CrowdPower: Events/Crowds

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objectives Identify the differences between Analytical Decision Making and Intuitive Decision Making Demonstrate basic design and delivery requirements.
Advertisements

A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
A3 Training Session. Introduction…. We all are involved in… – Looking for ways to save resources – Finding ways to improve quality – Fixing problems –
Degree and Graduation Seminar Scope Management
Social Media: FACEBOOK Kristin Martin Professional Development.
1 Types of Evaluation Decide on the Purpose: Formative - improve and inform Summative- identify value/effect.
Where are the Semantics in the Semantic Web? Michael Ushold The Boeing Company.
Finance, Financial Markets, and NPV
Susan Zimmerman and Chryse Hutchins
Reading Survey Results
Make Connections while they read
CS499 Use Cases References From Alistair Cockburn Writing Effective Use Cases (Book) - Use Case.
Design thinking evidence. design thinking assessment points When should assessment happen During the end of the project demonstration During the transitions.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
 Knowledge Acquisition  Machine Learning. The transfer and transformation of potential problem solving expertise from some knowledge source to a program.
Clarity Educational Community How Companies Are Using CA PPM for Application Portfolio Management Presented by: Mark Feher | Date.
Successfully recording Continuing Professional Development.
Project Administration Chapter-4. Project Administration Project Administration is the process which involves different kinds of activities of managing.
CHAPTER TEN AUTHORING.
Approaching a Problem Where do we start? How do we proceed?
IB Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer INTRODUCTION TO THE WAYS OF KNOWING.
Facebook Job Fair The Social Job Hunt John Golding, Jakub Fiedorowicz, Samuel Zats.
“A POV is a compelling statement of user, need, and insight that focuses and inspires your design process.” Provide focus/Frame the problem Inspire your.
Technology Enables New Types of Reading Brett Concilio Dr. Kern EDC 448.
Team Pacific. LEWIS CLARK Junior Year at Ohio State University Father has advanced degrees in computer science, now performs computer systems management.
Q UANTITATIVE AND Q UALITATIVE D ATA. Q UANTITATIVE OR Q UALITATIVE ? John’s reaction time with 10 hours’ sleep averaged0.21 seconds; with 6 hours’ sleep.
Event Character Inference 1Character Inference 2Character Inference 3 Inference Strategies Event Inference 1Event Inference 2Event Inference 3 Character.
Design thinking skills. scoring: description Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Missing.
ABRA Week 3 research design, methods… SS. Research Design and Method.
What You Should Expect From This Reading Course. You should expect to learn how to use visualization / imagery to help organize and hold in mind huge.
CS147 Presentation 2 Autumn Introduction Domain: Changing behaviors related to travel Tanner Gilligan Amanda McNary Dennis Ellis Rhea Dookeran.
Slide 5.1 Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 5 th Edition, © Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill 2009.
Customize this slide for your business!
AP CSP: Data and Trends.
National Coalition Academy Summary
How to think about interaction
Voluntary Pre-K: SIS Data Entry Good morning.
DSS & Warehousing Systems
Counseling Skills.
There and Back Discover • Rekindle • Maintain
Curriculum Structures
“I always wanted to be a musician…”
Needfinding.
Zoolinomics The Economics of Zoo Keeping
Warm Up Sit in your zoo groups from yesterday
A Guide to Reading Comprehension Strategies
Customize this slide for your business!
A GUIDE TO SELLING YOUR HOME.
Reading Strategies.
Reading & Annotating Text for Better Understanding
Review: Design Pattern Structure
Finding Trends with Visualizations
POV and Experience Prototypes
Experience Prototypes
Zoolinomics The Economics of Zoo Keeping
Dartis Willis Cristian Lara Neven Wang-Tomic
WALKING DOWN MEMORY LANE JOURNAL / MUSIC / AI
POVs // Experience Prototypes
Dartis Willis Cristian Lara Neven Wang -Tomic
Building Valid, Credible, and Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
Alex Lee, Jeremy Marcelo, Melinda Wang, Sarina Wu
Keep Track of Journalism
POV/Experience Prototyping
POVs and Experience Prototypes
Not just a guess Making Inferences.
Phase 2 Objectives Prototype your complete solution in real environment, collecting sufficient data to make a decision regarding whether to continue.
POVs & Experience Prototypes
Utilizing Analytics to mitigate
Wiki, Wiki Sanden, S., & Darragh, J. (2011). Wiki use in the 21st-century literacy classroom: A framework for evaluation. Contemporary Issues in Technology.
WORKSHOP Establish a Communication and Training Plan
Presentation transcript:

CrowdPower: Events/Crowds Dartis Willis Cristian Lara Neven Wang -Tomic

Initial P.O.V. “We met both event organizers and attendees at three distinct events. We were amazed to find there is a “sweet spot” crowd size that enhances the experience of an event. It would be game changing if we could make users feel knowledgeable about crowd size.” This P.O.V. is too superficial! (Let’s go deeper)

Additional Needfinding: Jenny Lu Attends many events Maintains active social life Considers herself an “expert” on the subject

With deeper analysis we found... Additional information/rules about sweet spot The sweet-spot concept is built on deeper human behavior. Our LEAP was: Experiencing events with others provides for many inherent human desires. Needs: To satiate the desire to enjoy things in groups, and to be informed about opportunities to do so

Revised P.O.V. #1 We met event goers at three distinct events, We were surprised to find that satisfying the primal desire to enjoy experiences in a group largely defines how much people enjoy an event. It would be game changing if we could enhance these “satisfying” group experiences before, during, and after an event.

Revised P.O.V. #2 We were surprised to find the amount of emphasis that people put on inferred guesses to best utilize the time and emotions they invest into events. (See desires from POV #1) It would be game changing if we could reliably provide information that would improve the time people spend at events and save them from unsatisfying experiences. People are surprisingly upset when expectations of events do not translate to reality.

How might we... Drum up excitement for events prior to their occurrence Stems from the first P.O.V in that collective excitement builds up the group experience

How might we... Provide snapshots of what an event is like in real-time Stems from the second P.O.V in that providing people with media and information from events aids in the decision making process..

How might we... Expand positive group feeling beyond the duration of the event. Stems from the first P.O.V in that people value the group feeling they get from social events, extending this would give people something to look back on.

Experience Prototype #1 “Bubble Map” Description: Bubble map of nearby events showing their immediate popularity What worked? The “hotness” meter Map Representation What didn’t? False events being created Unreliable event time reporting Survey-esque questions Surprises? New Learnings? It would be difficult to implement for small events How can we tell if an event’s plans change? Main Assumption Validity? Valid Seeing location based visualizations of events is a valid desire

Experience Prototype #2 “Timeline” Description: Timeline keeping track of past events attended What worked? Timeline Format Blurbs method of documentation What didn’t? Uploading directly to app is inconvenient Separated blurbs and snapshots Surprises? New Learnings? Images enhance experience Main Assumption Validity? Valid People want a social record of events they have attended

Experience Prototype #3 “Real-Time Update” Description: Live feed of events with supplied pictures for each event. What worked? Potential for “wide” selection of events Incentive to upload pictures What didn’t? Security Inclusion of friends Surprises? New Learnings? High “forgiveness” for app/experience failure Main Assumption Validity? Valid People are willing contribute to/use crowd sources of information about events they attend.