Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 536.
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Roberts AW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 325.
Lesokhin AM et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 291.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Alliance/CALGB 50803: A Phase 2 Trial of Lenalidomide plus Rituximab in Patients with Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma1 The ‘RELEVANCE’ Trial:
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
The Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor PCI is Highly Active as Single-Agent Therapy in Previously-Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Preliminary.
Dyer MJS et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 1743.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
1 Flinn I et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 084.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Brentuximab Vedotin Administered Concurrently with Multi-Agent Chemotherapy as Frontline Treatment of ALCL and Other CD30-Positive Mature T-Cell and NK-Cell.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Phase II SAKK 35/10 Trial: Rituximab Plus Lenalidomide Shows Durable Activity in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent.
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
Geisler C et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 290.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
A Phase III Randomized Intergroup Trial (SWOG S0016) of CHOP Chemotherapy plus Rituximab vs CHOP Chemotherapy plus Iodine-131-Tositumomab for the Treatment.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Reeder CB et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster)
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Korde N et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 732.
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
DiNardo C et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 327.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
Ibrutinib plus Rituximab in Treatment-Naive Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: Results from a Multicenter, Phase 2 Study1 Phase I Study of Rituximab,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Fujiwara H et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 181.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Kahl BS et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract LBA-6.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Attal M et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8018.
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
Niesvizky R et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 619.
Jakubowiak AJ et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 862.
Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 99.
Salles GA et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8004.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Zaja F et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 966.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Boccadoro M et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8020.
Presentation transcript:

Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036. Complete Response Rates with Lenalidomide plus Rituximab for Untreated Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Introduction The optimal treatment for newly diagnosed indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) has not been established. Several combination chemotherapy regimens have response rates approaching 90%, but toxicity is common with genotoxic agents. The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide has shown responses in relapsed NHL (Proc ASH 2009;Abstract 2719). In pre-clinical models, the combination of rituximab and lenalidomide showed a higher cell kill than either agent alone (Proc ASH 2009;Abstract 3441, Am J Hematol 2009;84:553). Current study objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with previously untreated indolent lymphoma. Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Phase II Study of Lenalidomide plus Rituximab Therapy for Untreated Indolent NHL Eligibility (N = 74) Untreated indolent NHL (follicular lymphoma [FL], SLL/CLL, and marginal zone lymphoma) Stage III or IV Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV d1 Lenalidomide 20 mg/d* PO d1-21 28-day cycle with delay for toxicity or cytopenia Response assessed after cycles 3 and 6 * Lenalidomide was increased to 25 mg/d after 3 cycles if stable disease. Patients with SLL/CLL received 10 mg/d cycle 1, 15 mg/d cycle 2, 20 mg/d cycle 3. Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Efficacy Results (Intent-to-Treat Population) Of 74 patients enrolled, 48 had completed six cycles of therapy and were included in efficacy and toxicity analyses. Histology Response Rates CR/CRu PR ORR FL (n = 30) 83% 10% 93% SLL/CLL (n = 5) 40% 80% Marginal zone lymphoma (n = 13) 46% 16% 62% Total (n = 48) 69% 14% CR = complete response; CRu = unconfirmed CR; PR = partial response; ORR = overall response rate Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Progression-Free Survival (Median Follow-Up 12 Months) Progression-free survival (PFS): at a median of 12 months (range, 3-20) 1 patient (FL) has progressed 100 Percent survival Months 80 60 40 20 5 10 15 25 N = 45 20-month PFS: 91% With permission from Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Molecular Response Bone marrow and peripheral blood were analyzed in 29 patients by PCR at baseline and after cycles 3 and 6. Nearly all patients were PCR negative by cycle 6. PCR Result Baseline n Post-Cycle 3 n (%) Post-Cycle 6 n (%) BCL-2 positive 11 3 1 BCL-2 negative 18 26 28 Total % conversion — 8/11 (73%) 10/11 (91%) Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Adverse Events Neutropenia 21% Thrombocytopenia 13% Rash Thrombosis 4% Grade 3/4 (n = 48) Neutropenia 21% Thrombocytopenia 13% Rash Thrombosis 4% Fatigue 2% Infection Neuropathy * Rash (all grades) was seen in 22 (46%) patients. The most common Grade 1/2 events were fatigue and myalgia. No patient developed tumor lysis syndrome. Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Conclusions The combination of rituximab and lenalidomide produces excellent overall and complete response rates in patients with untreated indolent NHL. Toxicity profile of rituximab-lenalidomide combination is mild with manageable hematologic side effects. Future randomized trials are planned. Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.

Investigator comments on a Phase II study of lenalidomide and rituximab for untreated indolent NHL We’ve observed activity with lenalidomide in recurrent lymphomas of all types, and now we’re starting to see combinations with rituximab. In fact, we have a Phase II CALGB study going on right now in recurrent indolent lymphoma, in which patients are randomly assigned to lenalidomide alone or lenalidomide with rituximab, to determine what rituximab adds to lenalidomide. It makes sense to start evaluating this agent in combination with rituximab and other agents, and as we move away from the relapse setting, it makes sense to evaluate it in the up- front setting as well. The findings from this study suggest that this combination might be a building block for other nonchemotherapy-containing regimens, which would be a nice alternative to chemotherapy for many patients. In the CALGB, we’ve been developing this sort of concept for a while with biologic doublets, and we're getting ready to open a trial of lenalidomide with rituximab as initial therapy for follicular lymphoma, which is similar to this MD Anderson study. Interview with John P Leonard, MD, June 28, 2010

Investigator comments on a Phase II study of lenalidomide and rituximab for untreated indolent NHL This was an impressive paper. Laboratory data suggest synergy with the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab, and here they resulted in an overall response rate of 93 percent and a complete response rate of 83 percent. This is interesting and it looks as if the combination might be best used in patients with indolent lymphoma and low tumor burdens for whom many doctors are using rituximab alone. Interview with Stephanie A Gregory, MD, June 18, 2010