Testing in the Context of the Operational Mission Mike Toole Army Future Combat Systems System Of Systems Test 4 March 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Hypersonic Weapon Flight Test Overview to the Space & Missile Defense Conference 14 August 2012 Ms. Debra G. Wymer Director, Technical Center.
Advertisements

U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command *Unclassified – For Public Release - Unlimited* Simulation and Training Technology Center 25 July.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS & GLOBAL SERVICES Craig Solem, CISSP Lockheed Martin Information Systems and Global Services Program Manager, Joint Medical information.
ProtoCore Capability What need is the ProtoCore addressing? Legacy middleware architectures, used in many simulation environments, do not make use of modern.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
Pacific Warfighting Center (PWC)
Army Test and Evaluation Command Developmental Testing: Industry/Government Roundtable – Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Brian Simmons Technical.
United States Army Combined Arms Center TIER III SUPPORT.
4 March 2015 Steven Szilagyi PEO IWS D4
AGENDA US Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM) Joint Force Trainer (JFT)
2009 M&S LEADERSHIP SUMMIT REGIONAL INITIATIVES IN MODELING & SIMULATION FAR WEST John Illgen Sector Director, Modeling & Simulation Northrop Grumman Information.
ITE Vision Adapted and Updated from the background for the Presentation, "Naval Platform Control Systems: 2015 and Beyond,” Eleventh Ship Control Systems.
1 EVALUATING INTELLIGENT FLUID AUTOMATION SYSTEMS USING A FLUID NETWORK SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT Ron Esmao - Sr. Applications Engineer, Flowmaster USA.
NDIA SE Division Meeting February 13, Developmental Test and Evaluation Committee Beth Wilson, Raytheon Steve Scukanec, Northrop Grumman Industry.
Modeling and Simulation Leadership Summit West Coast Panel.
Nurjana Technologies Company Presentation. Nurjana Technologies (NT) is a small business enterprise founded in 2012 and operating in Aerospace and Defence.
CLEANROOM SOFTWARE ENGINEERING.
MilSOFT UNCLASSIFIED 1/7 MilSOFT Presentation Turkey – UK Defence Industry Day February 11, 2010.
Multiple Autonomous Ground/Air Robot Coordination Exploration of AI techniques for implementing incremental learning. Development of a robot controller.
HPC use in Testing Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks
DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat Integrated Test Process Darlene Mosser-Kerner Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/Systems.
Measuring the Quality of Decisionmaking and Planning Framed in the Context of IBC Experimentation February 9, 2007 Evidence Based Research, Inc.
XMSF and Command & Control - GIG, XBML/C4I Testbed, XDV, XMSF Profiles Dr. Andreas Tolk Old Dominion University (ODU) - Virginia Modeling Analysis and.
© 2012 xtUML.org Bill Chown – Mentor Graphics Model Driven Engineering.
Developers Integration Lab (DIL) Nationwide Health Information Network Interoperability Presented By Mario Hyland, AEGIS.net, Inc. Federal Health Architect.
Web-Based Modeling and Simulation Understanding and Dealing With Complexity in... Mr. Dana Paterson AIR4.0X C4ISR Systems Architecture Development and.
1 US Joint Forces Command Welcome Aboard / Overview Maj Gen Jim Soligan, USAF Chief of Staff, USJFCOM.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
CrossCheckSimulation Results Conclusions References Model Instrumentation Modeling with CUTS Property Specification SPRUCE Challenge Problem Checking Model.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
Doing Business with the Naval Air Systems Command Presented to: SMART PROC 2015 Presented by: Ken Carkhuff Deputy Associate Director NAVAIR Office of Small.
1 Core Compl Systems Element Level Cap/Lim E, s, s, + Unks Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks M&S Decomposition Red Blue Capabilities & Limitations By Mission + Unks.
JNTC Joint Management Office
Joint Integrated Open Architectures: Progressing Toward Net-Centric Operations and Warfare March 30, 2004.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
Chang, Wen-Hsi Division Director National Archives Administration, 2011/3/18/16:15-17: TELDAP International Conference.
Integrated Development Environment (IDE) What need is the MATREX Architecture addressing? The MATREX architecture is designed to provide a robust, scalable.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
United States Army Combined Arms Center A next generation simulation architecture supporting both Computer Generated Forces (CGF) and SAF operations Provides.
Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Get the right M&S technology to the right place, at the right time, for the Decision.
Advancing National Wireless Capability Date: March 22, 2016 Wireless Test Bed & Wireless National User Facility Paul Titus Department Manager, Communications.
Bob Jones EGEE Technical Director
Center of Excellence in Cyber Security
U.S. Army RDE Command (Prov) - Supporting the Objective Force -
Brad Stubbs 19 Nov 02 DISA/TIS/TS3
Multi-Purpose Reconfigurable Training System (MRTS) Overview
TRANSFORMATION UPDATE
DoD Software Domains and their Impacts on SW Acquisition
Presentation Title September 9, 2018
Lesson 6 Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Exercise Team #
Subset of Executive Briefing
Simulation Initialization
An Overview of the ITTC Networking & Distributed Systems Laboratory
Dr. David “Fuzzy” Wells U.S. Pacific Command's Cyber War Innovation Center Introducing the Cyber War Innovation Center (CWIC) ** GE-104, 15:00 – 16:00,
41st Annual Targets, UAVs & Range Operations Symposium & Exhibition
13 November 2018.
XMSF and Command & Control - GIG, XBML/C4I Testbed, XDV, XMSF Profiles
DoD Automatic Test Systems (ATS) Strategies
18 November 2018.
OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION CHALLENGES
Bush/Rumsfeld Defense Priorities/Objectives A Mandate For Change
Technology for a NASA Space-based Science Operations Grid Internet2 Members Meeting Advanced Applications Track Session April, 2003 Robert N. Bradford.
Project Readiness Review P10029 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb
OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION PERSPECTIVE
Use of CMMI in an Acquisition Context Using CMMI for Process Improvement at USAF Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC) Dr. Jack R. Ferguson
4 March 2004 A Framework for OT&E Transformation NDIA 20th Annual Test and Evaluation Conference Dr. William G. Lese Vice President Simulation, Analysis.
Matteo Merialdo RHEA Group Innovative aspects in cyber range solutions.
Steering Committee Brief to the DoD M&S Conference 2008
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
DDR&E AC: Aligned to the National Defense Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Testing in the Context of the Operational Mission Mike Toole Army Future Combat Systems System Of Systems Test 4 March 2003

Future Focus of DT and OT Mission Emphasis on fighting in Joint Network Centric Operations “Need to Test Systems in the Context of the Operational Mission” Dr Marion Williams, AFTEC, Technical Director, ITEA Nov 2000 Contracting Lead Systems Integrator Army Future Combat Systems Global Missile Defense Combined Contractor & Government Test Teams in DT Distributed Integration & Test OSD joint Distributed Engineering Plant (JDEP) Air Force Joint Virtual Battle Space Navy Distributed Engineering Plant (DEP) Army Joint Interoperability Test Bed MDA Theater Missile Defense Systems Exerciser (TMDSE) Global Missile Defense Test Bed with ET ( Embedded Test & Training) Army Future Combat Systems System of Systems Integration Lab Leverage DT Developed Capability to Support OT

Testing for Joint Network Centric Operations Systems and System of Systems Tested in the Context of the operational Mission System Verification Family of Systems Verification Validate the Family of Systems Performance in a SoS Environment to include Joint operations. Integration Phase Approach Concurrent System and System of Systems Level Testing Reduces Risk of Systems of Systems Integration & Interoperability Integration in mission context with simulations, emulations and prototypes Distributed Integration & Testing Implement Simulation & Modeling Acquisition, Requirements & Training (SMART) Instantiate the Family of Systems in the System of Systems Environment Check out Interfaces and Design with real time simulations Connectivity to Distributed System Integration Labs Integrate early emulations to further reduce risk of prototypes interoperability in the mission context Leverage the DT developed capability to Support OT

Potential Opportunity OSD has goal to establish a Distributed Integration & Test and Experimentation Capability to Support Experimentation to Development of Joint O&O and Doctrine to Allow new programs to be integrated and tested as part of the Joint Force in the Network Centric Environment. Leverage Experience in Distributed Integration & Test and SMART to Meet the OSD Need Integrated Contractor & Government Testing in DT Leverage DT Capability to Support OT under Government control Common Hardware and Software Architecture Common Network DREN DISNET-LES Common Standards HLA JTA TENA

Leverage SMART Experience FCS SoS Virtual Framework Concept Common Standards & Software Architecture Immerse System of Systems (SoS) into a realistic synthetic battlespace Provide End-to-End, Real-time, UoA-scale test capability as the SoS matures into a delivered product Provide distributed testing capability in System SILs, the SoSIL, and ranges Support validation of SoS models and simulations Verify SoS Spec requirements Provide interoperability testing with external systems The SoS Virtual Framework wraps a simulated world around each Test Article, allowing for SoS performance assessment as the Test Articles mature.

Control Node Architecture Common Hardware Architecture SVF, Test Article Simulation, and Data Collection Platform (Qty 1) 32 Processor Server 5 TB Disk Farm Control & Monitoring Suite (Qty 3) COTS Software Red and Blue Cell Equipment Suites Red Force Role Player Workstations (Qty 15*) Blue Force Role Player Workstations (Qty 15*) Crew Simulators / WMI Mock-Ups (Qty 16*) *Qty is Scenario Dependent Node Communications & Time Sync Suite 6506 Switch (Gb/100/10) TACLANE E-100 Encryptors Time Code IRIG B, IRIG A, 1PPS Viewing Portal Suite (Sized for 20 Seat Theater) 2 Barco Projectors & Screen Audio & Video Processors Control Console & Recorders

Leverage Distributed I&T Experience SoSIL – Nationwide Distributed FCS Test Environment Viewing Portal Framework Test Data Management Center SoS Integration & Test Mobile Node WAN Network Equipment DREN Backbone Classified ACE IRCC UAMBL Connection to TRADOC Sites ATEC Sites

FCS-Focused, Nation-Wide Distributed Test Capability SoCal WSMR JFCOM RDEC UAMBL CTO CTSF JDEP Accessing Government Laboratory Resources To Support FCS Development and Test

Distributed Integration & Test Capability APG Common Control Node/DTCC CTO / DTTC Ft Belvoir RDECom Common Control Node Joint Integration & Test JDEP JSTARS OTHER SYSTEMS NAVY AREA DEFENSE AWACS IRCC/Common Control Node JFCOM System 1 n Joint Experimentation Common Control Node UAMBL Common Control Node BATTLE LAB 1 2 n Army Experimentation FCS Integration & Test IST Labs SoCal Viewing Portals Common Control Node CTSF Comanche Firefinder OTHER SYSTEMS Army Integration & Test Common Control Node WSMR EPG Field Tests OTHER RANGES Common Control Node C4ISR UGV MGV UAV