Clearly Connecting Performance Measures to Learning Interventions in Performance Improvement Activities Natalie Lavelle, M.Ed. Andy Hicken, PhD Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NEEDS ASSESSMENT IN CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION Diane Burkhart, PhD Director, Department of Education January 2010.
Advertisements

Self-Assessment, Lifelong Learning, & Assessment of Performance in Practice: Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians Parts II &IV David Price,
Many Members, One Voice Maintenance of Licensure: A Quick Overview.
Continu ing Competence The ability to provide service at specified levels of knowledge and skill, not only at the time of initial certification.
John R. Bowling DO, FACOFP dist. AOBFP representative to BOS
CME & ABP MOC Part 4 Jill Healy, MS QuIIN Project Manager Florida Pediatric Medical Home Demonstration Project (C4K) Learning Session September 23-24,
RADPEER™ Hani Abujudeh MD, MBA, FSIR Associate Professor of Radiology
GME Jeopardy. Compe 10 cies VISA issues ToolboxOversiteAlphabet Soup
® Realizing Collaboration: A MedBiquitous Update Peter Greene, MD Executive Director, MedBiquitous May 14, 2008.
Presentation to CAPA Annual Meeting MAINPRO + 25 October, 2014.
MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION © G. Rainey Williams Surgical Symposium Oklahoma City September 30, 2005 American Board of Surgery.
American Osteopathic Association Continuous Certification Process.
MPPDA 2014 Presidential Address Russ Kolarik, MD MPPDA National Meeting April 10, 2014.
Ongoing Evaluation of Physician Performance: Developing a Performance Portfolio Cary Sennett, MD, PhD MedBiquitous Annual Conference May 15, 2008.
New Certification Requirements Michelle DiBaise, MPAS, PA-C, DFAAPA.
AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE AAFP CHAPTER WEBINAR SERIES Resident MC-FP Requirements July 16, 2014 Ashley Webb Support Center Manager.
© 2012 NBOME WEB-BASED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT MODULE Luciana Goldstein, MLIS, MSEd Erik Langenau, DO Dot Horber, PhD.
Sara Lovell, CPCS Education Coordinator Providence Alaska Medical Center.
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., an Independent Licensee of the BlueCross BlueShield Association. This document has been classified as public Information.
MedBiquitous May 15, 2008 Integrating Quality Improvement Data into a Web- based CME Activity MedBiquitous May 15, 2008 Annette D. Boyer, R.Ph. CECity.com,
Society for Pediatric Research: Perspective on Maintenance of Certification February 2016.
Responding to Diplomate Feedback About the MOC Program.
An Online Self-Directed Research Curriculum Adrienne A. Williams, PhD Shana O. Ntiri, MD, MPH.
North Carolina Association Medical Staff Services May 13, 2016 Renee Aird Dengler, RN, MS, CPMSM, CPCS ABMS and MOC.
Health Literacy Summit Madison, WI
Clinical Quality Improvement: Achieving BP Control
Best Practices for Using Your Curriculum Management System
HOSPITAL ACCREDITATION & RETAINING QUALITY
NCAHRMM Spring conference
Incorporating Evaluation into a Clinical Project
Communication & organizational professionalism in clinical settings
Maintenance of Certification and the ABIM
Developing A Competency-based Curriculum
Dissemination Training
Developing A Competency-based Curriculum
Developing Sustainable Behaviour Change Training
Information Systems Selection
STFM Predoctoral Education Conference 2008
Professionalism & Medical Ethics
The STFM Graduate Medical Education Committee
Tejal Parikh, MD Paul Gordon, MD, MPH Frank A. Hale, PhD
Maintenance of Certification
Jennifer S. Novia INFO 643 March 6, 2011
From the Ground Up: Building an effective continuing education system for Egypt’s clinicians and community Prof. Graham McMahon, MD MMSc President and.
National Credentialing Forum February 1, 2018
Chapter 1: Introduction to Gerontological Nursing
New Approaches to Primary Care Informatics Education
Workforce Planning Framework
California Department of Public Health
Strategic Planning at Sunnybrook
Data Standards Provide a Focus for CME Initiatives
This slide was presented at the start of the program.
National Credentialing Forum February 11, 2016
September 15, 2009, presented at AHRQ Conference
Introduction to Electronic Health Records
Objectives of patients flow map
Using an ‘Oral Board’ exam to assess for EPA 10 in
Addressing the challenges of preceptor development and recruitment
Competencies in Health Information Systems
National Credentialing Forum February 8, 2019
Conclusions/ Future Directions
Key Building Blocks Evaluating Community Coalitions & Partnerships
OSCE Interest group 3rd April 2009 Barry Ricketts
Quality patient care is at the core of all we do
An Introduction to the ACGME
Housekeeping: CME Information Accreditation & Designation Statements
Precepting Performance Improvement Program
2019 Annual Meeting of the AMA Organized Medical Staff Section
Presentation transcript:

Clearly Connecting Performance Measures to Learning Interventions in Performance Improvement Activities Natalie Lavelle, M.Ed. Andy Hicken, PhD Director for Learning Technologies Director of Product Development National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners Web Courseworks May 16, 2016 Tech Demo Medbiquitous

Natalie Lavelle, M.Ed. Andy Hicken, PhD Nothing to disclose. DISCLOSURES Natalie Lavelle, M.Ed. Nothing to disclose. Andy Hicken, PhD Employee of Web Courseworks, a vendor of educational technologies (including some technology discussed in this presentation).

NBOME OPAIM A platform for on-demand, self-paced performance improvement (OCC Part IV ~ MOC Part IV) activities Competency-based education Stage A Provides immediate feedback on performance gaps and successes Compares performance to national quality benchmarks Automated, individualized reporting: no extra administrative work Stage B Directs participants to education based on performance gaps Various media used for the educational intervention Stage C NBOME has been able to successfully document that the educational activities are improving physician performance and having a positive impact on patient care.

Defining our Terms PI CME (Performance Improvement Continuing Medical Education): “A process by which evidence-based performance measures and quality improvement (QI) interventions are used to help physicians identify patient care areas for improvement and change their performance.” --AMA MOC Part IV (Maintenance of Certification Part IV): “These standards contribute to improved patient care through ongoing assessment and improvement in the quality of care provided by diplomates in their individual practices and/or in the larger hospital, health system, or community setting in which the diplomates practice medicine.” --ABMS OCC Part IV (Osteopathic Continuous Certification Part IV): “Requires that you engage in continuous quality improvement through comparison of personal practice performance measured against national standards for your medical specialty.” --AOA

Use of competency framework Pre-development Use of competency framework Mapped learning interventions to performance measures based in recognized best practices and current research

Three-Stage Model for PI CME Stage A Assess Current Performance “How well am I doing?” “What can I do to improve?” “Have I improved as a result?” Stage B Implement Interventions Stage C Reassess Performance

Assess Current Performance Three-Stage Model Stage A Assess Current Performance Performance assessment

“Infographic” Instantly available after completion of performance assessment Compares performance data to benchmarks Recommends learning based on performance data Key: NBOME staff can create intelligent recommendations based on performance data

Stage B: Individual Action Plan Practitioners reflect on Stage A, select learning interventions, and set goals for improvement Mention action plan?

Stage B: Learning Interventions Chunking: Learning Interventions are short (<5 min) videos grouped by performance measure Mention action plan?

Stage B: Practice Interventions Takeaway tools (quick references, performance support) to help learners implement interventions

Stage C Practitioners re-assess their performance after learning and practice interventions Infographic compares Stage A performance measures to Stage C

Results Completion rates have increased. Level 1 evaluation data: Learners rankings of the activity are improved. Level 3 evaluation data (performance assessment data) shows a significant improvement in performance. Average learner performance has improved on all performance measures – 10%. Statistically significant improvement in 2 performance measures – Potential side effects (16%) and interactions with other medications (23%)

Live Demo Participant view Administrator view Mention action plan?

Non-Clinically Active and Limited Scope Physicians OPAIM Futures Non-Clinically Active and Limited Scope Physicians OPAIM Simulation replaces data entry How could we draw in performance data from other sources? EHRs CDRs Elsewhere?