Enhancing Rapid Sand Filtration by Backwashing with Alum

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Water Treatment
Advertisements

Often water is prescreened, treated with ozone, or pre-chlorinated before entering the coagulation basin (depending on the quality of the water). Coagulation.
North Texas Municipal Water District Water Treatment Process.
CE 370 Sedimentation.
Waste Water Treatment (Sewage Treatment)
Filtration by Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E.
Introduction to the Mini-Pilot Treatment System CEEN 572 Environmental Engineering Pilot Plant Laboratory.
CE 370 Filtration.
Coagulation and Flocculation at Water Treatment Plants
Benjamin C. Whitehead, PE Benjamin J. Klayman, PhD, PE Case Study: Commissioning New Rapid Sand Filters at Donald K. Shine Water Treatment Plant.
TREATMENT OF WATER The available raw water has to be treated to make it fit. It should satisfy the physical, chemical and bacteriological standards. The.
Drinking Water Filter Backwashing Backwashing – reversing and increasing the water flow to flush particles out of the filter media. Backwashing is vital.
Surface Water Treatment Plant
Coagulation and Flocculation
ARSENIC REMOVAL Case History Milos Markovic. Arsenic removal m3/day Plant in Subotica-SERBIA.
Coagulation in Industrial water Treatment
Filter Loading and Backwash Rates Well Yields and Chlorine Dosage in Waterworks Operation Math for Water Technology MTH 082 Lecture Chapter 4 & 8- Applied.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems  Filtration avoidance criteria  Alternatives to Filtration.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Water Treatment Plant Reflections alum Flocculation Clear Well Sedimentation.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration.
Willamette Water Treatment Plant
CEE 453 Research Project Chris Garnic Nolan Rogers Creating Ideal Floc for Instant Startup of a Conical Flocculator.
NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration? ä Where should the plant(s) be located?
Jar Testing Coagulation Dosage Water Treatment Plants
Kavita Mahulikar and Taylor Reiss Cornell University 10 December 2005
Water Treatment Plant Reflections S 1 Raw Water alum QT S 2 S 4 m 1 S 3 Flocculation Sedimentation p 1 S 5 Clearwell Clean Water S 1 S 1 Raw Water alum.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering WTP Project Safety, Expectations, Economics, Logic Raw water To waste F1F1 F1F1 S1S1.
Conventional Surface Water Treatment for Drinking Water.
Molalla Water Treatment Plant Field Trip 4/24/07 Molalla Water Treatment Plant Field Trip 4/24/07.
ERU WATSAN SPANISH RED CROSS Water Treatment Plant SETA.
Surface Water Treatment Plant. Fig 4-8: Flow Diagram of conventional surface water treatment plant (“filtration plant”)
City of Atlanta Department of Watershed Management Bureau of Drinking Water.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Code No. (PE389) Lec. 5 and 6.
Water Treatment Stations Tue. (am) Tue. (pm) Wed. (am) Wed. (pm) Thur. (am) Thur. (pm) Station 1Mini-pilot (CO 166 Greenhouse - Liz) Station 2NF.
1 III. Water Treatment Technologies Topic. III. 5. Micro-mesh Screens. Filters: Kinds, Constructions and Operation Micro-mesh Screens I. Purpose §For plankton.
Water Treatment CE 326 Principles of Environmental Engineering Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Iowa State University March.
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering What’s New in Water Treatment? How well could filters remove Particles? Coagulants.
1 Full-Scale Testing of Innovative High Rate Filter Media for Plant Expansion Bob Raczko, P.E. United Water.
Processing, distribution and use of water.
Filtration. Filtration Single Media Rapid Sand Dual Media Rapid Sand.
The Drinking Water Treatment Process
Water in the Community: From Lake Ontario to us Thursday, March 25 th.
E NVIRONMENTAL E NGINEERING 441 Lecture 5: Water Treatment (3) Sedimentation & filtration Philadelphia University Faculty of Engineering Department of.
PERFORMANCE OF A GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON BIOFILTER IN LOW STRENGTH WASTEWATER TREATMENT D. S. Chaudhary, H. H. Ngo and S. Vigneswaran Environmental Engineering.
SETA Water treatment plant maintenance
 Watch the Peel Water Treatment Tours › Water Treatment Plant Tours Water Treatment Plant Tours  Complete the reading on Peel’s Water Treatment Process.
Water Treatment Steps Aeraton Coagulation Sedimentation Filtration
Waste Treatment, Physical
Sand Filtration. Tipe: Slow sand filtration Rapid (gravity) sand filtration Rapid (pressure) sand filtration.
Engineered systems for wastewater treatment and disposal.
Filtration Processes Introduction
Safe, Clean and Drinkable
Chemical Engineering Department Government Engineering College Bhuj Prepared by: Kumar Satyam Guided By: Prof. Sejal J. Solanki Chemical.
Research on Tube Settlers and Flocculation
Interpreting Filter Profiles
What’s New in Water Treatment?
Inventory and Tertiary Treatment of Effluent from Textile Industries in Bangladesh The use of a new system combining an enhanced coagulation, flocculation.
Prelim 2 Review Tomorrow at 7:30 pm in 318 Phillips
Drinking-water Treatment
SEDIMENTATION 9/11/2018.
Pre-Engineered Water Surface Water Treatment Plants
STREAMING CURRENT MONITOR FOR COAGULANT OPTIMIZATION IN
Lecture # 11 Water treatment:.
Pilot testing services and a case study to reduce organics Devendra Borikar, Laura Zettler, Jeff Avedesian, Lindsay Ariss, Luc Léonard, Denis Dolbec,
Three choices: Surface water Groundwater
TERTIARY TREATMENT METHODS
Prelim 2 Review M-F of next week
Water Treatment.
Mohr Separations Research, Inc.
Skid Mounted Water Treatment Plant
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing Rapid Sand Filtration by Backwashing with Alum Turbid Water Alum

Rapid Sand Filtration Rapid Sand Filtration: Filtration of water by passing it through a fine grained media to remove very small suspended particles Usually used after flocculation and sedimentation in water treatment plants for polishing Requires backwashing to clean filter

Quantifying Filter Performance Filter Removal Efficiency Particle Breakthrough Ripening Time– the time it takes for a filter to achieve the desired effluent turbidity Minimum Turbidity Achieved

How to Improve Filter Efficiency? ALUM Al2(SO4)3*14.3H2O Alum decreases repellant inter-particles forces Commonly used in coagulation in WTP’s If alum is in a filter it should mediate particle-media attachement Picture from: www.foodsubs.com/Misc.html

Our Approach Add alum in a backwash state Mixing should evenly coat the media throughout the filter Avoid creating a cap of flocculated particles on top of the filter column that creates high head loss Flocculated “Cap” Alum

Objectives To create a method to add alum to a filter in backwash mode To characterize the effects of varying the alum dose on the filter’s turbidity removal. efficiency and ripening time

Physical Apparatus Backwash effluent (to waste) - Solenoid valves Concentrated clay suspension (~ 4 g/L) 4 Stir plate Peristaltic Pump 1 Sand filter column Effluent (to waste) Flow Accumulator Turbidimeter Overhead water influent 1 2 20 g/L alum stock Head loss device and 7 kPa pressure sensor 3 Pressure regulating valve Manual needle valve Peristaltic Pump 2 Physical Apparatus

Process Control 5 states used in experimentation: Backwash Backwash With Alum Settle After Backwash Filter Settle After Filter

Experimentation Tested five different initial alum doses to the filter and one control filter Control, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 590 mg/L 4 hour filter runs (extended from 2 hour runs) Alum dose changed by increasing/decreasing peristaltic pump speed Calibrated the influent turbidity before each experiment to 25 NTU by manually adjusting the turbidity pump speed

Results: Overall Filter Performance Increased overall removal efficiency Positive correlation between increased alum dose and increased particle removal Alum Dose Percent Removal control 53 25 mg/L 76 50mg/L 78 100 mg/L 82 590 mg/L 90% Filter performance for 590 mg/L and 50 mg/L alum dosage (4 hrs run)

Results: Particle Breakthroughs Reduction in magnitude of particle breakthroughs Elimination of breakthroughs during approx. first hour of filtration. Reduced particle breakthroughs at high alum doses (590 mg/L) Control 100 mg/L

Results: Ripening Time Ripening Time estimated from effluent turbidity graphs Virtually no ripening time with alum added Control ripening time ~ 1200 seconds 25 mg/L alum ripening time ~300 seconds

Results: Ripening Time Ripening time did not improve with increasing alum dose Summary of observed ripening times for all 4 hour runs.

Results: Ripening Time Minimum achieved turbidity did not correlate with alum dose either Summary of observed minimum turbidities for all 4 hour runs.

Capacity Analogy The results show that alum dose to the filter can be thought of as a “capacity” for particle removal Improved overall efficiency for 4 hour run No correlation between alum dose and ripening time or minimum turbidity Filling two glasses analogy . . .

Difficulties Assumption that filter influent was consistently 25 NTU Stamp box response to state changes (hence the settling states in Process Controller) YAAGH!!!!

Future Research Use of two turbidimeters – one above and one below the filter – to make constant NTU assumption moot Measure head loss through pre-coated filter Longer filter runs Vary influent turbidity and alum dosage

Summary & Conclusions Unique method of alum addition to a rapid sand filter Substantial impact on filter performance under low turbidity conditions: Improved overall performance with alum addition Reduced particle breakthrough Virtual elimination of the ripening time No correlation between increased alum dose and shortened ripening time or minimum turbidity

Questions? Turbid Water Alum