Topic: Evaluating the Adams Presidency (1797-1801) Do Now: Political Parties only serve to make inflammatory statements to the public and build angry opposition. They only impede government progress in passing legislation. Defend or Refute this statement

John Adams as President Adams as Federalist candidate Jefferson also running “mud-slinging” election Adams wins by narrow margin Adams stubborn, old fashioned, but “independent” Revolutionary credentials Hamilton hates Adams too (“High Federalists”)

“Quasi-Naval War” With France French anger at Jay’s Treaty (pro-British) French attack American ships Federalists want war Adams sends an envoy to France XYZ Affair “millions for defense, but not one cent in tribute” American naval build-up Undeclared war (1798-1800) France can’t fight another enemy… Adams tries for peace again Convention of 1800 Adams now unpopular with Federalists

Federalist Hysteria (1798) Riding anti-French wave Afraid of Democratic-Republican opposition Alien Acts Changing citizenship requirements Anti-Foreigner Sedition Acts Restrict press and speech Illegal to criticize the government Matthew Lyon Case

Jeffersonians React Sedition acts trying to stop Dem-Rep End of an opposition party? Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions Alien and Sedition against the constitution States did not have to obey unconstitutional laws Nullification Election of 1800: Jefferson vs. Adams (Again!) Who wins…?

Conclusion In your opinion, was Adam’s Presidency a failure? What role did “partisan politics” play in the Adam’s Administration’s problems? Explain in 3-4 sentences