technology Evaluation (ITE) Team 17/11/2018 Innovative Technology Evaluation (ITE) Team Army National Guard Army Environmental Center Army Corps of Engineers AMEC Earth and Environmental Acknowledgements Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. US Filter Corporation Pennsylvania State University (PSU) The Purolite Company DL Maher (div. of Boart Longyear, Inc.)

ITE History and Mission 17/11/2018 ITE History and Mission History - Impact Area and Ranges at Site used for training since 1911 Mission - Evaluate innovative remediation technologies to treat low levels of perchlorate and explosives in soil and groundwater

Ex Situ Groundwater Treatment Technology Evaluation 17/11/2018 Ex Situ Groundwater Treatment Technology Evaluation Technologies evaluated Fluidized Bed Bioreactor (FBBR) Granular Activated Carbon (Standard GAC) Granular Activated Carbon tailored by the addition of a proprietary cationic monomer (Tailored GAC) Ion Exchange Resin (IX Resin)

Site Contaminant and Aquifer Characteristics 17/11/2018 Site Contaminant and Aquifer Characteristics Parameter Area #1 Area #2 Area #3 Area #4 Perchlorate (µg/L) 100 5 1 1 RDX & HMX (µg/L) 200 0 6 0 Nitrate as N (mg/L) 2.2 <0.12 0.05 0.1 Sulfate (mg/L) 4.6 6.1 4.4 5.0 Chloride (mg/L) 7.6 7.9 7.2 8.7 Total Organic Carbon (mg/L) <1.0 <1.0 0.59 0.68 Orthophosphate as P (mg/L) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Iron (mg/L) <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 pH (S.U.) 5.8 6.3 5.4 5.7 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 9.8 9.4 10.6 9.2

Fluidized Bed Bioreactor Overview 17/11/2018 Fluidized Bed Bioreactor Overview FBBR experience In use at DoD and commercial sites - Longhorn AAP (TX), Aerojet (CA) Vendor – Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Prior demonstration at lab scale on TNT but not RDX FBBR study Bed medium (GAC) Biomass Nutrient substrate Nutrients (N, P) pH control Fluidization control Fluidized Bed Bioreactor FBBR Flow Schematic Courtesy of Shaw, Inc.

FBBR Area #1 Study Results 17/11/2018 FBBR Area #1 Study Results FBBR A (Acetic Acid) Effluent Perchlorate vs. Time

FBBR Area #2 Study Results 17/11/2018 FBBR Area #2 Study Results FBBR A (Acetic Acid) Effluent Perchlorate vs. Time

FBBR Study Conclusions 17/11/2018 FBBR Study Conclusions Area #1 Study (Perchlorate and RDX) Perchlorate degraded to <1.0 μg/L at Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT) of 35 min. RDX degraded to <2 μg/L at HRT of 80 min. Area #2 Study (Perchlorate alone) Perchlorate degraded to <1.0 μg/L at HRT of 16 min. Addition of nitrate is required when perchlorate and other electron acceptors are low. Bench Scale FBBR

Granular Activated Carbon (Standard GAC) 17/11/2018 Granular Activated Carbon (Standard GAC) GAC - an old friend to water treatment, used on explosives Theory Contaminants held onto carbon surface via adsorption Contaminants removed but not destroyed Initial Breakthrough - after carbon’s capacity is exhausted, levels in effluent are above detection limits Rapid Small Scale Column Tests (RSSCTs) predict performance of a full-scale system Goal - Can Standard GAC remove perchlorate from groundwater at very low concentrations? Test - RSSCTs to find how much groundwater can be processed before breakthrough Carbon provided by US Filter Tests performed by PSU (Dr. Fred Cannon, Bob Parette)

Standard GAC RSSCTs Effective Bed Life (mo)1 13 2 3-4 9-11 9-10 17/11/2018 Standard GAC RSSCTs Parameter Test #1 Test #2 Test #3 Test #4 Test #5 Source Study Area #4 #1 #1 #1 #3 Perchlorate (µg/L) 1 5 5 5 1 Influent RDX (µg/L) 0 0 0 0 5.5 Influent HMX (µg/L) 0 0 0 0 0.5 EBCT (min) 20 5 7 20 10 BV to Perchlorate BT 30,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 to to to 25,000 24,000 46,000 BV to RDX BT N/A N/A N/A N/A 308,000 Effective Bed Life (mo)1 13 2 3-4 9-11 9-10 EBCT = Empty Bed Contact Time BV = Bed Volumes BT = Breakthrough 1 Effective Bed Life = time between media change-outs (months)

Modified Granular Activated Carbon (Tailored GAC) 17/11/2018 Modified Granular Activated Carbon (Tailored GAC) Theory - Increasing number of positive charges on GAC surface improves perchlorate adsorption Goal - Can modified GAC offer an economical alternative to conventional GAC? Test - Preload the GAC with organic monomer with a strong positive charge (Tailored GAC) Tests performed by PSU (Dr. Fred Cannon, Bob Parette) Materials - Proprietary cationic monomer - NSF approval is pending

Tailored GAC RSSCTs Parameter Test #6 Test #7 Test #8 3 17/11/2018 Tailored GAC RSSCTs Parameter Test #6 Test #7 Test #8 3 Source Study Area #2 #3 #3 Perchlorate (µg/L) 5 1 1 Influent explosives (µg/L) 0 6 6 EBCT (min) 5 9 9 BV to Perchlorate BT 77,000 270,000 270,000 to 170,000 BV to RDX BT N/A 8,000 308,000 Effective Bed Life (mo) 1 9 - 19 56 2 56 EBCT = Empty Bed Contact Time BV = Bed Volumes BT = Breakthrough 1 Effective Bed Life = time between media change-outs (months) 2 Bed Life applies only to perchlorate treatment, not RDX treatment 3 Test #8 combines results from Tests #5 & #7 (2 columns: 1 Tailored GAC, followed by 1 Standard GAC)

RSSCT Results & Conclusions 17/11/2018 RSSCT Results & Conclusions For 5 μg/L perchlorate in groundwater Standard GAC - operational life is 3 - 4 months (10-minute EBCT) Tailored GAC - operational life is ~ 20 months (5- minute EBCT) For 1 μg/L perchlorate and 6 μg/L explosives in groundwater Standard GAC - operational life is ~ 9 months (10-minute EBCT) Tailored GAC followed by Standard GAC - operational life is ~ 56 months (8.5-minute EBCT) Sorption differences Standard GAC very effective for explosives, slightly effective for perchlorate Tailored GAC very effective for perchlorate, ineffective for explosives

Ion Exchange Resins (IX Resins) 17/11/2018 Ion Exchange Resins (IX Resins) Theory - Anions held to a +charged surface are exchanged for other anions. These IX resins do not remove explosives/other neutral species Test - Field studies using Type I Styrenic Resins & Nitrate-Selective Resins Perchlorate Selective Resins evaluated, but appear to have similar effective bed life to Nitrate-Selective Resins for treating perchlorate at the site, at higher expense Materials - Purolite A520E, Purolite A600E are NSF approved for use in water supply Ion Exchange Resin Beads Courtesy of The Purolite Company

Field Study - Tailored GAC, IX Resins 17/11/2018 Field Study - Tailored GAC, IX Resins Goal #1 - Is Tailored GAC effective at field scale? Goal #2 - How much will monomer leach from Tailored GAC? Goal #3 - Will a “polishing” GAC vessel capture leached monomer? Goal #4 - Can IX resins treat low concentrations of perchlorate? From Well 50

Field Study - Tailored GAC, IX Resins 17/11/2018 Field Study - Tailored GAC, IX Resins Tailored N – S T1 - S Media GAC Resin Resin Source Study Area #2 #2 #2 Perchlorate (µg/L) 3 3 3 Explosives (µg/L) 0 0 0 EBCT (min) 5 5 5 Bed Volumes to date 21,000 21,000 21,000 Predicted Bed Volumes >150,000 72,000 15,000 Predicted Bed Life (mo)1 > 16 > 8 > 1.5 N-S = Nitrate Selective ion exchange resin T1-S = Type I Styrenic ion exchange resin EBCT = Empty Bed Contact Time BV = Bed Volumes 1 Predicted Bed Life = time between change-outs (months) Field Study: Tailored GAC and Ion Exchange Treatment 3 Treatment Vessels 2 Polishing Vessels for Tailored GAC Unit Final Polishing Vessels

ITE Field Study Results & Conclusions 17/11/2018 ITE Field Study Results & Conclusions Initial effluent from a Tailored GAC unit contains < 1 mg/L monomer; after one month < 0.1 mg/L. Preliminary: The Nitrate Selective Resin will likely remove perchlorate using an EBCT of 5 minutes, for an operation bed life of ~ 8 months. Preliminary: The Type I Styrenic Resin will likely remove perchlorate using an EBCT of 5 minutes, for an operation bed life of ~ 2 months.

Implementation Cost Comparison 17/11/2018 Implementation Cost Comparison Treatment Comparative Scenario Cost 5 µg/L perchlorate Standard GAC 2x Tailored GAC 1.5X Nitrate Selective IX Resin 4x 1 µg/L perchlorate, 6 µg/L explosives Standard GAC 1X Tailored GAC1 2X Nitrate Selective IX Resin 4X Assumptions: - Costs are for media only, except for Tailored GAC, where extra analytical costs are added. If monomer is NSF approved, costs are reduced by 0.5X - 1 Tailored GAC system requires extra Standard GAC vessel to treat explosives

ITE Study Recommendations 17/11/2018 ITE Study Recommendations Standard GAC can treat very low concentrations of perchlorate Standard GAC can be especially effective when explosives are present in addition to perchlorate Ion Exchange Resins can treat low concentrations of perchlorate to very low treatment goals. Tailored GAC may be an economical alternative to ion exchange resins. Further work to obtain NSF approval should be pursued. Applicability of ITE results to other sites is dependent on site characteristics -- RSSCTs, field studies recommended

References and Resources 17/11/2018 References and Resources AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. Katy Weeks – katherine.weeks@amec.com Scott Veenstra – scott.veenstra@amec.com Shaw Environmental and Infrastructure, Inc. Paul Togna - paul.togna@shawgrp.com Bill Guarini - william.guarini@shawgrp.com Pennsylvania State University Dr. Fred Cannon - fcannon@psu.edu Bob Parette - rbp122@psu.edu US Filter Dr. James Graham - GrahamJ@USFilter.com Tim Peschman - PeschmanT@USFilter.com The Purolite Company Tedd Begg - tbegg@puroliteUSA.com Francis Boodoo - fboodoo@puroliteUSA.com