Modal split to be estimated on an interzonal basis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System of linear Equation
Advertisements

THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Musical Sounds Physical Science101 Chapter twenty Amanda Hyer.
Regional Routing Model Review: C) Model Formulation and Scenario Analysis Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program.
Problem Solving: Using Systems Objective: To Use systems of equations to solve problems.
8-2: Solving Systems of Equations using Substitution
Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
ORDER OF OPERATIONS LESSON 2 DAY 2. BEDMAS B – Brackets E – Exponents D – Division from left to right M – Multiply from left to right A – Add from left.
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Innovations in Multi-Modal Transit Mapping Margaret Carragher E.I.T Advisor: Dr. Kari Watkins P.E. October 16, 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, Washington.
[Part 12] 1/38 Discrete Choice Modeling Stated Preference Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
In Portland, Oregon TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada Mark Bradley Research & Consulting.
1 1 Slides by John Loucks St. Edwards University Modifications by A. Asef-Vaziri.
My Holiday Economic Choices! Using your budget, choose an item to buy for each significant person in your life. Explain any opportunity costs.
4.6 Quick Graphs Using Slope-Intercept Form 1 GOAL
EXAMPLE 3 Use synthetic division
Mode Choice Lecture 10 Norman W. Garrick. Mode Choice The introduction of congestion charging in London in 2003 is one example of a situation where mode.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
1 Transportation Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequence Meeghat Habibian Modeling approach.
A Toll Choice Probability Model Application to Examine Travel Demand at Express and Electronic Toll Lanes in Maryland.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns Vishal Gossain Thomas A. Williams Joseph P. Savage Jr. Christopher E. Mwalwanda.
Norman W. Garrick Mode Choice The introduction of congestion charging in London in 2003 is one example of a situation where mode choice modeling is needed.
Modal Split Analysis.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Discrete Choice Models for Modal Split Overview. Outline n General procedure for model application n Basic assumptions in Random Utility Model n Uncertainty.
The Binary Logit Model Definition Characteristics Estimation 0.
Lec 11 TD-Part 4: & 5.5.1, H/O pp.491: Mode Usage (modal split) and Intro to trip assignment Understand why modal split needs to be done (5.4.3)
InMoSion: Science Shop for Innovative Mobility Solutions for Mobility Challenged Europeans 3rd INTERNATIONAL MEETING ANKARA, TURKEY Partnering: Civil Engineering.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions Ben-Akiva, Moshe, and Takayuki Morikawa. "Estimation of switching models.
Transportation Planning and Traffic Estimation CE 453 Lecture 5.
Joint Program in Transportation University of Toronto Generalized Time Transit Assignment in a Multi- Modal/Service Transit Network Eric J. Miller, Ph.D.
18 May 2015 Kelly J. Clifton, PhD * Patrick A. Singleton * Christopher D. Muhs * Robert J. Schneider, PhD † * Portland State Univ. † Univ. Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Standardized Test Practice
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
Dr. A.A. Trani Virginia Tech November 2009 Transportation Systems Analysis Modeling CEE 3604 Introduction to Transportation Engineering.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Distribution CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
A Model for Joint Choice of Airport and Ground Access Mode 11th National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6-10, 2007, Daytona Beach,
EMME/2 Conference Gautrain Rapid Rail Link: Forecasting Diversion from Car to Rail 8 September 2004 Presented by Johan De Bruyn.
Lecture 4 Four transport modelling stages with emphasis on public transport (hands on training) Dr. Muhammad Adnan.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
1 Components of the Deterministic Portion of the Utility “Deterministic -- Observable -- Systematic” portion of the utility!  Mathematical function of.
Meeghat Habibian Analysis of Travel Choice Transportation Demand Analysis Lecture note.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Florida Transit Modeling Workshop presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 8,
Enlarging the Options in the Strategy-based Transit Assignment TRB Applications Conference Reno 2011 Isabelle Constantin and Michael Florian INRO.
3. Transportation demand The discrete good case Theory.
Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology
A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Approach to Planning for Improved Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports (TO ) (Quarterly Meeting)
PEV Models and Scenarios for the 2015 IEPR Revised Forecast
Karen Tsang Bureau of Transport Statistics Department of Transport
Transportation Engineering Mode Choice January 21, 2011
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Analysis of Travel Choice
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Modeling Approach Direct vs. Sequenced
Trip Distribution Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Transportation Demand Analysis
Trip Generation II Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Travel demand models Anders Karlström Dept of Transport Science
Trip Generation II Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Transportation demand analysis
Presentation transcript:

Modal split to be estimated on an interzonal basis. Modal Choice Modal split to be estimated on an interzonal basis. For a given trip purpose: Modal choice = f(trip makers’ & modal characteristics) Examples: Trip makers characteristics: car ownership, income Modal characteristics: travel time (combination of access/egress time, waiting time, line haul time), frequency Car j i Transit Other

Logit Model Disaggregate level of analysis – the trip maker as the unit of analysis Choice riders vs. Captives Modelling travellers with a choice Probability of selecting a mode is a function of the impedance (I) or generalized cost (disutility but called utility U) of modes. U for a mode = f(travel time, travel cost, etc.) Example: U(transit) & U(automobile) From Probability of travellers’ mode choice, we Infer % of travellers for each mode

Logit Model (cont.) % auto captive % Transit 50% % transit captive U(transit)-U(auto) -ve +ve

Logit Model (Continued) Multinomial vs. Bimodal logit model Example of bimodal case: transit vs auto Pt = Probability that transit is chosen Pt Ut = Impedance of transit Ua = Impedance of auto e = base of log = 2.718 Pa = Probability that automobile is chosen Pt + Pa = 1.00 eUt = eUt + eUa

Logit Model (Continued) Example: A calibration study has resulted in the following impedance (utility) equation for any mode m: Um = am – 0.025X(1) – 0.032X(2) – 0.015X(3) – 0.002X(4) am = constant X(1) = modal access + egress time (min) X(2) = waiting time (min) X(3) = line haul time (min) X(4) = out-of-pocket cost (cents) =

Logit Model (Continued) From trip distribution model, for a future year Tij= 1000 person trips/day Future year service attributes: X(1) X(2) X(3) X(4) Auto 5 0 20 100 Bus 10 15 40 50 am modal constants: auto: -012, transit=-0.56 Find modal split. Solution: First compute U values U (auto) = -0.745 U(bus) = -1.990

Logit Model Example (Continued) Pauto = 0.78 Pbus = 0.22 1.00 Therefore modal shares from zone i to zone j: Auto users = 0.78x1000 = 780 trips Bus users = 0.22x 1000 = 220 trips 1000 trips

Multinomial Logit Model Pm = eUm Σ for all m’(eUm) Where Pm = probability that mode m is chosen Um = utility of mode m (defined earlier) e = base of logarithms m’ = index over all modes included in the choice set Note: if only two modes are involved, the multinomial logit simplifies to the binary logit model.

Multinomial Logit Model Example: A travel market segment consists of 900 individuals. A multinomial logit mode choice model is calibrated for this market segment, resulting in the following utility function: U = βm - 0.50C - 0.01T Where C = out of pocket cost (dollars), and T = travel time (minutes). βm values are Bus transit 0.00 Rail transit 0.20 Auto 2.40 For a particular origin-destination pair, the cost of an auto trip, which takes 12 minutes is $3.00. Rail transit trips, which take 20 minutes, cost $2.00. Bus transit takes 40 minutes and costs $1.25. Predict modal travel demand.

Multinomial Logit Model Solution: Utility functions: U = βm - 0.50C - 0.01T U (automobile) = 2.40 - 0.50(3.00) - 0.01(12) = 0.78 U(rail) = -1.00 U(bus) = -1.025 Modal probabilities by using multinomial logit model: Pm = eUm/[Sum of eUm’] By using the above, we find P(auto) = 0.7501 P(rail) = 0.1265 P(bus) = 0.1234 Expected demand (auto) = 900(0.7501) = 675 for rail = 114 and for bus = 111. Total = 675+114+111 = 900 check.