Redesign Dutch LFS 2021 Sample of persons with a panel of households

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building Web Collection Capability for ONS Social Surveys Fiona Dawe and Laura Wilson.
Advertisements

15-April-10 Johan van der Valk Sub sample of persons in Labour Force household Survey Just an idea.
Data and information on disability and employment
Design and Implementation of Labour Force Surveys
Data collection programmes: Data sources for the informal sector
Weighting issues in EU-LFS
The second wave of the new design of the Dutch EU-SILC: Possibilities and challenges Judit Arends.
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY
Item 5.3 Feasibility studies
Chapter 2: The nonresponse problem
Older persons in the Swedish Labour Force Surveys
Woman Participation in the Palestinian Labour Market
Planning the change to a targeted survey design
Workshop on Measuring the Transition from School to Labour Market Item 3 – Conceptual framework in the EU for the transition of youth from education.
Working Group on Labour Statistics for MEDSTAT countries October 2013
Effect of Panel Length and Following Rules on Cross-Sectional Estimates of Income Distribution: Empirical Evidence from FI-SILC Marjo Pyy-Martikainen Workshop.
LAMAS Working Group December 2014
Dependent interviewing in the Swedish LFS
Labour Market Statistics: Recent developments
Nonresponse adjustments and calibration: a comparison between two methods to weight the Labour Force Survey Tania Borg Principal Statistician Labour Market.
The European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Auxiliary data for the LFS
Redesigning the LFS at Statistics Netherlands
The impact of using web in The Danish LFS
Chapter 12: Other nonresponse correction techniques
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2015
Production of break free time series for the Italian LFS
Meeting of the European Directors of Social Statistics
Effects of attrition on longitudinal EU-LFS estimates
Roadmaps for LFS, SILC, Education/health Latest developments
2nd meeting of the task force on survey based disability statistics
LAMAS Working Group December 2013
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
LAMAS Working Group June 2015
Report from LAMAS Working Group meeting 24/25 June 2014 Agenda point 2
Feedback from LAMAS Working Group on IESS issues Agenda point 2.4a
Item 6.2 Participation in education and training in the last 12 months
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Debriefing from the December 2017 LAMAS meeting Item 4
« LFS series breaks with the adoption of the IESS FR How is Statistics Portugal planning to tackle the issue? 13th Workshop on Labour Force Survey Methodology.
Telling Canada’s story in numbers Marie-Josée Major
Data collection programmes: Data sources for the informal sector
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Eurostat ETS Working Group - Luxembourg, April 2013
Implementing mixed mode questionnaire in FI-SILC
Woman Participation in the Palestinian Labour Market
“Education and the labour market” in NewCronos
WG ILC Nucleus variables.
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Harmonizing Labour Statistics
Workshop on Measuring the Transition from School to Labour Market Item 7.5 – Preparation of the 2016 LFS module on young people on the labour.
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2015
13th LFS Workshop on Methodology Reykjavík 17th and 18th of May 2018
Quality improvements for the labour force survey Grant Agreement no
2.1 - IESS Framework Regulation update And implementation for SILC
SILC implementing regulation Overview and main text
Presentation to AES (Agricultural Economics Society),
EU-SILC Tracing Rules Implementation: Pros and Cons
FROM SCHOOL TO LABOUR MARKET PROJECTS IN ISRAEL Dalit COHEN-LERNER
Special bilateral event and Workshop ELSTAT – Statistics Poland
Mode effects in mixed-mode data collection WP2
Quick statistics - how to deal with quality?
HILDA Survey Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey is a household-based.
Correcting for non-response bias using socio-economic register data
SMALL AREA ESTIMATION FOR CITY STATISTICS
Chapter 2: The nonresponse problem
Item 4.1: Annual labour market flows
Draft delegated act on the Planning
Workshop on best practices for EU-SILC revision, −
Stratification, calibration and reducing attrition rate in the Dutch EU-SILC Judit Arends.
Presentation transcript:

Redesign Dutch LFS 2021 Sample of persons with a panel of households Martijn Souren Reykjavik, April 2018

6 domains 1. Sampling 2. Collection 3. Sub-sampling 4. Questionnaire 5. Processing 6. Output

1. Sampling

Sampling Person sampling: No proxy Shorter questionnaire -> mobile devices -> higher response and panel reqruitement rates -> Future proof More costs per response:

Sampling Make it as efficiënt as possible: Stratification targeted at meaurement of unemployment for 15- tot 75-years old: “Maximizing” design effect

Sampling Age = 15-24 25-44 45-64 65+ Reg. Unempl = 0 West = 1 3/8 1/4 1/8 West = 0 5/8 Reg. Unempl= 1 7/8 1

Sampling

1. Sampling 2. Collection 6. Output

Output Simulating person sample out of current household sample Applying the design effect Response wave 1 based on experiment Using same budget Assumptions on panel response -> Appr. 10 percent increase in SE MUR

6 stappen 1. Sampling 2. Collection 3. Sub-sampling 6. Output

Subsampling Type of variable Waves Q: Quarterly All H: Household One Y: Yearly M: Ad-hoc module T: Third party module L: Longitudinal 2-5

Subsampling Q Q,L From P1: Q: Quarterly From P2: Q: Quarterly, partly dependent int. L: Longitudinal Only P2 Y: Yearly M: Ad-hoc Only P3 T: Third Party Only P5 H: Household

Subsampling Q Q,L From P1: Q: Quarterly From P2: Q: Quarterly, partly dependent int. L: Longitudinal Only P2 Y: Yearly M: Ad-hoc H: Household Only P3 T: Third Party H: Household

Subsampling Q Q,L,H Q,L,h From P1: Q: Quarterly From P2: Q: Quarterly, partly dependent int. L: Longitudinal H: Household Q,L,h Only P2 Y: Yearly M: Ad-hoc Only P3 T: Third Party

1. Sampling 2. Collection 3. Sub-sampling 6. Output

Output Extending Structural Time series with household data Important: first wave estimate is the benchmark! Household data does not affect level of estimates but improves precision -> Appr. 10 percent decrease in SE MUR

Output Extending Structural Time series to more variables: - STAPRO/TEMP - Potential additional labour force - Duration of unemployment

1. Sampling 2. Collection 3. Subsampling 4. Questionnaire 5. Processing 6. Output

Questionnaire As short and respondent-friendly as possible for other Household members E.g.: Instead of model questionnaire: Does partner have a paid job? Is partner self-employed If no: did partner look for a job Could partner start working within 2 weeks.

Questionnaire and output For model-based estimates: Level is based on proxy-free person sample interviews For household/yearly variables a more general labour market position suffices

Conclusion Questions? First wave minimizes bias Panel maximizes precision Questions?