[Considerations of SCH functions in IEEE b Systems]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: b Submission Comment Resolution related to Coexistence Mar Chang-woo Pyo (NICT)Slide 1 IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Beacon Measurement on Pilot Frames
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE WG Status Report – July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Cooperative spectrum sensing inter cell
WRAN Protocol Reference Model(PRM)
Waveform Generator Source Code
[ Considering of Intra-cell multiple CBP response]
March 2014 Election Results
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Effect of FCH repetition on the detection of FCH and MAP
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
Schedule of details of PHY and MAC technical items
Fractional Bandwidth Usage
IEEE P Motions July Plenary EC Closing Meeting
On Coexistence Mechanisms
WRAN Protocol Reference Model(PRM)
[Comparison between CDMA Code and Contention-based Access]
IEEE WG Opening Report – March 2007
[Distributed Sensing for Active 2 Set Channels]
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
[Frame Structure modification in IEEE b Systems]
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
Reference Use Cases Date: Authors: September 2010
Forward Coexistence Measurement Report to Neighbour Cell
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
[PAPR Evaluation on SCH in IEEE ]
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
September Opening Report
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
MAC Management Messages for Reliable Inter-BS Communication
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
Inter-Cell Quiet Period Synchronization
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
A Summary of Inter-WRAN Coexistence Schemes
Comparison of CBP PHY Modes
Dynamic sensing schemes
[Preamble Design for IEEE b Segmentation]
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Acknowledgment for CBP transmission
Managing SCW regular pattern
Interference-free scheduling
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Interference-free scheduling
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Presentation transcript:

[Considerations of SCH functions in IEEE 802.22b Systems] September 2013 doc.: IEEE 802.22-12-00xx-02-000b September 2013 [Considerations of SCH functions in IEEE 802.22b Systems] IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2013-09-13 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.22. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.22. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair Apurva Mody <apurva.mody@ieee.org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.22 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@iee.org. Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

September 2013 doc.: IEEE 802.22-12-00xx-02-000b September 2013 Abstracts In this document, we investigate advantage and disadvantage of SCH employment in IEEE 802.22b Systems Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

September 2013 IEEE 802.22 SCH Overview The IEEE 802.11-2011 standard defined SCH in order to support below functions Frame allocation map  location of SCH during super-frame period Super-frame number  SCH sequence control CP  information of cyclic prefix factor FCH encoding flag  FCH PHY encoding mode notice Self-coexistence capability indicator  Self-coexistence method notice MAC version Quiet period control  To control QP properly, total 12 fields are defined Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

September 2013 IEEE 802.22 SCH Overview The IEEE 802.11-2011 standard defined SCH in order to support below functions(continue) SCW control  To exchange CBP packet, total 3 fields are defined DS/US Split  To align the DS/US split boundary between interfered BSs, if this split information not matched between BSs, there are some additional interference under overlapped area, total 3 fields are defined Incumbent detection reporting inhibit timer inhibit reporting of CPE incumbent detection during certain time duration HCS Padding bits Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

September 2013 IEEE 802.22 SCH Overview As a conclusion, SCH, defined in the IEEE 802.11-2011 ,supports many features for both Frame control and Coexistence mechanism between BSs Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

SCH features handover to FCH September 2013 SCH features handover to FCH In current IEEE 802.22b WG consider that SCH features moves from SCH to FCH as shown in [2] This looks like there is no difference between SCH in [1] and FCH in [2] However, there are some issues on this change as followed slides For convenience later parts of this document, we will say that SCH and EFCH are represented SCH in [1] and FCH in [2], respectively Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

Super-frame Structure[1] September 2013 Super-frame Structure[1] Super frame Structure Frame Structure Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

Super-frame Structure[2] September 2013 Super-frame Structure[2] Super frame Structure Frame Structure Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

Structure comparison September 2013 Super frame Structure – SCH Parameters are held during super-frame duration Robust preamble Extended Frame Structure – EFCH Parameters can change during super-frame duration Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

Coexistence between BSs September 2013 Coexistence between BSs For coexistence between BSs SCH and CBP take care of coexistence between BSs If SCH is removed EFCH, include both FCH and Extended FCH, can not replace with SCH EFCH should be modified for coexistence functions CBP should be modified, A CBP is composed of SCH+CBP IEs It is required that L/S-CPE side coexistence functions In order to coexistence mechanism working properly, more CBP should be exchanged because there is no SCH exchange Less allocation of SCW  less overhead for coexistence mechanism Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

SCH Pros Cons Robust preamble for SCH September 2013 SCH Pros Robust preamble for SCH No change of coexistence part of existing standard Coexistence mechanism CBP All SCH related parts No additional coexistence functions in CPE Less allocation of SCW  less overhead for coexistence mechanism Cons Parameter change duration larger than EFCH Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

EFCH Pros Cons Parameter change duration smaller than SCH September 2013 EFCH Pros Parameter change duration smaller than SCH Simple structure  if coexistence functions are not frequently required, all frames are the same format Assuming 2 sec minimum sensing time, an EFCH transmits at most every 12.5 super-frames including channel switching time in hardware 700us Cons A lot of works for coexistence functions Change of existing standard New definition of CPE side Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

Conclusions SCH EFCH Less change for coexistence mechanism than EFCH September 2013 Conclusions SCH Less change for coexistence mechanism than EFCH Less transmission of CBP Coexistence mechanisms between BSs are unique feature of other 802 standards. LTE deal with those functions in higher layer EFCH Faster reaction to situation change than SCH Simpler frame structure than SCH Required a lot of functions for coexistence Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI

September 2013 References [1] “IEEE P802.22-2011: Standard for Wireless Regional Area Networks Part 22: Cognitive Wireless RAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications: Policies and procedures for operation in the TV Bands”, Jul. 2011. [2] “802.22b General Frame,” 22-13-0074-03-000b, July, 2013. Gwangzeen Ko, ETRI