Sampling scheme for LUCAS 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Random vs. systematic sampling J. Gallego, MARS AGRI4CAST.
Advertisements

Ex Post Facto Experiment Design Ahmad Alnafoosi CSC 426 Week 6.
Probability Sampling.
Ch 5: Equal probability cluster samples
Module 2.3 Estimating emission factors for forest cover change (deforestation and forest degradation) REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen.
LUCAS Monitoring the European Union territory using a grid approach Maxime KAYADJANIAN Eurostat F-2.
1 JRC – Ispra Area frames for land cover estimation: Improving the European LUCAS survey Javier Gallego Jacques Delincé.
Transforming a sample design for taking into account new statistical needs, new information or new technological instruments for data collection Elisabetta.
11 july 2008 European Conference on Quality COMPARISON OF VALIDATION PROCEDURES TO DETECT MEASUREMENT ERRORS IN AN AREA FRAME SAMPLE SURVEY Laura Martino,
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
Has EO found its customers? Results of GLC2000 Legend Workshop November 2000 JRC / Ispra.
1 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Using remote sensing for crop and land cover area estimation
NTTS 2011 Brussels February 22, Joint Research Centre (JRC) Sampling Very High Resolution Images for Area Estimation
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Designing the Sample.
JRC-AL – Bonn on Disaggregation of CAPRI results Renate Köble Adrian Leip.
USE OF AERIAL FRAMES FOR AGRICULTURAL CENSUSES AND SURVEYS Fiji Experience.
European Forum of Geostatistics Bled October Downscaling population density with CORINE Land Cover Warning: This presentation.
© 2007 Thomson, a part of the Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and Atomic Dog are trademarks used herein under license. All rights reserved.
JRC Place on dd Month YYYY – Event Name 1 Land cover change Objective: estimate land cover changes, in particular between agriculture and non-agriculture.
LUCAS 2006 J. Gallego, MARS AGRI4CAST. Sampling scheme Adaptation of the Italian AGRIT First phase: Systematic sampling of unclustered points (single.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural Census Sampling Frames and Sampling Section B 1.
Land Use Theory. Johann Heinrich vonThunen  German economist and landowner  Studied the spatial patterns of agricultural activities around Rostock,
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Sampling Design of 2012 Global Adult Tobacco Use Survey (GATS 2012) in Turkey (Comparison with GATS 2008) Yılmaz ERSAHIN.
AC 1.2 present the survey methodology and sampling frame used
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Marketing Research Aaker, Kumar, Leone and Day Eleventh Edition
Computer Aided Simulation Model for Instream Flow and Riparia
MASTER SAMPLING FRAME(MSF) AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS
MASTER SAMPLING FRAME(MSF) AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS
Statistics – Chapter 1 Data Collection
Classification of unlabeled data:
Sampling Methodology for Rice Crop Cutting Pilot Survey
Sampling: Design and Procedures
Weighting issues in EU-LFS
Some notes about Italian experience with Land use surveys
SAMPLING – SELECTING SAMPLES
STRATIFIED SAMPLING.
Point 3.1 of the agenda From the pilot phase to the new LUCAS
Regression composite estimation for the Finnish LFS from a practical perspective Riku Salonen.
The GISCO task force “Remote Sensing for Statistics”
2. Stratified Random Sampling.
Item 5.1 of the agenda Preliminary results of LUCAS 2009 Part II
Item 5.1 of the agenda Preliminary results of LUCAS 2009 Part I
NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME
2. Stratified Random Sampling.
Random sampling Carlo Azzarri IFPRI Datathon APSU, Dhaka
Observational Studies, Experiments, and Simple Random Sampling
Cluster Sampling STAT262.
Metode Sampling (Ekologi Kuantitatif)
Working Group Land Cover and Land Use Statistics
LUCAS 2009/2012 results Optimising comparability and Quality Reports Item 4.1 Working Group for Land Cover and Land Use Statistics Bech.
LUCAS SURVEYS 2009/2012: Optimising comparability
SASU manual: sampling issues
Land Cover and Land Use Statistics
NOTES 1. PLACE, DATE AND EVENT NAME
Eurostat E-1 - Structural Statistics, Agriculture
Sampling scheme for LUCAS 2015
Concepts and Definitions Used in Area Sampling Frame
Updating inclusion probabilities for the sampling units
LUCAS 2015 Achievements and Dissemination
Dr Helen Pontier Senior Scientific Advisor for Habitats Defra
Chapter 5: Producing Data
Sampling Design Basic concept
Land Cover and Land Use Statistics
Finnish experiences in deriving CORINE land cover information
Alternative delimitations of area sampling frame
Land Use/Cover Area Frame Statistical Survey
Math 145 May 23, 2016.
1st Joint Workshop Pesticides Statistics
Institute for Protection and Security of the Citizen
Presentation transcript:

Sampling scheme for LUCAS 2015 J. Gallego, JRC-MARS

Reminder: LUCAS 2001-2003 two-stage sampling One cluster every 18x18 km Each cluster has 5 x 2 points 300m apart from each other. And one transect of 1200 m that joins one row of points It can be seen as an incomplete observation of a segment PSUs SSUs

LUCAS 2006 two-phase sampling First phase: Systematic sampling of unclustered points (single stage) A master or first phase sample (pre-sample): One point every 2x2 km Stratification by quick photo-interpretation Second Stratified sub-sampling Priority: crop area 50% in cropland strata 40% in grassland 10% other strata Excluded areas > 1200 m altitude 11 countries covered

LUCAS 2009 First phase sample: same 2-km grid as 2006 extended to EU25-(MT, CY) Excluded points: Altitude > 1000 m. Minor islands Subsampling rates tuned by stratum and NUTS2 A large number of points could not be reached and was photo-interpreted Office (ex-ante) >29,000 Field > 29,000

LUCAS 2012 EU-27 Non-eligible points: approx. 340,000 points are excluded from the second phase sampling for the field survey. Altitude > 1500 m. Minor islands Points photo-interpreted ex-ante in 2009 because they were considered too difficult to be reached. Points photo-interpreted in the field in 2009 were substituted by other points in the same NUTS2*strata with better accessibility Other points too far from the roads or too strong elevation change. Thresholds computed by NUTS0

LUCAS 2009-2012 photo-interpreted points

LUCAS 2015 EU-28 Keep 2012 rules on: Altitude (>1500 m) Points that could not be reached in a previous survey Distance thresholds to be applied only in “CLC-difficult-access” areas. Threshold distance to road: 600 m Threshold altitude change: 100 m Non-eligible points reduced from 340,000 to 167,000 points

LUCAS 2015 master grid (1st phase sample) Filling gaps on previous version Making it consistent with NUTS 2010 layer + Transitional waters (outside NUTS boundaries). Sampled but weight =0 for estimation Homogeneity across countries might need to be improved Transisional waters in LUCAS 2015 grid

CLC-difficult access Assumption: Agricultural areas are generally reachable by car, even if dirt roads are not reported in Tele-Atlas. CLC classes assumed to have easy accessibility: 1** : artificial 2** : agricultural

Distance to closest road Based on Tele-Atlas Agricultural dirt-roads not included

Types of non-eligible points Visual impression may be misleading (15% of points non-eligible)

Zoom on the sample: Alpes Scandinavia

LUCAS 2015 Subsampling rates  

Subsampling: additional modifications Minimum sample nh=2 per domain (NUTS2 * stratum) Some points selected by the Soil Bureau were forced to belong to the sample. The full 1st phase sample was selected for CY and MT

Covering excluded areas An additional sample to be photo-interpreted should be selected on the excluded points Including 2009 and mainly 2012