17.11.2018 Introducing ... The EAGLE concept – conceptual basis for a future European Land Monitoring Framework Stephan Arnold, Michael Bock, Barbara.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated GMES Project on Landcover and Vegetation geoland Grid based Spatial Disaggregation of Population Data Klaus Steinnocher – ARC systems research.
Advertisements

Land Cover in Europe lessons learned from CORINE land cover and new perspectives European Environment Agency (EEA) Markus Erhard.
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
Spatial analysis tools for biodiversity indicators on habitats and ecosystems Expert meeting on multi-scales mapping and integrated analysis of landscape.
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 Land Cover Classification.
Land Cover Classification System Class A Liaison Seminar of ISO TC 211 LCCS : An Approach to the Global Harmonisation of Land Cover John S. Latham and.
Has EO found its customers? 1 Space Applications Institute Directorate General Joint Research Centre European Commission Ispra (VA), Italy
BlackBridge | Earth Science Conference 2014 – USA Earth Science Conference 2014 – San Francisco - USA MASS PROCESSING.
Updating EU forest types process Marco Marchetti University of Molise-Italian Academy of Forest Science.
Spatial data for integrated assessment of urban areas Andrus Meiner European Forum for Geostatistics 12 October 2011, Lisbon.
Structure and Content of SoE Report in the Czech Republic Tereza Ponocná CENIA, Czech Environmental Information Agency.
Has EO found its customers? Results of GLC2000 Legend Workshop November 2000 JRC / Ispra.
1 Expert workshop on components of EEA Ecosystem Capital Accounts Focus on biomass carbon and biodiversity data 24/03/2015.
Corine land cover, Land accounts and scenario development An introduction Jean-Louis Weber & Ferràn Paramo 26 February 2003.
11 December 2008 P. Everaers, Eurostat, Directorate D Data Requirements and Conceptual Framework for Agricultural Statistics Discussion P. Everaers (Eurostat)
EEA 2006 Accounts Update Tables. PART 1 Table 1.1: Classifying land cover and land cover change for land accounting.
Roger Sayre, PhD Senior Scientist for Ecosystems Land Change Science Program U.S. Geological Survey and GEO Task Lead GI-14 Commonalities in Global Land.
Making the CDDA data model INSPIRE compliant Project information and status 2015 Eionet Biodiversity Ecosystems, Indicators and Assessments NRC Workshop.
UNCEEA NYC June 2009 Land Cover and Land Use Classifications in the SEEA Revision Xiaoning Gong (FAO) & Jean-Louis Weber (EEA) Fourth Meeting of.
Land accounts at the EEA Jean-Louis Weber & Ferràn Paramo 3 February 2004.
Assessment of the state of coasts in Europe – EEA activities and needs Andrus Meiner, European Environment Agency European Conference on Coastal Zone Research:
Monitoring Europe‘s ecosystem capital The role of Copernicus and other geographic information Working party meeting, Luxembourg, 2. March 2015 Stefan Jensen.
Land Use and Urbanization
Markus Erhard European Environment Agency (EEA) 1. Introduction:
The Initiative Landscape Character Assessment
Classifications (Level 1)
19th Council of Europe Meeting of the Workshops for the Implementation of the European Landscape Convention The implementation of the European.
Biodiversity.europa.eu BISE EEA and ETC/BD Rania Spyropoulou.
Expert Meeting Methods for assessing current and future coastal vulnerability to climate change 27 – 28 October 2010 Draft conclusions.
Markus Erhard European Environment Agency (EEA) 1. Introduction:
LC & LU databases coordination in Spain
EIONET interest group Land use and spatial planning
Provision of harmonized land cover information for lucas from the Finnish datasets Eurostat grant 2014 Provision of harmonized land cover/land use information:
What does this pie chart tell us?
ESPON Seminar Lillehammer May 10/11, 2004
Point 3.1 of the agenda From the pilot phase to the new LUCAS
© umweltbundesamt.at Bringing the LCML and EAGLE CONCEPTS TOGETHER STANDARDs FOR THE LAND COVER and LAND USE DOMAIN ISO TC211 - STANDARDS in ACTION Workshop,
LC Standards in the INSPIRE Initiative
Short and long term strategy on Land Cover/Land Use information
Development of a methodological framework (EEA contributions)
Expert session grassland
Pilot studies on the provision of harmonized land use/land cover statistics: Synergies between LUCAS and the national systems Norway Erik Engelien Division.
Land Cover and Land Use Classifications in the SEEA Revision
LUCAS Task Force 30 September 2015 Item 4 – Update on the Knowledge Innovation Project on Accounting for Natural Capital and ecosystem services (KIP INCA)
Existing data sets as source of information for LUCAS (I)
Integration of Territorial And Land Information
Vanda Nunes de Lima 18th June 2009
WORKING GROUP "Land Cover/Use Statistics" June 7-8th 2010,Luxembourg,
WORKING GROUP "Land Cover/Use Statistics" 20 October 2009, Luxembourg
“Land Cover/Use Statistics”
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
LUCAS Advisory Group Meeting LU/LC Classification & INSPIRE compliance
INSPIRE Directive & LUCAS: coordination of activities
Management of Natura 2000 Sites
Integration of Territorial And Land Information
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:
Land Cover and Land Use Statistics
Finnish experiences in deriving CORINE land cover information
Kaisu Harju Finnish Environment Institute Eurostat March 13th 2018
Revising the HNV Farmland methodology – Comparison of analysis of
United Nations Statistics Division
Towards future CLC Conceptual design and product outline
Green infrastructure developments at EEA 2018
LUCAS long term perspective
Environmental aspects
MAES and Accounting support to BD 2020 evaluation
MAES EU Wide Ecosystem Assessment
Copernicus Urban Atlas: an update
Presentation transcript:

17.11.2018 Introducing ... The EAGLE concept – conceptual basis for a future European Land Monitoring Framework Stephan Arnold, Michael Bock, Barbara Kosztra, Gebhard Banko, Gerard Hazeu, Geoff Smith, Nuria Valcarcel 1

Current Situation: numerous classification systems GIO HRL Forest Urban Atlas LUCAS ? EUNIS Habitats CLC GIO HRL Soil Sealing 2

Object orientation: A bread is a bread is a bread ... 3

Object orientation: A bread is a bread is a bread ... Classification Bread ≠ Bread Characterization Outer Appearence weight size shape Inner details grainsize density Ingredients salt wheat / rye water yiest E 510, … Color light dark Other Characters Bio-certificate Gen-free Use Food, Alimentation 4

Object orientation: Grass is grass is grass ... Classifications Grassland ≠ pasture ≠ lawn ≠ natural grassland Characterization Growth structure homogenous heterogenous Growth density closed sparse Moisture Wet soil Surface water Use intensiv extensiv Sports Management Multiple mowing Single mowing Ecosystem type Inland marsh 5

Structure of EAGLE Data Model & Matrix Information on landscape described with three separate main blocks… A.) LAND COVER Components – LCC block Abiotic, Vegetation, Water Surfaces B.) LAND USE Attributes – LUA block Agriculture, Forestry, Industry, Transportation etc. C.) further CHARACTERISTICS – CH spatial pattern, bio-physical parameters, ecosystem types, land management practices etc. 6

A.) Land Cover Components [LCC] Describe real landscape elements from pure LC point of view. (Read Matrix from top to bottom.) 7

B.) Land Use Attributes [LUA] Describe territory from pure LU point of view, according to function and socio-economic purpose, linked to INSPIRE (extract shown only) 8

C.) further Characteristics [CH] Characterize landscape with additional properties, flexible extendable list (extract shown only) 9

EAGLE data model: from matrix to UML chart 10

EAGLE data model: from matrix to UML chart 11

EAGLE data model: from matrix to UML chart 12

EAGLE data model: from matrix to UML chart 13

How to use the matrix: „bar-coding” method (I) 17.11.2018 How to use the matrix: „bar-coding” method (I) Bar Code Values: xx = not applicable (logically excluded, because not applicable) x = must not occur, excluded by definition 0 = not important (because of generalization effects) 1 = can be expected, but not defining element 2 = must occur, defining selective obligatory element (selective OR-function, at least one of tick-marked elements must be present) 14 14

How to use the matrix: „bar-coding” method (II) 17.11.2018 How to use the matrix: „bar-coding” method (II) Bar Code Values: 3 = must occur, defining cumulative obligatory element (cumulative AND-function, if more then one element tick-marked then all be present) 4 = multiple selective occurrence mandatory, more than one of the selected matrix element must be present 15 15

Matrix as semantic comparison tool 17.11.2018 Matrix as semantic comparison tool 16 16

Describing landscape with EAGLE model: „Built-up Area“ 17.11.2018 Describing landscape with EAGLE model: „Built-up Area“ Land cover components (LCC): conventional buildings, broadleaved trees, herbaceous plants, open sealed surfaces Land use attributes (LUA): permanent residential, agriculture/production for own consumption, road network Further characteristics (CH): soil sealing degree = 35% built-up pattern = discontinuous, single houses © Gyorgy Büttner 17 17

Describing landscape with EAGLE model: „Wetland“ 17.11.2018 Describing landscape with EAGLE model: „Wetland“ Land cover components (LCC): Inland water bodies, Reeds Land use attributes (LUA): nature protected land Further characteristics (CH): ecosystem type = inland marshes Salinity = fresh water © Barbara Kosztra 18 18

Benefits of usage of EAGLE concept Tool for analytic decomposition of class definitions Semantic translation between different classification systems Clear separation between LC and LU information Flexible structure of model allows integration of different land related information Conceptual basis for harmonized future European Land Monitoring Framework (NOT yet another classification system) 19

Current Situation of Land Monitoring in Europe ? Urban Atlas EEA CLC HRL LUCAS National HR- CLC / National Land Surveying CLC 25 ha National Land Monitoring National Stats 20

Scheme of EAGLE concept C O P E R N I C U S European & Global Level CLC Urban Atlas HR Layers BioPhys Par LUCAS European Land Monitoring Framework INSPIRE LC+LU compliant National & Sub-National Level National (A) Land Monitoring National CLC National (B) Land Monitoring Regional (a) Land Monitoring Regional (b) Land Monitoring 21

Remote Sensing community = EARSeL Surrounding context & relations of EAGLE concept Modelling & legal aspect: existing standards CLC, INSPIRE, ISO LCML Strategic aspect: stakeholders, user requirements MS, EEA, Eurostat, DGs EAGLE Scientific aspect: Methodological expertise for RS & LM Remote Sensing community = EARSeL 22

Who is EAGLE? EAGLE = EIONET Action Group on Land monitoring in Europe LC/LU experts from: - National Reference Centers (NRC) Land Cover, - INSPIRE TWGs, - ETC SIA partners, - FP7 HELM consortium Founded through self-initiative of experts from various European countries Open and voluntary participation 23

Thank you for your attention ! Contact us © Barbara Kosztra sia.eionet.europa.eu/EAGLE Upcoming event: 23. – 27. June 2013 INSPIRE Conference 2013, Florence, Italy. EAGLE workshop 24