NCALHD Committee Meeting Beth Lovette Wednesday, May 16th, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making Payment Reforms Work for Patients and Families Lee Partridge Senior Health Policy Advisor National Partnership for Women and Families January 28,
Advertisements

Paul B. Ginsburg, Ph.D. Presentation to The Rising Costs of Health Care: What Can be Done, Alliance for Health Reform, June 12, 2012 Policy Support for.
Care Coordination in the Patient-Centered Medical Home New York Academy of Medicine May 24, 2011.
Building the Digital Infrastructure for Vermont’s Learning Health System ONC HIT Policy Committee Testimony September 14, 2011 Hunt Blair, Deputy Commissioner.
Will Groneman Executive Vice President System Development TriHealth
HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.
Kevin Larsen MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT Improving Outcomes with HIT ASCO Oct
1 Medicaid Quality Incentive: Plan for Reducing Preventable Emergency Room Visits Department of Social and Health Services Health & Recovery Services Administration.
MaineCare Value-Based Purchasing Strategy Quality Counts Brown Bag Forum November 22, 2011.
SESIH Redesign Update Older Persons and Chronic Care Project Paul Preobrajensky Manager Redesign Program 19 September 2007.
HEALTH HOMES ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES LONG-TERM CARE POLICY SUMMIT SEPTEMBER 5, 2012.
1 Community Based Care Management Demonstration Project May 22 nd, 2008 Presenters: Geoff Green, Deputy Commissioner Deborah Nichols, Director Schaller.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
Health Care Home Payment Methodology Critical Access Hospitals, Chief Financial Officers Roundtable April 28, 2011.
Peer Networks of Primary Care Physicians and the Challenge of Care Coordination H.H. Pham, A.S. O’Malley, P.B. Bach, C. Saiontz-Martinez, D. Schrag Academy.
Better, Smarter, Healthier: Delivery System Reform U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” CYE 2014 Transition Process Overview AHCCCS Contractor Update.
Department of Vermont Health Access The Vermont Approach to Building an Integrated Health System Creating “Accountable Care Partners” Based on Shared Interests.
Virginia Health Innovation Plan 2015: State Innovation Model (SIM) Design December 3, 2015 Beth A. Bortz | President & CEO.
A NEW REIMBURSEMENT STRUCTURE FOR AMERICA ADVANCED DISEASE CONCEPTS.
PATIENTS FIRST: A Proposal to Strengthen Patient- Centred Health Care in Ontario © 2015 Ipsos. Overview for Consultation 2016.
Building the basis for a population health driven model for primary care: An analysis of Maryland primary care Laura Mandel Preceptors: Chad Perman & Russ.
Managed Care Nursing Facility Quality Initiatives February 2, 2015.
Definitions of Integrated Delivery System. Integrated care  Well-planned and well-organized set of services and care processes, targeted at the multidimensional.
Clinical Project Meeting NYHQ PPS Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Project Implementation Plan Development Primary Care Medical Home (PCMH)
Chapter 9 Case Management Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
North Carolina Community Care Networks (N3CN): Medical Home Access and Emergency Department (ED) Utilization May 2016.
Innovations in Primary Care: Implementing Clinical Care Management in Primary Care Practices Judith Steinberg, MD, MPH Deputy Chief Medical Officer Jeanne.
Current CMS Quality Reporting Programs Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Meaningful Use) Value-Based.
Challenges to integrating technology in healthcare settings
All-Payer Model Update
Population Health Management: Technical & Analytical Considerations
Clinical Project Meeting
DY7 PFM & Bundle Protocol
Maryland Primary Care Program
Health Workforce Innovations to Support Delivery System Transformation
Value Based Payment Programs Quality Payment Program
Update on CMS Financial Alignment Initiative and State Integration Efforts Inside and Outside Demonstration Authority Lindsay Barnette Medicare-Medicaid.
Alternative Payment Models in the Quality Payment Program
Positioning for Integration
Proposed Medicaid Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System
Health Care Homes: Better Health, Better Care, Lower Cost
ARKANSAS COMMUNITY PHARMACY ENHANCED SERVICES NETWORK
Program Integrity Reforms Personal Care and Home-Based Services
Stage 3 and ACI’s Relationship to Medicaid MU Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 Today’s presenters: Brendan Gallagher.
The Path to Provider Status
North Carolina’s Dual Eligible Beneficiary Integrated Delivery Model
North Carolina’s Dual Eligible Beneficiary Integrated Delivery Model
Pediatric Innovations in Medicaid Whole Child Model
Population Health under Managed Care:
Sco Senior Care Options Bringing Medicare and MassHealth Together.
Commonwealth of Virginia Health Information Technology
Greater Columbia ACH Board of Directors 4/19/17
The Basics on GCACH Alignment from Siloed Projects to Transformation of Care August 3, 2018.
Public Health 3.0 and Medicaid Transformation
PRACTICE MANAGER MEETING Thursday June 15th 2017 Noon – 1:00PM
December 12, :00pm – 3:00pm UMC – El Convento at Loretto
NC Dual Eligibles Advisory Committee September 23, 2016
Accountable care organizations
All-Payer Model Update
The Care Transitions Network
Division of Long-Term Services and Supports
Presented to the System Leadership Team July 9, 2010 Robin Kay, Ph.D.
Optum’s Role in Mycare Ohio
Sandra M. Foote Senior Advisor, Chronic Care Improvement June 23, 2005
Value-Based Healthcare: The Evolving Model
Behavioral Health Quality & Data Building
Alabama Coordinated Health Network
Baptist Memorial Health Care
Module #3: Top 3 Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) Access to Care/Transportation For more information on TCPI SANs please use this link:
Presentation transcript:

NCALHD Committee Meeting Beth Lovette Wednesday, May 16th, 2018

Agenda Discuss AMH model design and application to LHD primary care providers Discuss data systems in support of LHD-led care management 3-4PM: 4 -5PM: 6

AMH Model and Local Health Departments 7

Advanced Medical Home Overview The Advanced Medical Home (AMH) program will: Build on the strengths of today’s North Carolina’s primary care infrastructure as the State transitions to managed care Offer a range of participation options for providers Emphasize local delivery of care management Offer the opportunity for providers to be rewarded for high quality care by aligning payment to value Care management will be a shared responsibility of practices and PHPs, with division of responsibility varying by AMH “Tier” The AMH Program will launch concurrently with managed care, with a State certification process for practices launching in Summer/Fall 2018

Roles and Responsibilities Under managed care, PHPs (plans) will have responsibility for payments to providers and for care management of enrollees. The PHP contract will define standardized PHP care management responsibilities PHP Care Management Responsibilities Care Management for high-need Risk Scoring and Stratification Comprehensive Assessment Care Needs Screening enrollees Under the AMH program, primary responsibility for comprehensive assessment and care management passes from PHP to practices when practices certify into higher AMH “tiers” (see next slide)

Four “Tiers” in the AMH Program Practices will apply to DHHS to be certified to participate in the AMH program; AMH Tier status effectuated by contracting with a PHP AMH Tier Summary 1 Based on Carolina ACCESS standards (for practices that have not contracted with CCNC) Only available to CAI existing providers; Will phase out after 2 years 2 Based on Carolina ACCESS standards (for practices that have contracted with CCNC) 3 Based on Carolina ACCESS standards PLUS demonstrated care management capabilities at practice or system level to serve all Medicaid beneficiaries PHPs must contract with a substantial proportion (80% ) of certified Tier 3 practices in each region in which they operate 4 Will launch in Year 3 of managed care Care management capabilities as in Tier 3 Will capture “advanced” alternative payment arrangements

Certification Requirements by Tier Practices will be eligible to participate in AMH if they meet current requirements for Carolina ACCESS. DHHS will certify practices into Tiers prior to initial managed care contracting with PHPs. Practices will be required to choose between Tier 2 or 3 (existing CAI practices will be grandfathered into Tier 1; can notify if want to be Tier 2 certified) The Tier 3 practice attestation process will assess practices’ readiness to perform care management functions either independently or within a clinically integrated network (CIN): Risk stratifying all patients in their panel; Providing targeted, proactive, relationship-based care management to all higher-risk patients; Providing short-term or transitional care management; Providing medication reconciliation support to targeted higher-risk patients; Ensuring patients with emergency department visits receive a follow-up interaction o DHHS anticipates that most entrants to Tier 3 will be affiliated with CINs, but this is not a requirement

Four AMH Payment Types Payment Type Description Clinical Services Payments Fee-for-Service Medical Home Fees Payment for coordination with PHPs, similar to today’s Carolina ACCESS fees Will be set at Carolina ACCESS levels for 2 years Care Management Fees Payments available to Tier 3 practices for assuming significant care management responsibilities Fee levels negotiated between PHPs and practices Performance-Based Payments Payments based on performance against AMH measures

“Clinical Services Payments” (FFS) Payment Model by Tier DHHS will require PHPs to adhere to standard payment models by Tier AMH Tier “Clinical Services Payments” (FFS) Medical Home Fee Care Management Fee Performance Based Payments in Years 1-2 1  - CA I N/A Optional 2 - CA II 3 - Negotiated between each practice/CIN and PHP 4 (Year 3 +) Alternative Payment arrangements may change the balance or merge the components of the payment components, including by decreasing FFS

AMH Quality Measures DHHS will require PHPs to monitor the performance of AMHs in all tiers and calculate performance-based payments based on a set of quality measures DHHS will develop a set of Core AMH quality performance measures aligned with North Carolina’s Quality Strategy The core measure set will include (at a minimum) measures in the following categories: Measures tied to Quality Strategy objectives Total Cost of Care Key Performance Indicators PHPs will be responsible for monitoring the performance of AMHs in all tiers PHPs will be responsible for using the core measure set to design performance- based programs and payments 10

AMH Data Sharing To ensure that AMHs have sufficient data to support their care management efforts, PHPs will be required to share data on attributed enrollees: All AMH Tiers AMH Tier 3 and 4 Assignment/attribution files Results of PHPs’ risk stratification for Initial enrollee-level care needs screening data Enrollee-level summary information Practice-level quality measure performance information Timely enrollee level claims & encounter data feeds (DHHS to standardize format(s)) To receive feeds, Tier 3 and 4 AMHs will need to demonstrate*: Appropriate health information technology Data privacy and security processes 11 * Either directly or through subcontract

AMH Implications for Health Departments Today, LHDs are diverse in the level and type of primary care services they offer: Of 85 LHDs, ~ 50% participate in Carolina ACCESS (majority of those CA II) LHD providers will have options under AMH depending on eligibility and readiness: Attest into Tier 3 Notify/Attest into Tier 2 (CA I or Non-CA LHDs) Grandfather into Tier 2 (if CA II today) Grandfather into Tier 1 (only if CA I today) Choose not to participate LHDs could choose to affiliate with a CIN for a glide path into Tier 3 12

Data systems to support LHD-led care management 13

Data systems to support LHD-led Care Management Today, LHDs use CCNC’s CMIS as documentation and management platform for all care management activities across OBCM and CC4C DHHS has indicated that it will not continue to support CMIS (or its successor) as a single system of record for OBCM and CC4C during the managed care transition period For discussion: What challenges do LHDs face through removal of CMIS? What options have LHDs considered to unify their care management data across PHP populations? 14

Next Steps DHP/LHDs written feedback on CC4C by 5/18 15