Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enzyme Kinetics C483 Spring 2013.
Advertisements

Regulators of Cell Cycle Progression (Literature Review) Prepared by Cai Chunhui.
François Fages MPRI Bio-info 2006 Formal Biology of the Cell Modeling, Computing and Reasoning with Constraints François Fages, Constraint Programming.
Molecular mechanisms of long-term memory
Bioinformatics 3 V18 – Kinetic Motifs Mon, Jan 12, 2015.
Network Dynamics and Cell Physiology John J. Tyson Dept. Biological Sciences Virginia Tech.
Cells must either reproduce or they die. Cells that can not reproduce and are destined to die are terminal cells (red blood, nerve cells, muscles cells.
Modeling the Frog Cell Cycle Nancy Griffeth. Goals of modeling Knowledge representation Predictive understanding ◦ Different stimulation conditions ◦
John J. Tyson Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech
Computational Modeling of the Cell Cycle
The essential processes of the cell cycle—such as DNA replication, mitosis, and cytokinesis—are triggered by a cell-cycle control system. By analogy with.
8. Lecture WS 2010/11Cellular Programs1 Already simple genetic circuits can give rise to oscillations. E.g., a negative feedback loop X  R ─┤ X can yield.
Chp 2 Molecules and Cells in Animal Physiology Read Chp 2 of the book Use the notes for Human Physiology We will see metabolism and the enzymes in more.
APC = anaphase-promoting complex
Cell cycles and clocking mechanisms in systems biology ESE 680 – 003 : Systems Biology Spring 2007.
Aguda & Friedman Chapter 6 The Eukaryotic Cell-Cycle Engine.
Molecular Physiology: Enzymes and Cell Signaling.
A Primer in Bifurcation Theory for Computational Cell Biologists John J. Tyson Virginia Polytechnic Institute & Virginia Bioinformatics Institute
Protein Networks Week 5. Linear Response A simple example of protein dynamics: protein synthesis and degradation Using the law of mass action, we can.
Outline A Biological Perspective The Cell The Cell Cycle Modeling Mathematicians I have known.
Chapter 12 The Cell Cycle.
Chapter 12: Cell Cycle I. The key roles of cell division
Chapter 17 The Cell Cycle.
Bio 178 Lecture 21 The Cell Cycle (Cntd.) and Sexual Reproduction © Biodidac. 7F&File_type=GIF.
Multiplication of cells takes place by division of pre- existing cells. Cell multiplication is equally necessary after the birth of the individual for.
Metabolic pathway alteration, regulation and control (5) -- Simulation of metabolic network Xi Wang 02/07/2013 Spring 2013 BsysE 595 Biosystems Engineering.
Cell Cycle.
Picture of an enzymatic reaction. Velocity =  P/  t or -  S/  t Product Time.
G 1 and S Phases of the Cell Cycle SIGMA-ALDRICH.
Network Dynamics and Cell Physiology John J. Tyson Department of Biological Sciences & Virginia Bioinformatics Institute & Virginia Bioinformatics Institute.
Cell Cycle and its Control Lecture 37BSCI 420,421, 620Nov 27, 2002 “ Cells come from previous cells” – R. Virchow 1.Intro to the cell cycle 2.The cell.
Cell Cycle Sequential series of events from one mitosis to the next Regulated at critical transition points: G1/S and G2/M Regulation is essential for.
1 Introduction to Biological Modeling Steve Andrews Brent lab, Basic Sciences Division, FHCRC Lecture 2: Modeling dynamics Sept. 29, 2010.
22. Lecture WS 2005/06Bioinformatics III1 V22 Modelling Dynamic Cellular Processes John TysonBela Novak Mathematical description of signalling pathways.
Lecture 10: Cell cycle Dr. Mamoun Ahram Faculty of Medicine
Cell Cycle Checkpoint.
16. Lecture WS 2006/07Bioinformatics III1 V16 Modelling Dynamic Cellular Processes John TysonBela Novak Mathematical description of signalling pathways.
HOW DO CHECKPOINTS WORK? Checkpoints are governed by phosphorylation activity controlled by CDK’s (cyclin dependent kinases) Checkpoints are governed.
14. Lecture WS 2007/08Bioinformatics III1 V14 Dynamic Cellular Processes John TysonBela Novak.
How cells make decisions?. The cell is a (bio)chemical computer Information Processing System Hanahan & Weinberg (2000) External signals outputs.
Bistable and Oscillatory Systems. Bistable Systems Systems which display two stable steady states with a third unstable state are usually termed bistable.
CELL CYCLE AND CELL CYCLE ENGINE OVERVIEW Fahareen-Binta-Mosharraf MIC
Dynamics of biological switches 2. Attila Csikász-Nagy King’s College London Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics Institute for Mathematical.
BCB 570 Spring Signal Transduction Julie Dickerson Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Dynamics of biological switches 1. Attila Csikász-Nagy King’s College London Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics Institute for Mathematical.
1 The Cell Cycle “Mitosis” Packet #33 Chapter #13 Friday, November 18, 2016.
3.A.2 Cell Division Part I The Cell Cycle and Mitosis
The Biology of Cancer Chapter 8: pRb and Control of the
Basic enzyme kinetics Concepts building:
Basic enzyme kinetics Concepts building:
ENZYMES: KINETICS, INHIBITION, REGULATION
V14 Dynamic Cellular Processes
Overview of the Control of the Cell Cycle
Section 6 – Metabolism & Enzymes
Sustaining Proliferative Signaling and Evading Growth Suppressors
Chap. 19 Problem 1 Passage through the cell cycle is unidirectional and irreversible due to the degradation of critical regulators by proteasome complexes.
V24 – Kinetic Motifs in Signaling Pathways
Department of Physiology
Chapter 6 CHM 341 Fall 2016 Suroviec.
Control of the Cell Cycle
Section 6 – Metabolism & Enzymes
Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs
Enzymes Homeostasis: property of living organisms to regulate their internal environment, maintaining stable, constant condition *Occurs by multiple adjustments.
Mathematical Models of Protein Kinase Signal Transduction
The cell cycle: The continuity of life depends on cells growing, replicating their genetic material, and then dividing. The cell cycle consists of two.
A Dynamical Framework for the All-or-None G1/S Transition
Cell Size Control in Yeast
Protein Cascades. Protein Cascades Cascades Activator Output.
Phases of the Cell Cycle
Phases of the Cell Cycle
Presentation transcript:

Bioinformatics 3 V20 – Kinetic Motifs Mon, Jan 13, 2014

Modelling of Signalling Pathways Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221 1) How do the magnitudes of signal output and signal duration depend on the kinetic properties of pathway components? (2) Can high signal amplification be coupled with fast signaling? (3) How are signaling pathways designed to ensure that they are safely off in the absence of stimulation, yet display high signal amplification following receptor activation? (4) How can different agonists stimulate the same pathway in distinct ways to elicit a sustained or a transient response, which can have dramatically different consequences?

Linear Response E.g., protein synthesis and degradation (see lecture V10) S = signal (e.g., concentration of mRNA) R = response (e.g., concentration of a protein) \frac{dR}{dt} = k_0 + k_1\,S - k_2\,R \left. \frac{dR}{dt}\right|_{R=R_{ss}} = 0 R_{ss} \;=\; \frac{k_0 + k_1\,S}{k_2} \;=\; \frac{k_0}{k_2} + \frac{k_1}{k_2}\, S At steady state (which implies S = const): RSS => S RSS linearly dependent on S k0 = 1, k1 = k2 = 2

phosphorylation/dephosphorylation „forward“: R is converted to phosphorylated form RP „backward“: RP can be dephosphorylated again to R S + R => RP with Rtot = R + RP RP => R + T phosphorylated form \frac{dRP}{dt} = k_1\,S\,R - k_2\,RP \;=\; k_1\,S\,(R_{tot} - RP) - k_2\,RP RP_{ss} = \frac{k_1R_{tot}S}{k_1S + k_2} \;=\; \frac{R_{tot}S}{S + k_2/k_1} \;=\; \frac{R_{tot}S}{S + S_0} \frac{dT}{dt} = k_2\,RP Find steady state for RP: linear until saturation RPSS Output T proportional to RP level: S Rtot = 1, S0 = 1

Enzyme: Michaelis-Menten-kinetics ES T kon koff Reaction rate: Steady state: Total amount of enzyme is constant: => turnover:

The MM-equation Effective turnover according to MM: Pro: • analytical formula for turnover • curve can be easily interpreted: Vmax, KM • enzyme concentration can be ignored Cons: less kinetic information kon, koff, ET => Vmax, KM

Sigmoidal Characteristics with MM kinetics Same topology as before with Michaelis-Menten kinetics for phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. this means that S = Rt - RP KM = R0 \frac{dRP}{dt} = \frac{k_1 S\;(R_t - RP)}{R_0 + (R_t - RP)} - \frac{k_2\,RP}{RP_0 + RP} \;\stackrel{!}{=}\; 0 Quadratic equation for RP RPSS => sigmoidal characteristics (threshold behavior) often found in signalling cascades S Rt = 10, R0 = RP0 = 1, k1 = k2 = 1

Graded Response S RPSS S RPSS S RSS Linear, hyperbolic, and sigmoidal characteristic give the same steady state response independent of the previous history => no hysteresis BUT: In fast time-dependent scenarios, delay may lead to a modified response

Time-dependent Sigmoidal Response Direct implementation: Parameters: k1 = 1 (mol s)–1, k2 = 1 s–1, R0 = RP0 = 1 mol Initial conditions: R = 10 mol, RP = 0 t RP(t) Time courses for S = 1, 1.5, and 2, RP(0) = 0: equilibrium is reached faster for stronger signal

Adaption - „sniffer“ Linear response modulated by a second species X Steady state: Rss independent of S \frac{dR}{dt} = k_1\,S - k_2\,X\,R \frac{dX}{dt} = k_3\,S - k_4\,X X_{ss} = \frac{k_3}{k_4}\,S R_{ss} = \frac{k_1 k_4}{k_2 k_3} R changes transiently when S changes, then goes back to its basal level. S X found in smell, vision, chemotaxis, … Note: response strength ΔR depends on rate of change of S. R S => non-monotonous relation for R(S) k1 = 30, k2 = 40, k3 = k4 = 5

Positive Feedback Feedback via R and EP => high levels of R will stay "one-way switch" via bifurcation Found in processes that are "final": frog oocyte maturation, apoptosis, …

Mutual Inhibition - Toggle Switch Sigmoidal "threshold" in E <=> EP leads to bistable response (hysteresis): toggle switch Converts continuous external stimulus into two well defined stable states: • lac operon in bacteria • activation of M-phase promoting factor in frog eggs

Negative Feedback S controls the "demand" for R => homeostasis found in biochemical pathways, no transient changes in R for steps in S (cf. "sniffer")

Negative Feedback with Delay Cyclic activation X => YP => RP => X => Oscillations (in a range of S) Proposed mechanism for circadian clocks

Circadian Clocks CK1: casein kinase Rev-erb, ROR: retinoic acid- related orphan nuclear receptors Cdg: clock-controlled gene(s) Ko & Takahashi Hum Mol Genet 15, R271 (2006)

Substrate-Depletion Oscillations R is produced in an autocatalytic reaction from X, finally depleting X… Similar to Lotka-Volterra system (autocatalysis for X, too):

The Cell Cycle M-phase G1-phase G2-phase S-phase Cell division (cytokinesis) DNA separation (mitosis) DNA replication cell growth M-phase S-phase G2-phase G1-phase When to take the next step???

Cell Cycle Control

Cell Cycle Control System cdc = "cell division cycle" Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Feedback loops control cell cycle

G1 => S — Toggle Switch Mutual inhibition between Cdk1-CycB and CKI (cyclin kinase inhibitor) Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Mutual Inhibition ??? Assume: CycB:Cdk1:CKI is stable <=> dissociation is very slow => same topology <=> same bistable behavior (?)

Rate Equations: Toggle Switch Stoichiometric matrix "(C)" = catalyst R1 R2 R3 R4 A –1 S (C) R 1 E EP X A X R1 R2 R3 R4

Rate Equations: G1/S Module CycB –1 Cdk1 CycB:Cdk1 1 (C) CKI CKI:P3 CycB:Cdk1:CKI -1 R6

Comparison: Matrices A X Difference: catalysts vs. substrates R1 R2 R3 –1 S (C) R 1 E EP X R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 CycB –1 Cdk1 CycB:Cdk1 1 (C) CKI CKI:P3 CycB:Cdk1:CKI -1 Difference: catalysts vs. substrates

Comparison: Equations X R1 R2 R3 R4 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 Rename species => same rate equations => same behavior

Predicted Behavior: G1 => S Signal: cell growth = concentration of CycB, Cdk1 Response: activity (concentration) of CycB:Cdk1 Toggle switch: => above critical cell size CycB:Cdk1 activity will switch on Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

G2 => M Toggle switch: • mutual activation between CycB:Cdk1 and Cdc25 (phosphatase that activates the dimer) • mutual inhibition between CycB:Cdk1 and Wee1 (kinase that inactivates the dimer) => when the cell grows further during the second gap phase G2, the activity of CycB:Cdk1 will increase by a further step Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

M => G1 Negative feedback loop oscillator i) CycB:Cdk1 activates anaphase promoting complex (APC) ii) APC activates Cdc20 iii) Cdc20 degrades CycB Behavior: at a critical cell size CycB:Cdk1 activity increases and decreases again => at low CycB:Cdk1 level, the G1/S toggle switches off again, => cell cycle completed Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Overall Behavior Cell divides at size 1.46 => daughters start growing from size 0.73 => switches to replication at size 1.25 G1/S toggle => bistability M/G1 oscillator G2/M toggle => bistability Tyson et al, Curr. Op. Cell Biol. 15 (2003) 221

Preventing Cross-Talk Many enzymes are used in multiple pathways => how can different signals cross the same kinase? => different temporal signature (slow vs. transient) => Dynamic modelling!

Summary Today: Behavior of cell cycle control circuitry from its modules: two toggle switches + one oscillator => map biological system onto motif via • stoichiometric matrices • rate equations