Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Argument ad Ignorantiam
Advertisements

Argumentation.
The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify the types of fallacious reasoning discussed in Chapter 6. Chapter 6 discusses fallacies of insufficient.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
 In this task you will see 16 different arguments.  You have to identify which of the 8 common fallacies is being used by the argument.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
CHAPTER 7 LOGICAL FALLACIES.
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
Copyright  2010 Pearson Education Canada / J A McLachlan Chapter Five Principles of Discussion and Debate.
Persuasive Appeals ENGLISH 11. Persuasion Persuasion is presenting an argument The goal of argument is to win acceptance of one's ideas. Modern argumentation.
Let’s see some more examples!
Logical Fallacies Guided Notes
Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
By: Kennedy Logsdon. Definition of Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Ignorance is the assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of ridicule.
Academic Vocabulary Unit 7 Cite: To give evidence for or justification of an argument or statement.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Chapter Two: Good Reasoning Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.1 Chapters1 & 2.
Rhetorical Fallacies Purdue OWL.
Lecture Notes © 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education© 2008 McGraw Hill Higher Education 1 Critical Thinking Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance.
Notes for the Exam.  is just a fancy way of saying that you're stating your main point.  A claim tells what you think is true about a topic based on.
1 Lesson 7: Arguments SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
Logical Fallacies: Begging the Question. By Dean Berry, Ed. D. This PowerPoint represents the first half of the lesson.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
Go To Next Slide This tutorial will help you identify examples of the types of fallacies discussed in Chapter 5. Chapter 5 discusses fallacies of relevance.
Introduction to Argument Writing. Introduction Argument: Argument: is persuasive is persuasive has a strong thesis has a strong thesis includes support.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
Logical Fallacies Overview Logical fallacies are instances of “broken reasoning.” Fallacies avoid the actual argument. We want to avoid fallacies, be.
Wishful Thinker Critical Thinker I need to feel powerful, important and safe. I believe things that make me feel comfortable. I believe things that make.
Chapter 3 What are the reasons?.
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Created by: Tony Stark and Pepper Potts Period 2 or 6 March 7, 2014
Logical Fallacy: Argument Writing
Day 18 Research Vocab Practice—quiz Monday
Logical Fallacies Academic Writing, Nov. 12
College English Yichun Liu
Understanding Fallacy
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Logical Fallacies © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere (author of Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0) reprinted with permission as a Nizkor Feature on the Nizkor.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Let’s play.
Logical Fallacies ENGL 101.
Propaganda and Logical Fallacies
4 The Art of Critical Reading Reading Critically Mather ▪ McCarthy
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in Reasoning.
Workshop for Debate Teachers
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Workshop for Debate Teachers
Appeal to Force (Argumentum ad baculum)
Errors in Reasoning.
Chapter 9: Critical Thinking
Dawkins’ The God Delusion: A Public Debate
Informal Logical Fallacies
Looking for false logic in someone’s argument
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Logical Fallacies.
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
Common Logical Fallacies
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Day 21 Research Look at rubric Drafting Wednesday and Thursday
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
PROOF SURROGATE Jessica.
Claim Review An opinion that expresses a clear answer
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Avoiding Ungrounded Assumptions
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 5 Logical Fallacies I Fallacies of Relevance http://b1105.wordpress.com

Chapter 5: Logical Fallacies--1 Assessing Relevance Determine whether the premises in the following arguments are positively relevant, negatively relevant, or irrelevant to the conclusion. 1. Felix is a parrot. So Felix has feathers. 2. Halle is fifteen-years-old. So, Halle is a senior in high school. 3. Figure X is a triangle. So, figure X is a square.

Chapter 5: Logical Fallacies--1 Assessing Relevance Determine whether the premises in the following arguments are positively relevant, negatively relevant, or irrelevant to the conclusion. 1. Felix is a parrot. So Felix has feathers. 2. Halle is fifteen-years-old. So, Halle is a senior in high school. 3. Figure X is a triangle. So, figure X is a square. 1. positively relevant 2. negatively relevant 3. negatively relevant

Indicate in the space provide whether the following statements are true (T) of false (F). ______ 1. A fallacy is an argument that contains at least one false premise. ______ 2. Fallacies of relevance are fallacies that occur because the premises, though logically relevant to the conclusion, fail to provide sufficient evidence for the conclusion. ______ 3. A statement is positively relevant to another statement if it counts in favor of that statement.

Indicate in the space provide whether the following statements are true (T) of false (F). ______ 1. A fallacy is an argument that contains at least one false premise. ______ 2. Fallacies of relevance are fallacies that occur because the premises, though logically relevant to the conclusion, fail to provide sufficient evidence for the conclusion. ______ 3. A statement is positively relevant to another statement if it counts in favor of that statement. 1. F 2. F 3. T

Identifying Fallacies Identify the fallacies of relevance committed in the following passages. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." 1. Gambling is wrong, because it's wrong to play at games of chance for stakes. 2. It would be a mistake to appoint Pete Dobson as Superintendent of Schools. Mr. Dobson has twice been convicted of child endangerment and he was recently charged with embezzlement. 3. In a recent issue of Stogey magazine, Julio Fumar argues that Honduran cigars are better than Cuban cigars. But Fumar's argument isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Fumar is biased against Cuba because the Castro regime imprisoned his parents.

Identifying Fallacies Identify the fallacies of relevance committed in the following passages. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." 1. Gambling is wrong, because it's wrong to play at games of chance for stakes. 2. It would be a mistake to appoint Pete Dobson as Superintendent of Schools. Mr. Dobson has twice been convicted of child endangerment and he was recently charged with embezzlement. 3. In a recent issue of Stogey magazine, Julio Fumar argues that Honduran cigars are better than Cuban cigars. But Fumar's argument isn't worth the paper it's printed on. Fumar is biased against Cuba because the Castro regime imprisoned his parents. 1. begging the question 2. no fallacy 3. attacking the motive

Chapter 6: Logical Fallacies--2 True/False Indicate in the space provided whether the following statements are true (T) of false (F). ______ 1. Critical thinkers never accept a claim on the mere say-so of another. ______ 2. If a person accepts a claim on the say-so of an alleged witness or authority, and there is good reason to believe that the alleged witness or authority is biased, then the person commits the fallacy of inappropriate appeal to authority.

True/False Indicate in the space provided whether the following statements are true (T) of false (F). ______ 1. Critical thinkers never accept a claim on the mere say-so of another. ______ 2. If a person accepts a claim on the say-so of an alleged witness or authority, and there is good reason to believe that the alleged witness or authority is biased, then the person commits the fallacy of inappropriate appeal to authority. 1. F 2. T

______ 4. Some claims are so inherently controversial that they cannot be settled by appeals to expert opinion. ______ 5. The following argument commits the fallacy of appeal to ignorance: "No one has ever seen Billie Jenkins ride his bike to school. So, probably Billy Jenkins rarely if ever rides his bike to school." ______ 6. The fallacy of false alternatives need not be explicitly expressed in "either…or" form.

______ 4. Some claims are so inherently controversial that they cannot be settled by appeals to expert opinion. ______ 5. The following argument commits the fallacy of appeal to ignorance: "No one has ever seen Billie Jenkins ride his bike to school. So, probably Billy Jenkins rarely if ever rides his bike to school." ______ 6. The fallacy of false alternatives need not be explicitly expressed in "either…or" form. 4. T 5. F 6. T

Identifying Fallacies Identify the fallacies of insufficient evidence committed in the following passages. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." 1. Giving half your money to charity is either morally obligatory or morally prohibited. But giving half your money to charity is not morally prohibited. In fact, it would be highly praiseworthy. Therefore, giving half your money to charity is morally obligatory. 2. IRS agent: Mr. Peckinsniff, there is nothing in these documents that proves that you haven't been cheating on your taxes. Therefore, I must assume that you have been cheating on your taxes. 3. Kids play too many video games. That's why there's so much juvenile crime today.

Identifying Fallacies Identify the fallacies of insufficient evidence committed in the following passages. If no fallacy is committed, write "no fallacy." 1. Giving half your money to charity is either morally obligatory or morally prohibited. But giving half your money to charity is not morally prohibited. In fact, it would be highly praiseworthy. Therefore, giving half your money to charity is morally obligatory. 2. IRS agent: Mr. Peckinsniff, there is nothing in these documents that proves that you haven't been cheating on your taxes. Therefore, I must assume that you have been cheating on your taxes. 3. Kids play too many video games. That's why there's so much juvenile crime today. 1. false alternatives 2. appeal to ignorance 3. questionable cause