Cardiovascular outcomes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
Advertisements

Clinical implications. Burden of coronary disease 56 millions deaths worldwide in millions deaths worldwide in % due to CV disease (~ 16.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
Introduction Bernard Zinman CM, MD, FRCP, FACP Director, Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto 1.
TRANSCEND: Telmisartan Randomized AssesmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease ONTARGET / TRANSCEND Investigators Koon K. Teo,
Background There are 12 different types of medications to lower blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is widely agreed upon that metformin.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Date of download: 6/10/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Homocysteine-Lowering With Folic Acid.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
R1. 이정미 / prof. 이상열. INTRODUCTION Type 2 diabetes is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease The presence of both type 2 diabetes and.
Summary of “A randomized trial of standard versus intensive blood-pressure control” The SPRINT Research Group, NEJM, DOI: /NEJMoa Downloaded.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Prognostic Value of B-Type Natriuretic Peptides in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The PEACE Trial Torbjørn Omland, MD, PHD, MPH, Marc S.
Figure 1.1 Prevalence of CKD by stage among NHANES participants,
Case 66 year old male with PMH of HTN, DM, ESRD on renal replacement TIW, stroke in 2011 with right side residual weakness, atrial fibrillation, currently.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2017
Mikhail Kosiborod, MD Professor of Medicine (Cardiology)
Safety and tolerability
The SPRINT Research Group
From: Risks of Cardiovascular Adverse Events and Death in Patients with Previous Stroke Undergoing Emergency Noncardiac, Nonintracranial Surgery:The Importance.
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
Blood Pressure and Age in Controlling Hypertension
LEADER trial: Primary Outcome
Recent Breakthroughs in Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials in T2DM
Supplementary Table 1 Independent Predictors of 2-Year Mortality
Disclosure Consultations and Honoraria Grant Support
Career choice for Chinese medical graduate: Safety Physician
Chapter 1: CKD in the General Population
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
United States Preventive Services Task Force: Recommendations for ABPM
New Insights from EXSCEL
Empagliflozin Empagliflozin is a highly selective inhibitor of the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) in the kidney Glucose reduction occurs by reducing.
Diabetes Therapies and Cardiovascular Outcomes
with type 2 diabetes without heart failure?
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
Cardiovascular (CV) Safety and Severe Hypoglycemia Benefit of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine U100 in Older Patients (≥65 years) with Type 2 Diabetes.
on behalf of the LEADER Trial Steering Committee and Investigators
on behalf of the ASCOT Investigators *Imperial College London, UK
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Statins Evaluation in Coronary procedUres and REvascularization
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes.
A: Kaplan-Meier estimate of time to first LLA
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Heart failure.
P2Y12 blockade versus placebo; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
Figure 1 Diagram showing analysis flow of patient selection and treatment allocation of ONTARGET/TRANSCEND. Figure 1 Diagram showing analysis flow of patient.
ARISE Trial Aggressive Reduction of Inflammation Stops Events
Volume 375, Issue 9719, Pages (March 2010)
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
The results of the SHARP trial
CANVAS programe subanalyses HR (95%CI): 0.65 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
EMPA-REG OUTCOME: Cumulative incidence of the primary outcome
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Christian Madelaire et al. JCHF 2018;6:
Pamela E. Scott et al. JACC 2018;71:
Figure S1. A. B. Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier curve of progression-free survival by treatment group in soluble heregulin (HRG)-high population (A) and soluble.
Björn Bornkamp, Georgina Bermann
Presentation transcript:

Cardiovascular outcomes Silvio E Inzucchi Professor of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

Disclosure Consultations and non-financial support Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi/Regeron, Intarcia, Lexicon, Poxel, Takeda, Eli Lilly CME funding to Yale University Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Abbott, Merck and Sanofi

Primary outcome: 3-point MACE HR 0.86 (95.02% CI 0.74, 0.99) p=0.0382* Cumulative incidence function. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio. * Two-sided tests for superiority were conducted (statistical significance was indicated if p≤0.0498)

3-point MACE Empagliflozin 10 mg HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.72, 1.01) p=0.0668 Cumulative incidence function. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio

3-point MACE: sensitivity analyses On-treatment analysis** 407/4607 227/2308 0.87 (0.74, 1.02) 0.0839 Per protocol analysis*** 487/4654 278/2316 0.86 (0.75, 1.00) 0.0519 Patients with event/ analysed Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) p-value Intent-to-treat population 490/4687 282/2333 0.86 (0.74, 0.99)* 0.0382 ITT: Table 15.2.1.1: 2 OS: Table 15.2.1.2: 1 PPS: Table 15.2.1.2: 3 Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo Cox regression analysis. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio. *95.02% CI. **Excluding events >30 days after last intake of study drug and patients who received study drug for <30 days (cumulative). ***Patients treated with ≥1 dose of study drug who did not have important protocol violations.

Patients with event/ analysed CV death, MI and stroke Patients with event/ analysed Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) p-value 3-point MACE 490/4687 282/2333 0.86 (0.74, 0.99)* 0.0382 CV death Table 15.2.4.1.1: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.2: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.3: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.5: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.8: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.9: 1 Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo Cox regression analysis. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction *95.02% CI

CV death HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.49, 0.77) p<0.0001 Cumulative incidence function. HR, hazard ratio

CV death Empagliflozin 10 mg HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.50, 0.85) p=0.0016 Cumulative incidence function. HR, hazard ratio

Patients with event/analysed CV death, MI and stroke Patients with event/analysed Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) p-value 3-point MACE 490/4687 282/2333 0.86 (0.74, 0.99)* 0.0382 CV death 172/4687 137/2333 0.62 (0.49, 0.77) <0.0001 Non-fatal MI Non-fatal stroke Table 15.2.4.1.1: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.2: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.3: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.5: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.8: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.9: 1 Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo Cox regression analysis. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction *95.02% CI

Patients with event/analysed CV death, MI and stroke Patients with event/analysed Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) p-value 3-point MACE 490/4687 282/2333 0.86 (0.74, 0.99)* 0.0382 CV death 172/4687 137/2333 0.62 (0.49, 0.77) <0.0001 Non-fatal MI 213/4687 121/2333 0.87 (0.70, 1.09) 0.2189 Non-fatal stroke 150/4687 60/2333 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) 0.1638 Table 15.2.4.1.1: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.2: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.3: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.5: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.8: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.9: 1 Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo Cox regression analysis. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction *95.02% CI

Fatal and non-fatal stroke Patients with event/analysed Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) p-value Intent-to-treat population 164/4687 69/2333 1.18 (0.89, 1.56) 0.2567 Numerical difference largely driven by events occurring >30 days after treatment stop Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo On-treatment analysis* 141/4607 66/2308 1.04 (0.78, 1.40) 0.7849 Table 15.2.1.1: 2 On-treatment per protocol analysis (OS): Table 15.2.4.1.3: 3 On-treatment set (up to treat. stop + 30 days/indiv. trial compl): Table 15.2.4.1.3: 5 Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo Cox regression analysis. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio; *Excluding events >30 days after last intake of study drug and patients who received study drug for <30 days (cumulative)

3-point MACE and 4-point MACE Patients with event/analysed Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) p-value 3-point MACE 490/4687 282/2333 0.86 (0.74, 0.99)* 0.0382 CV death 172/4687 137/2333 0.62 (0.49, 0.77) <0.0001 Non-fatal MI 213/4687 121/2333 0.87 (0.70, 1.09) 0.2189 Non-fatal stroke 150/4687 60/2333 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) 0.1638 4-point MACE Table 15.2.4.1.1: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.2: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.3: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.5: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.8: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.9: 1 Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo Cox regression analysis. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction *95.02% CI

3-point MACE and 4-point MACE Patients with event/analysed Empagliflozin Placebo HR (95% CI) p-value 3-point MACE 490/4687 282/2333 0.86 (0.74, 0.99)* 0.0382 CV death 172/4687 137/2333 0.62 (0.49, 0.77) <0.0001 Non-fatal MI 213/4687 121/2333 0.87 (0.70, 1.09) 0.2189 Non-fatal stroke 150/4687 60/2333 1.24 (0.92, 1.67) 0.1638 4-point MACE 599/4687 333/2333 0.89 (0.78, 1.01)* 0.0795 Table 15.2.4.1.1: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.2: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.3: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.5: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.8: 1 Table 15.2.4.1.9: 1 Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo Cox regression analysis. MACE, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event; HR, hazard ratio; CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction *95.02% CI

3-point MACE: subgroup analysis HR (95% CI) Empagliflozin Placebo All patients 4687 2333 Age, years 0.01 <65 2596 1297 ≥65 2091 1036 Sex 0.81 Male 3336 1680 Female 1351 653 Race 0.09 White 3403 1678 Asian 1006 511 Black/African-American 237 120 HbA1c, % <8.5 3212 1607 ≥8.5 1475 726 Body mass index, kg/m2 0.06 <30 2279 1120 ≥30 2408 1213 eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2 0.20 ≥90 1050 488 60 to <90 2425 1238 <60 1212 607 p-value for interaction Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo For the test of homogeneity of the treatment group difference among subgroups with no adjustment for multiple tests. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (according to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation)

CV death: subgroup analyses HR (95% CI) Empagliflozin Placebo All patients 4687 2333 Age, years 0.21 <65 2596 1297 ≥65 2091 1036 Sex 0.32 Male 3336 1680 Female 1351 653 Race 0.43 White 3403 1678 Asian 1006 511 Black/African-American 237 120 HbA1c, % 0.51 <8.5 3212 1607 ≥8.5 1475 726 Body mass index, kg/m2 0.05 <30 2279 1120 ≥30 2408 1213 eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2 0.15 ≥90 1050 488 60 to <90 2425 1238 <60 1212 607 p-value for interaction Favours empagliflozin Favours placebo For the test of homogeneity of the treatment group difference among subgroups with no adjustment for multiple tests. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (according to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation)