Sensor Readings in Corn as Affected by Time of Day

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You are the owner of a acre farm, and you are growing many different crops in your farm…
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Missouri algorithm for N in corn
SPAD Chlorophyll Meter in Greenhouse Horticulture
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
2000. an increase in asymmetry in the red reflectance (as indicated by a MND of -6%) with a decrease in asymmetry in the NIR reflectance (MND of -6%),
Module 2 Healthy Plant Appearance When doing a field diagnosis, know how a healthy plant should appear. Consider the many parameters that can affect a.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
1 CANOPY REFLECTANCE (HRWW AND HRSW) IN SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC OPTIMUM NITROGEN RATE FOR HRSW IN SOUTH DAKOTA Nitrogen Use Efficiency Meeting Cheryl Reese*,
Outline Introduction – Importance for SE Mississippi State – Sensor Comparison – Wavelength/Index Analysis University of Arkansas – Active detection of.
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
Second part of precision farming Crop sensing by reflectance – Greenseeker Measuring fluorescence and photosynthesis – Yara N-tester Using Vegetation index.
GreenSeeker ® Technology For Plot Research Illustrating Data Collection: Plant Profiles.
Differences b etween Red and Green NDVI, What do they predict and what they don’t predict Shambel Maru.
Ch. 16 Color and the Design Process. The Magic of Color Affects how people feel Can evoke memories Trigger emotions Create thoughts in one’s mind Play.
Karnieli: Introduction to Remote Sensing
Field-Scale Sensor Evaluation Ken Sudduth, Newell Kitchen, Scott Drummond USDA-ARS Columbia MO.
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
SOLAR ENERGY.
Are NDVI Readings Sensors Dependent? Tremblay, N., Z. Wang, B. Ma, C. Bélec and P. Vigneault St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec.
NDVI: What It Is and What It Measures Danielle Williams.
Unit Plant Science. Problem Area Managing Plant Growth.
Interfacing Sensors with (VR)Application Equipment Scott Drummond Ken Sudduth IT Specialist Agricultural Engineer.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
Active-Crop Sensor Calibration Using the Virtual-Reference Concept K. H. Holland (Holland Scientific) J. S. Schepers (USDA-ARS, retired) 8 th ECPA Conference.
Improving NUE Using Crop Sensing : “It Takes a Village”
GreenSeeker ® Applicator Mounted Crop Vigor Sensors.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
F. Baret, O. Marloie, J.F. Hanocq, B. de Solan, D. Guyon, A. Ducoussou
State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Group Presentation, July 17, 2013
8th Grade Earth Science.
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Unit 1: The Scientific Method Chapter 1-1 & 1-2
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Shopper Traffic Case Study:
The Chi-Squared Test Learning outcomes
Scientific Inquiry Scientific Inquiry Foldable Notes taken in class.
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Cotton Sensor Research Update
OWC/OWRF Use of Sensors and Spectral Reflectance Water Indices to Select for Grain Yield in Wheat Dr. Arthur Klatt Dr. Ali Babar Dr. B. Prasad Mr. Mario.
Basics of radiation physics for remote sensing of vegetation
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
4th Grade Earth Space and Time
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Why does NDVI work? What biological parameter could I use to make agronomic decisions if it could be estimated indirectly? Plant Biomass  Nitrogen Uptake.
Steps in the Scientific Method
Extension: LCM 3 Three lights, red, yellow and green, are controlled by switches.  At the start, the three lights are switched on simultaneously.  The.
Ildiko Pechmann & Francisco Artigas
GreenSeeker® Technology For Plot Research Illustrated Data Collection
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
DAY & NIGHT CYCLE PowerPoint & Notes Set © Erin Kathryn 2016.
Questions Describe your observations
1 1.
Tracking System of Air Pollution
GreenSeeker® Technology For Plot Research Illustrated Data Collection
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Sun-Earth System Investigation 3, Part 2
Reflectance and Sensor Basics
MAX-DOAS#1, North Direction
SOLAR INTENSITY VARIABILITY AND CROP SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE
DAY & NIGHT CYCLE PowerPoint & Notes Set © Erin Kathryn 2016.
Photosynthesis: Pigments and the Light Reaction
Working Scientifically
Presentation transcript:

Sensor Readings in Corn as Affected by Time of Day Peter Scharf University of Missouri With thanks to Larry Mueller, Joao Medeiros, Bettina Coggeshall, and Amanda Coggeshall

Why consider time of day? Most of our readings were collected within one hour in our calibration research Our method requires comparison with a reference area If spectral properties change during the day, the time between measuring the reference area and fertilizing may introduce error There is some evidence in the literature that spectral properties change during the day

Literature: color vs. time Hoel & Solhaug, 1998: Wheat SPAD highest at dusk & dawn SPAD dropped when plants were transferred from low to high intensity light in growth chambers 5 units in 30 minutes in shade plant 6% in one hour in wheat SPAD goes back up when light intensity is dropped Brugnoli & Bjorkman, 1992: Sunflower transmittance higher at higher light intensity Due to chloroplast movement (arrangement & orientation)

Methods Experiments conducted in 2004 near Columbia Sensors were mounted in place over individual plants Sensor measurements were taken hourly from 6am to 9pm (approx. weekly) Experiment 1: June 16 (V8) to June 29 (V12) Experiment 2: July 7 (V6) to July 28 (V14)

NDVI vs. time: green is most sensitive

Green NDVI consistently drops a lot in the middle of the day

Green NDVI consistently drops a lot in the middle of the day

Regular NDVI also consistently drops in the middle of the day

Yellow NDVI also drops in mid-day, but perhaps the least of the three

What’s going on?--NIR

What’s going on?--VIS

What’s going on?--SPAD

Why were NDVI values lower in the middle of the day? SPAD suggests that these may change late in day Ideas: Change in canopy architecture Change in internal leaf structure Change in leaf pigment concentration or arrangement Influence of shadows (readings were in north-south rows: shadows in the background change dramatically during the day)

Why were NDVI values lower in the middle of the day? Ideas: Change in canopy architecture Change in internal leaf structure Change in leaf pigment concentration or arrangement Influence of shadows (readings were in north-south rows: shadows in the background change dramatically during the day) We were curious about this and decided to test it

Influence of shadows Greenseeker green & red, Crop Circle, stationary over soybean canopy Take reading in sun, then move shade over sensor & canopy, take reading, repeat Ten pairs afternoon 8/9/2005 Ten pairs morning 8/10/2005 Photo & measurements: Larry Mueller

Influence of shadows Greenseeker green NDVI was consistently much higher when measured in shadow Mean 0.684 in sun, 0.761 in shade Different with p = 0.0001 Greenseeker red NDVI was consistently higher when measured in shadow Mean 0.742 in sun, 0.769 in shade Different with p = 0.04

Influence of shadows Crop Circle yellow NDVI was not different measured in sun or shade Mean 0.707 in sun, 0.700 in shade p = 0.27

What about visible/NIR ratio? Visible/NIR ratio can be calculated exactly from NDVI—the exact same information is contained in both parameters So I won’t show vis/NIR vs. time of day But proportionally, differences are larger in vis/NIR than in NDVI analogs

Summary We thought that with active light sensors, we would not have problems with reflectance measurements changing as light conditions changed (time of day, clouds) With all three sensors, NDVI values were lower in mid-day and higher near dawn and dusk This pattern was much more pronounced with the Greenseeker green sensor than the other two

Summary Some of the diurnal change in NDVI may be due to actual changes in the crop SPAD is higher in evening Canopy architecture may also change Change in value for NDVI (or vis/NIR) during the course of the day is an obstacle to making good N rate decisions Need to solve this to be a useful on-farm tool Frequent reference reading is one possibility (N applied across rows with airplane?) Another possibility is to use a correction function

Summary We also observed differences in sensor readings in sun vs. shade Biggest in green Greenseeker Small in red Greenseeker No problem in Crop Circle Change in sensor readings when a cloud comes over is also an obstacle to making good N rate decisions We also have data from passive sensors in these experiments—not yet analyzed, but we will eventually compare them with active sensors