Bengt-Göran Sundqvist Saab Aerosystems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ClAss F3P Indoor Aerobatic Power Model aIRCRafts Schedule F3P - AP.
Advertisements

Emergency COA Process Presented to: UAS All Users TELCON
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 116.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 40.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 28.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 75.
Page 1 Approximately Maximum Bandwidth Routing for Slotted Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Approximately Maximum Bandwidth Routing for Slotted Wireless Ad Hoc.
Future Broadband Wireless Communication Mobility Testing Platform Ph.D, Prof. Fuqiang Liu, Xuefeng Yin Broadband Wireless Communication.
Insertion of UAS into the Spanish Airspace: Lessons learned Pablo González Brussels, 14 September 2011.
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
VDL Mode 4 Performance Simulator (DLS enhancements) presented by EUROCONTROL Montreal, 26 October 2004.
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
1 The PHARE Concept and Scenarios by Job Brüggen Head Air Transport Division National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR.
1 Results - Experience of Participating Air Traffic Controller By T. Symmans EUROCONTROL.
Using dynamic flow network modeling for global flight plan optimization CARE workshop 14th –15th March 2001, EUROCONTROL Brussels. Dritan Nace Heudiasyc.
Hierarchical, distributed and multi-agent control for ATM
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Estimating safe separations.
Tomorrows Safety Case Steve Kinnersly. Slide serial no 2 © 2001 AEA Technology plc Todays Safety Case? A reasoned argument that a system is or will be.
The EMERALD RTD Plan and the ASAS Validation Framework R P (Bill) Booth 10 October 2002.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
0 - 0.
CS4026 Formal Models of Computation Running Haskell Programs – power.
TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE Center for Robot Technology.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A The Transition Towards Free Flight: A Human Factors Evaluation of.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A “Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,
Mission Trajectory Step 1 From planning to deployment.
ASAS TN 6-8 October 2003 GS applications in Kiruna A Swedish ADS-B validation site Göran Hasslar CNS/ATM Applications Systems Engineer.
AIM Operational Concept
C ENTRE D'ETUDES DE LA NAVIGATION AERIENNE ASAS-TN, 2nd workshop - Malmö 6 ~ 8 october 2003page 1 Electronic separation Clearance Enabling the Crossing.
We are learning how to read the 24 hour clock
Motion in Two and Three Dimensions
Drop Zone Selection.
Distributed Systems Major Design Issues Presented by: Christopher Hector CS8320 – Advanced Operating Systems Spring 2007 – Section 2.6 Presentation Dr.
Large Aircraft Survivability Initiative (LASI) Programmatic Overview Briefing for the: 4 th Triennial Aircraft Fire & Cabin Safety International Research.
TOWARDS a UNIFIED FRAMEWORK for NONLINEAR CONTROL with LIMITED INFORMATION Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory and Dept. of Electrical & Computer.
Airpower: the Industry Vision
1 ECE 776 Project Information-theoretic Approaches for Sensor Selection and Placement in Sensor Networks for Target Localization and Tracking Renita Machado.
Synchronous Maneuvering of Uninhabited Air Vehicles
ACAT FRRP Automatic Collision Avoidance Technology Fighter Risk Reduction Program Copyright 2009 Lockheed Martin Corporation. Test Execution Lessons Learned.
Automatic Control & Systems Engineering Autonomous Systems Research Mini-UAV for Urban Environments Autonomous Control of Multi-UAV Platforms Future uninhabited.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
CL A Coordinated Flight of Uninhabited Air Vehicles Olivier Laplace Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University Program Quarterly Review - April, 2001.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Kai Virtanen, Tuomas Raivio, and Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis Laboratory (SAL)
Technology Input Formats and Background Appendix B.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Kai Virtanen, Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Ville Mattila Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki.
Agent Technology Center, Czech Technical University 25+ researchers performing : »basic research in multi-agent systems, agent based computing and agent.
Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
NIST Standards Education Dynamic Spectrum Access Systems Martin BH Weiss School of Information Sciences University of Pittsburgh
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Kai Virtanen, Tuomas Raivio and Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki.
SVDM ConOps 18 May 2010 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Space Vehicle Debris Threat Management ConOps Presentation to COMSTAC Space Transportation.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Kai Virtanen, Janne Karelahti, Tuomas Raivio, and Raimo P. Hämäläinen Systems Analysis.
UAV See & Avoid Employing Vision Sensors
Issues and Challenges for Co-operative UAV Missions Chris Halliday and Tony Dodd.
Discussions Summary ASSTAR - Crossing & Passing session.
Hybrid Systems Controller Synthesis Examples EE291E Tomlin/Sastry.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Manuscript “On the Use of Influence Diagrams in a One-on-One Air Combat Game” in Kai Virtanen’s.
Flygteknik 2010 Oct 19 MIDCAS – Sense and Avoid for UAS Bengt-Göran Sundqvist, Saab AB.
1 Reduced Transients at Wake Vortex Passage Wake Vortex Flight Control Laws presented at Meeting No. 98 SAE Aerospace Control and.
Beard & McLain, “Small Unmanned Aircraft,” Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 12: Slide 1 Chapter 12 Path Planning.
FAA Building Blocks Leading to UAS Integration Emerging Trends
Policy Compression for MDPs
VDL Mode 4 Performance Simulator (DLS enhancements) presented by EUROCONTROL Montreal, 26 October 2004.
SAIR127_EnBas 4/28/2019 4:23 PM Gripen development
Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology
VDL Mode 4 Performance Simulator (DLS enhancements) presented by EUROCONTROL Montreal, 26 October 2004.
Presentation transcript:

Bengt-Göran Sundqvist Saab Aerosystems 2005-02-02 Auto ACAS Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System The brief brief brief one. Bengt-Göran Sundqvist Saab Aerosystems 2005-02-02 SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

Historic perspective – Losses of 37 Viggen Auto GCAS Automatic Ground Collision Avoidance System Cooperaton Between Sweden and USA 1997 – 1999 Flight tested in F16. Currently under implementation and flight test in Gripen. Auto ACAS Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System Technology demonstration program between Sweden (FMV) and USA (USAF), 2000 – 2004 Funded (50-50) by USAF Air Force Research Laboratory and FMV (totally 12 MUSD) SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

Auto ACAS - Cooperation 2000 2001 2002 2003 Koncept Developm. Implementation Flight test LOCKHEED MARTIN LOCKHEED MARTIN SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

Auto ACAS Objective/ Customer ”requirements” Flight Test Demonstrate a system providing: Protection through an automatic escape maneuver No-nuisance operation, i.e. not interfere with normal operation (incl. Air Combat, Formation flight etc) Fail-Safe operation System designed as emergency last resort and aimed for both manned and unmanned A/C (UAV) SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

The concept Auto ACAS Intuitive to first identify a collision ….. SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

The concept Auto ACAS … and compute coordinated escape maneuvers. Auto ACAS does not predict future collision. It continuously optimizes coordinated escape maneuvers. The maneuver is executed when these claimed spaces intersect (in time and space). Datalink … and compute coordinated escape maneuvers. SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

The concept Auto ACAS The uncertainties are represented by cones Control is returned to the pilot Cones intersect The uncertainties are represented by cones Cone radius ½ Wingspan Position uncertainty Pred. error of trajectory Escape maneuver: roll 120 deg/s, followed by 5g Activate the escape maneuver! Roll to the selected escape angle and apply nz The aircraft fly within the claimed space SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

Summary Auto ACAS concept Does not predict collision. Continuously claims space, for the own escape maneuver, which is optimized against claimed spaces of other AC. The size of the space depends on the physical size of the AC and a number of uncertainties. The size varies continuously as a function of these. Automatically activates a safe escape maneuver when the optimized spaces intersect (in time and space). The AC flies in the claimed space during the activation. SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

Pros using the Auto ACAS concept Safe as all uncertainties are accounted for in the size of the claimed space. All AC ensure that the own fly-out will stay within the own transmitted claimed space. Nuisance free as the maneuver is deterministic for all AC it can be estimated with high fidelity and the uncertainties are thus kept small. Handles dynamic situations (continuously optimized escape maneuvers for all AC). Requires no handshaking (same optimization) Easily adoptable to new platforms Fail-safe Robust against link drop-outs SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

Cons using the Auto ACAS concept ACAS will require transmission of data over the link, this can limit the transmission of tactical data. Full operation is not safe in an out-of-network environment. Complex - to fulfill requirements, given the limitations and uncertainties, requires heavy algoithms. SAAB AEROSYSTEMS

Formation flight logic When in Close formation: all activations are inhibited. all other aircraft yield to formation flying aircraft. When in Inhibit: the activation is inhibited against the specific aircraft. full ACAS functionality against other aircraft. The logic is by-passed during activation. SAAB AEROSYSTEMS