Gravitational-wave Detection with Interferometers Present and Future Nergis Mavalvala October 09, 2002

Interferometric Detectors Worldwide TAMA LIGO LISA LIGO VIRGO GEO

Global network of detectors GEO VIRGO LIGO TAMA AIGO LIGO LISA

Gravitational Waves General relativity predicts transverse space-time distortions propagating at speed of light In TT gauge and weak field approximation, Einstein field equations  wave equation Conservation laws Conservation of energy  no monopole radiation Conservation of momentum  no dipole radiation Lowest moment of field  quadrupole (spin 2) Radiated by aspherical astrophysical objects Radiated by “dark” mass distributions  black holes, dark matter

Astrophysics with GWs vs. E&M Very different information, mostly mutually exclusive Difficult to predict GW sources based on E&M observations E&M GW Space as medium for field Spacetime itself Accelerating charge  incoherent superpositions of atoms, molecules Accelerating aspherical mass  coherent motions of huge masses Wavelength small compared to sources  images Wavelength large compared to sources  no spatial resolution Absorbed, scattered, dispersed by matter Very small interaction; matter is transparent 10 MHz and up 10 kHz and down Detectors have small solid angle acceptance Detectors have large solid angle acceptance

Astrophysical sources of GWs Coalescing compact binaries Classes of objects: NS-NS, NS-BH, BH-BH Physics regimes: Inspiral, merger, ringdown Other periodic sources Spinning neutron stars  numerically hard problem Burst events Supernovae  asymmetric collapse Stochastic background Primordial Big Bang (t = 10-43 sec) Continuum of sources The Unexpected Coalescing compact binaries  chirp sources NS-NS  far away; long periods; final inspiral gives GW chirp NS-BH  tidal disruption of NS by BH; merger  GRB triggers Inspiral  accurate predition with PPN proportional to (v/c)^11 Merger  nonlinear dynamics of highly curved spacetime Ringdown  ringdown of modes of coalesced object Periodic sources Spinning NS  axisymmetry unknown Galactic pulsars in SN remnant gases  non-axisymmetry unknown LMXBs  mass accretion from companion Is accretion spin-up balanced by GW spin-down? Issues  axisymmetric distortion from radiation reaction force Supernovae Collapse  Dynamics not understood. If instability makes star into tumblong bar, then GWs Core convection  detect via correlations with neutrinos GWs neutrinos photons now

Strength of GWs: e.g. Neutron Star Binary Gravitational wave amplitude (strain) For a binary neutron star pair M R Quadrupole formalism is accurate to order of magnitude for most sources. Involves computing wave generation and radiation reaction from Einstein eqn. Weak internal gravity and stresses  nearly Newtonian source Kepler’s third law of planetary motion: period^2 = 4*pi^2*radius^3/(G*Msun) Distances  1 parsec = 3.26 l.y. = 3e18 cm r ~ 10^23 m ~ 10 Mpc (center of Virgo cluster) Distance of earth to center of galaxy ~ 30000 l.y. ~ 10 kpc h ~10-21 r

GWs meet Interferometers Laser interferometer Suspend mirrors on pendulums  “free” mass Optimal antenna length a L ~ l/4 ~ 105 meter DL = h L Delta_L = h * L 10^-16 m = 10^-21 * 10^5 m

Practical Interferometer For more practical lengths (L ~ 1 km) a “fold” interferometer to increase phase sensitivity Df = 2 k DL  N (2 k DL); N ~ 100 N a number of times the photons hit the mirror Light storage devices a optical cavities Dark fringe operation a lower shot noise GW sensitivity  P a increase power on beamsplitter Power recycling Most of the light is reflected back toward the laser  “recycle” light back into interferometer Price to pay: multiple resonant cavities whose lengths must be controlled to ~ 10-8 l Arm cavity  increase strain-to-phase conversion (phi = N * dL) Power recycling  improves shot noise limited phase sensitivity

Power-recycled Interferometer Optical resonance: requires test masses to be held in position to 10-10-10-13 meter “Locking the interferometer” end test mass Light bounces back and forth along arms ~100 times  30 kW Light is “recycled” ~50 times  300 W input test mass Laser + optical field conditioning 6W single mode signal

LIGO WA 3 k m ( ± 1 s ) 4 km 2 km LA 4 km

Initial LIGO Sensitivity Goal Strain sensitivity < 3x10-23 1/Hz1/2 at 200 Hz Displacement Noise Seismic motion Thermal Noise Radiation Pressure Sensing Noise Photon Shot Noise Residual Gas Facilities limits much lower

Limiting Noise Sources: Seismic Noise Motion of the earth few mm rms at low frequencies Passive seismic isolation ‘stacks’ amplify at mechanical resonances but get f-2 isolation per stage above 10 Hz

Limiting Noise Sources: Thermal Noise Suspended mirror in equilibrium with 293 K heat bath a kBT of energy per mode Fluctuation-dissipation theorem: Dissipative system will experience thermally driven fluctuations of its mechanical modes: Z(f) is impedance (loss) Low mechanical loss (high Quality factor) Suspension  no bends or ‘kinks’ in pendulum wire Test mass  no material defects in fused silica FRICTION

Limiting Noise Sources: Quantum Noise Shot Noise Uncertainty in number of photons detected a Higher input power Pbs a need low optical losses (Tunable) interferometer response  Tifo depends on light storage time of GW signal in the interferometer Radiation Pressure Noise Photons impart momentum to cavity mirrors Fluctuations in the number of photons a Lower input power, Pbs  Optimal input power for a chosen (fixed) Tifo Shot noise: Laser light is Poisson distributed  sigma_N = sqrt(N) dE dt >= hbar  d(N hbar omega) >= hbar  dN dphi >= 1 Radiation Pressure noise: Pressure fluctuations are anti-correlated between cavities

Core Optics 25 cm diameter, 10 kg fused silica optics Polished substrates Micro-roughness  < 10 ppm scatter Optical coatings < 2 ppm scatter < 1 ppm absorption Metrology  Surface uniformity ~1 nm rms

Displacement Sensitivity (Preliminary S1, Sept. 2002)

Evolution of strain sensitivity Major improvements Front-end electronics (ADC) noise  whiten signal Laser frequency noise  common-mode servo Output electronics (DAC) noise  whiten signal Sensing electronics noise  increase light level

LIGO I Instrument Status: What works All three interferometers locked for hours at a time in power-recycled configuration a Grec ~ 25 – 45 Lock acquisition is done using sys id methods a MTTL ~ 1 – 2 minute Optical parameters consistent with lab metrology a mirror losses < 70 ppm Mechanical (internal) modes of test masses excited a 104 < Q < 107 End-to-end simulation program Data analysis pipelines and algorithms

LIGO I Instrument Status: What doesn’t (yet) Large factor to be gained in strain sensitivity Laser input power 1 – 5 W but all light power not detected (PD saturations) a alignment control system Coupling to environment, e.g. Earthquakes Trains twice a day at Livingston Anthropogenic noise seismic pre-isolation system Electronics improvements

The Task Ahead Engineering runs Science runs Characterize and improve detector sensitivity and reliability Exercise data analysis system end-to-end pipeline Science runs Upper limits (E7 and beyond) Scientific searches (S1 was 08/23/02 to 09/07/02) Coincidence with GEO and TAMA Commissioning remaining subsystems Factor of 100 (above 400 Hz) to 100000 (at 40 Hz) improvement needed to reach design sensitivity LIGO II R&D already underway

The next-generation detector Advanced LIGO (aka LIGO II) Now being designed by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Goal: Quantum-noise-limited interferometer Factor of ten increase in sensitivity Factor of 1000 in event rate. One day > entire 2-year initial data run Schedule: Begin installation: 2006 Begin data run: 2008

A Quantum Limited Interferometer Facility limits Gravity gradients Residual gas (scattered light) Advanced LIGO Seismic noise 4010 Hz Thermal noise 1/15 Optical noise 1/10 Beyond Adv LIGO Thermal noise: cooling of test masses Quantum noise: quantum non-demolition LIGO I LIGO II Seismic Suspension thermal Test mass thermal Quantum

How will we get there? Seismic noise Thermal noise Quantum noise Active isolation system Mirror suspended as fourth (!!) stage of quadruple pendulum Thermal noise Suspension: fused quartz; ribbons Test mass: higher mechanical Q material, e.g. sapphire Quantum noise Input laser power: increase to ~200 W Optimize interferometer response, Tifo: signal recycling

Optimizing the optical response: Signal Tuning Power Recycling Signal r(l).e i f (l) l Cavity forms compound output coupler with complex reflectivity. Peak response tuned by changing position of SRM Reflects GW photons back into interferometer to accrue more phase

Advance LIGO Sensitivity: Improved and Tunable Thorne… SQL  Heisenberg microscope analog If photon measures TM’s position too well, it’s own angular momentum will become uncertain.

Implications for source detection NS-NS Inpiral Optimized detector response NS-BH Merger NS can be tidally disrupted by BH Frequency of onset of tidal disruption depends on its radius and equation of state a broadband detector BH-BH binaries Merger phase  non-linear dynamics of highly curved space time a broadband detector Supernovae Stellar core collapse  neutron star birth If NS born with slow spin period (< 10 msec) hydrodynamic instabilities a GWs ~10 min ~3 sec 20 Mpc 300 Mpc

Source detection Spinning neutron stars Stochastic background Galactic pulsars: non-axisymmetry uncertain Low mass X-ray binaries: If accretion spin-up balanced by GW spin- down, then X-ray luminosity  GW strength Does accretion induce non-axisymmetry? Stochastic background Can cross-correlate detectors (but antenna separation between WA, LA, Europe a dead band) W(f ~ 100 Hz) = 3 x 10-9 (standard inflation  10-15) (primordial nucleosynthesis d 10-5) (exotic string theories  10-5) Signal strengths for 20 days of integration Sco X-1 Thorne GW energy / closure energy

Detection of candidate sources Thorne

When gravitational waves are detected… Tests of general relativity Waves  direct evidence for time-dependent metric Black hole signatures  test of strong field gravity Polarization of the waves  spin of graviton Propagation velocity  mass of graviton Astrophysical processes Inner dynamics of processes hidden from EM astronomy Cores of supernovae Dynamics of neutron stars  large scale nuclear matter The earliest moments of the Big Bang  Planck epoch Astrophysics…

New Instrument, New Field, the Unexpected…