Class 7 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 The Pole Attachments Act

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North American Portability Management LLC 1 NAPM LLC MEMBERSHIP INTRODUCTION.
Advertisements

Class 4 Wrap Up and Takeaways GSB 42201: The Legal Infrastructure of Business Market Power: Network Industries Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial.
Straight Talk on Tough Infrastructure Access Issues Charles A. ZdebskiEric B. Langley Troutman Sanders LLPBalch & Bingham LLP Washington, DCBirmingham,
John Windhausen, Telepoly Consulting Cathy Sloan, Computer and Communications Industry Association May 19, 2010.
Class 12 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Pre-Confirmation Distributions Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of.
ECO 436 Industry Studies Seminar David G. Loomis Universal Service.
Development of the Telecommunications Industry. Early History initial telephone service Alexander Graham Bell.
WEI 2009 Joint Use Conference Boise, Idaho September 28, 2009 Richard J. Busch Busch Law Firm PLLC Kirkland, WA
Class 6 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Changes in State and Federal Telecommunications Policies: How Do They Affect US All? SCAN NATOA 16 th Annual Spring Conference and Star Awards Long Beach,
Class 22 Copyright, Spring, 2008 Copyright and the Constitution Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of.
Legal & Regulatory Classification of Broadband Demystifying Title II.
BROADBAND ACCELERATION INITIATIVE: POLES, ROW State and Local Government Webinar (FCC) Oct. 5, 2011.
Class 7 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Class 24 Copyright, Winter, 2010 International Issues Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law The Law School The University of Chicago
Competitive Universal Service TC 310 June 5, 2008.
Network Neutrality: An Internet operating principle which ensures that all online users are entitled to access Internet content of their choice; run online.
Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Do Now How would you feel if you had to pay more for high-speed access to various websites on the internet? What plan would you join from the choices below?
Lecture 1 Introduction to Ethics. Chapter Overview Introduction Review of some ethical theories Comparing workable ethical theories 1-2.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Objective 2.05 Understand responsible actions for conducting business. SLIDE 1 Objective 2.00 Understand.
Section 1 Definition & kinds of right.  A group of obligatory rules that organizes the relationship between individuals in a certain society.  Thus,
ITS 602 Purposes of the course
Guided and Unguided Media
Development of the Telecommunications Industry
NATIONAL CREDIT BILL, 2005.
JOINT USE 101: Past, Present & Future Southwest Electric Distribution Exchange Horseshoe Bay, Texas May 4, 2017 Eric Langley.
4 Social Responsibility of Business and Government
4 Social Responsibility of Business and Government
U. S. CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION
Class 21 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 Network Neutrality
The University of Chicago
9/17/2018 Class 8 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 Interconnection and Data Roaming Randal C. Picker James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor.
Class 13 Antitrust, Winter, 2018 Tying
Class 09 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 Duration
Class 16 Secured Transactions, Fall, 2018 Choice of Law
Class 12 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Pre-Confirmation Distributions
Class 21 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 Copyright Misuse
LEVERAGING YOUR ASSETS AND CREATING PARTNERSHIPS FOR BUILDING FIBER
Class 17 Antitrust, Winter, 2018 Vertical Mergers
The University of Chicago
The University of Chicago
Class 18 Antitrust, Winter, 2018 AT&T/Time Warner
Class 19 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 Broadband: Legal Framework
Class 7 Antitrust, Winter, 2018 Applying the Rule of Reason
Class 4 Antitrust, Winter, 2018 Counting Entities
Class 2 Antitrust, Winter, 2018 Introduction: Market Power
Class 3 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Claims
Class 17 Copyright, Autumn, 2016 Fair Use
Class 6 Secured Transactions, Fall, 2018 Perfection: Debtor’s Name
Class 6 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Executory Contracts
Class 17 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 The Post Office
Advanced Legal Analysis and Writing Class 5
4 Social Responsibility of Business and Government
The University of Chicago
Government Regulation and Competition
1/2/2019 Class 9 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 Building Infrastructure: Highways/REA Randal C. Picker James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor.
The University of Chicago
Class 20 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 Network Neutrality
The University of Chicago
Class 19 Bankruptcy, Spring, 2009 Absolute Priority Rule
Class 3 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 Traditional Rate Cases
Class 4 Secured Transactions, Fall, 2018 Rights in the Collateral
Washington, DC Joseph Van Eaton April 20, 2010
The University of Chicago
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
Class 2 Platforms and Network Industries Spring 2019 The Post Office
Class 15 Secured Transactions, Fall, 2018 Transfers
Presentation transcript:

Class 7 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 The Pole Attachments Act 11/17/2018 Class 7 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 The Pole Attachments Act Randal C. Picker James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law The Law School The University of Chicago 773.702.0864/r-picker@uchicago.edu Copyright © 2000-14 Randal C. Picker. All Rights Reserved.

1978 Pole Attachments Act History 11/17/2018 1978 Pole Attachments Act History Facts from Legislative History 7800 cable pole attachment agreements in place 53% of poles controlled by power companies 85% of these already had telephone wires attached to them Most of the rest controlled by telephone companies November 17, 2018

1978 Act Legislative History: FCC Authority November 17, 2018

1978 Act Legislative History: FCC Authority November 17, 2018

1978 Act Legislative History 11/17/2018 November 17, 2018 1978 Act Legislative History

1978 Act Legislative History November 17, 2018 1978 Act Legislative History

1978 Act Legislative History November 17, 2018 1978 Act Legislative History

November 17, 2018 1978 Act: Key Definitions

1978 Act: FCC Just and Reasonable Rate Regulation (Subject to State Displacement) November 17, 2018

November 17, 2018 1978 Act: State Regulation

1978 Act: FCC Just and Reasonable Formula November 17, 2018

1978 Act: Sunset of formula in (d) November 17, 2018 1978 Act: Sunset of formula in (d)

1978 Pole Attachments Act History 11/17/2018 1978 Pole Attachments Act History Rate-Setting without Access Rights Desire to control monopoly power No access required, but if access to poles given and the states have not regulated the price of access, federal rates apply November 17, 2018

11/17/2018 1996 Amendments Core Create parallel rights for telecommunications service providers Rewrite of 224(a)(1) and 224(a)(4) New 224(f) Revised rate formulas in 224(d); add new 224(e) November 17, 2018

1996 Amendments (47 USC 224): Definitions November 17, 2018 1996 Amendments (47 USC 224): Definitions

1996 Amendments: FCC General Rate-setting Authority November 17, 2018

1996 Amendments: State Authority November 17, 2018 1996 Amendments: State Authority

1996 Amendments: FCC Rate Formula November 17, 2018 1996 Amendments: FCC Rate Formula

What is a “telecommunications service”? 1996 Amendments: What services are covered by the FCC formula? November 17, 2018

1996 Amendments: Telecommunications Services rates November 17, 2018

1996 Amendments: Nondiscriminatory Access Right November 17, 2018

Rights Structure Absolute right to access poles? Answer: No, but … 11/17/2018 Rights Structure Absolute right to access poles? Answer: No, but … Sec. 224(f)(1) obligation applies only to a “utility” Under Sec. 224(a)(1), two requirements for utility: LEC or public utility, and poles etc. used for “any wire communications” November 17, 2018

11/17/2018 Rights Structure General public utility will not be using poles for communications unless it has entered that business or given access to third parties Once it does so, this triggers the nondiscrimination obligation of 224(f)(1) But, with 47% controlled by telephone companies and at least 85% of the remaining 53% already with wire communications, close to full access November 17, 2018

FCC Pole Attachments Order (1998) November 17, 2018 FCC Pole Attachments Order (1998)

FCC Pole Attachments Order (1998): Commingled Cable Service gets benefit of 224(b) November 17, 2018

FCC Pole Attachments Order (1998): What rate for commingled under 224(b)? The 224(d)(3) rate November 17, 2018

FCC Pole Attachments Order (1998): Internet service is not telecommunications service November 17, 2018

Pricing and Internet Service Attachments 11/17/2018 Pricing and Internet Service Attachments What kind of service is cable modem service? Why do we care? Under 224(a)(4), pole attachments rules tied to cable TV systems or provider of telco service Pricing rules tied to cable TV system “solely” providing cable service (224(d)(3)) or telcom carrier providing telcom service (224(e)(1)) or general rule of 224(b) November 17, 2018

Pricing and Internet Service Attachments 11/17/2018 Pricing and Internet Service Attachments What kind of service is cable modem service? Why do we care? If cable system hooks up wire doing something other than cable or telcom service, do they have access right and what rate do they pay? November 17, 2018

According to the FCC Cable internet 11/17/2018 According to the FCC Cable internet Isn’t a telcom service, so 224(e) doesn’t apply Chooses not to decide whether it is a cable service but applies the 224(d) pricing scheme anyhow November 17, 2018

Wireless Carrier Attachments 11/17/2018 Wireless Carrier Attachments Lower Court Analysis 224(a)(1) and (a)(4) together are limited to attaching wires to poles “Read in combination, these two provisions give the FCC authority to regulate attachments to poles used, at least in part, for wire communications, and by negative implication does not give the FCC authority over attachments to poles for wireless communications.” November 17, 2018

Wireless Carrier Attachments 11/17/2018 Wireless Carrier Attachments Why is this wrong? Should the theory of the PAA matter? Focus on access to bottleneck facilities? Poles aren’t that for wireless communications? November 17, 2018