Hall C KPP Demonstration March 10, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.
Advertisements

Investigations of Semileptonic Kaon Decays at the NA48 Еxperiment Milena Dyulendarova (University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”) for NA48 Collaboration.
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 17, 2011.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Directional Detectors and Digital Calorimeters Ed Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For the 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky,
Muon Tracker Overview The PHENIX Muon Arms detect vector mesons decaying into muon pairs, allow the study of the Drell-Yan process, and provide muon detection.
Identification of Upsilon Particles Using the Preshower Detector in STAR Jay Dunkelberger, University of Florida.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
SHMS Detector Commissioning and Installation Howard Fenker Hall-C Users Meeting Jan-2015.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Proton Form Factor ratio GEp/GMp with polarization method --on behalf of Jefferson lab GEp3 collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University, China April
The Design of a Detector for the Electron Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider Anders Ingo Kirleis 1, William Foreman 1, Elke-Caroline Aschenauer 2, and Matthew.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
Detection of Cerenkov light emission in LAr Ettore Segreto University of L’Aquila Ettore Segreto University of L’Aquila Cryodet International Workshop.
Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, /21/20091K.Okada.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
A N DY Status Commissioning with colliding beams (p  +p  at  s=500 GeV) L.C.Bland, for AnDY 8 March 2011 Time Meeting, BNL.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
18/11/04DELPHI visits, PhC1 Visits to DELPHI/LHCb Ph.Charpentier.
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility(CEBAF) is the central particle accelerator at JLab. CEBAF is capable of producing electron beams.
Anders Kirleis Stony Brook University The Design Of A Detector For The Electron Ion Collider.
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 22, 2011.
1 G9a -FROST. 2 Experiments FROST New generation of CLAS photoproduction experiments with FROzen Spin Polarized Target (FROST) E02-112: γp→KY (K + Λ,
The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility (CEBAF) at JLab in Newport News, Virginia, is used to study the properties of quark matter. CEBAF.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia Goal: To generate electron fiducial.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
NBI2006 Starting OPERA data-taking with the CNGS beam D.Autiero IN2P3/IPN Lyon 5/9/2006.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
2008 European School of High-Energy Physics - Trest, Czech Republic - 19 August - 1st September Target Tracker Data Analysis In OPERA Experiment S. Dmitrievsky,
1/28 VISITS TO COMPASS / NA58 Seminar for guides 9 March 2005 Susanne Koblitz Gerhard Mallot.
Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia INTRODUCTION The purpose of.
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
FARICH status E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
SHMS Aerogel Detector Construction is complete
12-GeV Upgrade of Hall-C: Project Scope and Status
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
MDT and analog FEE mass production:
LKr inefficiency measurement
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
Overview of CLAS12 Calibration
G. Arnison et al., UA1 Collaboration
Prepared By M. A. Allosh, SVU, Egypt
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
When this happens... We see this... 12/6/2018 Steve Wotton.
The Hall C Heavy Gas Cerenkov
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
CLAS Simulations for the E5 Data Set
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
Particle Detectors Thomas Coan SMU What to detect? How to probe?
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Wednesday ,April 4, 2012 Dr. Brandt
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

Hall C KPP Demonstration March 10, 2017

GLOSSARY Acronym Description SHMS Super High Momentum Spectrometer NGC Noble Gas Cerenkov HGC Heavy Gas Cerenkov Shower Electromagnetic Calorimeter PSh Pre-Shower Calorimeter S1 / S2 Hodoscope Scintillator Array 1 / Array 2 PMT Photomultiplier Tube TDC Time-to-Digital Converter

Hall C KPP Run Period March 7–10, 2017 Beam ~ 5 mA CW Target BeO, Carbon

Hall C KPP Run Period SHMS Spectrometer – installation & Project commissioning complete

Hall C KPP Run Period SHMS settings: Momentum: 3 GeV/c Angle: 15º All magnets operational during KPP run period. Magnet Current vs Time Note: to verify polarity, magnets were occasionally ramped down and currents reversed.

Hall C KPP Detector operational: events recorded with a > 2nA electron beam at > 6 GeV beam energy (3 pass). KPP Demonstration Criteria: Detector running for 8 hours recording data from all subsystems. Screenshots of beam status and/or accelerator e-log entries demonstrating electron beam current and energy. Data showing relative timing of trigger, tracking, and particle identification in detector subsystems. Figures demonstrating charged-particle tracks from position-sensitive detectors. Particle identification plots using signals from calorimetry and Cerenkov detectors.

#1: Detector running for 8 hours 1. Detector running for 8 hours, recording data from all subsystems. Snapshot of Production run-start log entries (12h) Snapshot of timestamped datafiles (24h) Beam current stripchart (12h) coda@cdaq[4][pts/38]:/net/cdaq/cdaql3data/coda/data/raw Beam Current [mA] Label step [2 hours]

#2: Beam Status 2. Screenshots of beam status and/or accelerator e-log entries demonstrating electron beam current and energy. mA Beam Established: Log Entry: 3466542 Beam Energy, Current & Beam Position readbacks show beam to Hall C E = 6.406 GeV/c Current = ~ 5 mA Snapshot of Target Ladder Camera Log Entry: 3466543 Shows beam illuminating BeO target in Hall C

#3: Detector Performance 3. Data showing relative timing of trigger, tracking, and particle identification in detector subsystems. Hodoscope Timing 4 hodoscope planes in SHMS S1X, S1Y, S2X, S2Y Each plane composed of 13–21 individual detectors (“paddles”) Horizontal axis is paddle # Vertical axis indicates time of hit in nanoseconds relative to trigger Horizontal red / high-intensity stripe indicates all active paddles in each plane are seeing hits within 5–10 ns of each other [Left-side PMT signals shown “-”. Right-side PMT signals “+” ; are essentially the same.] Paddle Number Time [ns] S1X- TDC time vs Paddle # S1Y- TDC time vs Paddle # S2Y- TDC time vs Paddle # S2X- TDC time vs Paddle #

#3: Detector Performance 3. Data showing relative timing of trigger, tracking, and particle identification in detector subsystems. Time [ns] PreShower Left Side Timing HGC Timing PMT Number NGC Timing Shower Timing HGC, NGC Timing Horizontal axis is PMT # Shower Timing Pre-shower Timing PreShower Right Timing PMT Number PMT Number

#3: Detector Performance 3. Data showing relative timing of trigger, tracking, and particle identification in detector subsystems. Wire Drift Chambers 2 wire drift chambers provide tracks for charged particles 6 wire planes per chamber Figure shows time distribution histograms of particles passing by the wires in all 6 planes All planes have similar timing structure, minimal background All planes have similar counts indicating equal detection efficiencies See Criterion #4 for track reconstruction Wire Drift Chamber Timing Timing relative to Trigger [ns]

#3: Detector Performance 3. Data showing relative timing of trigger, tracking, and particle identification in detector subsystems. HGC Heavy Gas Cerenkov (HGC) Filled with CO2 Noble Gas Cerenkov (NGC) Filled with Argon Performance plots (right): Electrons generate large signal 'Other' generate no/small signal Note: Additional particle ID plots associated with Criterion #5 Black = total Red = electrons Blue = other Number of Photo-electrons NGC Run 478 NGC T->Draw("P.ngcer.adc_p[0]>>(500,1,10000)","P.tr.x[0]>0&&P.tr.y[0]>0") T->Draw("P.ngcer.adc_p[0]","P.tr.x[0]<0&&P.tr.y[0]<0","same") HGC T->Draw("P.hgcer.adc_p[1]>>(500,1,2000)","P.tr.x[0]>0&&P.tr.y[0]<0") T->Draw("P.hgcer.adc_p[1]","P.tr.x[0]<0&&P.tr.y[0]>0","same") Black = total Red = electrons Blue = other Number of Photo-electrons

#4: Detector Performance 4. Figures demonstrating charged-particle tracks from position-sensitive detectors. Preshower S1x S1y S2x S2y Wire Chambers Shower Run 488, Event 16 Tracking / Event Display Two perspectives on the same event shown in Hall C event display. Red track generated by Wire Chamber data only Visual confirmation that the other detector elements along the track do indeed see the same particle [NGC, HGC give negligible position information and are not shown here.]

Preshower Energy (arb. units) Preshower Energy (arb. units) #5: Particle ID 5. Particle identification plots using signals from calorimetry and Cerenkov detectors. HGC vs PSh Electrons HGC Signal (arb. units) NGC vs PSh NGC Signal (arb. units) Preshower Energy (arb. units) Pions Preshower Energy (arb. units) arb. = arbitrary

Shower Energy (arb. units) Preshower Energy (arb. units) #5: Particle ID 5. Particle identification plots using signals from calorimetry and Cerenkov detectors. Electrons Shower Energy (arb. units) Pions Preshower Energy (arb. units) arb. = arbitrary

KPP Demonstrated Detector operational: events recorded with a > 2nA electron beam at > 6 GeV beam energy (3 pass). Detector running for 8 hours recording data from all subsystems. Screenshots of beam status and/or accelerator e-log entries demonstrating electron beam current and energy. Data showing relative timing of trigger, tracking, and particle identification in detector subsystems. Figures demonstrating charged-particle tracks from position-sensitive detectors. Particle identification plots using signals from calorimetry and Cerenkov detectors.