Khalad Hasan Xing-Dong Yang Hai-Ning Liang Pourang Irani

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A User Study on User Collaboration and Privacy Concerns thorough the use of a Round Table-top Multi-touch Interface Nicolas J. Dedual.
Advertisements

Interaction patrick baudisch microsoft research adaptive systemsinteraction focus friday, may 18, large screens.
Mouse Training Instruction by: Connie Hutchison & Christopher McCoy.
WatchIt: Simple Gestures and Eyes-free Interaction for Wristwatches and Bracelets S. Perrault, E. Lecolinet, J. Eagan, Y. Guiard Télécom ParisTech – LTCI.
Regis Kopper Mara G. Silva Ryan P. McMahan Doug A. Bowman.
EdgeSplit: Facilitating the Selection of Off-Screen Objects Zahid Hossain Khalad Hasan Hai-Ning Liang Pourang Irani.
KRAD Collections UI Review of UI design challenges – work in progress.
1 Slipping and Drifting: Using Older Users to Uncover Pen-based Target Acquisition Difficulties Karyn Moffatt and Joanna McGrenere Department of Computer.
Multi-Modal Text Entry and Selection on a Mobile Device David Dearman 1, Amy Karlson 2, Brian Meyers 2 and Ben Bederson 3 1 University of Toronto 2 Microsoft.
Object Manipulation Observations 1. Most objects attached or connected to other objects 2. Objects easier to position if in contact with others 3. Objects.
How to Position the Cursor? An Exploration of Absolute and Relative Cursor Positioning for Back-of-Device Input Khalad Hasan Xing-Dong Yang Hai-Ning Liang.
Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-Based Interfaces Using Touch Daniel Vogel University of Toronto Patrick Baudisch Microsoft Research.
Precise Selection Techniques for Multi-Touch Screens Hrvoje Benko Andy D. Wilson Patrick Baudisch Columbia University and Microsoft Research CHI 2006.
Try It: Curvature Dial: Eyes free parameter entry for GUIs mc schraefel, Graham Smith, Patrick.
SNOUT: One-Handed use of Capacitive Touch Devices Adam Zarek, Daniel Wigdor, Karan Singh University of Toronto.
SWEEP-SHAKE FINDING DIGITAL RESOURCES IN PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTS Presented by Eric( 王政堯 ) Simon Robinson, Parisa Eslambolchilar, Matt Jones MobileHCI 2009.
Smartwatches + Head-Worn Displays: the ‘New’ Smartphone Marcos Serrano 1, Khalad Hasan 2, Barrett Ens 2, Xing-Dong Yang 3, Pourang Irani 2 1 IRIT- University.
Interactive Mesh Sculpting Using a Haptic Device.
Human Factors for Input Devices CSE 510 Richard Anderson Ken Fishkin.
Evaluation of Viewport Size and Curvature of Large, High-Resolution Displays Lauren Shupp, Robert Ball, John Booker, Beth Yost, Chris North Virginia Polytechnic.
William H. Bowers – Direct Manipulation and Pointing Devices Cooper 21.
Drag-and-pop a technique for accessing remote screen content on touch- and pen-operated systems patrick baudisch & ed cutrell, dan robbins, mary czerwinski,
Slides based on those by Paul Cairns, York ( users.cs.york.ac.uk/~pcairns/) + ID3 book slides + slides from: courses.ischool.berkeley.edu/i213/s08/lectures/i ppthttp://www-
1 RodDirect : Two-Dimensional Input with Stylus Knob Motoki Miura and Susumu Kunifuji Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, JAPAN
Input Devices. What is Input?  Everything we tell the computer is Input.
Crowdsourcing Color Perceptions using Mobile Devices Jaejeung Kim 1, Sergey Leksikov 1, Punyotai Thamjamrassri 2, Uichin Lee 1, Hyeon-Jeong Suk 2 1 Dept.
Snap-and-go helping users align objects without the modality of traditional snapping patrick baudisch ed cutrell ken hinckley adam eversole microsoft research.
Enabling User Interactions with Video Contents Khalad Hasan, Yang Wang, Wing Kwong and Pourang Irani.
University of Toronto earPod: Eyes-free Menu Selection with Touch Input and Reactive Audio Feedback Shengdong Zhao Pierre Dragicevic Mark Chignell Ravin.
Visualizing Off-Screen Locations on Small Mobile Displays Sean Gustafson master of science thesis defense Dec 15 / 2008.
1/15 5 Case Study Towards Guidelines for Touch Screen Design: Perception of Button Size and Height Fjeld, Zuberbühler, Guttormsen, Voorhorst, Krueger ETH.
User Input in a multi-touch, accelerometer driven, location aware world Brian Robbins President/Founder – Riptide Games Twitter:
User Performance in Relation to 3D Input Device Design  Studies conducted at University of Toronto  Usability review of 6 degree of freedom (DOF) input.
Touch Screen Technology
Transitioning from Implicit to Explicit, Public to Personal, Interaction with Multiple Users Daniel Vogel, Ravin Balakrishnan Department of Computer Science.
UFCFX5-15-3Mobile Device Development Unity 3D Development for Android Unity Mobile Assets.
Shift patrick baudisch :: dan vogel. pen unique contact point remove hand from screen finger unclear contact point finger occludes target.
Pen Based User Interface II CSE 481b January 25, 2005.
Pen Based User Interface Issues CSE 490RA January 25, 2005.
A Framework for Perceptual Studies in Photorealistic Augmented Reality Martin Knecht 1, Andreas Dünser 2, Christoph Traxler 1, Michael Wimmer 1 and Raphael.
Touch Trouble Shooting
Windows Forms for mobile development
Standard Methods of Input.
Department of Computer Science
1.3 Mouse Training.
Input Devices Text Entry Devices
3DUI – Submission #120 LOP-cursor Fast and Precise Interaction with Tiled Displays Using One Hand and Levels of Precision Henrique Debarba, Luciana Nedel,Anderson.

Google Cardboard.
Luke Dillman & James McManus with Scott Bateman
Lesson 3 Standard Methods of Input.
Franklin (Mingzhe) Li, Mingming Fan & Khai N. Truong
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(10):16. doi: / Figure Legend:
Objectives To define terminology associated with Windows operating systems. To examine uses of Windows in business and industry. To explain techniques.
 Connect iPhone to computer with USB cable.  Launch iTunes on your computer and turn off your iPhone.  Hold Home button and Sleep button at the same.
 1. In your iOS device, open Settings and head to “iTunes and App Store”  2. At the top of the store screen, tap on “Apple ID: 
Untold Stories of Touch, Gesture, & NUI
mouse ether helping users acquire targets across multimon
Copyright Catherine M. Burns
1.3 Mouse Training Mouse Training.
Techniques for Interacting with Off-Screen Content
Haptic Pen: A Tactile Feedback Stylus for Touch Screens
HCI For Pen Based Computing
AirFlip: A Double Crossing In-Air Gesture using Boundary Surfaces of Hover Zone for Mobile Devices Hiroyuki Hakoda, Takuro Kuribara, Keigo Shima, Buntarou.
HCI for Pen Computing CSE 481b January 24, 2006.
Lesson 3 Standard Methods of Input.
QGesture: Quantifying Gesture Distance and Direction with WiFi Signals
wedge clutter-free visualization of off-screen locations
Mouse Skills Moving a mouse on flat surface makes the pointer on the screen to move in the same direction as the mouse itself. To make the selection, the.
Presentation transcript:

Khalad Hasan Xing-Dong Yang Hai-Ning Liang Pourang Irani How to Position the Cursor? An Exploration of Absolute and Relative Cursor Positioning for Back-of-Device Input Khalad Hasan Xing-Dong Yang Hai-Ning Liang Pourang Irani

Motivation One-handed interaction is convenient and allows users to multi-task by freeing their other hand for tasks such as holding a bus handle. Karlson et al. [9] have found that users prefer using one hand for two handed tasks. Despite some advantages, this form of interaction imposes several limitations, such as occlusion and reachability [8, 20, 27]. Occlusion

Motivation Fat-finger One-handed interaction is convenient and allows users to multi-task by freeing their other hand for tasks such as holding a bus handle. Karlson et al. [9] have found that users prefer using one hand for two handed tasks. Despite some advantages, this form of interaction imposes several limitations, such as occlusion and reachability [8, 20, 27]. Fat-finger http://blog.mailboxtees.com/2008/04/18/iphone-stylus-for-big-fat-fingers--iphone-finger-covers-for-dirty-sticky-fingers.aspx

Motivation Reachability Overlapping off-screen visual cues : Hard to identify and select Large number of objects make visualization cluttered : Trouble in selection Very small visual cues : Not good for selection Reachability

Solution Back-of-device input Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input Back-of-device input

We explored Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input

Research Questions Suitable selection mechanism Cursor positioning (absolute or relative) Target size and location suitable selection mechanism for the BoD input? (2) Which mode of cursor positioning (absolute or relative) is preferable on the back? (3) How will target size and location affect performance with these two modes?

Contributions Identify suitable selection mechanisms Benefits of absolute and relative cursor control Examine variations of absolute pointing mode to resolve the reachability To answer these questions, we conducted three separate studies and from the results we make the following contributions: (1) identify suitable selection mechanisms for one-handed BoD input; (2) explore the benefits of absolute and relative cursor control for BoD input; (3) examine two variations of absolute pointing mode to resolve the reachability issues discovered in our studies.

Related Work

Back-of-device Input

ReadType Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input Scott et. al

LucidTouch Widgor et. al Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input Widgor et. al

nanoTouch Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu

Dual-Surface Input Yang et. al Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input Yang et. al

Behind-the Display Yang et. al Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input Yang et. al

Cursor Positioning

Absolute Input Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input

Relative Input Hybrid Touch Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input

Selection Mechanism Land on Lift-off Prior studies have shown that these challenges can be overcome by allowing users to interact with the back-side of the device back-of-device input

Experiments 20

Experiment 1: Experiment 2: Experiment 3: Selection Mechanism Absolute vs relative cursor Movement Experiment 3: Exploring accuracy and reachability with absolute pointing 21

Selection Methods: Cursor Movement: Double-tap Frontside-touch Side-button Double-tap Frontside-touch Did not include lift-off selection Cursor Movement: Relative Absolute 22

Design Selection mechanism (3) × Target size (3) × Repetitions (6) × Cursor movement (2) × Selection mechanism (3) × Target size (3) × Repetitions (6) × Participants (12) 23

Results 24

Results 25

Experiment 1: Experiment 2: Experiment 3: Selection Mechanism Absolute vs relative cursor Movement Experiment 3: Exploring accuracy and reachability with absolute pointing 26

Tasks 27

Design Target size (3) × Locations (9) × Repetitions (3) × Cursor movement (2) × Target size (3) × Locations (9) × Repetitions (3) × Participants (12) 28

Results 29

Results 30

Results 31

Experiment 1: Experiment 2: Experiment 3: Selection Mechanism Absolute vs relative cursor Movement Experiment 3: Exploring accuracy and reachability with absolute pointing 32

Two variations of Absolute 33

ThumbSpace 34

SlidingWindow 35

Design Target Position (2) × Repetitions (12) × Participants (12) Technique (4) × Target Position (2) × Repetitions (12) × Participants (12) 36

Results 37

Results 38

Limitations Tested on single touch device Results are influenced by the target sizes Tested on single touch device A variety of mapping factors were not tested 39

Guidelines Separating selection and cursor control Targets should be at least 30 pixels in size (6.6 mm) and preferably placed in the top index-reachable part When using Relative positioning, targets can be as small as 22 pixels 40

Guidelines For tasks requiring precision, Relative positioning should be provided When distorting the 1:1 mapping between the input space and display, consider providing additional visual feedback 41

Conclusion we examine which selection mechanisms are suitable Compare the performance of Absolute and Relative cursor positioning modes Two approaches to solving the reachability issue 42

How to Position the Cursor How to Position the Cursor? An Exploration of Absolute and Relative Cursor Positioning for Back-of-Device Input Khalad Hasan Xing-Dong Yang Hai-Ning Liang Pourang Irani Thank you