Characterizing FOX Demonstrator Test Setups for LArDPS to FEX Modules at CERN RuthAnn Gregory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
7 Connectors © Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only. Explain how connectors and adapters are used in.
Advertisements

1 Physics 434 Module 1 About the computers: –You can save VI’s on the local disk. put them into My Documents\your_name (But beware: no backup, no protection)
Conclusions on torque and grease1 Alexander Dierlamm, Michael Eppard (CERN) Measurements of thermal contact between TOB module and rod May 2004.
Testing Fiber Optic Media Lab Last Update Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 1.
ST/SEU-CO | | © Robert Bosch GmbH reserves all rights even in the event of industrial property rights. We reserve all rights of disposal such as copying.
MICROCONTROLLERS MODULE 2 Programming, Controlling and Monitoring.
Pursuit of Better testing Instrument Let's go in the grandway......
ABRF meeting 09 Light Microscopy Research Group. Why are there no standards? Imaging was largely an ultrastructure tool Digital imaging only common in.
Fiber Optics BASIC FIBER OPTIC LINK.
Optical Interfaces Lab Last Update Copyright 2014 Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 1.
L1 => L2 Optical Network Patch Panel Update Tim Durkin STFC RAL 03/04/2014.
Power Budgeting in Distributed Systems.  Single transmitter signal distributed to two or more receivers via optical splitters Transmitter Receiver #1.
Results The following results are for a specific DUT device called Single Ring Micro Resonator: Figure 6 – PDL against Wavelength Plot Figure 7 – T max.
TESTING MULTIMODE FIBER
Chapter 10 Optical fiber measuring instruments and testing single-mode fiber networks.
1 Fiber Optic Measurement Technique Piotr Turowicz Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center Training Session Kiev 9-10 October.
Purpose Learn how to use basic electronic equipment:
Chapter 7 Photonic Transmission Systems (Digital & Analog)
Optical Receiver Sensitivity Rainer Schwemmer, LHCb Electronics Meeting Dec
Power Amplifiers Power Amplifiers are used in the transmitter
Testing Fiber Optic Media Last Update
NETE 0510 Presented by Dr.Apichan Kanjanavapastit
Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
Fiber Optics LINK LOSS BUDGET.
LightABLE Production Status ID Week October 2014 Tony Weidberg1.
1 LIGO-G V1 Magnetometer DC Power Assessment Magnetometers are distributed in the corner station and both end stations. The complete chain of one.
Analysis of Phase Noise in a fiber-optic link
Chapter 10 Optical Communication Systems
Atlas L1Calo CMX Card CMX is upgrade of CMM with higher capacity 1)Inputs from JEM or CPM modules – 40 → 160Mbps (400 signals) 2)Crate CMX to System CMX.
Chapter 8 Basic System Design. System factors for designing from scratch: Design Verification FactorAvailable choices Type of fiberSingle mode, multimode,
Optical Components/Devices
Advantages of the One-Jumper Reference Method 15 July The Advantages of the One-Jumper Reference Method Over the Two-Jumper Reference Method when.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
1 Physics 434 Module 1 Reminder about the computers: –You can save VI’s on the local disk. put them on the desktop put them into My Documents\your_name.
Physics 2225: Working With Electronic Equipment Purpose  Learn how to use basic electronic equipment: Digital multi meter Oscilloscope Function generator.
Optical Gigabit Ethernet Group 4 Presentation 3 February 10, 2005 David Larado.
Commissioning and Operation of the CMS Tracker analogue optical link system at TIF with CMSSW: R.Bainbridge, A.Dos Santos Assis Jesus, K.A.Gill, V. Radicci.
University of Kansas 2004 ITTC Summer Lecture Series Network Analyzer Operation John Paden.
Kavita Lalwani, Pooja Saxena, Kirti Ranjan, Ashutosh Bhardwaj Department of Physics & Astrophysics University of Delhi Manoj Sharan High Energy Nuclear.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz. L1Calo Phase-1 System Uli Schäfer 2 CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo ROD JMM PPR From Digital Processing System CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo.
12 September 2006Silicon Strip Detector Readout Module J. Hoffmann SIDEREM SIlicon Strip DEtector REadout Module.
Quality Control  Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Predicting the In-System Performance of the CMS Tracker Analog Readout Optical Links Stefanos Dris CERN & Imperial College, London.
FOX demonstrator Configuration for LArDPS to eFEX Test -- direct path Rev: 07-Jan-2015.
ZDC Status A.Mestvirishvili Iowa. Quite while we had some problems with ZDC, QIE saturations, Reflections, Noise etc. To improve the situation several.
Optical InterLinks LLC (OIL)----- GuideLink ™ Polymer Waveguide Products Multichannel Monolithic Data Network Monitoring Taps Using OIL’s Polymer Waveguide.
RF Calibration Introduction
Radiation Test Results Preliminary measurements from exposure to gamma rays at SCK-CEN B. Todd Huffman, C. Issever, T. Weidberg Summer Students - A. Povey,
KM3NeT-Italy Collaboration meeting 27/11/2014 Sistema di trasmissione dati su fibra ottica: Tower Sara Pulvirenti.
CuOF towards the Production Certification Tests 4/9/131 D. Dattola, P. De Remigis, S. Maselli, G. Mazza, G.Ortona, G.L. Pinna Angioni, F. Rotondo, R. Wheadon.
Part Three – Relay Input Sources
DESIGN STUDY November 28 th - 30 th 2005First EURISOL Design Study TOWN MEETING High Power RF Amplifiers Development at LNL Fabio Scarpa - INFN LNL.
Internet Architecture & Protocol
OptiSystem applications: SER & BER analysis of QAM-PSK-PAM systems
MSA / Gage Capability (GR&R)
OptiSystem applications: BER analysis of BPSK with RS encoding
Subject Name: Optical Fiber Communication Subject Code: 10EC72
7 Connectors. 7 Connectors Objectives Explain how connectors and adapters are used in the broadcast industry. Identify the types of connectors used.
RF cables calibration Matteo Volpi Thomas Geoffry Lucas
Error rate due to noise In this section, an expression for the probability of error will be derived The analysis technique, will be demonstrated on a binary.
First slides: Prof. Stojanovic, MIT Last slides: Prof. Dally, Stanford
Section 1: Measuring Motion
Inactivation of Medial Frontal Cortex Changes Risk Preference
Broadband Lateral Tapered Structures for Improved Bandwidth and Loss Characteristics for All-Optical Wavelength Converters Xuejin Yan, Joe Summers, Wei.
Mosquitoes Use Vision to Associate Odor Plumes with Thermal Targets
Section 1: Measuring Motion
Section 1: Measuring Motion
Polarization Maintaining Fiber Splitter
Diode Laser Experiment
TTC setup at MSU 6U VME-64 TTC Crate: TTC clock signal is
Presentation transcript:

Characterizing FOX Demonstrator Test Setups for LArDPS to FEX Modules at CERN RuthAnn Gregory

Outline FOX demonstrator introduction Review conclusions from tests at MSU Introduction Testing the ‘zero’ reference points for insertion loss measurement procedure Measuring the insertion loss for the systems of optical components to be used in the L1Calo system: LArDPS to eFEX test configuration without and with splitters LArDPS to j/gFEX test configuration without and with splitters More Tests: Fluke meter vs CMX board Conclusions

FOX Demonstrator Fiber Optic eXchange (FOX): Refers to an upgrade for the L1Calo system. FOX demonstrator was used to test the optical components Maximum light loss tolerated by the optical components is ~ 10 dB

Review of tests done at MSU Tests were done to better understand the behavior and reproducibility of the components (MiniPods, cables, attenuators, splitter, etc.) that the FOX and L1Calo will be using. The light output and input measurements show similar reproducibility and stability under different conditions (different temperatures, before/after cleaning, etc.) Receiver optical power variations: 0.2 dB for disconnecting and reconnecting MTP connectors 0.2 dB for a temperature increase from 36.4 to 38.2°C 0.9 dB from one MiniPod channel to another .4 dB from disconnecting, cleaning, and reconnecting

Review of tests done at MSU The attenuator measurements are not very reproducible. Manufacturer specifications, and measurements done with Fluke and CMX yield different results The splitter behaves as expected: Measures about 3dB loss for each output Outputs are split about 50% Next Step (in progress): Bit Error Tests Empirical measurement of the “light power budget” Characterization of the steepness of that empirical limit. Synchronization is lost at around 10 dB of attenuation

FOX Demonstrator Tests Motivation: To measure the insertion loss of the systems of optical components that will be used in the L1Calo system. Purpose of measurements of test setups for LArDPS to FEX modules: To fully characterize the FOX demonstrator. Purpose of tests with Fluke meter: To explore the stability and reproducibility of the system using a different measuring device.

FOX Demonstrator Tests at CERN In order to make insertion loss measurements a reference or ‘zero’ offset measurement needs to be measured. Diagram for LArDPS to eFEX FOX demonstrator (details to be explained later) Actual setup for LArDPS to eFEX FOX demonstrator

Testing the ‘zero’ reference points for insertion loss These references were used in the light loss calculations. Two configurations of the ‘zero’ reference points were used. A defective fiber was found on one of the breakout cables. This defect is in the breakout cable and is not part of the FOX. Configuration 2: Configuration 1 with two additional 48 fiber breakout cables and one additional 48 fiber trunk cable. Configuration 1: Two 12 fiber breakout cables with direct LC-LC connections

Testing the ‘zero’ reference points for insertion loss One of the 48 fiber breakout cables used in this setup had bad fiber on a breakout cable with significantly more light loss than the rest of the fibers This fiber is omitted from the plot shown here. Plot shows very little light loss through two 48-fiber MTP connectors + one LC connector Sets the scale for the light loss to expect from two 48 fiber MTP connections.

LArDPS to eFEX test configuration without splitters The diagram below shows the test configuration used including specific cables and connectors.

LArDPS to eFEX test configuration without splitters The outlier from the bad fiber was omitted from this graph. A very small amount of light loss (about 0.2-1.4 dB) was measured for this setup. This is compatible with and reinforces the results from slide 9.

LArDPS to eFEX test configuration with splitters The configuration with splitters uses a 48 fiber breakout cable with three built-in passive splitters as part of one group of 12 fibers Three built-in passive splitters plus three discrete splitters were used to split the fibers for one group of 12 fibers in the special 48 fiber breakout cable.

LArDPS to eFEX test configuration with splitters Plot shows light loss through LArDPS to eFEX test setup plus loss through built-in splitters. Expected loss for splitters is about 3dB per output The amount of light loss was similar between the two outputs Individual discrepancies for splitters is expected. Example: ± 0.3 dB corresponds to a 53/47% split.

LArDPS to eFEX test configuration with splitters Insertion loss from three discrete splitters was measured in different positions. First, second and third group of three positions were measured by discrete splitters 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Discrete splitters add roughly 3 dB of light loss. Measurements can vary with position by up to about 0.3 dB.

LArDPS to j/gFEX test configuration without splitters This configuration makes use of 72 fiber cables.

LArDPS to j/gFEX test configuration without splitters Most fibers in this setup continue to measure very little light loss. Some fibers near one side of the connector measure a larger amount of light loss

LArDPS to j/gFEX test configuration with splitters As before, the 48 fiber breakout cable with built-in passive splitters and discrete splitters were inserted into the light path.

LArDPS to j/gFEX test configuration with splitters As before, the light loss through the built-in passive splitters was significantly higher than the light loss without splitters. The Black and Rose built-in passive splitters measure similar light loss for both outputs. Output 2 on the Aqua built-in splitter measured about 2dB less light loss than output 1 (even though it is the same splitter as on slide 13)

LArDPS to j/gFEX test configuration with splitters The discrete splitters typically add about 3 dB of insertion loss as expected. Channel 3 shows higher light loss than the rest of the channels, which is attributable to the higher light loss measured on channel 3 without splitters shown on slide 16.

Fluke laser light source and light meter

Fluke Meter Tests Fluke meter light loss tests were done for the LArDPS to eFEX configuration without splitters and for the LArDPS to gFEX configuration with splitters using the ‘zero’ method 1 as the reference. The light loss measurements with the Fluke meter were consistently higher than the measurements with the CMX module.

Conclusions Measurements were made with FOX demonstrator that mimic the systems of fibers and connectors to be used to map optical signals in the L1Calo system. The insertion loss through the FOX demonstrator was very small, most fibers had between about .2 and 1.5 dB of insertion loss (with the exception of two defective fibers). The splitters behaved as expected with about 3 dB light loss for each output. The Fluke meter consistently measured about 1 dB more light loss than the CMX module. (similar to the results of the tests done at MSU).

Backup Slides

FOX Demonstrator Tests Notation In the 48 and 72 fiber cables, four groups of 12 fibers were used. These groups are referred to by color and relative position: Aqua group of 12 fibers, contains fibers in positions 1-12. Beige group of 12 fibers, contains fibers in positions 13-24. Rose group of 12 fibers, contains fibers in positions 25-36. Blue group of 12 fibers, contain fibers in positions 37-48. Fiber naming convention example: For Trunk cables: number in parenthesis indicates length of cable in meters. First Letter: Indicates type of fiber (T for Trunk and B for Breakout) TF48_n1(2) Second Letter: Indicates type of connector (M for Male and F for Female) Fiber identification number Number of fibers

LArDPS to eFEX test configuration without splitters and ‘zero’ method 1

Bit Error Tests

Discrete Attenuators

Disconnecting and Reconnecting MTP Connectors Each MTP connector was disconnected and reconnected for two trials in the LArDPS to eFEX configuration without splitters. Two measurements were taken after each disconnection/ reconnection There was little change in the average light output after disconnecting and reconnecting the MTP connectors

Disconnecting and Reconnecting MTP Connectors

Variable Attenuators