Has the Early Warning Mechanism Enhanced the EU’s Democratic Legitimacy? Ian Cooper Democratic Innovations of the Lisbon Treaty Carleton University, 2 June 2017
Treaty of Lisbon: National Parliaments 1. A symbolic recognition 2. The control of the subsidiarity principle 3. Information rights 4. Participation in the revision of the treaty 5. A specific role for Freedom, Security and Justice 6. An acknowledgment of inter-parliamentary cooperation
National Parliaments’ Other EU-level Activity Political Dialogue with Commission (since 2006) Network of National Parliament Representatives in Brussels New Interparliamentary Conferences 2012: CFSP-CSDP Conference 2013: SECG Conference (Article 13 TSCG) 2017: JPSG for Europol
The Early Warning Mechanism Council of Ministers Commission European Parliament
The Early Warning Mechanism Council of Ministers Commission European Parliament National Parliaments
The Early Warning Mechanism Council of Ministers Commission European Parliament 1/3 National Parliaments
The Early Warning Mechanism Council of Ministers Commission European Parliament 1/3 National Parliaments 1/2 + 1
EWM 2010-2016
EWM 2009-2016 300+ Reasoned Opinions (for 600+ legislative proposals) 3 Yellow Cards 2012: Monti II Regulation (withdrawn) 2013: EPPO proposal (maintained) 2016: Posted Workers Directive (maintained) 0 Orange Cards
What Effect on Democratic Legitimacy of the EU? Literature on EWM: Process-tracing of single cases of yellow card Legal vs. political approaches Comparison of national parliaments Comparison of legislative proposals Question: Have national parliaments had an influence on EU legislative outcomes? My approach: Look at broader group of cases Include Political Dialogue contributions
EWM and Political Dialogue 2006-2016
Proposals with ½ vote for yellow card, 2010-2016
Has the Early Warning Mechanism Enhanced the EU’s Democratic Legitimacy? Ian Cooper Democratic Innovations of the Lisbon Treaty Carleton University, 2 June 2017