Economics of Soybean Maturity Groups’ Yield Response to Insecticides Seed Treatments with Early Planting 1Normie Buehring, 2Angus Catchot, 3Don Cook, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of Insect Repellents and Barriers as Methods to Control Cucumber Mosaic Virus of Bell Peppers Joe Nunez Vegetable/Plant Pathology Advisor UC.
Advertisements

Reducing Soil Phosphorus Buildup From Animal Manure Applications Gerald W. Evers Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center Overton.
The soybean aphid in Illinois before ―Surprised like everyone else 2001―Economic infestations occurred, but they were not widespread. Populations.
R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Center North Carolina State University.
Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist Overview of Cotton Agronomic Research & Extension Program.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Immediate and Residual Effects of Urea and Pelleted Poultry Manure on Corn and Soil in.
Soybean Agronomics Eric P. Prostko Department of Soil & Crop Science The University of Georgia.
Systemic Insecticide Seed Treatments Will it be standard in variety testing? Overview Wheat, Soybean, Corn Bill Bruening * Don Dombek * Fred Allen.
Inventor: Craig Canady, Ph.D. Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Click to add Co-Investigator(s) NOVEL SUPPLEMENT TO SEED.
Physiological Maturity and Effect of Seed Priming on Germination Ability of Vegetable Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) Aye Nwe Win 1 (Master of Science.
Ag Innovations Program Jeff Tichota Monsanto Technology Development Topics to Discuss – Genuity – Acceleron – SmartStax – Roundup Ready 2 Yield ®
Soybean Aphids in Iowa – Past and Present Marlin E. Rice Extension Entomologist Iowa State University.
Defoliation, Harvest, and Cotton Quality…. Philip Jost University of Georgia.
Evaluating Algebraic Expressions 5-6 Indirect Measurement Extension of MG1.2 Construct and read drawings and models made to scale. California Standards.
UW MADISON AGRONOMY Impact of Cultural Practices on Soybean Aphid Incidence, Soybean Yield, and Virus Incidence John Gaska, Dr. Craig Grau, Nancy Kurtzweil,
C.W. Bednarz and W.D. Shurley University of Georgia and W.S. Anthony USDA-ARS Losses in Yield, Quality, and Profitability of Cotton From Improper Harvest.
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
Louisiana Variety Testing 2010 SCC-33/UCTA St. Pete Beach, FL January 26-29, 2010 Rick Mascagni Northeast Research Station St. Joseph, LA.
Use of Insecticide- Treated Soybean Seed by SCC-33 OVTs Don Dombek University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture.
Plant Growth Regulator Programs in Arizona Cotton Erin L. Taylor and Patrick A. Clay University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.
 If three sides of one triangle are congruent to the three sides of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.  If AB = DE, BC = EF, AC.
1 Notes 9/4/12 Pairs of Lines. 2 Parallel Lines Parallel lines are coplanar lines that do not intersect. Arrows are used to indicate lines are parallel.
Lesson 2-1 Pairs of Lines.
What Maturity Group to Plant - When and Where Larry Purcell, Michael Popp, and Montserrat Salmeron MSSB Meeting January 12, 2016 Memphis,
Soybean Maturity Groups and Selection
WHOLE FARM RETURNS FOR SPINDLE PICKER NARROW ROW PATTERNS IN A NON-IRRIGATED ENVIRONMENT: FINAL REPORT Normie W. Buehring, Robert R. Dobbs and Mark P.
Management of Fusarium root rot on carrots
Table 4. Statistical significance of parents and F1 hybrids of maize for various grain quality traits Qurban Ali et al. Gene Action for Various Grain and.
The graph is neither Eulerian or Semi – Eulerian as it has 4 ODD vertices.
Reduced tillage and crop rotation systems with winter wheat, grain sorghum, corn and soybean. Mark M. Claassen and Kraig L. Roozeboom Kansas State University.
Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting
Irrigation Method Impacts on Peanut Pod Yield. S. Leininger 1, L. J
Influences of Planting Population on Sugarcane Aphid (Melanaphis sacchari) in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Brittany Lipsey Mississippi State University.
Whitney D. Crow, Angus Catchot, Jeff Gore,
Yang Fang Graduate Student David Liu and Jeff Williamson
Agronomy Research Program
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Lesson 2-3: Pairs of Lines
2017 Cotton Agronomic Update
Lesson 3-1: Pairs of Lines
Section 3.1 Pairs of Lines.
Dominic Reisig NCSU Entomology and Plant Pathology
RISER Row-crop Irrigation Science Extension and Research
Similar Figures.
Grain Sorghum/Sugarcane Aphid Insecticide Seed Treatment Test
Cephalosporium stripe symptoms
Efficacy of sterol-inhibiting fungicides and SAR chemicals for control of black root rot of cotton in the absence and presence of nematodes Harun Toksoz.
Question 6: Sorghum IPM System for SCA Management
Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting
Lesson 3-1 Pairs of Lines.
Botanicals Inhibited Fusarium Pathogens of Millet Seedlings
Efficacy of various pre and post-emergence herbicides against weeds
Responsible Nitrogen Management in 2018: Rates, Treatments and Timing IFCA Webinar February 9, 2018 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois.
Congruence Human Products : God’s creation:
Arcs and Central Angles
The Impact of Planting Date on Fiber and Yarn Quality
Update on PLH Resistant Alfalfa
Fractional Factorial Design
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum
Effect of Planting Pattern on Cotton Growth and Yield
Methods of Determining Canopy Closure in Winter Wheat
Lesson 2-3: Pairs of Lines
2018 UGA OFT Cotton Varieties (14)
Lesson 2-3 Pairs of Lines.
Design matrix Run A B C D E
VARIABILITY IN TRIALS Adapted fr M Gunther.
Optimization of Strawberry Production in Fusarium Infested Soil Part 1
Lesson 2-3: Pairs of Lines
The Effects of Defoliation Timing and Ethephon Rate on Harvest Date, Lint Yield, and Fiber Quality of Cotton Guy Collins, Keith Edmisten, James Lanier,
reducing power assay (%inhibition )
Presentation transcript:

Economics of Soybean Maturity Groups’ Yield Response to Insecticides Seed Treatments with Early Planting 1Normie Buehring, 2Angus Catchot, 3Don Cook, and 3Jeff Gore 1NMREC Center; 2Entomology and Plant Pathology Dept, MSU; 3Delta Research and Extension Center

Objective Evaluate the effect of insecticide seed treatment on: Variety Maturity Group (lll, lV, and V) and planting dates on growth and yield. Returns above seed treatment cost. B. Determine optimum planting dates for soybean variety maturity groups.

Locations: Verona, Starkville, and Stoneville Maturity Groups Varieties: MGIII (AG3906); Early MGIV (AG4403); Late MGIV (Pioneer 94B73); Early MGV (DK5068); and Late MGV (DP5634). Planting dates: Early April, Early May, and Early June. Seed treatments: Apron (CK) and Apron + Cruiser.

a a b b b bc bc bc cd d d de de de A + C = 28.3 a A = 26.5 b 1.8 e

a a b bc cde bcd cde def efg defg gh fgh hi i bcde def efg defg gh fgh hi A + C = 50.3 a A = 46.0 b 4.3 i

12D 16D 22D

a a ab ab ab bc c c c c d d d de e A + C = 64.0 a A = 61.9 b 2.1

14D 18D 22D

Plant Height at Maturity Yield } b 2.7 a

Acknowledgement This research was supported in part by the Mississippi Soybean Promotion Board.