Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Expanding the PP2A Interactome by Defining a B56-Specific SLiM
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Supriyo Bhattacharya, Nagarajan Vaidehi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Opioid Receptor Three-Dimensional Structures from Distance Geometry Calculations with Hydrogen Bonding Constraints  Irina D. Pogozheva, Andrei L. Lomize,
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2011)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Ultraslow Water-Mediated Transmembrane Interactions Regulate the Activation of A2A Adenosine Receptor  Yoonji Lee, Songmi Kim, Sun Choi, Changbong Hyeon 
Structural Basis for Apelin Control of the Human Apelin Receptor
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 2175-2185 (December 2013) The Role of a Sodium Ion Binding Site in the Allosteric Modulation of the A2A Adenosine G Protein-Coupled Receptor  Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán, Arnault Massink, David Rodríguez, Wei Liu, Gye Won Han, Jeremiah S. Joseph, Ilia Katritch, Laura H. Heitman, Lizi Xia, Adriaan P. IJzerman, Vadim Cherezov, Vsevolod Katritch, Raymond C. Stevens  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 2175-2185 (December 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2013 21, 2175-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure and Conservation of the Central Sodium Ion Binding Allosteric Pocket in Class A GPCRs (A) The sodium ion distorted octahedral coordination as in the A2AAR crystal structure. The first shell is occupied by two conserved polar residues (green) and three water molecules, which contact with a second shell of residues (cyan), or with a second layer of water molecules connecting with the third shell of residues (magenta). (B) Sequence conservation of the 15 residues lining the binding pocket among inactive GPCR crystal structures. (C) Structure of the A2AAR complex with ZM241385, showing residues with higher than 50% conservation in all class A receptors as sticks with green carbons. (D) A close-up of the central allosteric pocket (transparent blue surface), showing the side chains located within 5 Å from the ten waters of the sodium ion/water cluster (green sticks: A2AAR; gray thin lines: the corresponding side chains of the overlaid GPCR crystal structures listed in B). See also Figure S1. Structure 2013 21, 2175-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Two Coordination States of the Sodium Ion as Observed in MD Simulations (A) Volumetric density map (isosurface contoured at 0.3 Å−3 value, blue) corresponding to the sodium ion occupancy as calculated from simulations MDS1 (see Table 1). The starting crystal structure is displayed, together with the electron density (contoured at 1 σ level, black). (B) The time evolution of the distances between the sodium ion and Asp2.50 (blue), Ser3.39 (red), and Asn7.45 (green), shown for the three independent replicates (R1–R3) of MDS1. The corresponding distances are denoted as dashed lines in (A) with the same color code and are the source of the data in Table S1. The root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) of the ion with respect to its crystallographic position is indicated with a black line, while the horizontal bar at 1.8 Å (the resolution of the parent crystal structure) denotes the limit for the crystallographic coordination state (position c1). See also Table S1 and Figure S2. Structure 2013 21, 2175-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Rotameric Transitions of Trp6.48 and Asn7.45 in the apo Simulations of the Inactive A2AAR (A) Populations of the initial conformational states in the simulations with (MDS2) and without (MDS4) the sodium ion, and the number of waters in the ion binding site (each data is an average of the three MD replicas). Note that Trp6.48 only finds the trans conformation when not in the initial g+ conformation, while Asn7.45 is more flexible and can be found in trans, g+, or the initial g− conformations. (B and C) Representative snapshot (magenta) of the conformation of these two residues in MDS2 (B) and MDS4 (C), with the reference crystal structure overlaid in light gray. Structure 2013 21, 2175-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Movement of Helix VII in Order to Accommodate the Sodium Ion (A) Starting (grey) and ending (rainbow, with helix VII colored orange) conformations of the agonist-bound A2AAR in the presence of sodium ion (MDS5), with the inactive crystal structure denoted in anthracite. (B) The distance between helices III and VII (x axis, Cα of residues Ile3.40 and Asn7.45 as indicated by a dashed line in the 3D structure) is plotted against the backbone rmsd of the motif His7.43-Asn7.49 (y axis), using as a reference the inactive conformation of A2AAR. Each dot is a snapshot extracted every 0.5 ns, with the time evolution depicted by the shading code (light gray to black). Active and inactive conformations are indicated with an asterisk and a triangle, respectively. Structure 2013 21, 2175-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Impact of Amiloride and HMA on the Binding of Antagonists (A) Amiloride docking (magenta carbons) induces a shifted position of Trp2466.48 side chain, revealing potential steric clashes with the orthosteric ligand ZM241385 (yellow carbons, superimposed from the crystal structure with PDB code 4EIY). (B) The same conformation of the amiloride-bound A2AAR, with the caffeine pose (green carbons) superimposed from the crystal structure of A2AAR/caffeine complex (PDB code 3RFM). (C) Flexible docking of HMA (magenta carbons) is predicted to further shift Trp2466.48 and interfere with ZM241385 binding. (D) Mobility of the antagonists in the presence or absence of amiloride, HMA, and sodium ion in the allosteric pocket, calculated as the rmsf from the MD simulations (dark shaded bars for ZM241385; light shaded bars for caffeine). The error bars indicate the SD estimated from three MD replicas (n = 3); ami, amiloride; ZM, ZM241385. Significantly different from the control simulation (i.e., absence of any allosteric ligand) in a Student’s t test with ∗p < 0.05. Structure 2013 21, 2175-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Equilibrium Displacement of [3H]ZM241385 and [3H]NECA by Allosteric Modulators NaCl (A), amiloride (B), and HMA (C). Representative graphs from one experiment performed in duplicate on human A2AARs transiently expressed in HEK293T cell membranes. Associated IC50 values are listed in Table S2. Structure 2013 21, 2175-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Effect of Allosteric Binders on A2AAR Thermostability Measured by CPM Assay (A) Effect of NaCl titration on A2AAR thermostability; mean ± SEM shown for measurements performed in triplicate. (B) Effect of NaCl (150 mM), amiloride (100 μM), caffeine (500 μM), ZM241385 (50 μM), UK432097 (50 μM), and combinations thereof on A2AAR thermostability. Structure 2013 21, 2175-2185DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.020) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions