PG&E Automated Demand Response Program Webinar 2008 Program Summary and Participant Forum October 14, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Case Study of Demand Response: Con Edison Business Program by Eileen Egan-Annechino Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Advertisements

In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Go-to-Market Strategy
Enabling Customer Demand Management Kevin Evans President & CEO June 24, 2010.
2004 NERC, NPCC & New England Compliance Programs John Norden Manager, Operations Training, Documentation & Compliance August 31, 2003 RC Meeting.
1. International Module – 503 Noise: Measurement & Its Effects Day 5.
The 4 T’s of Test Automation:
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Best Practices, Design Guidelines and Standards
National Grids Involvement in New Englands Forward Capacity Market Helping to Bring Demand Resources into the Supply Mix Tim Roughan Director, Distributed.
PG&Es 2009 Participating Load Pilot. 2 Overview Regulatory Context Pilot Characteristics Lessons Next Steps.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
Learner-Centered Education Course Redesign Initiative Builds upon work of prior LCE grants Will award grants of $40,000 - $50,000, with the option.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Market Interface Committee Recent Regulatory Activities Philip Tice October 14, 2011.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Dynamic Pricing - Potential and Issues Joe Wharton and Ahmad Faruqui Kansas Corporation Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency March 25, 2008.
1 Comments for Workshop on EEU Budget for August 6, 2008.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
IdMRC THEME Design Information & Knowledge Estimating and Managing Through Life Costs Presenter Linda Newnes
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Automated Demand Response June 9, 2009 Connectivity Week, Santa Clara.
Proud Members of the Consulting Group, LLC
Software change management
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
© 2010 Invensys. All Rights Reserved. The names, logos, and taglines identifying the products and services of Invensys are proprietary marks of Invensys.
Smarter Balanced Field Test MARCH 2014 WHITTIER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Customer Service.
GSA Federal Supply Service DOING BUSINESS WITH GSA.
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
© 2005 AT&T, All Rights Reserved. 11 July 2005 AT&T Enhanced VPN Services Performance Reporting and Web Tools Presenter : Sam Levine x111.
California Roundup: Summary of DR Activity in California John Goodin Lead, Demand Response 2008 National Town Meeting on Demand Response June 3, 2008.
Smart Buildings for a Smart Grid Technology & Services to Make Buildings Grid Responsive James Dagley, Vice President of Channel Marketing and Strategy.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
1. 2 Captaris Workflow Microsoft SharePoint User Group 16 May 2006.
Functional Areas & Positions
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1. 2 The San Jacinto Unified School District presents: Strategic Plan For
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
1. 2 Introduction Industry trends Engagement models Governance Innovation Case Study Summary & Wrap Up Agenda.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Automated Demand Response Project History and Future Directions Presentation to the California Maritime Academy Mary Ann Piette Lawrence Berkeley National.
Automated Demand Response "PG&E" refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. ©2013 Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
1 SMUD’s Small Business Summer Solutions Pilot: Behavioral response of small commercial customers to DR programs (with PCTs) Karen Herter, Ph.D. Associate.
How Energy Efficiency and Demand Response can Help Air Quality Presentation to the California Electricity and Air Quality Conference October 3, 2006 Mary.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Overview of OpenADR May 4, 2011 Integrating Demand Response, Efficiency, Renewables and Smart Grid Sila Kiliccote Deputy, Demand Response Research Center.
Demand Response Research and Capabilities at LBNL Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Midwest Demand Response Initiative.
1 OpenADR Taskforce Chair – Albert Chiu Co-chair – Ed Koch Technical Editors – Bruce Bartell, Gerald Gray.
Summary: Automated Demand Response in Large Facilities Mary Ann Piette, Dave Watson, Naoya Motegi, Building Technologies Dept., LBNL Osman Sezgen, Energy.
California Energy Commission - Public Interest Energy Research Program Demand Response Research Center Research Overview Load Management Informational.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
Information Technology for Building Operations, Energy Efficiency and Demand Response June 9, 2009 Mary Ann Piette Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
High-Efficiency Buildings and Demand Response Phillip Price Mary Ann Piette Demand Response Research Center Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Demand Response Research Center Accomplishments and Future Directions Mary Ann Piette Research Director - Demand Response Research Center State Energy.
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program

Summary: Automated Demand Response in Large Facilities
Presentation transcript:

PG&E Automated Demand Response Program Webinar 2008 Program Summary and Participant Forum October 14, 2008

2 Webinar Agenda Welcome (Albert Chiu, PG&E) Review and summary of 2008 Auto-DR program (Greg Wikler, GEP) DRAS technology update (Dan Hennage, Akuacom) New technologies on the horizon for Auto-DR (Mary Ann Piette, LBNL) Participant Forum

3 Auto-DR Program – Core Team Program management and incentive program administration Program administration, customer recruitment, prime contractor to technical coordinators, engineering and validation, and incentive processing Primary research, technical advisor, training, quality assurance, system validation and evaluation Auto-DR system architecture and hardware design and production

4 Auto-DR Program – Technical Coordinator Team for 2008 APT* – Building Automation The Energy Coalition* – BEC Program Administrator C&C – Building Automation EPS – Industrial Process PowerIT Solutions* – Building Automation SCG* – Technical Services Site Controls* – Building Automation Syserco* – Building Automation * denotes new TC for 2008

5 What is Auto-DR? Automated Demand Response (Auto-DR) is a communication and technology platform designed to: Provide customers with automated, electronic price and reliability signals Provide customers with the capability to identify and automate site specific demand response strategies Improve the reliability of demand response programs so they can achieve the same operational status as conventional generation resources at a fraction of the cost Auto-DR can support all DR and pricing options Auto-DR is not a program but rather a platform for enabling existing and proven technologies

6 Auto-DR System Architecture

7 Auto-DR 2008 Program Summary Program Goals: Ensure that approximately 22.9 MW of Auto-DR from 2007 is available for DR events in 2008 Enable additional 7-8 MW of Auto-DR to bring total capability from efforts to 30 MW Commercialize Auto-DR program delivery 2008 Auto-DR program open to customers on Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) and/or Demand Bidding (DBP) programs

8 Accomplishments in 2008 Approximately 7.5 MW recruited with over 1.1 MW now tested and ready for program deployment Remaining 6.4 MW currently in the enablement process A total of 11 CPP events held this summer (between 5/15/08 and 9/4/08) One DBP test event (4 hours) held on 7/9/08 Training and technical transfer Technical coordinators Auto-DR system operations Load assessment and settlement Refinement of program procedures

9 New Auto-DR Customers for 2008 A total of 30 PG&E service accounts Baseline peak demand representing over 30 MW Estimated reduction amounts nearly 7.5 MW Average reduction of 29% (mainly driven by large industrial participants) Average facility reduction of 21% (for non-industrial participants)

10 Makeup of New Auto-DR Participants

11 Auto-DR Participant Makeup (cont.)

12 Auto-DR Participant Makeup (cont.)

13 Auto-DR Participant Makeup (cont.)

Results – CPP Events 29 facilities participated in all 11 CPP events in MW of actual shed from 3-6PM using the CPP Morning Adjustment baseline method for the 11 CPP events That reduction represents 70% of the automated load shed capability

15 Cumulative Auto-DR Shed for CPP Customers on 7/9/08

Results – DBP Events 54 facilities participated in 1 test event (2PM-6PM) on 7/9/08 Average MW of bids received by 3:30PM day-before for the event 11.1 MW provided load reductions for at least 2 hours (drawing upon the CPUC-approved 3/10 baseline method) The achieved reduction represents 85% of the bid amounts

17 Cumulative Auto-DR Shed for DBP Customers on 7/9/08

18 Program Planning for Customer support for current program participants to ensure continued functionality of automation systems Continue offering enablement incentives (up to $250/kW) for new participants who adopt Auto-DR measures Expand automation into other emerging DR program options Emphasis on distribution and feeder congestion management through Auto-DR

19 The Future of the DRAS Client Feedback Shed Potential: What the facility is capable of shedding (at all times) Shed Performance: Facility kW reduction vs. baseline (during events) Location Based Auto-DR Event constraints based upon grid and geographic locations Shed Potential and Performance for groups of clients defined by their grid and geographic location

20 Projects at the DR Research Center Supporting Auto-DR Embedding Auto-DR Clients in control systems Piloting small commercial Auto-DR systems using low-cost communicating thermostats Developing large commercial pre-cooling field studies and simulation tools Testing dimmable lighting systems, designs to provide efficiency and DR Evaluating industrial processes - case studies on refrigerated warehouses, wastewater, controls Planning implementation of OpenADR in Title 24

21 Linking Energy Efficiency and DR

22 Participants Forum – Potential Topics for Discussion Results of the end-of-year participant survey showed that all current Auto-DR customers plan to continue in Auto-DR in What is your primary reason for continuing with Auto- DR? Savings? Ease of participating in DR events? Employment of advanced technology? What can be done to improve Auto-DR for you? Additional shed performance information? An updated technical audit of your site(s) for additional load shed opportunities? A review of your manual sheds to assess their potential for automation? Were thinking of a doing a webinar prior to the beginning of the 2009 DR season to bring you updated Auto-DR information. Would you be interested in attending and participating?

Thank You! Global Energy Partners, LLC 3569 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suite 200 Lafayette, CA Tel: Fax: