Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protocol Development.
Advertisements

Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in Mind Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in.
Contextualized Knowledge Translation Packages for Technology Transfer and Product Development ATIA Orlando, Florida January 2012 James A. Leahy Center.
Overview of Technology Transfer Process RERC on Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone University at Buffalo/
How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer School.
Stages of Development (SoD) National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) Copyright National Institute on.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
NHMRC Development Grants Overall Objectives The aim of a Development Grant is to progress research to a stage where it can attract investment from.
Analytic Tools: Ensuring industry relevance for university-based R&D projects intending transfer. Joseph P. Lane & James Condron Center on Knowledge Translation.
Bridging the Evidence Gap: Level Of Knowledge Use Survey - LOKUS as a Validated Instrument Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
The Case for Industry Leadership in STI Policy Implementation. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
1 SBIR/STTR Overview Wang Yongqiang. 2 Federal SBIR/STTR Program ‣ A +$2Billion funding program set-aside for small businesses seeking to early stage.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Stages of Research and Development
Skolkovo PRESENTATION
Center on KT4TT: Contributing to Three Grantee Outcomes
ITIL: Service Transition
Janice Light and Thomas Jakobs Penn State University & InvoTek, Inc.
Innovation Ecosystems Fellowship Overview
Financing Small Firm Innovation in the United States
Setting the Foundation for Public Health: Local Health Departments’ Vision for the System in Kansas September 20, 2016 View from Kansas Health Institute.
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK CAPACITY BUILDING AND TRAINING.
MUHC Innovation Model.
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Stephen Bauer NIDILRR Program Officer
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
A prospective study of the translational process in the technology development and transfer projects of NIDILRR’s technology grantees: a qualitative study.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
From Theory to Practice: Operationalizing Knowledge Translation for Successful AT Commercialization Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States
A prospective study of the translational process in the technology development and transfer projects of NIDILRR’s technology grantees: a qualitative study.
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Joseph P. Lane & James Condron
MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System
Talking to Sharks and Angels: What You Need to Know!
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer (KT4TT)
The Case for Industry Leadership in STI Policy Implementation.
AEA Annual Meeting , Nov , 2009 Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone.
Is One Minute Madness?? Joseph P. Lane
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Knowledge Translation Across RERC Activities
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Reconciling Government Policies and Programs with Public Expectations: The Case of Innovation in AT Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Knowledge Utility results from Rigor in Methods & Relevance in Content
The Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: Orienting Scholar “Technology Grantees” to Best Practices in Transfer & Commercialization Joseph P. Lane, Director.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
Employee engagement Close out presentation
Research funding application process
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
Presentation transcript:

Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement 2017 Online Conference Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement Hosted by AIR’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and Rehabilitation Research (KTDRR) October 30, November 1, and November 3, 2017 Copyright © 2017 American Institutes for Research (AIR). All rights reserved. No part of this presentation may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from AIR. Submit copyright permissions requests to the AIR Publications Copyright and Permissions Help Desk at copyright_PS@air.org. Users may need to secure additional permissions from copyright holders whose work AIR included after obtaining permission as noted to reproduce or adapt materials for this presentation. 2017

Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Tips and Tools for Communicating with Key Stakeholders Jennifer L Flagg- University at Buffalo, Center on KT4TT October 30, 2017 Insert Logo Insert Logo Insert Logo Insert Logo Copyright © 2017 American Institutes for Research (AIR). All rights reserved. No part of this presentation may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from AIR. Submit copyright permissions requests to the AIR Publications Copyright and Permissions Help Desk at copyright_PS@air.org. Users may need to secure additional permissions from copyright holders whose work AIR included after obtaining permission as noted to reproduce or adapt materials for this presentation. October 2016

Outline 1. Introduction 2. Key Stakeholders 3. Overarching Frameworks 4. Barriers to Development and Transfer 5. Tools for Overcoming Barriers 6. Milestones and Metrics 7. Summary 8. Q&A

Introduction About me: Co PI at KT4TT; Editor of ATOB Center background: Center on KT4TT- since 2008 Formerly the Tech Transfer RERC- 1993-2008 Audience: This presentation is geared towards NIDILRR investigators engaged in development projects

What is the purpose of this talk? NIDILRR’s mission1 “New knowledge” Moving knowledge from the lab to the market- technology transfer.

Technology Transfer Office Industry Partners/ Investors Key Stakeholders NIDILRR Staff Peer Reviewers Product Buyers/Users Technology Transfer Office Industry Partners/ Investors

NIDILRR Stages of Development (SoD)2 Proof of Concept- key technical challenges are resolved. Stage results establish that the product is feasible. Proof of Product- fully-integrated and working prototype meeting critical technical requirements is created. Stage results establish that the fully-integrated product is realizable. Proof of Adoption- product is substantially adopted by target population and used for intended purpose. Stage results establish that the product is beneficial.

NIDILRR Stages of Development- continued New peer review criteria related to development projects: The applicant identifies and justifies the stage(s) of development for the proposed project; and activities associated with each stage.3 Stages of Development Resources: NIDILRR Stages of Development Overview (pdf) Stages of Research and Development (ppt) Stages of Development (ppt)

Need to Knowledge Models (NtK)- Overview4 What are the NtK Models? Four variants Commercial Products Industry Standards/ Clinical Guidelines Laboratory Instruments/ Fabrication Tools Freeware Applications/ DIY Instructions

Need to Knowledge Models- Details Supported by best practices Stage/gate design with step-by-step details Tools, supporting evidence, and case examples All variants begin with Stage 1: Problem definition; Stage 2: Scoping the solution; Stage 3: Assessing need for research Models diverge after Stage 3 All include guidance on using KT for tech transfer

Stages of Commercial Devices NtK Model 1: Define problem and solution 2: Scoping 3: Scientific research 4: Begin development 5: Build and test prototype 6: Beta testing 7: Production planning 8: Launch 9: Post-launch review

Aligning The Frameworks SoD: Proof of Concept = Feasible NtK: Stages 1-5 SoD: Proof of Product = Realizable  NtK: Stages 5-7 SoD: Proof of Adoption = Beneficial  NtK: Stages 8-9

The SoD and NtK Models can be used for: SoD and NtK Takeaways The SoD and NtK Models can be used for: Structuring and planning development project activities Identifying appropriate milestones Establishing performance metrics Communicating with key stakeholders!

Barriers to Development and Transfer5 Insufficient allocation of resources Lack of preliminary assessment Failure to build business case Lack of intellectual property protection Inadequate shopping of a technology

Overcoming Barriers: Tips and Tools Insufficient allocation of resources  Adequate planning (NtK Models) Lack of preliminary assessment  Evaluate market and business potential early and often (Tech Transfer Planning Template (TTPT) & Industry Profiles) Failure to build business case  Investigate the industry and market (Primary market research, TTPT & Industry Profiles)

Overcoming Barriers: Tips and Tools (ct.) Lack of intellectual property protection  Talk with tech transfer office early in the process to establish expectations and plans (SoD, NtK, TTPT) Inadequate shopping of a technology  Develop commercialization package (NtK, TTPT, & Industry Profiles)

Tech Transfer Planning Template (TTPT) The TTPT is an online tool for planning and describing development projects Asks simple questions Provides resources Output reports organize your responses Commercialization plans Technology Transfer plans Summary reports

Links to External Resources TTPT Resources Links to External Resources Disability statistics websites USPTO Company information databases Industry Profiles Cognition; Vision; Educational Technology; Wheeled Mobility Examples Marketing report Phase II SBIR proposal

Business, Engineering & Universal Design Tools TTPT Resources Business, Engineering & Universal Design Tools Descriptions of 50+ tools for development and transfer Guides & Handbooks Intellectual Property Protection Chronological Guide for Inventors Primary Market Research Evaluation Resource Guide Conducting Competing Product Searches (coming soon)

Tech Transfer Plan Output Report Structured to align user input with Need to Knowledge Model steps. Useful for developing grant proposals and TT plans (RERC requirement). Helps the user to take stock of what activities are completed, planned, or missing.

SBIR Output Report Structured to align user input with SBIR Phase II Commercialization Plan requirements. Useful for developing grant proposals and commercialization plans for communicating with partners and investors.

Structured in paragraph form using only high-level information. Summary Output Report Structured in paragraph form using only high-level information. Useful for fleshing out development project ideas, beginning to craft narratives for proposals, and to pique the interest of potential project partners.

Milestones and Metrics- Concept is Feasible Completion of NtK Model Stages 1 - 4 may demonstrate Proof of Concept. i.e. Scoping activities showed that there is a viable market. Research on system components led to a determination that the invention would be technically feasible. User feedback indicates interest. Metrics might include: Achievement of proposed technical objectives, identification of potentially viable path to market, and/or demonstration of business and market feasibility.

Milestones and Metrics- Product is Realizable Completion of NtK Model Stages 4 -6 may demonstrate Proof of Product. i.e. Development activities may have resulted in the generation of an invention that is unique, and feasible to produce and sell. Interest may have been expressed by a potential manufacturing partner. Metrics might include: Integrated working prototype, demonstrated consumer interest, commitment from transfer partner, and/or Intellectual property protection or transfer.

Milestones and Metrics- Product is Beneficial Completion of NtK Model Stages 8 and 9 may demonstrate Proof of Adoption. i.e. Product has been launched. Monitoring has commenced. Sales and marketing data can provide information on purchase & use as well as problems. Metrics might include: purchases/downloads, usage/abandonment, comparison with alternatives, and/or satisfaction statistics.2, 6

Communicating with NIDILRR and Peer Reviewers: Pre-Award Use the SoD and NtK Models’ stages/gates & detailed steps as a framework to orient proposal readers to the current situation and plans for the project period. Compare project plans to NtK stages and steps to ensure that all critical elements are included, and needed resources are allocated. Ensure that the proposal refers to an appropriate SoD for each development project.

Communicating with NIDILRR, Team Members, and Partners: Post-Award Use the NtK as a checklist for project activities, ticking off each step as it is completed. Demonstrate forward progress through the completion of each SoD and NtK stage. Share outputs with others, using guidance from the NtK’s KT Tables.

Communicating with Potential Buyers/Users Use the NtK to identify opportunities to obtain user input throughout the planning and development processes. The resulting information can be invaluable for: Ensuring your proposed solution will meet consumers’ needs Identifying appropriate functions/features Developing your business case!

Technology Transfer Office (TTO) Communicating with… Technology Transfer Office (TTO) Use NtK steps to identify gaps in expertise that the TTO may be able to fill. Share results from NtK Stage 2 scoping activities, and Stage 4 business case to orient the TTO in regards to the invention’s market and competition. Industry Partners/ Investors Use NtK to demonstrate where an invention lies in the process, and where additional support is needed. Use TTPT output reports to communicate project and invention/ potential product details.

Resources Resource Guide to Evaluation in the Context of New Product Development- methods, case studies, evaluation instruments and resources. Need to Knowledge Models (including KT tables) Technology Transfer Planning Template Industry Profiles- cognition, vision, education technology, wheeled mobility Primary Market Research Training Module- focus groups and surveys Chronological Guide for Inventors-step by step guide

References Administration for Community Living. (2017). About NIDILRR. Retrieved from: https://www.acl.gov/about-acl/about-national-institute-disability- independent-living-and-rehabilitation-research NIDILRR. (2015). Stages of development. Retrieved from: http://neweditions.net/sites/default/files/Stages_of_Dev_SoDv6.14.pptx NIDILRR. (n.d.) Stages of research and development: An overview. Retrieved from http://neweditions.net/sites/default/files/RERC%20Presentations/Ruth%20Br annon508A.pptx Flagg, J., Lane, J., & Lockett, M. (2013). Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: an evidence-based framework for generating technological innovations with socio-economic impacts. Implementation Science, 8(21), 1-10. Leahy, J. & Lane, J. (2010). Knowledge from research and practice on the barriers and carriers to successful technology transfer for assistive technology devices. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 6(1), 73- 86. Stone, V., Lockett, M., Usiak, D., & Arthanat, S. (2010). Beyond technology transfer: Quality of life impacts from R&D outcomes. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 6(1), 87-128.

Jennifer L Flagg jlflagg@buffalo.edu Center on KT4TT 100 Sylvan Parkway, Suite 400 Amherst, NY 14228 kt4tt.buffalo.edu Insert Logo Insert Logo Insert Logo Insert Logo

Acknowledgement The contents of this presentation were developed under grant numbers 90DP0054-01-00 (KT4TT) and 90DP0027 (KTDRR), both from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this presentation do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.